Ferri Phosphas 2026-10-31
Historical formulation name; composition is identified by pharmacopoeial edition.
Ferri Sulphas 2026-10-31
Historical formulation name; composition is identified by pharmacopoeial edition.
Formal hole count in a cuprate Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For a chosen homogeneous composition , assign formal oxidation states to lanthanum, to barium and to oxygen. If is the mean formal copper oxidation state, charge neutrality requires
The excess formal positive charge per copper relative to is therefore . For stipulated and , it is ; at , it is zero. These are bookkeeping examples, not measurements of mobile carriers. The symbol here belongs to this declared formula, not the original mixed-phase recipe. A whole-pellet elemental ratio cannot simply be assigned to each constituent phase.
Charge neutrality alone does not locate holes. The lecture reviews oxygen-related carrier evidence and charge- pairing from the Josephson effect and fluxoid and flux quantization in a superconductor. Pair charge does not establish phonon-mediated BCS theory for cuprate superconductors.[ref]
Ionic approximation of bonds Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
For the routine examples here, assign all bonding electrons between different chemical elements to the more electronegative partner; divide bonding electrons between identical chemical elements equally. Retain each lone pair on its original chemical atom. Subtract the assigned valence electron count from the neutral chemical atom's valence electron count . The IUPAC convention uses Allen electronegativity, based on free-chemical atom valence electron energies. Close electronegativity comparisons and some reversibly bound chemical compounds require care beyond this simple rule.[ref]
Figure 1. . Original bookkeeping diagrams, not electron density maps or measured partial atomic charges. Arrows indicate allocation of bonding electrons; an equal split is used for O–O. The sodium hydride panel represents a formula unit of an ionic compound, not an isolated gas-phase molecule. Details.
The examples explain exceptions to memorized rules:
These drawings record allocations, not molecular geometry or a physical process of breaking the chemical bonds. In particular, the O–O line in the molecular oxygen panel only marks the connection; it does not assert a complete Lewis structure or spin state.
Iron compound 2026-10-31
A chemical compound containing iron; the oxidation state and associated ligands distinguish medicinal preparations.
Iron(II) 2026-10-31
The +2 oxidation state of iron; the aqueous cation is commonly represented by .
Iron(III) 2026-10-31
The +3 oxidation state of iron; the aqueous cation is commonly represented by .
Iron phosphate 2026-10-31
An iron phosphate; a precise description must state the oxidation state and hydration or mixed composition.
Lead(II) 2026-10-31
The +2 oxidation state of lead. The actual aqueous species can depend on pH, hydrolysis and ligands; a bare ionic formula is an analytical shorthand.
Mercury(II) 2026-10-31
The +2 oxidation state of Mercury. The actual aqueous species can depend on pH, hydrolysis and ligands; a bare ionic formula is an analytical shorthand.
Mercury(I) ion 2026-10-31
The paired cation , containing a mercury–mercury bond and average oxidation state +1.
Migratory insertion 2026-10-20
In migratory insertion, adjacent ligands combine while remaining attached to the metal in the product. In alkene insertion into M–R, R forms a bond to one alkene carbon while the other carbon acquires the M–C bond. metal oxidation state need not change.