Josephson effect ($I_s=I_c\sin \varphi ,\dot{\varphi }=2eV/\hslash$)

In the ideal sinusoidal Josephson junction, the pair electric current and quantum phase obeyHere $e>0$ is the magnitude of the Electron electric charge, $\hslash =h/(2\pi )$ uses the Planck constant, and $I_c$ is the junction's superconducting critical current under the specified conditions. Define the signs as follows: positive conventional electric current flows from terminal 2 to terminal 1, and $V$ is the voltage of terminal 2 relative to terminal 1. The Gauge-invariant Josephson phase below fixes the matching orientation of $\varphi$. The DC Josephson effect and AC Josephson effect follow from these relations. ^[ref]

A SQUID uses Josephson junctions in a loop made from a superconductor to detect changes in magnetic flux.

Write the superconducting order parameters as ${\psi }_j=|{\psi }_j|e^{i{\theta }_j}$, using a field of pair electric charge $q=-2e$. For a specified path across the superconducting weak link, defineHere $\mathbf{A}$ is the magnetic vector potential. To check electromagnetic gauge invariance, use a scalar function $\chi$ and transformThe change of ${\theta }_2-{\theta }_1$ is $q({\chi }_2-{\chi }_1)/\hslash$, exactly cancelled by the change of the line integral. Thus $\varphi$ is unchanged although each local quantum phase changes. This is the same charge/sign bookkeeping discussed in gauge-coupling sign in Ginzburg-Landau superconductivity. Different physical paths can enclose magnetic flux, so fixing the path matters.

For stationary reservoirs with equal internal pair chemical potentials and a time-independent vector potential, the local Schrödinger equation gives ${\dot{\theta }}_j=-q{U}_j/\hslash$ after dropping the common internal term. With electric potentials $U_j$ and $V=U_2-U_1$, subtraction gives $\dot{\varphi }=-qV/\hslash =2eV/\hslash$. For a general circuit, $V$ denotes the corresponding measured electrochemical voltage and the electromagnetic contribution must be treated consistently. A bare difference of phases without the vector potential term is insufficient in an arbitrary gauge.

The ideal Josephson junction has a phase-dependent energyDifferentiating and using the voltage–phase relation yieldsThus the ideal pair element stores and returns energy. At $V=0$ it carries a static electric current without electrical power loss. Under a nonzero periodic drive its instantaneous power need not vanish, but its energy returns after a full phase cycle. Real junctions also have a capacitance, quasiparticle transport and an external circuit; their total losses cannot be inferred from this conservative pair term alone.

At zero electric potential difference, $\dot{\varphi }=0$ permits a nonzero constant quantum phase and hence a steady pair electric current. Under an imposed electric current $I_b$ with $|I_b|<I_c$, a static solution satisfies $\sin \varphi =I_b/I_c$. The low-energy branch has $\cos \varphi >0$. For example, a stipulated $I_b=I_c/2$ gives $\varphi =\pi /6$ modulo $2\pi$; it does not require a voltage drop. In the ideal current-biased energy $-E_J\cos \varphi -(\hslash I_b/2e)\varphi$, the positive second derivative on that branch explains its local stability.

The superconducting critical current $I_c$ is a maximum available static pair electric current, not the inevitable electric current under a voltage bias. At $V=0$ the initial state and circuit select a phase and a current. Above $I_c$ this sinusoidal model has no static phase solution, but its two relations alone do not predict the complete resistive current-voltage characteristic, switching dynamics or hysteresis. Those require the circuit and dissipative channels.

For constant nonzero voltage $V$, direct integration givesA constant electric potential difference therefore produces an oscillating pair electric current. The average of this ideal sinusoid over a complete cycle is zero; a measured nonzero steady electric current can include single-electron superconducting tunneling. Josephson's lecture explicitly separates the ordinary quasiparticle term from the phase-dependent term. ^[ref]

For an original numerical example, use the exact SI values $e=1.602176634\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{C}$ and $h=6.62607015\times 10^{-34}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{s}$. ThenThe corresponding period is about $0.2067834\mathrm{ns}$. These values describe an assumed exact applied voltage, not a historical measurement. The factor $2e$ identifies coherent pair transfer; replacing it by $e$ would halve the predicted frequency.