Since and , the two linear congruences reduce to
Write . The second congruence becomes
or after division by three. Since , . The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives the complete family
The modulus is because the compatibility condition modulo their greatest common divisor is satisfied.
The first series is telescoping, since
Its th partial sum is , so
a rational number.
The second series converges absolutely, for example by the ratio test, and is the odd part of the exponential series:
This value is irrational. Indeed, if were algebraic, then would satisfy
making algebraic over the algebraic numbers and hence algebraic, contrary to the Hermite theorem on the transcendence of e. Thus the second sum is in fact transcendental.
During a short interval , let the rocket's mass change by and its speed by . The expelled mass has inertial-frame speed to first order. Conservation of linear momentum, including the impulse , gives
Discarding the second-order product leaves
and hence the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
In deep space , so . Burning from initial mass to increases the speed by
Measure displacement downward from the release point and take downward speed . Newton's second law with quadratic drag gives
Writing
separation of variables gives the terminal velocity solution
The distance fallen by time is therefore
Setting and solving for yields
Fermat's little theorem states that for a prime and integer ,
if , equivalently . For the latter form, multiplication by permutes the nonzero residue classes modulo . Multiplying the congruences and cancelling gives . The first form also covers .
Since , the theorem gives
We prove both identities by mathematical induction. They hold at . Assume they hold at . Using ,
Adding this to and using gives
These are precisely the two assertions with replaced by , completing the induction.
True. Write the odd integer as . The identity from part (b) and give
Consecutive Fibonacci numbers are coprime, so is invertible modulo . Hence
Thus is a quadratic residue modulo the odd prime , which occurs exactly when .
This statement can be false. For example, is even and
but the odd prime divisor satisfies , rather than .
The inclusion-exclusion principle states that for finite sets ,
For each prime , exclude pairs whose two coordinates are divisible by . For a set of distinct prime divisors , exactly pairs have both coordinates divisible by their product. Inclusion-exclusion therefore gives
The condition says that the ideal of generated by is all of . The multi-integer Bezout identity therefore supplies integers such that
Equivalently, first apply Bézout's identity to and then to .
Assume and choose as in part (b). Put . Multiplying by and using gives
Similarly, multiplication by gives .
Moreover, is a unit modulo n: if a prime divided both and , the two congruences would make it divide , contrary to . Thus means precisely that two pairs differ by multiplication by a unit modulo . Reflexivity, symmetry using , and transitivity using products of units now show that is an equivalence relation.
The class of is
so its size is Euler's totient function
The unit group acts freely on every pair in : if and , multiplying the Bezout identity by gives . Hence every equivalence class has size . Dividing the answer from part (a) by this size gives
If is injective and , then for some , so injectivity gives . The reverse inclusion always holds; hence .
Conversely, if (ii) holds and , then , so . Thus (i) and (ii) are equivalent.
Assume is injective. The inclusion holds for every function. If belongs to the right-hand side, write with and . Injectivity gives , proving equality.
Conversely, suppose (iii) holds and . If , take and . Then is nonempty whereas , a contradiction. Hence is injective.
Parts (i) and (ii) prove (i)(ii), while the two directions in part (ii) prove (i)(iii). Therefore all three statements are equivalent.
Define
Certainly . If , then and has a unique predecessor because is injective. For every , writing and using uniqueness gives ; hence and . Thus .
If , its unique predecessor must lie in , so ; consequently . If a point belonged to every for , it would belong to and also to , which is impossible. Therefore
A set is countable if it is finite or admits an injection into the natural numbers; equivalently, its elements can be listed by a finite list or a sequence.
The product of two countable sets is countable: after choosing enumerations, its elements are indexed by pairs , and these pairs can be listed diagonally. Thus an injection followed by an injection proves that is countable.
The integers are listed as , so is countable. Every rational number is represented by a pair , so is countable as the image of a countable set.
Finally, if are countable, choose listings , allowing repetitions for finite sets. The diagonal listing of the pairs lists every , proving that a countable union of countable sets is countable.
Fix a positive rational radius . Distinct disjoint circles of radius have centers more than apart, so their open interior disks are pairwise disjoint. Each such disk contains a point of the countable dense set . Fix an enumeration of and assign to each disk the first rational point it contains. Disjointness makes this assignment injective, so there are only countably many circles of radius .
The positive rational numbers are countable. Taking the countable union of countable sets over all rational radii proves that the whole collection is countable.
The conclusion remains true, even though the scaling factor and hence the radius may now be arbitrary. At the point where its handle meets its circle, every lollipop contains a simple triod: take a short arc of the circle in each direction together with a short segment of the handle. Pairwise disjoint lollipops therefore contain pairwise disjoint simple triods. The Moore triod theorem says that every such family in the plane is countable, so
The rod imposes a mechanical constraint, and its force is perpendicular to the wrecking ball's instantaneous velocity, so it does no work. In the constant parallel Newtonian gravitational field, the ball falls through the vertical distance . Conservation of energy between and therefore gives
and hence
Let be the centre of the Earth and let be its mass. Since and , the law of cosines in triangle gives the ball's initial distance from as
The surface value of the Newtonian gravitational field satisfies . Using the Newtonian gravitational potential energy , conservation of energy now gives
Therefore
Put and . Then
The binomial series gives
so
Since , a second binomial series expansion yields
Thus the constants in the stated Big O notation expansion are
The Lorentz force and Newton's second law give
Writing , the component equations are
The initial velocity therefore gives
and integration with the initial position gives
This is helical motion in a uniform magnetic field: a helix of radius around the line , , with its axis parallel to the magnetic field.
The three fixed charges are related by rotations through about the origin. Their three Coulomb's law forces on a charge placed at the origin have equal magnitudes and directions separated by , so their vector sum vanishes. Thus
is an equilibrium point.
Let be the distance from the origin to each fixed charge, and denote their position vectors by . For a small planar displacement , the Taylor expansion
can be summed using the threefold symmetry relations
The electric potential due to the fixed charges is consequently
The moving charge has electrostatic potential energy of point charges . Because the quadratic coefficient is positive, the origin is a strict local minimum of , and the equilibrium is stable.
Taking the gradient of the quadratic potential energy found in part (ii) resolves the linearized force into identical and components:
Each component therefore performs simple harmonic motion with
Thus the angular frequency is
By Newton's second law, force is mass times acceleration. Hence its dimensions are
The electric field is force per unit electric charge, so
Write and . The constant electric force gives momentum
Combining with the relativistic energy-momentum relation gives
The dimensional analysis from part (a) confirms that has the dimensions of momentum, so is dimensionless and the expression has the dimensions of velocity.
The speed increases monotonically from zero and approaches the speed of light asymptotically:
Integrating in the direction of the field gives
At small times, the Taylor expansion of the square root gives the nonrelativistic limit
which is motion from rest with the constant acceleration .
At time , the accelerated proton has momentum and, by the relativistic energy-momentum relation, energy
The incident Cosmic microwave background photon adds energy . Since the final state contains only the Delta-plus baryon, conservation of relativistic energy gives its laboratory-frame Lorentz factor
Its rest-frame decay time is a proper time, so time dilation gives the laboratory decay time
Let be an orthonormal basis fixed in and write . A basis vector rotating with angular velocity satisfies
Differentiating the components and the basis vectors in therefore gives the rotating-frame derivative formula
Apply part (a) first to the position :
Applying it again to both terms on the right gives
where because . Substituting the first formula into the last term produces
In the Earth-fixed rotating reference frame, the sideways apparent force is the Coriolis acceleration multiplied by the ski-doo's mass:
At the South Pole, is vertical and antiparallel to the local outward normal, while is horizontal, so
The force points to the left of the direction of travel, which is westward when the ski-doo is moving north after crossing the pole.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.