Past exam of the relativity course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / Paper 1 / 2

The weak equivalence principle states that freely falling, sufficiently small test bodies have the same motion in a given gravitational field irrespective of composition or mass, neglecting their own gravity and nongravitational forces. In the Newtonian limit, $m_i\mathbf{a}=m_g\mathbf{g}$ makes this universality equivalent to a universal gravitational-to-inertial mass ratio, conventionally set to one.

The Einstein equivalence principle adds that local nongravitational experiments in a freely falling, nonrotating laboratory have the laws of special relativity, independent of the laboratory's position and velocity. At an event one can choose a local inertial frame with $g_{\mu \nu }={\eta }_{\mu \nu }$ and ${\partial }_{\alpha }{g}_{\mu \nu }=0$. A freely falling observer feels no supporting force, while a supported observer can model a locally uniform gravitational field by an accelerated laboratory. This explains why freely moving particles follow timelike geodesics and light follows null geodesics when other interactions are negligible.

The locality qualification is essential. The Riemann curvature tensor generally remains nonzero; separated freely falling bodies have tidal relative acceleration, measured by geodesic deviation. A finite-size experiment can therefore distinguish a curved gravitational field from a merely accelerated coordinate description of flat spacetime. Equivalence alone also does not select the complete Einstein field equations.

A useful weak-field consequence is the upward photon shift $\Delta \nu /\nu \simeq -gH/c^2$ over laboratory height $H$. In an upward-accelerating laboratory the receiver gains recession velocity during the light flight, giving the same leading redshift. The Pound-Rebka experiment tested this with resonant absorption of 14.4-keV gamma rays over about 22.5 m. A controlled source velocity calibrated the Doppler sensitivity; interchanging source and absorber reversed the gravitational contribution while retaining an intrinsic source–absorber offset. Monitoring their temperature difference was essential because lattice-motion shifts could mimic the small signal.^[ref] This verifies a gravitational clock-shift prediction; by itself it is not a unique test selecting general relativity over every alternative metric theory.

Consider an ideal spherical collapse with a vacuum exterior of constant mass $M$. Once pressure support is insufficient, a surface can continue inward and cross the Schwarzschild event horizon $r_s=2GM/c^2$ in finite comoving proper time. An event horizon is a causal boundary: light emitted from inside cannot reach distant observers. It is not a material shell or, in the classical Schwarzschild solution, a local curvature singularity at $r=r_s$.

The distant view of gravitational collapse differs from the surface clock's history. Exterior Schwarzschild time has $dt/d\tau \propto (1-r_s/r{)}^{-1}$ for regular infall and diverges as the surface approaches the horizon. Outgoing radial light also takes an increasingly long coordinate time to escape: $dt/dr=[c(1-r_s/r){]}^{-1}$ has a logarithmically divergent integral at the horizon. Signals received far away are progressively delayed and redshifted; both gravity and the inward emitter's Doppler shift contribute. photons carry less received energy and arrive at a lower rate, while the available escape directions also narrow.

Thus a distant observer does not receive a light signal announcing the crossing; the image fades and reddens rather than remaining a permanently bright frozen surface. A finite-band detector with finite sensitivity loses it in finite observation time. The divergence of one coordinate chart does not prevent the material crossing in finite proper time; horizon-regular coordinates describe that continuation. The pressureless Oppenheimer-Snyder model makes this distinction explicit, without representing all the pressure, rotation and radiation of a real stellar collapse.^[ref]

The plotted example is a test-particle geodesic falling from rest at infinity, used to isolate the coordinate and signal effects; it is not a fitted stellar-collapse light curve. No actual observer can hover on the horizon to supply a static local frame there.

A light ray follows a null geodesic. For a weak, approximately spherical field and impact parameter $b\gg GM/c^2$, the asymptotic Schwarzschild light deflection isAt the solar limb this is about $1.75$ arcseconds, whereas a simple Newtonian fast-particle calculation gives half that value. The difference tests relativistic spacetime geometry beyond the universality of slow-body free fall. The quoted angle compares incoming and outgoing directions far from the deflector, not a locally measured turn at a sharp vertex.

For an eclipse measurement, photograph background stars near the obscured Sun and compare their apparent positions with reference plates taken when that field is away from the Sun. Back-projecting the deflected incoming light makes a star appear displaced outward from the Sun's apparent position. Fit the radial displacement against inverse angular separation from the Sun, while allowing plate translation, rotation and scale. The expected pattern must be separated from atmospheric refraction, optical distortion and changes of focus or scale, rather than inferred from one displaced star.

The 1919 expeditions obtained observations at Sobral and Príncipe, published by Frank Watson Dyson, Arthur Eddington and Charles Davidson in 1920. The original report compares eclipse and reference plates and discusses instrument scale and image-quality limitations; it should not be treated as an exact modern precision measurement.^[ref] Repeated observations with independent instruments and calibrated reference fields test whether the displacement follows the predicted geometry. vacuum gravitational bending is achromatic to this order, a useful distinction from dispersive propagation effects.