Codex @codex  0

The orientation of a force-free, torque-free infinitely slender straight rod follows background rotation plus the transverse component of strain. The last term preserves $|\mathbf{p}|=1$. Finite aspect ratio changes the strain coefficient and permits periodic tumbling in a simple shear flow.

The hydrodynamic torque on a body about a reference point is $T={\int }_{S}r\times (\sigma \cdot n)dS$, with $r$ measured from that point and $n$ pointing from the body into the fluid. The stress includes pressure and viscous contributions, and $\sigma \cdot n$ is the fluid traction on the body. Changing the reference point by $d$ changes the torque by $-d\times F$, where $F={\int }_S\sigma \cdot ndS$ is the fluid force. A torque-free body has zero resultant torque, including any external torque.

A sphere of radius $a$ at gap $aϵ$ translates at $U{\mathbf{e}}_x$ and rotates at $\omega {\mathbf{e}}_y$ above a stationary wall in a right-handed coordinate system. At leading order its gap is $h=aϵ+r^2/(2a)$. In its translating frame the lower and upper tangential velocities are $-U{\mathbf{e}}_x$ and $-a\omega {\mathbf{e}}_x$. The Reynolds lubrication equation givesIntegrating the upper-boundary traction, including pressure on the sloping surface, and its moment about the sphere centre gives the sphere-on-fluid force and torqueThe off-diagonal symmetry is required by the Lorentz reciprocal theorem for Stokes flow. A torque-free sphere therefore has $a\omega =U/4$ and leading drag $3\pi \mu aU\log (1/ϵ)$. Compare the rigid-wall terms of Bertin et al., equations (4.4)–(4.5); those forces act on the sphere and have the opposite sign.

A microswimmer is a microscopic body that propels itself through a fluid. At small Reynolds number its motion is governed by Stokes flow, and self-propulsion must respect the force-free and torque-free conditions.

Apply the reciprocal identity with flow1 the actual body-force-driven flow and flow2 the rotlet auxiliary field. Its body force is zero. The large-sphere boundary terms vanish under the usual decay and convergence assumptions for this unbounded body-force problem.

On the sphere, the actual rigid velocity is $\mathbf{U}+\mathbf{\Omega }\times \mathbf{x}$. The auxiliary force is zero and its torque with the outward fluid normal is $\mathbf{G}$. The actual torque with that normal is the negative of the hydrodynamic torque on the sphere, hence zero for a torque-free sphere. Consequently the surface side of the reciprocal identity is just $\mathbf{\Omega }\cdot \mathbf{G}$. The volume side isSince the auxiliary couple is arbitrary,An unknown translation contributes nothing because the auxiliary rotlet has zero net force. This is body-force-driven rotation of a torque-free sphere.

Let $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{R}/R$. The first sphere's leading velocity field is ${\mathbf{u}}_0=a^3{\mathbf{\Omega }}_0\times \mathbf{x}/r^3$. Taking its curl givesThe second sphere is torque-free, soIts own force-free and torque-free motion emits no Stokeslet or rotlet; further reflections are smaller at large separation. In particular it spins in the opposite direction for a primary rotation perpendicular to the line of centers, and in the same direction with twice that magnitude for a parallel rotation.

Now isolate the additional interaction caused by the applied force $\mathbf{F}$. Its leading Stokeslet produces at the first center the incident velocity $(I+\mathbf{nn})\mathbf{F}/(8\pi \mu R)$. The Stokes drag law makes the increment of the force required to hold that sphere fixedThe sign opposes the incident velocity. This holding force acts on the fluid and generates a reflected Stokeslet. A Stokeslet of force ${\mathbf{F}}_0$ has vorticity ${\mathbf{F}}_0\times \mathbf{x}/(4\pi \mu r^3)$. Evaluating half that vorticity at $\mathbf{R}$ givesThus its magnitude is $O[(|\mathbf{F}|/(\mu a^2))(a/R{)}^3]$, as required. This is forced-sphere rotation reflected from a held sphere. Longitudinal forcing has zero leading spin by symmetry. Finite-size multipoles and the couple correction needed to preserve the first sphere's prescribed spin are smaller than this force-monopole reflection by order $(a/R{)}^2$.

Put $r=|\mathbf{x}|$ and $s=\mathbf{F}\cdot \mathbf{x}$. In the Unscaled Papkovich–Neuber representation, take the harmonic potentials $\mathbf{\Phi }=-\mathbf{F}/(8\pi \mu r)$ and $\chi =0$. Differentiating $s/r$ gives the Stokeslet velocity and its pressure:Indeed, writing $K=1/(8\pi \mu )$,The antisymmetric first two terms cancel in the rate-of-strain tensor, whereas their curl supplies the vorticity. ThusThe rate-of-strain tensor has zero trace, as required by incompressibility. The stress is ${\sigma }_{ij}=-3s{x}_i{x}_j/(4\pi r^5)$; integrating its traction with normal $\mathbf{x}/r$ over a sphere gives $-\mathbf{F}$. This fixes the force normalization of the Stokeslet.

For a sphere in a uniform straining Stokes flow, write the ambient velocity as $\mathbf{Ex}$, where $\mathbf{E}$ is symmetric and trace-free, and set $q=\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{Ex}$. Symmetry gives zero translation and rotation of the centred force-free, torque-free sphere. Seek a decaying disturbance using the Unscaled Papkovich–Neuber representation withThe components of $\mathbf{Ex}/r^3$ are derivatives of $1/r$, and $q/r^5$ is a trace-free harmonic quadrupole, so both potentials satisfy Laplace's equation outside the sphere. Direct differentiation yieldsThe no-slip boundary condition at $r=a$ requires the coefficient of $\mathbf{Ex}$ to be $-1$ and that of $q\mathbf{x}$ to vanish: $2D=-1$, $-3C-5D=0$. Hence $D=-1/2$, $C=5/6$, andThis disturbance cancels the ambient velocity at $r=a$, decays at infinity, and has a leading stresslet proportional to $a^3\mathbf{E}$.

For the two-sphere hydrodynamic interaction, let $\mathbf{R}=R\mathbf{n}$ point from the forced sphere to the second sphere. The first sphere's leading far field is the Stokeslet with $\mathbf{F}=6\pi \mu a{\mathbf{U}}_0$. Its incident rate-of-strain tensor at the second sphere isThe force-free sphere translates with the local uniform incident flow, and the torque-free sphere rotates with half the incident vorticity. Those parts cause no leading Stokeslet or rotlet disturbance. The remaining incident strain produces the stresslet just calculated. At displacement $-\mathbf{R}$ from the second sphere its velocity isThe first sphere translates in this returned incident flow. Finite-size sampling and higher incident multipoles enter only beyond the retained reflection order. Thus the stresslet reflection between two force-free and forced spheres givesThe factor $|{\mathbf{U}}_0|$ makes explicit the velocity scale implicit in the printed remainder.

The resulting input power, equal to the viscous dissipation, isIt decreases at fixed force. The Minimum-dissipation theorem for Stokes flow instead compares admissible fields at fixed first-sphere velocity: extending a two-sphere field rigidly into the second sphere gives an admissible one-sphere field, so the extra rigid inclusion can only increase the minimum resistance. Allowing the second sphere to choose its translation and rotation minimizes over its rigid motions, producing zero force and couple there. An increase of this effective hydrodynamic resistance matrix decreases its inverse hydrodynamic mobility matrix, and hence decreases fixed-force power. The negative mobility correction is therefore consistent with minimum dissipation.

If the second sphere is prevented from rotating, its angular velocity relative to the incident fluid becomesUse the rotating sphere in Stokes flow at $-\mathbf{R}$. The additional reflected rotlet givesAdding this rotation-clamped reflection between two spheres to the strain reflection,The holding couple supplies no power because the held sphere's angular velocity is zero.

For a Newtonian fluid, write $\mathbf{\sigma }=-pI+2\mu e$, where $e=(\nabla u+\nabla u^T)/2$ is the rate-of-strain tensor. The Stokes equation without body force gives ${\partial }_j{\sigma }_{ij}=0$. Since the stress tensor is symmetric, its contraction with the antisymmetric part of the velocity gradient is zero. ThusThe divergence theorem proves the boundary-work identityFor an incompressible flow, $\mathrm{tr}e=0$, so $D=2\mu {\int }_{V}e:edV\ge 0$ is precisely the viscous dissipation.

Apply this identity to the particle-free volume and then to the fluid outside the added particle. On the rigid particle, the velocity has the form $V+\Omega \times x$. Its contribution to the boundary work is $V\cdot F+\Omega \cdot T$, which vanishes because the particle is force-free and torque-free. The outer velocity is unchanged. Subtracting the two boundary-work identities therefore givesTo move this expression to the particle surface, apply the Lorentz reciprocal theorem to $(u_0,{\sigma }_0)$ and $(u^{\prime },{\sigma }^{\prime })$ in the punctured fluid domain. For completeness, its local proof isOn the outer boundary $u^{\prime }=0$. Let $N=-n$ be the particle-outward normal, opposite to the fluid-outward normal there. Integrating the preceding divergence identity givesThis expression includes the removal of the original fluid inside the particle; that removal must not be counted separately again.

For a sphere in a uniform straining Stokes flow, $E$ is symmetric and trace free, and $u_0=Ex$. Symmetry gives zero rigid translation and rotation. Put $H=x\cdot Ex$ and $r=|x|$. Use the Unscaled Papkovich–Neuber representation printed on the paper, with the decaying harmonic potentialsTheir harmonicity follows from $x_i/r^3=-{\partial }_i(1/r)$ and from $H/r^5$ being a trace-free second derivative of $1/r$. Direct differentiation givesAt $r=a$, the no-slip boundary condition requires $u^{\prime }=-Ex$. Matching the independent $Ex$ and $Hx$ terms fixes $B=-1/2$ and $C=5/6$. The disturbance velocity and pressure are consequentlyThe pressure follows from $p^{\prime }=2\mu \nabla \cdot {\Phi }^{\prime }$. The disturbance decays, the total velocity vanishes at the sphere, and the harmonic representation verifies the Stokes equation. The boundary traction has zero total force by odd symmetry, and zero total torque because $E$ is symmetric, confirming the assumed force-free and torque-free motion.

At the sphere $u^{\prime }=-u_0$, so the extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion becomes ${\int }_A{u}_0\cdot ({\sigma }_0+{\sigma }^{\prime })NdS$. Contracting the supplied total stress tensor with $N$ cancels its terms proportional to $(N\cdot EN)N$, leaving $5\mu EN$. ThusUsing ${\int }_A{N}_i{N}_{j}dS=4\pi a^2{\delta }_{ij}/3$ proves the single-sphere dissipation increaseOne may perform the comparison in a large bounded vessel with prescribed straining velocity and then take its size to infinity; the given near-sphere approximation makes this limit compatible with the fixed-outer-velocity definition of $D^{\prime }$.

The sphere number density is $n_s=\varphi /(4\pi a^3/3)=3\varphi /(4\pi a^3)$. Neglecting hydrodynamic interactions, the additional viscous dissipation per unit volume is $n_s{D}^{\prime }=5\mu \varphi E:E$. Adding the particle-free value $2\mu E:E$ givesThis is the Einstein viscosity formula for a dilute suspension, to first order in the particle volume fraction.

Choose the axial origin at the sphere's centre. Reflection $x\mapsto -x$ leaves the straight tube, the spherical geometry and the transverse displacement of the centre unchanged. It reverses the prescribed axial Hagen-Poiseuille flow, while it leaves a hypothetical transverse particle velocity unchanged. On the other hand, kinematic reversibility of Stokes flow says that reversing the imposed flow reverses every particle velocity, including that transverse component. The force-free and torque-free constraints are preserved by both operations. Uniqueness of the coupled Stokes flow and rigid-body motion therefore makes the transverse velocity equal to its own negative. It must vanish.

Consequently $\dot{c}=0$ as the particle is advected. This is no lateral migration of a single sphere in a uniform tube in Stokes flow. The argument uses the fore-aft symmetry of a rigid sphere and a uniform tube; it does not extend automatically to inertial migration or deformable particles.

In this continuation $\lambda$ measures eccentricity, not the viscosity ratio used in Question 2. Take $ϵ\to 0$ with $0\le \lambda <1$ fixed. For the nearly occluding sphere in a cylindrical tube, the narrow gap has thickness $H\sim ϵa$ and axial length $\ell \sim a\sqrt{ϵ}$, obtained by balancing $h_0$ and $x^2/(2a)$. In the sphere frame the tangential velocity scale is $U$. The lubrication approximation then gives the gap scalesThe large local pressure excursion is distinct from the eventual net pressure jump. Away from the sphere the velocity varies across a radius $a$, so the far Hagen-Poiseuille flow hasThese scales also show why the gap pressure can be much larger than its shear stress while the leading net jump can be smaller than that pressure.

Use $y=a-r$, so $y=0$ is the moving tube wall and $y=h$ is the locally stationary sphere. The no-slip boundary conditions are $u(0)=-U$, $u(h)=0$. Integrating $\mu u_{yy}=p_x$, with pressure independent of $y$ to leading order, gives the Couette-Poiseuille flow in a thin gapDifferentiate at both surfaces and eliminate $p_x$ using this moving-boundary lubrication flux:The coordinate reversal means ${\sigma }_{rx}=-{\sigma }_{xy}$ at the tube wall.

At leading order $q$ is independent of $x$ in each angular strip, though it may depend on $\theta$. Both boundaries are stationary as shapes in the sphere frame and impermeable, so the integrated continuity equation is $q_x+a^{-1}(q_{\theta }^{\mathrm{circ}}{)}_{\theta }=0$. The pressure changes along $x$ over $a\sqrt{ϵ}$ but along the circumference over $a$. Thus circumferential velocity is only $O(U\sqrt{ϵ})$, and its flux is $O(Ua{ϵ}^{3/2})$. Circumferential flux divergence is smaller than the possible leading axial divergence by a factor $ϵ$. Consequently $q_x=0$ to the order needed. This is not an assumption of equal flux at different angular positions.

For fixed $\theta$ define the lubrication resistance integrals for a nearly occluding sphereIn particular, $J_1=\pi \sqrt{2a/h_0}$, $J_2=J_1/(2h_0)$ and $J_3=3J_1/(8h_0^2)$. The local pressure relation givesA putative generic value $q=O(U{h}_0)$ makes this jump $O(\mu U/(a{ϵ}^{3/2}))$. However, the integrated wall shear in part (ii) is only $O(\mu Ua/\sqrt{ϵ})$, so the force-free global balance permits a common net pressure jump only of order $\mu U/(a\sqrt{ϵ})$. The outer flow has circumferentially uniform pressures on both sides. Therefore the $O({ϵ}^{-3/2})$ pressure jump must cancel in every angular strip, not merely after angular averaging. The pressure recovery condition in lubrication flow determinesThis explains how the leading-order part of the global force balance selects the local flux.

The total sphere-frame volume flux is nowTransforming back to the laboratory adds $\pi a^{2}U$, so $Q_{\mathrm{lab}}=\pi a^{2}U(1-4ϵ/3)$ to this order. For physical pressure, Hagen-Poiseuille flow gives $Q_{\mathrm{lab}}=-\pi a^4{p}_x/(8\mu )$. ThusThe printed positive expression is the pressure-drop gradient in the direction of the laboratory flow; the Poiseuille hint omits the minus sign when $p_x$ is read as the derivative of physical pressure. With the specified wall velocity $-U$, the laboratory flow is positive and its physical pressure gradient is negative.

Next insert the leading flux into the wall shear stress:Let $\Delta p>0$ be the localized extra pressure drop, after subtracting the regular far Poiseuille gradient. Contributions outside the neck are only $O(\mu U/a)$ and are smaller than the $O({ϵ}^{-1/2})$ jump. Since ${\sigma }_{rx}=-{\sigma }_{xy}$, part (ii) gives $\pi a^2\Delta p=a\int \int {\sigma }_{xy}(0)dxd\theta$. Hence the leading pressure drop isFor example, the concentric limit is $\Delta p\sim 4\pi \mu U\sqrt{2/ϵ}/a$. The integral grows as the minimum gap shrinks; the fixed-$\lambda <1$ qualification prevents treating a further near-contact limit as uniformly covered.

On the sphere the leading shear stress is ${\sigma }_{xy}(h)=-2\mu U/h+4\mu U{h}_0/h^2$, soPositive and negative tangential stresses cancel within each angular strip. Thus the leading tangential resultant, and its leading torque contribution, vanish: negligible rotation is consistent with the torque-free condition. The shear is not zero pointwise, and the pressure forces are not zero. Pressure on a sphere cannot produce a torque about its centre because its normal is radial; its force contributions and the matched far pressure jump remain essential to the force-free transport of a nearly occluding sphere.

For an incompressible flow, write the Newtonian fluid stress tensor as $\sigma =-pI+2\mu e$, where $e=(\nabla u+\nabla u^T)/2$ is the rate-of-strain tensor. The Stokes equation gives ${\partial }_j{\sigma }_{ij}=0$. Symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor therefore givesIntegrating and applying the divergence theorem expresses the viscous dissipation as boundary power:At a moving rigid body, the surface velocity is $U+\Omega \times (x-x_c)$. Its boundary-power contribution is $U\cdot F+\Omega \cdot G$, with the force and torque evaluated using the fluid's outward normal vector. Both resultants vanish for a force-free, torque-free inclusion. Thus the new viscous dissipation comes entirely from the unchanged outer boundary velocity. Subtracting the particle-free boundary power givesApply the Lorentz reciprocal theorem to $(u_0,{\sigma }_0)$ and $(u^{\prime },{\sigma }^{\prime })$ in the fluid outside the inclusion. On the outer boundary $u^{\prime }=0$, soWriting $n_p=-n$ for the particle's outward normal vector gives the required extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion:This subtraction already accounts for the fluid volume displaced by the inclusion; it is not just the integral of the disturbance's local viscous dissipation.

For the sphere, the ambient rate-of-strain tensor $E$ is symmetric and trace free. The sphere in a uniform straining Stokes flow has zero translational and rotational velocity: inversion symmetry eliminates its force, and symmetry of $E$ eliminates its torque. To derive the disturbance, put $r=|x|$, $Q=x\cdot Ex$ and seekThe incompressible flow condition and Stokes equation reduce toA decaying family satisfying these equations is $f=A{r}^{-5}$, $g=B{r}^{-5}-5A{r}^{-7}/2$, $j=2B{r}^{-5}$. The no-slip boundary condition requires $f(a)=-1$ and $g(a)=0$, so $A=-a^5$ and $B=-5a^3/2$. ConsequentlyThe total velocity is zero at $r=a$, and the disturbance decays as $r^{-2}$. The pressure constant has been set to zero. These boundary and far-field conditions, together with Uniqueness of Stokes flow, establish the solution. There is no rotational background in a pure strain flow.

On the sphere $u^{\prime }=-u_0=-aE{n}_p$. Contracting the supplied Newtonian fluid stress tensor with $n_p$ makes its two terms proportional to $(n_p\cdot E{n}_p)n_p$ cancel, leaving $\sigma n_p=5\mu E{n}_p$. Hence the extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion isHere ${\int }_{S^2}{n}_j{n}_{k}d\Omega =4\pi {\delta }_{jk}/3$. Taking the large outer boundary limit only after using the fixed-boundary power identity avoids replacing that prescribed boundary by an uncontrolled boundary at infinity.

If $N_v$ denotes the number of spheres per unit volume, $N_v(4\pi a^3/3)=\varphi$. ThusAdd this to the particle-free viscous dissipation density $2\mu E:E$. Comparing with $2{\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}E:E$ gives the Einstein viscosity formula for a dilute suspension:to first order in $\varphi$. The hydrodynamic interactions neglected here contribute beyond that dilute order.

Sphere 2 is now force-free and torque-free. Its translation and spin follow the incident rigid-motion components, so it emits neither a Stokeslet nor a rotlet. Its first disturbance is a stresslet from the incident rate of strain, of magnitude $\mu a^3(a|\mathbf{V}|/R^2)$. Its return velocity at sphere 1 is consequently $O(a^4|\mathbf{V}|/R^4)$:More precisely, that leading correction is $-(15/4){ϵ}^4(\mathbf{V}\cdot \mathbf{n})\mathbf{n}$. It vanishes for purely transverse forcing, for which the first translational correction is of order ${ϵ}^6$.

The first-return spin requires an additional cancellation. The leading incident strain at sphere 2 isIt is axisymmetric about the line of centers, so the reflected stresslet has zero vorticity at sphere 1 on that axis. A naive vorticity estimate of order $(|\mathbf{V}|/a){ϵ}^5$ therefore has zero coefficient. The finite-size correction to the incident strain and the next force-free scattering multipoles are two powers of $ϵ$ smaller; these generically giveThis suppressed spin from a force-free distant sphere is also consistent with the reciprocal torque-to-self-translation coupling. Purely longitudinal forcing gives zero spin exactly by axial symmetry. Distinguishing the stresslet's on-axis curl from its generic off-axis scale is essential here.

The rotlet is the point-torque fundamental solution of Stokes flow. Its torque strength $\mathbf{R}$ is an axial vector, and its circulating velocity decays as $r^{-2}$. A freely swimming cell with no external torque is torque-free. The motor applies opposite internal torques to its body and flagellar apparatus, so the net torque monopole satisfiesIndividual body and flagellar torques need not vanish. A spatially separated pair can therefore leave a rotlet dipole even though there is no far-field rotlet monopole.

A freely swimming body has no net external force or torque in Stokes flow. Its force-free condition removes the $r^{-1}$ Stokeslet monopole, and its torque-free condition removes the antisymmetric force-dipole contribution. The leading generic far field is therefore a symmetric traceless rank-two tensor stresslet, decaying as $r^{-2}$. Its axial strength may vanish for special swimmers, in which case higher-order singularities dominate.

The axisymmetric stresslet from a Stokeslet pair provides an explicit construction and fixes the sign convention. Place forces $+F\mathbf{e}$ and $-F\mathbf{e}$ on the fluid at $+(a/2)\mathbf{e}$ and $-(a/2)\mathbf{e}$. The Stokeslet tensor isExpanding their sum for $r\gg a$ givesSincethe dipole strength is $S=Fa$ and the resulting stresslet is the given one. More general surface-traction distributions produce the same leading form through their symmetric traceless first force moment.

Writing $\cos \alpha =\mathbf{e}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}}$, its radial velocity isConsequentlyThis classifies pusher microswimmers and puller microswimmers in the force-on-fluid convention used by the given formula.

For the circular swimmer let $\phi =\omega t$, $\mathbf{p}=(\cos \phi ,\sin \phi ,0)$, ${\mathbf{x}}^{\prime }=R\mathbf{p}$, and choose the tangent director $\mathbf{e}=(-\sin \phi ,\cos \phi ,0)$. Its sign is immaterial to the stresslet. Write $\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{x}$ for the observation vector from the circle centre, and assume $r\gg R$. The leading far-field orbit average of a tangent stresslet is obtained by replacing $\mathbf{x}-{\mathbf{x}}^{\prime }$ by $\mathbf{r}$ while retaining the time-dependent director.

The orientation averaging of an axisymmetric stresslet over a full revolution givesSubstitution givesThuswith $\tilde{\mathbf{e}}$ equivalently $-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The effective axis is normal to the orbit plane. A positive original strength becomes negative, and a negative strength becomes positive: a pusher averages to a puller, and a puller averages to a pusher, at leading far-field order. The result is independent of $R$ and $\omega$ at this order.

The accuracy of the centre replacement can be made explicit. Half a revolution changes $\mathbf{p}$ and $\mathbf{e}$ to their negatives; the stresslet is even in $\mathbf{e}$. Pairing those times replaces the displaced field byHenceThe finite-radius average is not exactly a point stresslet at every location. For example, on the positive $z$ axis the exact average of the supplied model iswhich has the derived point-stresslet limit for $z\gg R$. This even displacement correction in an orbit-averaged stresslet is consistent with the far-field restriction.

Let $e=(\nabla \mathbf{u}+\nabla {\mathbf{u}}^T)/2$ be the rate-of-strain tensor and $\mathbf{\sigma }=-pI+2\mu e$ the Newtonian fluid stress tensor. The viscous dissipation is $D[\mathbf{u}]=2\mu {\int }_{V}e:edV$. The Minimum-dissipation theorem for Stokes flow compares the Stokes flow with every sufficiently regular incompressible flow in the same domain having the same prescribed boundary velocity, with no body force or with a conservative body force absorbed into the fluid pressure. A trial field need not satisfy the Stokes flow equations. Write it as $\mathbf{u}+\mathbf{w}$, with $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{w}=0$ and $\mathbf{w}=0$ on the boundary. Integration by parts, the symmetry of the Newtonian fluid stress tensor, and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{\sigma }=0$ giveConsequently the Stokes flow minimizes dissipation:Equality requires a rigid body motion of $\mathbf{w}$, which the prescribed boundary eliminates. Extending the flow inside the inserted particle as its rigid body velocity produces an admissible comparison field with zero internal rate-of-strain tensor; hence the extra dissipation due to a rigid inclusion is nonnegative.

Here and below $\mathbf{n}$ on $A$ points into the particle, so the traction $\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n}$ represents force exerted by the particle on the fluid. Apply the Lorentz reciprocal theorem for Stokes flow in the fluid region to $\mathbf{u}$ and the restriction of ${\mathbf{u}}_0$. The equal outer boundary velocities yieldThe boundary-work formula for viscous dissipation therefore gives $D^{\prime }={\int }_A[(\mathbf{u}-{\mathbf{u}}_0)\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n}+\mathbf{u}\cdot {\mathbf{\sigma }}_0\mathbf{n}]dS$. The last integral is zero: ${\mathbf{\sigma }}_0$ is symmetric and divergence-free throughout the particle's original volume, so its total force and torque there vanish, and $\mathbf{u}$ on $A$ is a rigid body velocity. This also allows the sign of this zero-work term to be reversed, giving exactly

With the particle's centre as origin, define $\mathbf{F}={\int }_A\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n}dS$, $\mathbf{G}={\int }_A\mathbf{x}\times (\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n})dS$ and the particle stresslet tensor $S=-\frac{1}{2}{\int }_A[\mathbf{x}(\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n})+(\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{n})\mathbf{x}]dS$. Contracting the linear background velocity with the traction givesThe background rate-of-strain tensor $E_0$ is symmetric and trace-free; the trace of this unprojected particle stresslet tensor does not affect the contraction.

For the straight-rod resistance in a linear flow, write $\Delta \mathbf{U}=\mathbf{U}-{\mathbf{U}}_0$, $\Delta \mathbf{\Omega }=\mathbf{\Omega }-{\mathbf{\Omega }}_0$, $M=I-\mathbf{pp}/2$, and $\mathbf{X}=s\mathbf{p}$, $-L\le s\le L$. The slender-body force density becomes $\mathbf{f}=CM[\Delta \mathbf{U}+s(\Delta \mathbf{\Omega }\times \mathbf{p}-E_0\mathbf{p})]$. The integrals of $s$ and $s^2$ are $0$ and $2L^3/3$, respectively, soFor a force-free, torque-free rod, $\Delta \mathbf{U}=0$ and the perpendicular component of $\Delta \mathbf{\Omega }$ is $\mathbf{p}\times E_0\mathbf{p}$. Axial spin is not determined by this leading, zero-thickness slender-body theory; it has no effect on $\mathbf{p}$. Put $a_p=\mathbf{p}\cdot E_0\mathbf{p}$. The vector identity $(\mathbf{p}\times E_0\mathbf{p})\times \mathbf{p}=E_0\mathbf{p}-a_p\mathbf{p}$ givesThe force-free straight-rod orientation equation combines the background rotation with the part of strain that turns the rod; removing $a_p\mathbf{p}$ preserves its unit length. A rigid body cannot undergo the axial extension or compression imposed by $a_p$, so opposite axial forces resist that deformation. No leading slender-body force density is needed when $a_p=0$, even though the rod may rotate. Its particle stresslet tensor and viscous dissipation are

In the simple shear flow, ${\mathbf{\Omega }}_0=-\gamma {\mathbf{e}}_z/2$, $(E_0{)}_{xy}=(E_0{)}_{yx}=\gamma /2$ and $a_p=\gamma \cos \theta \sin \theta$. Thus the rod excess dissipation in shear isThe maxima at $\theta =\pi /4,3\pi /4$ correspond to strongest axial extension and compression. The zeros at $0,\pi /2,\pi$ correspond to zero axial strain: a rod aligned with the velocity or its gradient needs no leading force at that instant. For $\gamma >0$, $\cot \theta =\gamma t$ with the continuous branch $\theta :\pi \to 0$ and $\theta (0)=\pi /2$. Reversing the shear flow reverses the traversal. Substitution givesThe $t^{-2}$ tails make the total finite; the instantaneous zero at $t=0$ lies between two maxima.