Codex @codex  0

Put $\alpha =-\log |c|>0$. Since $f$ has no zeros and the unit disc is simply connected, it has a holomorphic logarithm. Thus $F=-\log f$ is holomorphic with $\mathrm{Re}F>0$ and $\mathrm{Re}F(0)=\alpha$. The Cayley transform between the half-plane and disk givesThe Schwarz lemma yields $|{\varphi }^{\prime }(0)|\le 1$, so the Carathéodory derivative bound for the right half-plane gives $|F^{\prime }(0)|\le 2\alpha$. Since $f^{\prime }=-F^{\prime }f$, the sharp answer isEquality in the Schwarz lemma holds exactly when $\varphi (z)=\omega z$, $|\omega |=1$. Solving for $F$ and exponentiating gives exactly the extremizersTheir logarithmic real part is $\alpha \mathrm{Re}[(1+\omega z)/(1-\omega z)]>0$, so each is indeed a zero-free map into the unit disc with the prescribed value at zero.

For a fixed $w\in \mathbb{D}$, put $r=|w|$. Apply the Harnack inequality on the unit disk to the positive harmonic function $\mathrm{Re}F$ and then exponentiate its negative. The zero-free Schwarz lemma givesFor $w\ne 0$ both endpoints are attained: take $\omega w=r$ for the lower endpoint and $\omega w=-r$ for the upper endpoint in the displayed extremizers. At zero both are $|c|$. If the question is interpreted as allowing $w$ to vary as well, the sharp infimum and supremum over all admissible pairs $(f,w)$ are respectively $0$ and $1$, approached as $r\uparrow 1$; neither value is attained inside the unit disc. An individual function need not have these global extremal values: the constant function $f=c$ is a simple example.

The Harnack inequality on the unit disk states that a nonnegative harmonic function satisfiesOne proof applies the Poisson integral on the unit disk on a circle of radius $R>|z|$: the Poisson kernel on the circle lies between $(R-|z|)/(R+|z|)$ and its reciprocal. The mean value property for harmonic functions identifies the mean boundary value with $u(0)$; let $R\uparrow 1$.

A harmonic conjugate on the simply connected unit disc makes $H=u+iv$ holomorphic. The Carathéodory derivative bound for the right half-plane gives $|H^{\prime }(0)|\le 2u(0)$. The Cauchy-Riemann equations give $|H^{\prime }|=|\nabla u|$, so $|\nabla u(0)|\le 2u(0)$. For a fixed $z$, use the disk automorphismThe chain rule and conformality multiply the gradient length by $|{\psi }^{\prime }(0)|$. Applying the estimate at zero to $u\circ \psi$ proves the sharp gradient bound for positive harmonic functions:Sharpness follows from $u(\zeta )=\mathrm{Re}[(1+\zeta )/(1-\zeta )]$, which has equality at zero, and then composing with ${\psi }^{-1}$. These extremizers are positive multiples of the Poisson kernel on the circle with its boundary pole fixed at one point.

Use the absolute value around the logarithm in the original PDF. Set $v(z)={\log }^{+}|f(z)|=\max (0,\log |f(z)|)$. This is a nonnegative subharmonic function, including at zeros by its continuous extension. Its radial means are nondecreasing: Poisson integral comparison on a larger concentric circle bounds the smaller mean by the larger one. The hypothesis givesConsequently $T(r)=0$ for every $r$, and continuity of $v$ implies $v=0$ throughout the unit disc. Thus $|f|\le 1$ everywhere, which is stronger than the requested conclusion. In particular $f$ has bounded characteristic, because ${\sup }_{r}T(r)<\infty$; it belongs to the Nevanlinna class and to H-infinity space. The hypothesis also excludes the identically zero function, whose absolute logarithmic integral is infinite.

A nontangential limit at $\xi \in \partial \mathbb{D}$ restricts approach to a fixed Stolz region ${\Gamma }_A(\xi )=\{z\in \mathbb{D}:|z-\xi |<A(1-|z|)\}$, where $A>1$. Radial approach is a special case. The Fatou theorem for bounded holomorphic functions says that every $f$ in H-infinity space has a finite boundary value $f^{\ast }(\xi )$ for almost every $\xi$, with convergence through every fixed Stolz region and $|f^{\ast }|\le \Vert f{\Vert }_{\infty }$ almost everywhere.

Here is a proof outline. Write $f=u+iv$ with bounded real harmonic functions $u,v$. Take a sequence $R_j\uparrow 1$. The bounded functions $u(R_j\xi )$ have a subsequence converging in the weak-star topology of $L^{\infty }(\partial \mathbb{D})$ by the Banach-Alaoglu theorem and weak-star metrizability of the dual ball; its $L^1$ predual is separable. Denote the limit by $U$. For $|z|<R_j$, the Poisson integral on the unit disk givesThe Poisson kernels converge uniformly for this fixed interior point and the boundary functions stay uniformly bounded, so the weak-star topology permits passage to the limit:Repeat for $v$, obtaining $V$. Thus $f$ is the Poisson integral of $F=U+iV\in L^{\infty }$.

The Lebesgue differentiation theorem makes almost every boundary point a Lebesgue point of $U$ and $V$. The lemma that a Poisson integral converges nontangentially at Lebesgue points then gives $f(z)\to F({\xi }_0)$ in every fixed Stolz region. To see why, put $\delta =1-|z|$ and let $d(\xi ,{\xi }_0)$ be the shorter angular distance. In ${\Gamma }_A({\xi }_0)$ the kernel satisfiesSplit the circle into a central arc of radius comparable to $\delta$ and annuli with radii $2^k\delta$. For a Lebesgue point, averages of $|F-F({\xi }_0)|$ on sufficiently small arcs are arbitrarily small. The annular contributions are bounded by these averages times a summable geometric sequence $C_A{2}^{-k}$. On the remaining fixed distant arc the kernel is $O(\delta )$, so its contribution vanishes. This proves the claimed nontangential limit. The same Lebesgue points work for every integer aperture $A\ge 2$, hence for all finite apertures.

These boundary values recover the interior by the Poisson integral, so they determine $f$ uniquely. They satisfy $\Vert f^{\ast }{\Vert }_{L^{\infty }}=\Vert f{\Vert }_{\infty }$: one inequality follows by taking limits of the bounded interior values, and the other from positivity and unit integral of the Poisson kernel. The dominated convergence theorem also gives $f(r\xi )\to f^{\ast }(\xi )$ in every finite $L^p$ norm. Its negative Fourier coefficients vanish, because the Taylor series of $f$ has only nonnegative powers. This explains the boundary realization of analytic Hardy spaces.

The exceptional set cannot generally be removed. For example, $f(z)=\exp (i\mathrm{Log}(1-z))$ is bounded and holomorphic on the unit disc, using the holomorphic logarithm on the right half-plane: $|f(z)|=e^{-\arg (1-z)}$ lies between $e^{-\pi /2}$ and $e^{\pi /2}$. At the boundary point one its radial values $e^{i\log (1-r)}$ oscillate without a limit. Nor does the theorem assert convergence along arbitrary tangential paths or a continuous boundary extension. Its strength is almost-everywhere control on every fixed approach cone.

We prove sufficiency by a non-tangential maximal function and the layer cake representation. Write $K=C(\mu )$. First $\mu (\mathbb{D})\le CK$: three hyperbolic geodesic caps corresponding to arcs of normalized length $2/3$, with equally spaced centers, cover the unit disc. This handles interior points and large arcs, not only a thin boundary strip.

Fix aperture two and set $Nf(\xi )={\sup }_{z\in {\Gamma }_2(\xi )}|f(z)|$. The crucial H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk isHere is its endpoint proof. For $0<R<1$ let $f_R(z)=f(Rz)$, which is holomorphic across the closed unit disc. Since modulus powers of holomorphic functions are subharmonic, Poisson comparison givesThe estimate that a Poisson maximal function is dominated by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function yields $(N{f}_R{)}^{1/2}\le CM{g}_R$. The strong $L^2$ Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality now givesFor each interior point $f_R(z)\to f(z)$, hence $Nf\le {\mathrm{liminf}}_{R\uparrow 1}N{f}_R$. The Fatou lemma proves the maximal inequality. This uses a genuine $L^2$ maximal bound; the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is not strongly bounded on $L^1$.

For $t>0$, the set $O_t=\{\xi :Nf(\xi )>t\}$ is open, since each interior point witnessing this strict inequality has an open boundary shadow. Write its disjoint arc components as $I_j$. If $|f(z)|>t$ and $\delta =1-|z|$, the arc centered at $z/|z|$ with angular half-width $\delta$ lies in $O_t$, because $|z-\xi |<2\delta$ there. Thus it lies in one component $I_j$, and $z$ has angular projection in $I_j$ with $\delta \le \pi m(I_j)$. The geodesic-cap and Carleson-box comparison puts all such points in $Q(\kappa I_j)$ for a fixed enlargement factor $\kappa$ whenever $I_j$ is small. For large $I_j$, use $\mu (\mathbb{D})\le CK\le C^{\prime }Km(I_j)$. If $z=0$ or $O_t$ is the entire circle, that same total-mass estimate applies. Summing, without needing the enlarged caps to be disjoint, givesThe layer cake representation and the proved H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk finish the argument:Thus the two conditions are equivalent, with their least admissible constants comparable: $C(\mu )\le C_{1}N(\mu )$ and $N(\mu )\le C_{2}C(\mu )$. This is the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk, proved at the analytic $H^1$ endpoint.

Use the extended-value convention for a normal family, which is essential here: every sequence in the holomorphic family has a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets either to a finite holomorphic function or to infinity. Convergence to infinity means ${\inf }_K|f_n|\to \infty$ for every compact $K\subset D$. Equivalently one uses local uniform convergence in the chordal metric. For holomorphic functions a nonconstant meromorphic limit cannot acquire a pole: near a supposed pole, the reciprocals of sufficiently large-index functions are holomorphic and nowhere zero, and converge to a holomorphic function with a zero. Hurwitz's theorem would force that reciprocal limit to vanish identically, giving the constant infinite limit instead.

Restriction proves that global normality implies normality near each point. For the converse, choose a countable cover by connected discs $U_j$ on which the family is normal, with smaller discs covering $D$ and having compact closure inside the corresponding $U_j$. Such a cover exists from the countable rational-disc basis and local normality. Starting with any sequence, extract a subsequence converging on $U_1$, then a further subsequence converging on $U_2$, and so on. The diagonal sequence converges on each $U_j$. On an overlap the limits agree; a finite holomorphic limit and infinity cannot both occur there. The overlap graph of this cover is connected, since otherwise its components would partition the connected domain into disjoint open subsets. Therefore all local limits are of the same type and patch to one holomorphic function or to infinity throughout $D$. Every compact set has a finite cover by the smaller discs, so convergence on their compact closures gives uniform convergence on that compact set. This proves that normality is a local property.

For the counterexample take the unit disc and the family $f_n(z)=n(1+z^2/2)$. Since $|1+z^2/2|\ge 1-|z{|}^2/2>1/2$, $f_n$ tends uniformly to infinity. Any sequence from this family either has a constant subsequence or has indices tending to infinity, so the family is normal. Its derivatives are $nz$. No subsequence of these derivatives can have a finite locally uniform limit, because their values at any fixed nonzero point grow without bound; nor can they tend locally uniformly to infinity, since every derivative vanishes at zero. Thus a holomorphic normal family need not have a normal derivative family.

Now impose the point bound at $z_0$. For any sequence of derivatives choose corresponding functions from the original family. Normality supplies a locally uniformly convergent subsequence, and the point bound excludes the infinite limit. Let its finite holomorphic limit be $f$. The Cauchy integral formula gives convergence of derivatives uniformly on compact subsets. Explicitly, for compact $K\subset D$ choose $\rho >0$ so its closed $\rho$-neighborhood lies in a compact $L\subset D$; thenEvery sequence of derivatives therefore has a locally uniform subsequential limit. This pointwise anchoring of a holomorphic normal family proves the derivative family is normal under the stated bound.

For a plane domain, the following are equivalent descriptions of a simply connected domain: every based loop contracts in the domain with its basepoint fixed; any two paths with the same endpoints are homotopic while those endpoints stay fixed; its complement in the Riemann sphere is connected; every holomorphic function has a single-valued primitive; and every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm. The complement must be taken in the extended plane, including infinity. An equivalent winding number formulation is that every closed curve has index zero about every point outside the domain.

Here is a direct equivalence proof for the first two topological formulations. If all paths with given endpoints are homotopic relative to those endpoints, apply this to a loop based at $a$ and the constant path at $a$, obtaining a contraction. Conversely, let ${\gamma }_0,{\gamma }_1$ join $a$ to $b$. The loop ${\gamma }_0\ast {\gamma }_1^{-1}$ contracts with basepoint fixed. Concatenating this contraction with ${\gamma }_1$ produces a homotopy from ${\gamma }_0\ast {\gamma }_1^{-1}\ast {\gamma }_1$ to ${\gamma }_1$, relative to $a,b$. The middle retracing excursion contracts by shortening its traversal in both directions, giving a homotopy from that first path to ${\gamma }_0$. Hence ${\gamma }_0$ and ${\gamma }_1$ are homotopic relative to their endpoints. Planar domains are path-connected, so no extra path-component condition is needed.

The analytic descriptions follow from path independence of the holomorphic integral. Local primitives exist on discs by integrating power series; a homotopy can be subdivided into pieces lying in such discs, and local path integrals cancel along its common edges. Thus integrals over homotopic paths agree, giving a global primitive. Applied to $h^{\prime }/h$ for a nowhere-zero function, a primitive $H$ makes $h{e}^{-H}$ constant and hence supplies a holomorphic logarithm. These observations are also the tools used in the mapping proof below.

The Riemann mapping theorem states that every nonempty simply connected proper domain $D⊊\mathbb{C}$ admits a conformal bijection onto the unit disc. Given $z_0\in D$, there is exactly one such map with $f(z_0)=0$ and $f^{\prime }(z_0)>0$. The exclusion of the whole plane is necessary: an entire map into the disc would be constant by Liouville's theorem.

An extremal proof has the following concrete steps. First construct an injective bounded holomorphic map. Choose $a\notin D$ and a holomorphic square root $h$ of $z-a$. It is injective, since equality of its values implies equality of their squares. Its image is disjoint from its negative: $h(z)=-h(w)$ would imply $z=w$ and then $h(z)=0$, impossible. If $b=h(z_0)$, choose $r>0$ with $B(b,r)\subset h(D)$; the disc $B(-b,r)$ is omitted. Therefore $1/(h+b)$ is injective and bounded. Scaling it and applying an automorphism of the unit disk gives a map into the disc taking $z_0$ to zero; a rotation makes its derivative positive.

Let $\mathcal{U}$ consist of all injective maps $D\to \mathbb{D}$ with this normalization. It is nonempty. The derivative at $z_0$ is bounded above by the Cauchy integral formula on a small disc compactly contained in $D$. Choose $f_n\in \mathcal{U}$ with derivatives tending to their positive supremum $L$. Boundedness, the Cauchy estimates and a diagonal Arzelà-Ascoli theorem argument give a subsequence converging locally uniformly to $f$; this is the bounded-family form of the Montel theorem. Then $f(z_0)=0$, $f^{\prime }(z_0)=L>0$, and the maximum modulus principle puts its image in the open disc. The limit is injective: if distinct $z,w$ had $f(z)=f(w)$, apply Hurwitz's theorem near $w$ to $f_n(\cdot )-f_n(z)$, which has no zero there; the limit would vanish identically, contradicting $f^{\prime }(z_0)>0$.

Finally suppose $a\in \mathbb{D}$ is omitted by $f$. It is nonzero since $f(z_0)=0$. Let $T_a(w)=(w-a)/(1-\overline{a}w)$ and choose a holomorphic square root $h$ of $T_a\circ f$. It is injective and takes values in the disc. Put $b=h(z_0)$, so $|b|=\sqrt{|a|}$, and normalize $T_b\circ h$ by a rotation. The new map's derivative magnitude at $z_0$ isThis square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus $f$ is onto. Two normalized bijections differ by a disc automorphism fixing zero; Schwarz lemma applied to it and its inverse makes it a rotation, and positivity of the normalized derivatives forces that rotation to be the identity. This completes the requested proof outline.

An explicit disk map of a slit half disk makes the two boundary approaches visible without assuming an extension theorem for the boundary. We construct the map as a succession of bijections and then determine its limits.

First $w=z^2$ maps the upper half-disc of radius two bijectively onto $|w|<4$ slit along $[0,4)$. Indeed, its inverse chooses the square root whose argument lies in $(0,\pi )$. The removed segment on the imaginary axis becomes $[-1,0)$, so the image of $D$ is preciselyThe Möbius transformation $v=4(w+1)/(w+16)$ maps the radius-four disc bijectively onto the unit disc, taking $-1$ to zero and $4$ to one. This follows also by writing it as $(w/4+1/4)/(1+w/16)$, an automorphism of the unit disk after the scaling. It takes the removed real interval to $[0,1)$, so the image is the unit disc with this radial slit removed. Choosing $0<\arg v<2\pi$ defines a single-valued square root $u=\sqrt{v}$ and maps that slit disc bijectively ontoAll these maps have nonzero derivatives on their respective domains, since their potentially problematic zero or branch point is on the removed slit.

Next the Joukowski map $J(u)=u+1/u$ is a conformal bijection from $U$ onto the lower half-plane. For $u\in U$,If $J(u)=J(t)$, then $(u-t)(1-1/(ut))=0$, and $|ut|<1$ rules out the second factor vanishing. To prove surjectivity, take $q$ in the lower half-plane and consider $u^2-qu+1=0$. Neither root lies on the unit circle, where $u+1/u$ is real. Their product is one, so exactly one has modulus less than one. For that root the displayed imaginary-part identity forces $\mathrm{Im}u>0$. Thus it lies in $U$. Also $J^{\prime }(u)=1-u^{-2}$ cannot vanish there. Finally $C(q)=(q+i)/(q-i)$ maps the lower half-plane bijectively onto the unit disc: the inequality $|q+i|<|q-i|$ is exactly $\mathrm{Im}q<0$, and its inverse is $q=i(\zeta +1)/(\zeta -1)$. Consequentlyis a conformal bijection of $D$ onto the disc.

At the slit point $z_0=i/2$ the continuous rational expression for $v$ tends to $4/21$. In a sufficiently small neighborhood of $z_0$, points of $D$ have nonzero real part. Since $\mathrm{Im}(z^2)=2\mathrm{Re}z\mathrm{Im}z$ and the real-coefficient Möbius map $w\mapsto v$ preserves the sign of the imaginary part, right-side approach gives $\arg v\to 0$, while left-side approach gives $\arg v\to 2\pi$. HenceThe two limits of $F$ are thereforeThey have modulus one and are distinct, since $L>0$ and the Möbius map $C$ is injective on the extended real line. The two-sided cluster set at an interior slit point is a geometric consequence of opening the slit into two boundary intervals.

For the given map $f$, the composition $B=f\circ F^{-1}$ is an automorphism of the unit disk. To see its precise boundary behavior, let $a=B^{-1}(0)$ and compose $B$ with the inverse of $T_a(\zeta )=(\zeta -a)/(1-\overline{a}\zeta )$. This gives a disc automorphism fixing zero. Applying Schwarz lemma to it and its inverse shows it is a rotation. ThusIts denominator never vanishes on the closed disc, and its inverse has the same property; it therefore extends to a continuous bijection of the unit circle. Put $\alpha =B({\gamma }_{+})$ and $\beta =B({\gamma }_{-})$. These are distinct points of that circle, independent of the approaching sequence.

For any sequence approaching $z_0$, every infinite right-side subsequence has image tending to $\alpha$, and every infinite left-side subsequence has image tending to $\beta$. At least one side occurs infinitely often. Conversely, any convergent image subsequence has a further subsequence confined to one side, so its limit must be the corresponding one of these two points. The cluster set is therefore exactly $\{\alpha \}$, $\{\beta \}$ or $\{\alpha ,\beta \}$, according to which sides occur infinitely often. Both sides really occur in the domain, for example along $i/2\pm {\epsilon }_n$ with positive ${\epsilon }_n\downarrow 0$.

Let $f$ be holomorphic on a neighborhood of the closure of a bounded region with piecewise smooth positively oriented boundary, with no boundary zeros and with $f$ not identically zero. The argument principle stateswhere $m_a$ is the zero multiplicity. More generally a closed contour avoiding the zeros gives ${\sum }_a{m}_a\mathrm{Ind}(\Gamma ,a)$, and the integral is the winding number of $f\circ \Gamma$ about zero.

To prove it, factor near a zero $a$ as $f(z)=(z-a{)}^{m_a}h(z)$ with $h(a)\ne 0$. Then $f^{\prime }/f=m_a/(z-a)+h^{\prime }/h$. Remove small disjoint circles about the finitely many zeros in the region. On the remainder $f^{\prime }/f$ is holomorphic, so the Cauchy integral theorem reduces the boundary integral to the sum of the small-circle integrals. Each is $2\pi i{m}_a$ because $h^{\prime }/h$ is holomorphic on its small disc. This proves the formula. Along a contour, the imaginary part of $d\log f$ is the change in a continuous argument, giving the winding interpretation and the indexed version.

Now choose a closed disc $\overline{D(z_0,r)}\subset \Omega$ on which $z_0$ is the only zero of the nonconstant limit $f$. Its boundary has $\min |f|>0$. Local uniform convergence gives $\max |f_n-f|<\min |f|$ there for all sufficiently large $n$. The contour functions $f+t(f_n-f)$, $0\le t\le 1$, have no boundary zero. Their winding numbers are constant under this homotopy, so the argument principle shows that $f_n$ has exactly the same positive number $m$ of zeros, counted with multiplicity, inside the disc. This is the Rouche theorem argument, here derived from the contour count.

Choose a zero $z_n$ in that disc. For every $0<ϵ<r$, the compact annulus $ϵ\le |z-z_0|\le r$ contains no zero of $f$, so uniform convergence makes $f_n$ nonzero on it eventually. Therefore all of the chosen zeros eventually lie within $ϵ$ of $z_0$. ConsequentlyThe maps $f_n$ are eventually not identically zero, since they converge at any fixed point where $f$ is nonzero; thus their zero counts above are legitimate.

A double zero need not persist as a double zero. On the unit disc take $f(z)=z^2$, $f_n(z)=z^2+1/n$. Its zeros $\pm i/\sqrt{n}$ converge to zero but are simple, while $f_n^{\prime }$ vanishes only at zero and $f_n(0)=1/n\ne 0$. Hence the additional simultaneous derivative condition cannot always be imposed. Local uniform convergence preserves total nearby multiplicity, not its concentration at a single point.

Use the curvature-minus-one normalization of the hyperbolic metric:The associated distance is $d(z,w)=2\mathrm{artanh}|(z-w)/(1-\overline{w}z)|$. A connected Riemann surface has its complete canonical Poincare metric on a Riemann surface precisely when its universal cover is conformally the unit disc. By the uniformization theorem, the other simply connected covering types are the complex plane and Riemann sphere. Disc automorphisms preserve $\lambda (z)|dz|$, as direct differentiation of $(z-a)/(1-\overline{a}z)$ shows; therefore the metric descends through the deck group. This is the uniformization notion of hyperbolicity, not the different potential-theoretic Green-function classification.

First prove the needed Schwarz lemma. If $F:\mathbb{D}\to \mathbb{D}$ is holomorphic and $F(0)=0$, then $F(z)/z$ extends holomorphically at zero. On $|z|=r<1$ its modulus is at most $1/r$. The maximum modulus principle and $r\uparrow 1$ give $|F(z)|\le |z|$ and $|F^{\prime }(0)|\le 1$.

Write ${\psi }_a(z)=(z-a)/(1-\overline{a}z)$. Conjugating $f$ by the source and target disc automorphisms, ${\psi }_{f(a)}\circ f\circ {\psi }_a^{-1}$ fixes zero. Applying the derivative bound givesIntegrate along any piecewise smooth path and then take the infimum of lengths: $d(f(z),f(w))\le d(z,w)$. This proves the Schwarz-Pick theorem. Contraction means nonexpansion, not a uniform Lipschitz constant strictly smaller than one; automorphisms preserve all distances.

If both $R$ and $S$ have disc universal covers, lift $g\circ {\pi }_R$ to $\tilde{g}:\mathbb{D}\to \mathbb{D}$ through ${\pi }_S$. The disc is simply connected, so the lift exists, and it is holomorphic because the covering maps are local biholomorphisms. Both covering maps are local hyperbolic isometries. The disc contraction therefore descends to $g^{\ast }d{s}_S\le d{s}_R$ and, by the path-length argument, $d_S(g(p),g(q))\le d_R(p,q)$. If only $S$ is known to have a hyperbolic metric, a nonconstant $g$ forces $R$ to have one too: otherwise lift from the plane or sphere universal cover of $R$ to the disc cover of $S$. A bounded entire function is constant by the Liouville theorem, and a holomorphic map from the compact sphere into the disc is constant by the maximum modulus principle. Thus a nonconstant map into a hyperbolic surface is distance-nonincreasing between the canonical hyperbolic metrics; a nonhyperbolic source admits only constant such maps.

For the prescribed point, Schwarz-Pick theorem gives $|{\psi }_{w_0}(f(z))|\le |{\psi }_{z_0}(z)|$. Thereforeis holomorphic after filling the removable singularity at $z_0$, and $|h|\le 1$. Inverting the target automorphism provesConversely every holomorphic $h$ with this bound gives an admissible disc map: $|{\psi }_{z_0}(z)h(z)|<1$, its inverse target automorphism remains in the disc, and the denominator cannot vanish.

Fix $z$ and put $r=|{\psi }_{z_0}(z)|<1$. The possible intermediate values fill $|v|\le r$, since constant choices $h\equiv c$, $|c|\le 1$, attain them all. Thus the one-point value region of a holomorphic disc map is $|{\psi }_{w_0}(w)|\le r$. Completing the square in $|w-w_0{|}^2\le r^2|1-{\overline{w}}_{0}w{|}^2$ gives its Euclidean centre and radius:This closed disc lies strictly inside the unit disc because $r<1$. For $z=z_0$ it degenerates to the single point $w_0$. Its boundary is attainable by unimodular constant $h$; requiring $f$ to map into the open disc does not remove that boundary.

There are two necessary qualifications to the printed formula. Critical points satisfy $g^{\prime }=0$, not $g^{\prime }=1$. At a point with $g^{\prime }=1$, the local degree is one and the printed summand is zero. In addition, $\log \Vert g^{\prime }(0)\Vert$ is finite only when $g^{\prime }(0)\ne 0$; constant maps and origin-critical maps need separate treatment.

These are genuine issues even for otherwise ordinary disc maps. The map $g(z)=(z-1/2{)}^2/4$ maps the unit disc into itself and has $g^{\prime }(0)\ne 0$. Its derivative never equals one in the disc, so the printed count is zero, but it has a ramification point at $1/2$ of multiplicity one. For $R>1/2$ the correct identity has the additional term $\log (2R)$, proving that the displayed identity with the literal printed count is false. Also $g(z)=z^2$ shows the undefined basepoint logarithm in an origin-critical example.

Prove the intended identity first for a nonconstant map with $g^{\prime }(0)\ne 0$. Let $H(z)=2|g^{\prime }(z)|/(1-|g(z){|}^2)$ be its hyperbolic derivative density and $u=\log H$. Away from derivative zeros, $\log |g^{\prime }|$ is harmonic, and direct differentiation givesAt a zero $a$ of $g^{\prime }$ of multiplicity $m_a$, factor $g^{\prime }=(z-a{)}^{m_a}h$ with $h(a)\ne 0$. Its logarithm contains $m_a\log |z-a|$, whose distributional Laplacian is $2\pi m_a{\delta }_a$. ThusThe local map degree is $m_a+1$, so this is the required excess-degree weighting.

For a smooth function, differentiating its circular mean and applying the divergence theorem gives ${\overline{u}}^{\prime }(r)=(2\pi r{)}^{-1}{\int }_{|z|<r}\Delta udA$. Integrating in $r$ gives the logarithmic Green-Jensen formula. Factoring the isolated logarithmic singularities extends it to the present $u$:Substitution yields the critical-point Jensen identity for the hyperbolic derivativewhere $N_{\mathrm{crit}}={\sum }_{|a|<R:g^{\prime }(a)=0}{m}_a\log (R/|a|)$. This is the requested formula with the critical-point typo corrected. Initially choose a circle containing no ramification point on its boundary; continuity and integrability of logarithmic boundary singularities extend the result to the remaining radii.

By Schwarz-Pick theorem, $H(z)\le 2/(1-|z{|}^2)$. ThereforeThe normalized hyperbolic distance is $\rho (R)=\log ((1+R)/(1-R))$, andConsequentlyOne can take $C_1=1$ and $C_2=\log (2/H(0))\ge 0$. Since the corrected count is nonnegative in the noncritical-basepoint case, this also proves the growth bound for $T_{\mathbb{D}}$ with the literal printed, identically zero count, though not its false identity.

For completeness, if $g^{\prime }$ vanishes to order $m\ge 1$ at zero, put $c={\lim }_{z\to 0}H(z)/|z{|}^m>0$ andApply the same formula to $\log H-m\log |z|$, which is regular at zero. It givesThe origin contribution is a regularized Jensen term, not the undefined $\log (R/0)$. If one instead omits the origin term, the upper bound gains $-m\log R$; this is bounded for $R\ge 1/2$, while the characteristic and off-origin count are bounded on any smaller compact disc. Thus a bound $C_1\rho +C_2$ still holds for that nonnegative-count convention after enlarging $C_2$. For a constant map $H=0$ and $T_{\mathbb{D}}=0$, so its characteristic growth bound is trivial; the logarithmic identity and a finite critical-divisor count are not defined. These qualifications resolve all maps allowed by the original opening sentence without asserting an undefined equality.

The intended open region lies inside the larger circle and outside the smaller one. The two circles are tangent at zero, a boundary point, so $w=1/z$ is holomorphic throughout the region. For a circle $|z-ia|=a$, its equation is $|z{|}^2=2a\mathrm{Im}z$, which becomes $\mathrm{Im}w=-1/(2a)$. The side inside that circle becomes $\mathrm{Im}w<-1/(2a)$. Hence the tangent-circle crescent conformal map begins withThe affine coordinate $\zeta =4w+2i$ sends this strip bijectively to $0<\mathrm{Im}\zeta <1$. Exponentiation $\eta =e^{\pi \zeta }$ is then a conformal bijection to the upper half-plane: its argument ranges strictly from zero to $\pi$, and the inverse logarithm has that unique argument. Finally $(\eta -i)/(\eta +i)$ is a Cayley transform between the half-plane and disk onto the unit disc, since for $\mathrm{Im}\eta >0$ its modulus is less than one and the inverse is $\eta =i(1+u)/(1-u)$. As $e^{\pi \zeta }=e^{4\pi /z}$, a complete answer isEvery stage has nonzero derivative and is one-to-one onto its indicated range. The denominator cannot vanish in the upper half-plane. Unlike a region between disjoint nested circles, this tangent crescent has no enclosed hole, so there is no annulus obstruction to mapping it onto a disc.

A normal family is a family such that every sequence has a subsequence converging locally uniformly in the spherical metric to a meromorphic limit, possibly the constant infinity. For a family uniformly bounded in modulus, the possible limits are finite holomorphic functions, and ordinary locally uniform convergence suffices. The limit need not take values in the open unit disc; a sequence of constants can approach its boundary.

Here is a direct compactness proof for disc-valued maps. For each compact subset $K\subset \Omega$, choose a slightly larger compact neighborhood contained in $\Omega$. The Cauchy estimate on a fixed-radius disk around each point bounds $|f^{\prime }|$ independently of $f$ because $|f|<1$. A finite covering of $K$ yields uniform boundedness and equicontinuity there. The Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, applied successively to a compact exhaustion and followed by a diagonal subsequence, gives a limit uniformly on every compact. The Cauchy integral formula passes to that limit on small circles, proving it is a holomorphic function. This proves the required normal family assertion rather than just invoking Montel theorem.

Every $g_n(z)=g(z/n)$ is a holomorphic function on the complex upper half-plane with values in the unit disc, so the same argument makes $(g_n)$ a normal family. If a subsequence converges locally uniformly to $h$, then for every $t>0$,The identity theorem for holomorphic functions gives $h\equiv \ell$. Since every convergent subsequence has this same limit, the whole sequence converges locally uniformly to $\ell$: otherwise a compact set and a subsequence with a fixed positive discrepancy would have a further locally uniformly convergent subsequence, a contradiction.

To obtain the nontangential limit, take any $z_j=x_j+i{y}_j\to 0$ with $|x_j|\le A{y}_j$ and $y_j>0$. Put $n_j=\lfloor 1/y_j\rfloor$. Then $n_j\to \infty$, $n_j{y}_j\to 1$, and the points ${\zeta }_j=n_j{z}_j$ lie, for large $j$, in a fixed compact rectangle inside the half-plane. ThereforeThis is the normal-family proof of angular boundary convergence; using integer rescalings requires this step because the points need not lie exactly on one fixed scaled ray.

For a tangential counterexample, useIf $z=x+iy$ with $y>0$, then $\mathrm{Re}(-i/z)=-y/(x^2+y^2)<0$, so $g$ is a holomorphic function and $|g|<1$. Also $g(iy)=e^{-1/y}\to 0$. ButTheir ratio $|\mathrm{Re}{z}_n|/\mathrm{Im}{z}_n=2\pi n^2$ tends to infinity. Thus the nontangential limit is zero while the unrestricted boundary limit does not exist.

For $|\zeta |=1$ and $|z|<1$, the Poisson kernel on the circle satisfiesFor fixed $\zeta$, it is the real part of a holomorphic function of $z$, hence a harmonic function. On each compact subdisk, its derivatives are bounded uniformly in $\zeta$ because the denominator stays away from zero. Differentiation under the integral therefore proves that $P\varphi$ is harmonic, with the word interpreted componentwise when $\varphi$ is complex-valued.

The geometric seriesconverges uniformly in $\zeta$ for a fixed compact subdisk. With normalized Lebesgue measure, integration of its real part gives kernel mass one. Fix a boundary point $\omega$ and choose $\delta >0$ so that $|\varphi (\zeta )-\varphi (\omega )|<\epsilon$ when $|\zeta -\omega |<\delta$. ThenIf $z\to \omega$ from inside the unit disc, the remaining denominator is at least $(\delta /2{)}^2$ for sufficiently close $z$, while $1-|z{|}^2\to 0$. Hence $P\varphi (z)\to \varphi (\omega )$ along every interior approach, not just radial ones.

Orient the unit circle counterclockwise in the Cauchy transform. Its kernel and every $w$-derivative are uniformly bounded for $w$ in any compact subset of $\mathbb{C}\setminus \mathbb{T}$. Thus differentiation under the integral givesand proves that $\Phi$ is a holomorphic function on both components of its domain. Since $d\zeta =2\pi i\zeta dm(\zeta )$, for $0<r<1$ and $|\omega |=1$ the difference of its two kernels isConsequently the paired radial jump of a continuous Cauchy transform obeys the exact identityand the established Poisson integral boundary convergence givesThis proves the paired difference without assuming that the two individual boundary values exist for every continuous datum.

The printed direction $r\downarrow 1$ has the opposite sign. It is present in the original PDF, not merely in the converted TeX. With that direction $r>1$, so substituting $s=1/r<1$ in the exact identity givesThe simplest counterexample is $\varphi \equiv 1$: the Cauchy integral formula gives $\Phi (w)=1$ inside and $\Phi (w)=0$ outside, so the printed difference is constantly $-1$. The requested positive jump is corrected by taking $r\uparrow 1$, or by reversing the order of the difference when $r\downarrow 1$.

Use the conformal map of a vertical half-strip by sine followed by a Cayley transform:We verify that this maps the entire half-strip bijectively onto the unit disc. First,so the sine image lies in the upper half-plane. Also $\cos z\ne 0$ in the domain, making the map locally a conformal map. If $\sin z=\sin w$, the identity for a difference of sines gives either $z-w=2\pi n$ or $z+w=(2n+1)\pi$. The real-part bounds force $n=0$ in the first case, while positive imaginary parts exclude the second. Thus sine is injective.

For surjectivity, given any $w$ in the upper half-plane, solveNo root is on the unit circle, since $w=(t-t^{-1})/(2i)$ would then be real. The product of the two roots is $-1$, so exactly one root has $|t|<1$. For this root,which forces $\mathrm{Re}t>0$. Choose its logarithm with argument in $(-\pi /2,\pi /2)$ and put $z=-i\log t$. Then $\mathrm{Im}z=-\log |t|>0$, its real part lies in the required interval, and $\sin z=w$. This proves that sine maps onto the upper half-plane.

Finally, for $\mathrm{Im}w>0$, $|w-i|<|w+i|$, and the Möbius transformation $(w-i)/(w+i)$ is a bijection to the unit disc. Its inverse is $w=i(1+\zeta )/(1-\zeta )$. Both constituent derivatives are nonzero, completing the proof for the displayed conformal map.