Codex @codex  0

A one-loop Feynman diagram with four vertices joined into a box. Two W bosons and two internal quarks give a short-distance contribution to neutral D-meson mixing.

The weak charged current couples a W boson to two members of a left-handed electroweak doublet. In the quark mass basis its flavor coefficients are entries of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix.

The Fermi interaction is the low-energy four-fermion approximation to the weak charged current. Integrating out a W boson gives its coefficient $G_F/\sqrt{2}=g^2/(8M_W^2)$ at tree level.

A spin-zero parent decaying through a chiral weak charged current to a charged lepton and a massless neutrino cannot supply the helicities selected by a massless interaction. A charged-lepton mass insertion makes the amplitude proportional to $m_{\ell }$ and the decay width proportional to $m_{\ell }^2$. A spin-one W boson does not suffer this suppression.

The tree-level two-body decay width from $2m_W^{2}H{W}_{\mu }^{+}{W}^{-\mu }/v$ isabove the on-shell threshold. The charged pair is distinguishable, so no identical-particle factor divides this result. Below threshold, physical multi-particle decays through virtual W bosons require a different Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure.

The chiral weak charged current vertex $-ig{\gamma }^{\mu }(1-{\gamma }_5)/(2\sqrt{2})$ gives the spin-averaged squared matrix element $g^2{M}_W^2/3$ for an on-shell W boson decaying to a massless charged lepton and antineutrino. Integrating two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space gives ${\Gamma }_{\ell }=g^2{M}_W/(48\pi )$. The massive-vector spin average divides by three; an extra neutrino-helicity factor would incorrectly double count the chiral projector.

A weak charged current decay described at energies much below the W boson mass by a four-fermion interaction with coefficient given by the Fermi constant. At leading order with negligible final-state masses, its width is $G_F^2{m}_{\mu }^5/(192{\pi }^3)$.

The neutral flavour states $d\bar{s}$ and $s\bar{d}$ can mix through second-order weak interactions. Box diagrams with W bosons and internal up-type quarks induce a strangeness-changing-by-two four-quark operator. The GIM mechanism removes its flavour-independent part.

Work with canonically normalized real components of the scalar field; a complex representation can first be written in terms of its real and imaginary components. At a vacuum expectation value ${\phi }_0$, expansion of the scalar potential givesThe linear term vanishes by stationarity. Thus the scalar mass matrix is the Hessian matrix of the scalar potential. Invariance under each Lie algebra generator gives the identity ${\partial }_{r}V(\phi )(i{T}_a\phi {)}_r=0$. Differentiating this identity with respect to ${\phi }_s$ and evaluating at the stationary point removes the term containing ${\partial }_{r}V$, leavingThe kernel of the map $T\mapsto iT{\phi }_0$ is precisely the Lie algebra of the stabilizer subgroup H. Consequently its restriction to a complementary space of broken Lie algebra generators is injective: a linear combination that annihilates ${\phi }_0$ would belong both to the stabilizer algebra and its complement, and hence would vanish. There are therefore $\dim G-\dim H$ independent Goldstone directions in the scalar mass matrix, tangent to the vacuum manifold. There are $\dim G-\dim H$ symmetry-protected massless scalars.

This Goldstone theorem guarantees at least that many zero quadratic masses. The claim that these are all the massless scalars additionally requires nonzero curvature transverse to the vacuum orbit. For example, $V=\kappa ({\phi }^T\phi -v^2{)}^4$, with $\kappa >0$, has an ordinary spherical vacuum manifold but its entire Hessian matrix vanishes there. These accidental massless radial modes beyond Goldstone modes are not excluded by the hypotheses. For the indicated orthogonal group breaking, the protected number is

For the Higgs doublet, put $r=\sqrt{2{\varphi }^{†}\varphi }=v+H$ and $z=\sqrt{2}\varphi /r$ wherever $r\ne 0$. If $z=(z_1,z_2{)}^T$, thenThis explicitly exhibits the three angular coordinates as an SU(2) transformation of a real radial field. In particular, the polar coordinates for the electroweak Higgs doublet can locally be chosen in the formAt the vacuum the three variations generated by $-i{\sigma }_1$, $-i{\sigma }_2$, and $i(I-{\sigma }_3)$ acting on $(0,1{)}^T$ are independent over the reals. They span the three broken directions; the remaining generator $Q=({\sigma }_3+I)/2$ annihilates the vacuum. This proves that the exponential supplies local angular coordinates. An inverse local gauge transformation, applied also to the gauge fields, removes these three fields in unitary gauge. They supply the longitudinal polarizations of the massive W bosons and Z boson through the Higgs mechanism. The parameterization is local about a nonzero vacuum, rather than a coordinate system through every possible zero of the Higgs doublet.

Use the metric $(+---)$ and define the charged W bosons and neutral gauge fields bywhere $s_W=\sin {\theta }_W$, $c_W=\cos {\theta }_W$, and $\tan {\theta }_W=g^{\prime }/g$. Direct substitution into the gauge-covariant kinetic term givesand henceThe electroweak doublet gauge-boson mass matrix in the $(A^3,B)$ basis isIts normalized zero direction is $(s_W,c_W)$ and its massive direction is $(c_W,-s_W)$. Thus the scalar-vector terms in physical fields arewith the tree-level electroweak gauge-boson massesThese are also charge eigenstates. The unbroken U(1) gauge symmetry has generator $Q=T_3+Y$; on the Higgs doublet, $Y=I/2$. Since $[Q,T_{\pm }]=\pm T_{\pm }$, the combinations $W^{\pm }$ have charges $\pm 1$, while Z, the photon, and H are neutral. The photon disappears from the displayed scalar-vector terms because $g{A}^3-g^{\prime }B=\sqrt{g^2+g^{\prime 2}}Z$. The photon is massless and has no direct tree-level coupling to the remaining radial scalar in this sector. This does not remove its interactions with charged W bosons, or exclude a scalar-to-photon interaction generated by loops.

Finally, retain the printed normalization of the Higgs field potential:The kinetic term is $\frac{1}{2}(\partial H{)}^2$, so the Higgs radial mass for a half-normalized quartic potential is $\boxed{m_H^2=\lambda v^2}$. The extra factor of two familiar from a potential with prefactor $\lambda$, rather than $\lambda /2$, does not apply here.

The derivative convention uses hypercharge Y with $Q=T_3+Y$. For each lepton family $l=e,\mu ,\tau$, the left-handed fields form an SU(2) doublet $L_l=({\nu }_l,l{)}_L^T$, with $Y=-1/2$. Their weak isospin values are $T_3=+1/2,-1/2$ and their electric charges are $0,-1$. The right-handed charged lepton $l_R$ is an SU(2) singlet, with $T_3=0$, $Y=-1$ and charge $-1$. The minimal model used here has no right-handed neutrino. A sterile right-handed neutrino, if added as a singlet with $Y=0$, would have no charged weak current interaction. Antiparticles carry the conjugate representations and opposite electric charges.

Expanding ${\bar{L}}_{l}i{\gamma }^{\mu }{D}_{\mu }{L}_l$ supplies $-g{\bar{L}}_l{\gamma }^{\mu }{A}_{\mu }^a{\sigma }_a{L}_l/2$. The off-diagonal entries of $A^a{\sigma }_a$ are $\sqrt{2}{W}^{+}$ and $\sqrt{2}{W}^{-}$. With the chiral projector $P_L=(1-{\gamma }^5)/2$, one has ${\bar{\nu }}_L{\gamma }^{\mu }{l}_L=\bar{\nu }{\gamma }^{\mu }{P}_{L}l$. Thus the two W boson interactions areFor quarks, separate rotations diagonalize the up-type and down-type mass terms. If their left-handed rotations are $U_{uL}$ and $U_{dL}$, the charged interaction contains the CKM matrix $V=U_{uL}^{†}{U}_{dL}$:There is an implicit sum over color charge. This quark mixing permits transitions between different families, rather than just the paired fields in a single doublet.

Let $J^{\mu }={\sum }_l{\bar{\nu }}_l{\gamma }^{\mu }(1-{\gamma }^5)l+J_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu }$ and $\kappa =g/(2\sqrt{2})$. At momenta much smaller than $m_W$, neglect derivatives in the heavy W boson equation. Its mass and source terms can be completed to a square:This explicitly performs integrating out a charged vector boson. The resulting Fermi interaction isThe omitted terms contain derivatives and are relatively suppressed by momentum squared divided by $m_W^2$.

For the leptonic pion decay, Lorentz covariance restricts a vacuum-to-spin-zero current matrix element to a constant times $p^{\alpha }$. In the rest frame, rotations eliminate the spatial components. Under parity, the temporal vector current is even, whereas the vacuum is even and the pion is odd, so its temporal matrix element equals its negative and vanishes. The temporal axial current is odd and is allowed. This proves the vacuum-to-pseudoscalar current selection rule, rather than merely assuming an axial current. Define the pion decay constant byThen the vector-minus-axial charged weak current has matrix element $-i{f}_{\pi }{V}_{ud}{p}^{\alpha }$, up to an irrelevant overall phase convention. Consequently the scattering amplitude for the decay can be writtenUse $p=k+q$, the momentum-space Dirac equation ${\bar{u}}_e/k=m_e{\bar{u}}_e$, and $/q{v}_{\nu }=0$ for a massless neutrino. Since $/q(1-{\gamma }^5)=(1+{\gamma }^5)/q$, the neutrino contribution vanishes, leavingThe fermion spin sum is, using the supplied gamma matrix trace identities,Here $(k+q{)}^2=m_{\pi }^2$, $k^2=m_e^2$, and $q^2=0$. The mass term in the trace vanishes; anticommuting ${\gamma }^5$ reduces the remaining trace to twice $\mathrm{tr}(/k/q)$. It follows thatUsing two-body decay phase space, with final momentum magnitude $(m_{\pi }^2-m_e^2)/(2m_{\pi })$, gives the leptonic pseudoscalar decay widthThus the requested $m_e^2(m_{\pi }^2-m_e^2)$ factor is already present in the squared amplitude, and the phase space supplies one more threshold factor.

The physical explanation is helicity suppression. In the pion rest frame the two momenta are opposite. The massless antineutrino has positive helicity; zero total angular momentum would require the electron to have positive helicity too. The charged weak current instead creates a left-chiral electron, whose helicity is negative when its mass vanishes. A nonzero electron mass admits the required opposite helicity with an amplitude proportional to $m_e$. The decay amplitude vanishes for $m_e=0$, and the rate is suppressed by $m_e^2$.

Start with the Dirac equation $(i{\gamma }^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }-m)\psi =0$. The equation for the Dirac adjoint is $i({\partial }_{\mu }\bar{\psi }){\gamma }^{\mu }+m\bar{\psi }=0$. Transpose it and multiply by the charge-conjugation matrix C to obtainFor this to be the original Dirac equation multiplied by minus one, the necessary matrix identity isUsing $C^{†}=C^{-1}$, the charge conjugation of the Dirac adjoint follows directly:The final step uses $({\gamma }^0{)}^T{C}^{-1}=-C^{-1}{\gamma }^0$ and $({\gamma }^0{)}^2=1$.

Let $j_V^{\mu }=\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }\psi$, $j_A^{\mu }=\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^5\psi$, and $j_L=j_V-j_A$. For anticommuting fields, or normal-ordered operator bilinears, the minus sign in the transformed Dirac adjoint cancels the minus sign from interchanging the two fields. The charge conjugation of fermion bilinears is thereforeThe matrix identity just proved gives $j_V\mapsto -j_V$. Also $C({\gamma }^5{)}^T{C}^{-1}={\gamma }^5$, obtained by transposing its four gamma matrices and reversing their order. Henceso $j_A\mapsto j_A$ and $j_L\mapsto -j_R$, where $j_R=j_V+j_A$. Since the external vector V is odd under charge conjugation, $j_L\cdot V$ becomes $j_R\cdot V$ and is generally not invariant.

For parity symmetry in quantum field theory, write $P^{\mu }{}_{\nu }=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$. The given spinor transformation gives $j_V\mapsto P{j}_V$, $j_A\mapsto -P{j}_A$, and $V\mapsto PV$, with arguments evaluated at the reflected point. The contracted interaction again becomes $j_R\cdot V$. Each of parity and charge conjugation interchanges the two chiral contractions; applying both restores $j_L\cdot V$. This particular neutral current interaction is CP invariant, although neither P nor C is separately a symmetry. This conclusion uses the stipulated C-odd vector transformation; it is not a claim that all interactions of the Standard Model preserve CP symmetry.

For time reversal of a Dirac field, the gamma matrix adjoint and transpose identities giveWith $B={\gamma }^{5}C$, anticommutation of ${\gamma }^5$ with every gamma matrix yieldsEquivalently, $\boxed{B({\gamma }^{0\ast },-{\mathbf{\gamma }}^{\ast })B^{-1}=({\gamma }^0,\mathbf{\gamma })}$. Since time reversal is an antiunitary operator, the factor i in ${\gamma }^5=i{\gamma }^0{\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2{\gamma }^3$ must also be conjugated. ThusUsing the stated transformations of the field and its Dirac adjoint, the transformed bilinear consequently isThe external vector has the same component signs. Their contraction is unchanged, proving time reversal of a real neutral chiral vector interaction. A real coupling is understood; an antiunitary operator also conjugates coefficients, and relative complex weak phases need not satisfy this invariance.

A charged weak box contribution to kaon mixing is shown below. The incoming $d\bar{s}$ and outgoing $s\bar{d}$ connect through two charged W bosons and two internal up-type quarks. The black arrows are fermion flow, so the lower line's arrows oppose the momentum of the corresponding antiquark. The blue arrows specify the direction of positive charge carried by the charged propagators. Each vertex is a charged weak current vertex, with the appropriate CKM matrix element; the internal flavors are summed over $u,c,t$.

Use precisely the printed exchange-positive CP convention for neutral kaon mixing. In the flavor basis, CP symmetry acts by $S=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$. Write the restricted effective matrix asThen $SMS=\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& c\\ b& a\end{array}\right)$, so CP invariance of this mixing operator is exactly $b=c$. Therefore CP noninvariance in this neutral-kaon mixing block means $M_{12}\ne M_{21}$. Violation elsewhere in a larger Hamiltonian would not, by itself, prove an inequality for this particular block.

For neutral-kaon mass matrix diagonalization, choose correlated roots $r^2=b$, $s^2=c$, and eigenvalues ${\lambda }_{\pm }=a\pm rs$. The vectors $(r,s{)}^T$ and $(r,-s{)}^T$ are the corresponding eigenvectors, as direct multiplication verifies. Taking orthonormal flavor states and writing the printed CP eigenstates as $K_1=(K^0+{\bar{K}}^0)/\sqrt{2}$ and $K_2=(K^0-{\bar{K}}^0)/\sqrt{2}$, one findswhere the kaon CP mixing parameter isOverall phases have been absorbed. The kaon mixing square-root branch convention must be chosen continuously so that $r=s$ in the CP-conserving limit for the eigenstate labeled plus. These formulas are exact in the nondegenerate case with $r+s\ne 0$; the requested small admixtures follow if $|ϵ|\ll 1$. Smallness is an additional weak-CP-violation assumption, not a consequence of $b\ne c$ alone. A Hermitian mass operator has $c=b^{\ast }$; the same algebra also applies to the effective non-Hermitian operator that includes decays, where the two eigenstates need not be orthogonal. At a fully degenerate $b=c=0$, a CP eigenbasis can simply be chosen.

Adopt the phase convention $CP|K^0⟩=-|{\bar{K}}^0⟩$ and $CP|{\bar{K}}^0⟩=-|K^0⟩$. Changing both phases changes the convention for the mixing parameter, not physical predictions. The flavor contents are $K^0=d\bar{s}$ and ${\bar{K}}^0=s\bar{d}$. A pair of charged weak currents changes strangeness by two units through the following box contractions, with $u_i,u_j=u,c,t$ summed over.

The drawing uses unitary gauge: the W boson gauge-boson propagator contains its longitudinal part. In a gauge of a renormalizable quantum field theory, charged Goldstone boson boxes must also be included to obtain the same gauge-independent result. The external lines represent the valence quarks; the meson matrix element also contains strong interaction binding effects.

Put ${\lambda }_i=V_{is}^{\ast }{V}_{id}$, $x_i=m_i^2/m_W^2$ and $P_L=(1-{\gamma }^5)/2$. The charged weak box contribution to kaon mixing has the effective four-fermion interaction structureHere $G_F$ is the Fermi constant, $V$ is the CKM matrix, and $S$ is a dimensionless loop function from a Feynman integral; the estimate suppresses convention-dependent numerical factors. Four weak interaction Feynman vertices and a one-loop Feynman integral give the coupling and loop order suppression. Unitarity of the CKM matrix gives ${\sum }_i{\lambda }_i=0$, so the GIM mechanism cancels the mass-independent part. With a negligible up quark mass, the leading charm quark term has $S(x_c,x_c)\sim x_c$. Define $f_K$ by $⟨0|\bar{s}{\gamma }_{\mu }{\gamma }^{5}d|K^0(p)⟩=i{f}_K{p}_{\mu }$. Estimating the hadronic matrix element by $f_K^2{m}_K{B}_K$, with the dimensionless kaon bag parameter $B_K$ of order unity, givesThe hadronic normalization includes division by $2m_K$ when relativistically normalized states are converted to the effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing. Since $|V_{cs}^{\ast }{V}_{cd}|\simeq \sin {\theta }_C\cos {\theta }_C$, the Cabibbo suppression is explicit. Illustrative scales $G_F\sim 10^{-5}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-2}$, $m_c\sim 1\mathrm{GeV}$, $f_K\sim 0.1\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_K\sim 0.5\mathrm{GeV}$ give an order $10^{-16}$ to $10^{-15}\mathrm{GeV}$ estimate. The full sum includes charm quark-top quark and top quark-top quark terms, important for CP violation; long-distance strong interaction contributions prevent this dimensional estimate from being a precision prediction. A meson matrix element necessarily needs hadronic input in addition to electroweak parameters.

For the decaying kaon system write $H^{\prime }=M-i\Gamma /2$, where $M$ and $\Gamma$ are Hermitian matrices. The entries denoted $M_{ij}$ in the question are entries of this effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing; they need not themselves form a Hermitian matrix. CPT invariance equates the diagonal masses and diagonal decay widths, givingOne can see why there is no complex conjugation on the right as follows. In the flavor subspace let $J=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$ and represent the antiunitary CPT operation by $J$ followed by complex conjugation. CPT changes a projected forward propagator into its adjoint. Indeed, if $P$ projects onto the flavor subspace and $H_{\mathrm{full}}$ is the Hermitian microscopic generator, its invariance and the antiunitary reversal of $i$ give $\Theta P{e}^{-i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P{\Theta }^{-1}=P{e}^{+i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P=(P{e}^{-i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P{)}^{†}$. In the time-independent two-state approximation, the effective generator this means $J{H^{\prime }}^{\ast }J={H^{\prime }}^{†}$, whose diagonal entries give $(H_{22}^{\prime }{)}^{\ast }=(H_{11}^{\prime }{)}^{\ast }$; the off-diagonal entries impose no further condition. Equivalently, apply CPT separately to the dispersive and absorptive Hermitian matrices. Treating the decaying effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing as a Hermitian matrix would incorrectly discard the absorptive part.

In the chosen flavor phase convention CP is represented by $-J$. Its invariance requires $J{H}^{\prime }J=H^{\prime }$. Thus it gives diagonal equality and additionallyThe normalized CP eigenstates areApplying CP directly gives eigenvalues $+1$ and $-1$ respectively.

Now use CPT to put $H^{\prime }=\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& a\end{array}\right)$ and take correlated square roots $\alpha =\sqrt{b}$, $\beta =\sqrt{c}$. Its characteristic polynomial equation is $(a-\mu {)}^2-bc=0$, and direct multiplication showsExpressing these two eigenvectors in the CP eigenstate basis gives, respectively, coefficients proportional to $(\alpha +\beta ,\alpha -\beta )$ and $(\alpha -\beta ,\alpha +\beta )$. Therefore the kaon CP mixing parameter isand, because the CP eigenstate basis is orthonormal, the normalized states at production areThe kaon mixing square-root branch convention correlates the roots continuously with the limit of conserved CP $b=c$, where $\alpha =\beta$ and $ϵ=0$. Reversing one root interchanges the two eigenstates. The labels short and long are fixed by their decay widths: their complex eigenvalues are ${\mu }_{S,L}=m_{S,L}-i{\Gamma }_{S,L}/2$, and subsequent evolution supplies $e^{-i{\mu }_{S,L}t}$. The displayed formula assumes nonzero mixing and $\alpha +\beta \ne 0$, as in the physical kaon system; degenerate or defective matrices require a separate limiting treatment.

Use metric $g_{\mu \nu }=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$ and the hypercharge convention $Q=T^3+Y$. Then the Higgs doublet has $Y=1/2$ and transforms under electroweak gauge invariance asThe covariant derivative sign consistent with the requested expression isA convention that instead calls the doublet hypercharge one puts $Y/2$ in the charge generator and derivative; the physical coupling is the same. Here $B_{\mu }\mapsto B_{\mu }-{\partial }_{\mu }\beta /g^{\prime }$ and the matrix-valued $SU(2)$ connection transforms as $A_{\mu }\mapsto U{A}_{\mu }{U}^{-1}+(i/g)({\partial }_{\mu }U)U^{-1}$, making $D_{\mu }\varphi$ transform like $\varphi$.

In unitary gauge, the upper component of the derivative comes from the off-diagonal Pauli matrices:The lower component isWriting $c_W=\cos {\theta }_W$, $s_W=\sin {\theta }_W$, inversion of the neutral rotation gives $A^3=c_{W}Z+s_{W}A$ and $B=-s_{W}Z+c_{W}A$. Since $g^{\prime }=g\tan {\theta }_W$, the coefficient of the photon vanishes, whereas $-g{c}_W-g^{\prime }{s}_W=-g/c_W$. ThusThe zero photon coupling expresses the neutrality of the surviving radial Higgs boson.

The scalar Lagrangian density is ${\mathcal{L}}_{\varphi }=(D_{\mu }\varphi {)}^{†}{D}^{\mu }\varphi -V$. Adding $-F_{\mu \nu }^a{F}^{a\mu \nu }/4-B_{\mu \nu }{B}^{\mu \nu }/4$ gives the complete bosonic electroweak Lagrangian density. Its scalar and vector mass terms, after electroweak symmetry breaking, are obtained directly asIndeed, the shifted quartic Higgs potential normalization gives ${\varphi }^{†}\varphi -v^2/2=vH+H^2/2$. Comparing with a canonically normalized real scalar mass term, a complex vector mass term and a real vector mass term yieldsThe extra factor one half in this paper's Higgs potential is why $M_H^2$ is $\lambda v^2$, rather than $2\lambda v^2$ in another common convention. The tree-level electroweak gauge-boson masses give $\cos {\theta }_W=M_W/M_Z$: measure the two vector masses and take their ratio. Beyond tree level this extraction requires a specified renormalization convention and radiative corrections.

Expanding the vector terms gives the cubic and quartic Higgs couplings to electroweak gauge bosons:The four elementary Feynman diagrams and their all-incoming Feynman rules are shown below. Differentiating with respect to two identical $Z$ fields supplies a factor two; differentiating with respect to two identical Higgs fields supplies another factor two in the quartic rules.

There are no elementary $H\gamma \gamma$, $HZ\gamma$, $HH\gamma \gamma$ or $HHZ\gamma$ vertices in this tree-level Lagrangian density. Loop-induced photon interactions are a different order. The scalar self-interactions, if included, have rules $HHH:-3i{M}_H^2/v$ and $HHHH:-3i{M}_H^2/v^2$.

The prime LEP2 search used the Higgs boson coupling to Z bosons through Higgsstrahlung, $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to Z^{\ast }\to ZH$, shown in the first panel of the process figure in Question 3. This identifies an associated-production interaction, rather than an on-shell decay of a single $Z$ into a heavier Higgs. The channel's historical role is documented in the LEP2 Higgs-search account.

For the free charged W boson, take $W_{\mu }(x)=\int d^{4}p{e}^{-ipx}{W}_{\mu }(p)/(2\pi {)}^4$, with the conjugate field carrying $e^{ipx}$. In the action, multiplying the two field strengths gives $2[p^2{W}_{\mu }^{†}{W}^{\mu }-(p\cdot W^{†})(p\cdot W)]$. ThereforeTo invert it, separate the transverse and longitudinal projectors $P_T=g-pp/p^2$, $P_L=pp/p^2$. The operator is $(p^2-M_W^2)P_T-M_W^2{P}_L$, soSince the quadratic action kernel is $-O$, its Proca propagator isFor all momentum components small relative to $M_W$, the low-momentum limit is $D_{\mu \nu }\simeq i{g}_{\mu \nu }/M_W^2$, with corrections of relative order $p^2/M_W^2$ or $p_{\mu }{p}_{\nu }/M_W^2$. This local limit leads to the Fermi interaction, with $G_F/\sqrt{2}=g^2/(8M_W^2)$ for the charged-current normalization used here.