Topics (318k) Articles (329k) Users (386) Discussions (237) Comments (383) Files (10k) New article
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 20 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An almost complex structure is compatible with if , , and is a positive-definite inner product. To construct one, choose a Riemannian metric and define by . The map is invertible and skew-adjoint, so is positive definite. Its positive square root commutes with , andThe same identities show that preserves . The positive square root depends smoothly on , giving a smooth compatible almost complex structure.
For a compatible , applying this metric construction of a compatible almost complex structure to returns . Given , apply it to to obtain a path joining them. In fact interpolation to any fixed auxiliary metric gives a contraction. Thus the space is nonempty and connected, and even contractible, by contractibility of compatible almost complex structures.
Regularity of a J-holomorphic curve means that its linearized Cauchy–Riemann operator is surjective. Differentiating in coordinates givesup to the harmless factor in the convention for . For constant , the last term vanishes, is constant, and the pulled-back tangent bundle is . Identifying with , this is a direct sum of copies of the Dolbeault operator on the trivial line bundle. Its cokernel is , by Dolbeault cohomology of the projective line. Hence constant maps are regular for every compatible .
The Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve says that the energy is . If the homology class is zero, this integral is zero, forcing . Thus every zero-class sphere is constant and regular.
In real dimension four, the Fredholm index of the parametrized sphere operator is . At a regular nonconstant sphere, quotienting by the six-dimensional Möbius transformation group gives a local moduli space, or an orbifold for finite stabilizers, of real dimensionThis is the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres.
For a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class , the adjunction inequality for a simple J-holomorphic sphere gives . If , the displayed moduli dimension is negative, so such a regular simple J-holomorphic sphere cannot exist. To cover nonsimple maps as well, interpret regularity here as regularity for all nonconstant maps under discussion. A degree- cover, , of a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class has , with and . Its local family of rational covering maps of the projective line modulo domain reparametrization has real dimension , while the predicted dimension isIt therefore cannot be regular. This proves there are no regular spheres in a class with square at most minus two, by negative-square exclusion under full sphere regularity. Regularity only for simple curves would not suffice: multiple covers of an exceptional minus-one sphere are the counterexample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 20 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A symplectic blowup replaces a small symplectic ball around the point by an exceptional divisor , for . One can construct its form by symplectic reduction. In a Darboux chart, consider with the circle actionOn the action is free because . Its quotient therefore carries a smooth symplectic form. Where , choose the representative with positive real; the reduced form is the original form on . Where , the quotient is the Hopf fibration quotient of , namely . The local quotient is the tautological complex line bundle near its zero section, hence the local blowup. Glue this model to the exterior of the ball to obtain a symplectic form on the blowup.
The area of a projective line in the exceptional divisor is . For a closed , changing this size changes the symplectic volume:Consequently the blowup is not determined up to symplectomorphism without a size choice. The underlying smooth blowup is fixed, but the symplectic construction has a parameter, as in symplectic blowup size changes volume.
For the blowdown map and exceptional divisor , the First Chern class isIn real dimension four this becomes , the first Chern class formula for a symplectic blowup.
The tangent bundle of the standard four-torus is a trivial complex rank-two bundle, so its symplectic canonical class is zero. For a generic fiber of a symplectic Lefschetz pencil, the symplectic adjunction formula gives . Two generic fibers intersect precisely at the base points, each with local intersection number one in the pencil model . HenceThis is base-point count for a Lefschetz pencil on a symplectic four-torus.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 20 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The symplectic neighborhood theorem says that a symplectomorphism between compact symplectic submanifolds, together with a symplectic vector bundle isomorphism of their symplectic normal bundles, extends to a symplectomorphism of neighborhoods. To outline the proof, use tubular neighborhoods to extend the bundle identification smoothly. The two pulled-back symplectic forms agree as bilinear forms along the zero section. The relative Poincaré lemma writes their difference as , with vanishing there. Their linear interpolation remains nondegenerate on a sufficiently small neighborhood. Solvingand integrating gives the relative Moser theorem; the flow fixes the submanifold and carries one form to the other.
For the symplectic fiber sum along a square-zero surface, the self-intersection is the Euler number of the oriented rank-two normal bundle. Thus each normal bundle is trivial. Rescale one ambient symplectic form if necessary to equalize the areas of the two copies of . The Moser theorem for the surface then supplies a base identification preserving their area forms. The symplectic neighborhood theorem identifies each neighborhood with a product carryingRemove small disk neighborhoods and glue collars with the base identification andfor a suitable positive constant . Both signs reverse, so the normal two-forms match; the base forms already match. They define a closed nondegenerate two-form across the neck, agreeing with the ambient forms elsewhere. This constructs the symplectic sum. Its construction uses the area normalization and the chosen normal-bundle gluing.
For a smooth counterexample, take , and in a small four-ball in each choose an unknotted sphere bounding a three-ball. These spheres are null-homologous and have self-intersection zero. Their standard smooth fiber sum isIndeed, the complement of the standard in is ; doubling these complements gives , and the two ambient projective-plane summands remain as connected sums. This is the smooth fiber sum along unknotted null-homologous spheres.
In the induced orientation, both summands in have positive positive index of the intersection form. The symplectic connected-sum obstruction therefore rules out a symplectic form: connected-sum vanishing of the Seiberg–Witten invariant of a four-manifold contradicts Taubes nonvanishing theorem. In the opposite orientation the intersection form is negative definite, also ruling out a symplectic form, whose class has positive square. Thus the smooth fiber sum need not be symplectic.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 20 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the local flow of a vector field . The Lie derivative of a differential form is . We prove Cartan's magic formulaBoth sides are degree-zero derivations of an algebra on the exterior algebra of differential forms. They agree on a function , since . They also agree on : pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, so , while . Locally every differential form is a sum of products of functions and coordinate differentials, proving the identity in every degree.
For a compactly supported Hamiltonian vector field , take the convention . Since , Cartan's magic formula gives , so its complete flow of a vector field consists of symplectomorphisms. Given and , a bump function lets us choose a compactly supported with , and hence . Choose such fields for a basis of . Their successive small-time flows give a map with invertible derivative at the origin. The inverse function theorem makes the orbit of open. Every orbit is open; because is connected, there is only one orbit. Thus the compactly supported symplectomorphisms act transitively on points, by Hamiltonian transitivity on a connected symplectic manifold.
On the unit sphere, the standard symplectic area is . The equator has complementary disks of areas , whereas the latitude at height has complementary disks of areas : the cap above height has area . A symplectomorphism must preserve the unordered pair of complementary areas. Therefore no such symplectomorphism exists, by complementary areas obstruct symplectic equivalence of separating curves.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 2 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An essential right ideal intersects every nonzero right ideal nontrivially. A regular element of a ring is a two-sided non-zero-divisor: both and imply . Writing for the set of these elements, the classical right ring of quotients is a ring containing , with every invertible and every element of expressible as .
Goldie theorem states that a semiprime ring has a semisimple Artinian classical right ring of quotients if and only if it is a right Goldie ring: it satisfies the ascending chain condition on right annihilators and has finite uniform dimension. In particular, every semiprime ring that is a right Noetherian ring satisfies the theorem. We prove the requested case directly using the supplied assumption about essential right ideals.
First let . If a nonzero right ideal had , the sumwould be direct. Indeed, a finite relation gives , hence ; cancellation of repeats the argument. Each is a nonzero right ideal, so the partial sums form a strictly ascending chain. This contradicts right Noetherianity. Thus a regular principal right ideal in a right Noetherian ring is essential, and every right ideal containing is essential.
For and , putThis is an essential right ideal. To check this, take a nonzero right ideal . If , then . Otherwise is a nonzero right ideal, so it meets nontrivially; lifting an element of that intersection gives a nonzero element of . By the supplied assumption, contains some , givingThis is the right Ore condition. The set is multiplicatively closed, and the denominator cancellation condition holds because its elements are non-zero-divisors. Therefore Ore theorem constructs and embeds in it.
For every right ideal of ,Indeed, if , then . Contracting an ascending chain of right ideals of to therefore proves that is a right Noetherian ring.
Suppose is an essential right ideal of . For a nonzero right ideal of , choose . The right Ore condition gives a common right denominator for a finite expression of in , so there is withThus is an essential right ideal of . It contains a regular element of a ring, which becomes a unit in , and consequently .
Finally, for any right ideal of , choose by Zorn lemma a right ideal maximal subject to . Then is essential: a nonzero right ideal disjoint from would enlarge while keeping it disjoint from . Hence . Every submodule of the right regular module has a complement, making it a semisimple module. Since it is also Noetherian, it is a finite direct sum of simple modules. It is therefore Artinian, and is a semisimple Artinian ring. This is semisimplicity of a classical quotient from regular elements in essential ideals.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 2 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Jacobson radical is , where runs over the maximal right ideals. Every proper right ideal lies in such an : the union of a chain of proper right ideals containing is a right ideal and remains proper because it omits . Thus Zorn lemma applies.
The right-module form of Nakayama lemma says that a finitely generated module with is zero. More generally, if is a submodule and , then . To prove the first statement, suppose and take a generating set of minimal size. Since , there are withThe unit criterion for the Jacobson radical makes a unit. Hence is generated by the other , a contradiction. Apply this result to the quotient module to obtain the general form.
For an injective module endomorphism of an Artinian module , the descending chain condition givesfor some . Given , write ; injectivity of gives . Thus is surjective, as asserted by Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.
Now is a semilocal ring and is a finitely generated module over the right Artinian ring . A finite direct sum of copies of , and hence its quotient module , is an Artinian module. The module endomorphism induces on , and the given inverse-image condition says precisely that . The preceding argument makes surjective, soThe quotient module is finitely generated and satisfies . Applying Nakayama lemma yields . Therefore is surjective, by surjectivity from injectivity modulo the Jacobson radical.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 2 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppose first that is a Noetherian module. An ascending chain of submodules of is also a chain in , so it stabilizes. A chain in the quotient module lifts to a chain in , so it also stabilizes. Thus both and are Noetherian modules.
Conversely, let be a chain of submodules of . If and are Noetherian modules, both and stabilize, say for . For , equality of the images gives with . Then , and hence . This proves the extension direction of Noetherian modules in a short exact sequence.
The left regular module is Noetherian because is a left Noetherian ring. Applying the extension result inductively makes each finite direct sum Noetherian. Every finitely generated module on the left is a quotient module of such a direct sum, so it is Noetherian.
A poly-(cyclic or finite) group has a finite subnormal serieswhose factors are cyclic groups or finite groups. We prove that the group ring is a left Noetherian ring by induction. Put . A finite factor makes a finite free left -module, using a coset transversal. Its left ideals are -submodules, so finite-module extension preserves Noetherianity handles this case.
If the factor is infinite cyclic, choose a lift of a generator and let . The group ring is the skew Laurent polynomial ring . Here is the required left-sided skew Hilbert basis theorem. For a left ideal , defineEach is a left ideal of . Left multiplication by gives . The ascending chain condition makes these ideals constant for ; choose finitely many generators for each , , and lift them to polynomials .
If has degree and leading coefficient , writeSubtracting cancels the leading coefficient. For , use the lifts for instead. Induction on polynomial degree shows that the finitely many generate . Thus the skew polynomial ring of an automorphism is a left Noetherian ring.
Finally, for a left ideal of , its intersection with has finitely many generators. Every satisfies for some , so those same generators generate after multiplication by . This completes the induction and proves that is left Noetherian, the left-sided form of group rings of poly-(cyclic or finite) groups are Noetherian.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 19 5 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose the maximal torus of consisting of rotations in orthogonal planes, and write . In the complexified standard representation the torus eigenvalues are , with weights . For the complexified Lie algebra has the Dn root system . The root-space decomposition theorem splits this Lie algebra into its Cartan subalgebra and one-dimensional root spaces. The Cartan subalgebra contributes the zero weight with multiplicity . Therefore its character isTake positive roots for , so . For the root is a highest weight: its root vector is killed by every positive root vector, since is never a root for positive . To verify irreducibility without relying on an unstated simplicity theorem, apply complete reducibility and compare dimensions. For the Dn root system the Weyl dimension formula readsFor only pairs involving the first two indices change. With , cancellation givesThis is exactly , so the irreducible summand containing the highest-weight vector exhausts the Adjoint representation. Thus for the complexified Adjoint representation is irreducible, with highest weight .
For , the roots split into the two independent systems and . The Adjoint representation splits into two irreducibles of dimension three, with respective highest weights and . Equivalently these are the self-dual and anti-self-dual exterior two-forms in four dimensions. Their characters areThey add to the displayed adjoint character. This agrees with the Chiral decomposition of the complexified so4 Lie algebra.
For a direct character comparison, put . The eigenvalue formula for an exterior square givesThis is precisely . More intrinsically, let be the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form preserved by and defineThis endomorphism is skew with respect to , so maps to . In an orthonormal basis the bivectors map to a basis of skew skew-symmetric matrices, proving that it is an isomorphism. Since is invariant,Thus the exterior square and the complexified Adjoint representation are naturally isomorphic, explaining the character equality without a weight calculation.
The symmetric square is not irreducible. The inverse metric tensor is a nonzero invariant vector, and contraction with splits off its trivial line:The contraction sends to , so this is indeed a direct sum. A highest-weight vector , where has torus weight , lies in the traceless part because , and has highest weight . The same dimension formula gives, for ,This equals . Complete reducibility therefore proves that the traceless part is irreducible, including the dimension-nine case for . In particular,If the circle case is included, the adjoint character is and the symmetric square instead has three one-dimensional weights .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 19 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . We use complete reducibility of compact-group representations, and the highest-weight classification: the multiplicity of in a completely reducible representation is the dimension of its weight- subspace killed by all positive root vectors. Each irreducible summand contributes just its one-dimensional highest-weight line to that subspace.
Symmetrizing and antisymmetrizing the three tensor factors give invariant subspaces and of . The vectors and are highest-weight vectors of weights and respectively. The unitary version of the Weyl dimension formula isIt givesThese are exactly the dimensions of the third symmetric power and exterior power, so each is irreducible and occurs once in those subspaces.
The weight in has basisThe only positive root vector that acts nontrivially on this weight space is . Acting on the tensor product as the sum of its actions on the three factors, it sends each of to . Consequently the highest-weight vectors in this space are preciselyThis is a two-dimensional space, so occurs exactly twice. Its dimension isThe dimensions of the summands already found add toThus no other irreducible summand can remain. We have proved the full decompositionThere are four summands counted with multiplicity and three distinct isomorphism types.
For , the exterior cube vanishes. The third symmetric power still has highest weight and dimension , while the same two-dimensional highest-vector calculation gives two copies of the representation of weight and dimension . It is , since a determinant twist shifts the standard highest weight to . Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 19 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For define the skew-symmetric matrixThen . This is a linear isomorphism , with inverse . Since rotations preserve the cross product,Thus intertwines the Adjoint representation with the standard representation. The vector triple-product identity gives, for every ,Consequently and the chosen normalization satisfiesNo undetermined scale remains in this explicit matrix convention.
Identify with the unit quaternions usingThe relations and verify multiplication, and every matrix in has this form. If is imaginary, then . Quaternionic conjugation reverses product order and , soThus conjugation preserves . Multiplicativity of the quaternion norm shows that this action preserves the inner product. The unit quaternions form the connected three-sphere, so its determinant, equal to one at the identity, is always one. We obtain a homomorphism .
Its group kernel consists of unit quaternions commuting with every imaginary quaternion. Commuting with both and forces a quaternion to be real, so the group kernel is exactly . To prove surjectivity explicitly, let be a unit imaginary quaternion and put . For imaginary , multiplication satisfies . Expanding therefore givesThis is the Rodrigues rotation formula about axis . Every element of has such an axis-angle description: an odd-dimensional orthogonal matrix of determinant one has an eigenvector of eigenvalue one, and its action on the perpendicular plane is a plane rotation. Hence is onto, andThis is the quaternionic form of the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3). Its differential sends an imaginary quaternion to , because , consistent with the bracket normalization used above.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 19 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
There are two necessary qualifications to the literal formulation. The whole group is itself a closed normal subgroup, so the claim about containment in the centre must concern proper closed normal subgroups. Also, the homomorphism conclusion needs a nontrivial target : for example, has surjective differential onto the zero Lie algebra, but its group kernel is all of and no quotient by a finite subgroup is a one-point group. We prove the precise assertions, including these exceptional cases.
Write . The centre is invariant under the Adjoint representation, so irreducibility makes it either zero or all of . In the latter case is Abelian. For connected , the adjoint action is then trivial: the group is generated by exponentials, and . A nonzero trivial representation is irreducible only in dimension one. A connected compact one-dimensional Lie group is a circle, so .
For every other , the Lie algebra of its centre is zero. The centre is a closed compact Lie subgroup; a zero-dimensional compact Lie group is finite. Let be a closed normal subgroup. The closed-subgroup theorem identifies as an adjoint-invariant subspace of , hence or . If the latter holds, contains an identity neighbourhood and is open, so connectedness forces . If is proper, it therefore has zero Lie algebra and is finite. For any , the continuous map takes connected into the finite set , so it is constant and equal to . ThusProper closed subgroups of the circle are finite as well, and of course central.
Now let be surjective. The submersion theorem makes contain an identity neighbourhood in , so it is an open subgroup. Since is connected, . Its group kernel is closed and normal. If is nontrivial, is proper and the preceding argument gives a finite central group kernel; this also holds for , whose proper closed subgroups are finite. The Lie-group first isomorphism theorem givesIf is trivial, the correct statement is instead .
For the Spin groups, use the real Clifford algebra with . The group consists of products of an even number of unit vectors inside its invertible even part. Conjugation on the embedded defines the standard double covering with group kernel . The Clifford relations show that a unit-vector reflection, with the usual twisted conjugation, is a hyperplane reflection; the even products give orientation-preserving transformations. The Cartan–Dieudonné theorem states that every orthogonal transformation is a product of reflections, proving surjectivity. For this connected covering group is simply connected; is a circle.
Here is an explicit exterior-square construction of the requested six-dimensional map. Put with its standard Hermitian form and volume . On , write and define an antilinear map byIt satisfies . Intrinsically, if and the Hermitian inner product is linear in its first variable, then . Because preserves both and , it commutes with . This is the real structure of the SU4 exterior square.
The fixed space has the following real orthonormal basis, with all vectors divided by :Thus is six-dimensional over , its complexification is , and the exterior-square action restricts to an orthogonal representation on . Its determinant is one because is connected. We obtain .
To compute the group kernel, diagonalize with eigenvalues . If , its complexified exterior-square action is the identity, hence for every . Comparing pairs shows that all are equal, and their common value has square one. A unitary matrix with that single eigenvalue is scalar, so . Conversely, those two scalar matrices plainly act trivially on the exterior square.
The differential of is injective because its group kernel is finite. Both Lie algebras have dimension , so the differential is an isomorphism. Its image is consequently open in connected , hence all of . ThereforeThis also realizes as , since is simply connected, by uniqueness of the connected simply connected covering group.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 19 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For take the diagonal maximal torusThe spectral theorem for unitary matrices says that every element is conjugate to an element of . A diagonal element with pairwise distinct eigenvalues has centralizer exactly . Its conjugates therefore determine its eigenvalues up to permutation, and the normalizer quotient is . The character lattice of a torus is , with . Conjugation on the matrix unit has weight , so these are the roots. Choose positive for ; thenDominant integral weights are precisely the integer tuples . Negative entries are allowed: they correspond to determinant twists, so polynomial representations alone do not exhaust the irreducible representations of .
Normalize Haar measure on and to have mass one, and putThe Weyl integration formula for U(n) for a continuous class function isFor a general continuous function, replace in the torus integral by , using the normalized invariant quotient measure.
To prove the formula, consider the conjugation map , . On regular torus elements its fibres have exactly points: the possible orderings of the distinct eigenvalues. Equip the group with an invariant inner product on its Lie algebra and split . After translating the derivative back to the identity, its torus directions contribute the identity, while its transverse directions contribute . Each pair supplies a real two-dimensional off-diagonal plane. On that plane is multiplication by , regarded as a plane rotation, so the absolute real determinant of the transverse derivative isThe change-of-variables theorem, divided by the covering multiplicity, now gives the desired weighted integral up to the constant relating the normalized invariant measures. The nonregular locus has measure zero: repeated eigenvalues are the zero-set of the nonzero discriminant, and the torus coincidence sets likewise have measure zero. Thus its omission causes no change to the integral. To determine the normalization, expand as a sum of distinct torus characters. Fourier orthogonality gives . Applying the formula to fixes the coefficient to . This proves both the class-function and conjugacy-averaged forms.
We can now derive the character formula from integration, rather than merely quote it. Use the basic highest-weight theorem: a finite-dimensional irreducible representation has a unique highest weight with a one-dimensional highest-weight space; all its other weights are minus a nonnegative sum of positive roots. Its character is Weyl invariant. Also, character orthogonality for compact groups gives . This orthogonality follows by averaging the representation on : the integral projects onto intertwining operators, whose dimension is one by the Schur lemma.
Let and, for a strictly decreasing integer tuple , put . The finite Laurent polynomial is alternating. Every alternating Laurent polynomial is a linear combination of the : collect its monomials by permutation orbits, and observe that an orbit with repeated exponents has zero coefficient by antisymmetry. Different are orthogonal on and each has squared norm .
The coefficient of in is exactly one. Indeed, a contribution from the term would require a weight in . For , the vector is a nonzero nonnegative combination of the positive simple roots, so that weight lies above and is impossible. The identity permutation supplies the highest-weight coefficient one. ConsequentlyApply the integration formula to . Torus orthogonality givesAll the other coefficients vanish, provingThe quotient extends across repeated eigenvalues because its product with the denominator is the already defined continuous character. Equivalently, alternant divisibility makes it a Laurent polynomial invariant under permutations; multiply by a determinant power if negative exponents must first be removed.
Finally, is fixed by the Weyl group, so its common factor cancels in the quotient. Since , the determinant expression is exactlyUsing in the derivation avoids treating a possibly half-integral as an actual character of the torus. At the identity, taking the leading Vandermonde term of the two determinants gives the accompanying dimension formula
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 18 5 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Torelli theorem concerns a connected smooth projective curve over and its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. Its conclusion isThe polarization of a complex torus is part of the hypothesis. We will reconstruct the curve intrinsically from the Jacobian variety and the theta divisor, using the Gauss map of a theta divisor, and prove the reconstruction in both the nonhyperelliptic and hyperelliptic curve cases. The needed biduality and ordinary-tangency facts about projective dual varieties are the general projective-duality results permitted here.
First explain why the polarized data determine the theta divisor up to translation. On , take integral one-form classes dual to the symplectic cycle basis. Pullback by the degree-one Abelian sum map identifies them with the corresponding classes on ; the Riemann bilinear relations giveOn , the sum map pulls each one-form back to the sum of its pullbacks from the factors. It has generic degree onto : the Abel theorem for divisors and the existence of classes with give a unique effective unordered representative, and ordering gives the factorial. Integrating a wedge of basis one-forms over the product, only terms assigning a matching pair to each factor survive. Dividing by gives integral one when precisely one matching pair is omitted, and zero for all other basis wedges. Hence the Poincaré dual class of isThis is exactly the integral form of the canonical principal polarization of a complex torus constructed by periods.
Its associated line bundle has one-dimensional section space. One can check this without any theta multiplicity assumption: in normalized period coordinates a representative has sections satisfyingExpand the first periodicity in a Fourier series . The second periodicity forces . Positive definiteness of makes this series normally convergent, so the section space has dimension exactly one. Other line bundles giving the same polarization of a complex torus differ by a degree-zero line bundle. The map is an isomorphism from to its dual abelian variety for a principal polarization of a complex torus: on lattices it is the unimodular alternating form. Thus all these line bundles are translates, and so are their unique zero divisors. In particular the given polarized data recover the reduced divisor on an algebraic curve up to translation. Translation does not change tangent hyperplanes after identifying tangent spaces with .
Put and . At a smooth class , the Riemann singularity theorem says . The derivative of the Abelian sum map identifies the translated tangent hyperplane with . Thus the intrinsic Gauss map of a theta divisor isIn particularWe will see that this map is dominant and generically finite. Its function-field extension therefore determines an intrinsic finite cover: normalize in , obtaining . Normalization in a finite extension is finite here. Let be its reduced codimension-one branch locus. Using this finite cover avoids counting omitted points of the rational Gauss map of a theta divisor as ramification. Everything in this construction is determined by the polarized Jacobian variety.
Suppose first that and is nonhyperelliptic. Its canonical map embeds it as a nondegenerate curve . For clarity, this follows directly from the Riemann-Roch theorem: on a positive-genus curve, so has no base point. If a length-two effective divisor had , a nonconstant meromorphic function with poles bounded by would give a map of degree at most two to . Degree one forces genus zero, and degree two is the hyperelliptic curve case. Hence , and the Riemann-Roch theorem gives . The canonical sections therefore separate every pair of points and every tangent direction, proving the embedding.
Let be the open set of hyperplanes transverse to . A hyperplane in cuts out distinct points. These points span the hyperplane: if a second independent canonical section vanished at all of them, its zero divisor would have to equal the same degree- divisor, and the ratio of the two sections would be a constant. Consequently some of the intersection points are independent. For the divisor formed by such a subset, and .
We need to know that every -subset of a general hyperplane section has this property. Here is the monodromy argument, with its essential steps. The incidence space choosing one intersection point is a projective bundle over before restricting to , so it is irreducible. The incidence space choosing two distinct ordered intersection points is likewise a projective bundle over minus its diagonal, with fibre ; it too is irreducible. Restricting to transverse sections preserves irreducibility and hence connectedness of these covers. Thus the monodromy action of a covering space on the intersection points is two-transitive. A general tangent hyperplane has just one contact of order two, by characteristic-zero projective biduality theorem; locally its intersection equation is together with the other simple points. A small loop in exchanges exactly those two points. Two-transitivity conjugates this transposition to every transposition, so the monodromy is the full symmetric group .
It follows that the finite étale cover of choosing a -subset is connected and irreducible. The condition of dependent evaluations is closed on that cover. It is proper because we have exhibited an independent subset; its image under the finite map is therefore a proper closed subset of . Outside that image every subset is independent. By the Abel theorem for divisors, distinct such subsets have distinct Abelian sums: means there is only one effective representative of its class. Thus the subset cover is birational to with its Gauss map of a theta divisor, andMore precisely it is exactly the restriction of over , since this étale cover is normal and has the same function field.
There can consequently be no branch component over . Its complement is the irreducible hypersurface of tangent hyperplanes, the projective dual variety of . Around a general point of , the transposition of two roots acts nontrivially on -subsets: choose a subset containing exactly one of those two roots. Hence the finite cover is ramified there. This proves the exact identityThe quoted biduality theorem now recovers as an embedded curve, and the canonical map identifies with . This proves reconstruction in the nonhyperelliptic case, including special curves rather than only a general curve in moduli.
Now suppose that is a hyperelliptic curve of genus . Let be its degree-two map. The Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives branch points . Choose an affine coordinate with no branch at infinity and writeThe forms are holomorphic and independent; their orders at the two points at infinity show there are exactly of them. Thus the canonical map factors as followed by the degree- rational normal curve embeddingWrite .
A general hyperplane section of consists of distinct points avoiding the branch points. The corresponding canonical divisor on consists of the pairs . Choosing one lift from each pair gives an effective divisor with : the evaluation matrix of the canonical forms has Vandermonde rank . If instead a degree- sub-divisor contains an entire pair, it has at least two sections, because that pair is a fibre of and moves in a pencil. Every choice not taking exactly one point from each pair contains an entire pair. Therefore the generic smooth theta points over the hyperplane are exactly the independent choices of one lift in each pair, andThe cover of these choices is again the restriction of to the open set of transverse sections of avoiding the : the identification on a dense open follows from the Abel theorem for divisors, and the choice cover is finite étale and normal. Its components would correspond to components of the function field of the irreducible theta divisor, so it is connected.
There are precisely two types of codimension-one branching. If a simple root crosses a branch point , its two lifts exchange, giving nontrivial monodromy on the choices. This yields the hyperplaneIf two roots collide away from the , a local transverse parameter gives roots . Trivialize the two sheets of near . Choices selecting different sheets for the two roots are exchanged when the roots exchange; hence this also causes branching. Its locus is , the hypersurface of tangent hyperplanes to . Away from these two loci all roots and all their lifts vary locally without branching, so there are no other branch components. ConsequentlyFor , is irreducible and nonlinear. Indeed, hyperplane sections of the degree- rational normal curve are binary forms of degree , and the repeated-root hypersurface is their irreducible discriminant of degree . Thus intrinsically separates into its single nonlinear component and its linear components. Biduality recovers , while dualizing recovers the point on .
These data recover the double cover uniquely. Identify with and move infinity away from the recovered branch set. Its function field isAny other quadratic extension with the same simple branch points has a defining rational function whose ratio to this product has even valuation everywhere. On such a rational function is a constant times a square, and every nonzero complex constant is a square. The quadratic extensions are therefore isomorphic; their smooth projective models are isomorphic. This proves the hyperelliptic reconstruction. The branch locus also distinguishes the two cases: the nonhyperelliptic locus has one irreducible branch hypersurface, whereas the hyperelliptic locus has the additional linear components.
Finally handle the small genera. In genus two, the theta divisor is , the image of itself. The Abelian sum map on is injective because a principal divisor with would give a degree-one map to . Its derivative is nonzero since the canonical bundle has no base point, so this compact injective immersion identifies with . In genus one the same argument identifies with its Jacobian variety after choosing an origin. In genus zero the Riemann-Roch theorem supplies a function with one simple pole, giving . These cases complete the proof: the canonically polarized Jacobian determines the curve in every genus.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 18 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume is a connected compact Riemann surface of geometric genus . Work first in , translating back to the Jacobian variety by tensoring with when desired. PutThis is the image of the Abelian sum map from . The Riemann singularity theorem asserts that this image is a reduced Cartier divisor and thatHere multiplicity means the order of a local defining equation in the maximal ideal of the smooth ambient Jacobian variety. Consequently the singular points are precisely the classes with at least two independent sections. We will prove the multiplicity equality, including the nonvanishing of its proposed leading term.
Choose an effective divisor of degree , and a local holomorphic family of degree- line bundles about on , where is a small neighborhood in . Such a family is obtained by varying the Čech cocycles of a line bundle. Since for all , Serre duality gives ; the Riemann-Roch theorem gives . The cohomology and base change for line bundles on a curve then identifiesas vector bundles of rank . Evaluation defines a matrix . For each , its exact sequence isThus vanishes exactly on .
The function is not identically zero. To exhibit a degree- line bundle with no section, choose distinct points giving independent evaluation functionals on . Such points can be chosen successively because a nonzero holomorphic differential form cannot vanish everywhere. For , the Riemann-Roch theorem gives . Choose outside . The unique section of does not vanish at , so has no section. Therefore the evaluation determinant genuinely cuts out a hypersurface. Its support is irreducible, since it is the image of the irreducible symmetric product of a curve .
Fix now , and put , the equality following from the Riemann-Roch theorem. The matrix has an invertible by block. After invertible holomorphic row and column operations, its local form iswhere is by . More explicitly, eliminate the invertible block by its Schur complement; the discarded determinant is a holomorphic unit. Hence is a unit times . Every entry of lies in the maximal ideal, so its order is at least .
The linear term of is the cup-product mapTo verify this, deform the transition functions as and try to lift a section to . Its first-order gluing equation has right side , whose Čech cohomology class is exactly the obstruction to the lift. The kernel-to-cokernel derivative of the evaluation matrix gives that same obstruction. Under Serre duality, if and are bases of and , thenWe must show that this matrix is invertible for some ; otherwise the lower bound on multiplicity would not be an equality.
For each of these two -dimensional section spaces, there are distinct points with independent evaluations. Choose them successively, using a section in the remaining kernel to find the next point. The set of such -tuples is a nonempty open subset of . The two open sets intersect because is irreducible, and we may avoid their diagonals. Choose in that intersection and trivialize and there. Both matricesare invertible. Let be the sum of the evaluation functionals at these points, with any nonzero weights . Thenis invertible. It follows that the degree- polynomial is nonzero, so . This proves the needed invertible cup-product direction for a line bundle on a curve by an explicit construction.
We still need to identify this determinant hypersurface with the reduced image, rather than a multiple of it. Choose distinct points imposing independent conditions on . For their sum , the Riemann-Roch theorem gives . At its class, the calculation above gives order one. The determinant hypersurface has irreducible support, so its sole divisor on an algebraic curve coefficient is one everywhere. A local hypersurface in a smooth space with these divisor on an algebraic curve coefficients is reduced. Thus it is exactly the reduced image , and the multiplicity formula holds for that image itself.
The argument gives the useful additional descriptionFor , its nonzero linear equation is . This agrees with the derivative of the Abelian sum map: if , then is the unique holomorphic differential form vanishing along . For , the local equation has no linear term and the point is singular. When , is the single trivial line bundle in , with multiplicity one; the argument includes this case using the empty effective divisor. In genus zero there is no of effective divisors on an algebraic curve, so that hypothesis is necessary.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 18 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a smooth projective curve over , let be an effective divisor on an algebraic curve of degree , and identify a translate of the Jacobian variety with . The precise derivative theorem iswhere is the connecting homomorphism ofThe target is under Serre duality. Its dual is restriction of holomorphic differential forms to the length- closed subscheme :In particular, this includes derivatives of the local coefficients at repeated points, rather than simply evaluating once for each point of the support.
Here is a local proof of all these identifications. Near a point of multiplicity , take a coordinate vanishing at that point. Nearby effective divisors are represented by monic polynomials of degree . A first-order deformation has equationThese coefficients are the elementary symmetric coordinates on the symmetric product of a curve; they give independent tangent directions even at a repeated point. Dividing the variation of the equation by the original equation identifies the tangent direction with the principal part . Doing this at each point gives , a space of dimension .
To see the derivative of the line bundle directly, use the local frame for and the frame outside the small disks. Relative to the frame at , its transition multiplier changes byFirst-order changes of line bundle transition functions have the form ; changing frames adds a Čech coboundary. Thus the tangent space to the Picard group is , and the derivative is exactly the Čech cocycle of these principal parts, namely .
This agrees with differentiating the Abel integrals, including the sign. If and , the sum of at the roots of has derivativeFor example, expand . The first-order Newton identities give for , and zero for , yielding exactly the residue above. Equivalently the same formula follows by differentiating the contour integral for the sum over roots. Serre duality pairs the principal part class with by the sum of these residues. Locally this pairing is perfect between the principal parts and the jets times . This proves the asserted dual restriction map.
The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology now gives the kernel and rank without any reduced-support assumption:By duality,This is the geometric form of the derivative of the Abelian sum map. For distinct points, the image is spanned by the evaluation vectors of the canonical map; at repeated points, the corresponding osculating directions must also be included. The Riemann-Roch theorem confirms the rank as . When , the Abelian sum map is an immersion at . For and , its image is a hyperplane annihilated by the unique nonzero holomorphic differential form vanishing along , which will be the tangent hyperplane to the theta divisor.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 18 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Fix on a connected compact Riemann surface, and construct its Jacobian variety by periods as in the first solution. For a divisor on an algebraic curve of degree zero, defineChanging the paths adds a period lattice element; changing adds a common integral multiplied by . The Abel theorem for divisors saysEquivalently, effective divisors on an algebraic curve of the same degree have the same Abelian sum exactly when they are equivalent under linear equivalence of divisors.
We need a meromorphic version of the Riemann bilinear relations. Let be a differential of the third kind, with residues at its simple poles, and let be a holomorphic differential form. Choose representatives of the cycles and paths avoiding the poles in the same cut polygon, and let there. ThenHere the equality is an equality of the chosen complex numbers, before taking any quotient. To prove it, remove small disks about the poles. Since on the remaining polygon, its boundary integral is zero. Pairing opposite outer edges gives the left side, just as in the first solution. The clockwise boundary about contributes by the residue theorem. Moving these terms to the other side proves the formula and its sign.
Such an exists whenever . Here is the required existence argument. Let be the reduced support of , and considerLocally the last map takes to . By Serre duality, the obstruction in is dual to restriction of constant functions, so it is the sum of the residues. Thus the kernel of this sum is exactly the image of global meromorphic differentials. Alternatively, the Riemann-Roch theorem gives , and the residue theorem identifies that image with the same codimension-one subspace. Subtracting a linear combination of the normalized holomorphic differential forms makes for every .
Suppose now that . Let with the paths used above. There are integer columns such that . The normalized meromorphic bilinear formula gives . Thereforehas -periods and -periods . Its integrals around the poles are also in . These cycles generate the homology of the punctured surface, sois a single-valued, nowhere-zero holomorphic function away from the support of . Near , write . Then times a nonzero constant, with . It extends meromorphically with order exactly . Hence .
Conversely, if , take . It has residues and every period lies in : continuation of a local logarithm of changes it by an integral multiple of . Write and . Applying the meromorphic bilinear formula to givesThus and , completing both directions without assuming the conclusion as a property of the Jacobian variety.
For completeness, the effective degree- version lives on the symmetric product of a curve . The sum of integrals on is invariant under the finite symmetric group and descends to the Abelian sum map . The quotient is locally described by elementary symmetric coordinates, so repeated points are included. The proof above identifies its fibre over withExplicitly, a nonzero global section gives its effective zero divisor, and two sections give the same divisor precisely when their quotient is constant. These maps are holomorphic in local symmetric coordinates. More intrinsically, a family of effective divisors on an algebraic curve in this fixed class determines a line of sections of , after locally trivializing any line bundle pulled back from the parameter space. Conversely such a line of sections gives its family of zero divisors on an algebraic curve. These operations are inverse and unaffected by that trivialization, proving the identification with the projective space in families as well as on points.
Finally this description identifies the analytic Jacobian variety with . Every degree-zero line bundle has a meromorphic section: after twisting by a sufficiently large effective divisor, the Riemann-Roch theorem supplies a nonzero global section. Its divisor represents the original line bundle. The correspondence to the period quotient is well-defined and injective by the theorem. It is surjective because one may choose distinct points with independent evaluations of holomorphic differential forms; the derivative of the sum of their Abel integrals is then an isomorphism. Hence the subgroup generated by point differences contains an open subset of the connected complex torus, and must be the whole group. Local integration coordinates, or the exponential sequence for , give the same holomorphic identification. This justifies the subsequent use of degree- line bundles as points of a translate of the Jacobian variety.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 18 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a connected compact Riemann surface of geometric genus , equivalently a smooth projective curve over , and put . Choose a symplectic basis of with . For a closed differential form , write and . The underlying bilinear identity isIt holds for any two smooth closed one-forms. In particular, the Riemann bilinear relations for holomorphic differential forms arefor and in the inequality. The inequality fixes the orientation and the sign convention.
To prove the identity, cut along the symplectic basis to a fundamental polygon . On , a closed one-form has a primitive . The Stokes theorem givesOpposite copies of each cut have opposite orientations, while their values of differ by the corresponding period of . Pairing those edges therefore leaves for the th handle. Summing proves the identity. The same calculation can be made with a small disk about the polygon's vertices removed; its extra boundary terms tend to zero, so the vertices cause no additional term.
For holomorphic differential forms , their wedge product of differential forms vanishes: locally both are multiples of . This proves the first relation. If and , thenA nonzero holomorphic differential form is nonzero on an open set, so the integral is strictly positive. Applying the identity to proves the second relation.
These relations first prove that the map taking -periods is injective: if every vanishes, the positive integral just computed would vanish. Since by the Riemann-Roch theorem, it is an isomorphism. Consequently there is a unique basis with . Set . The first relation gives , and the second gives, for any nonzero column ,Thus the normalized period matrix of a complex torus is symmetric and has positive-definite imaginary part:
The integration map sends a cycle to the functional in . In the normalized basis its image is the period latticeIndeed, the real-linear map from to is an isomorphism: its imaginary part is , and is invertible. Its image of is therefore discrete and has compact quotient. This proves thatis a well-defined -dimensional complex torus, rather than merely a quotient by an arbitrary subgroup.
The relations also provide its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. With the convention that a Hermitian form is conjugate-linear in its first argument, put and . Symmetry of givesIn particular is integral and unimodular on , and it is compatible with the complex structure. These are exactly the positivity and integrality conditions for a Riemann form on a complex torus; they make the complex torus a Jacobian variety with a principal polarization of a complex torus. If instead one uses a first-argument-linear Hermitian form, the same alternating form is . Changing the symplectic basis changes the coordinates but not this polarized quotient. For , and the Jacobian variety is a point.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 17 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
On the standard affine charts , use the formal frame and glue rank-one free sheaves byThe transition functions are regular units on overlaps and satisfy the cocycle identity. This constructs the twisting sheaf on projective space as an invertible sheaf for every integer , including negative .
On a nonempty , a section has local expressions , where . Pulling to the punctured affine cone gives . Their agreement on overlaps makes them one homogeneous rational function of degree , regular on . To make its polynomial representation explicit, write one nonzero local coefficient as in the affine coordinates. Homogenize to degrees ; the resulting rational expression isIf the exponent of is negative, move its power to the denominator. Cancel common factors; the greatest common divisor of homogeneous polynomials can be chosen homogeneous. Thus with coprime homogeneous polynomials, , and .
Conversely, for such a homogeneous rational function regular on , its coefficient is regular on : restrict to the slice . These coefficients obey the displayed transition rule and hence define a section. This proves the homogeneous rational sections of a twisting sheaf description in both directions, for arbitrary open rather than only a standard chart.
Now lift a regular degree-zero rational function to the punctured cone. The quotient rule givesThis is a rational function homogeneous of degree . It is independent of the chosen representation because differentiation is a derivation of the rational function field. It is regular wherever is regular: a derivation of a polynomial ring extends to each localization by the quotient rule, and regular functions are locally such fractions. The preceding homogeneous-section description therefore provesZeros of a particular displayed denominator do not invalidate this argument; regularity is a property of the rational function, which can have another local representation.
The map is a -linear sheaf derivation with values in . The universal property of Kähler differentials consequently definesMultiplication by the coordinate section defines the other mapFor a degree- homogeneous polynomial, differentiating each monomial gives . Applying this to the equal-degree numerator and denominator gives for degree-zero , so . This identity is valid in every characteristic.
To prove all the exactness assertions, fix and put for . The Kähler differential sheaf is free there on , because a derivation of the polynomial ring is determined freely by its values on the coordinates. Trivialize each with frame . In this frame,where now denotes the th coordinate vector of the direct sum. The map is surjective, since its th coefficient is one. Its kernel consists exactly of tuples with , so the displayed vectors form a free basis of that kernel. The map sends the differential basis bijectively to this kernel basis and is therefore injective. Exactness on these charts proves the cotangent Euler sequence in homogeneous coordinatesThe proof uses no division by an integer and hence no characteristic-zero assumption.
For , the cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space givesIn particular, , , and for every . The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology of the displayed Euler sequence beginsand gives zero in the remaining degrees. ThusThe nonzero group is generated by the connecting image of the section of . If is admitted, is a point and its cotangent sheaf is zero, so the sole requested group is zero.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






