For a real or complex vector bundle $E$, choose a fiber metric. Its Thom space is the pointed quotientcollapsing the sphere bundle to one basepoint. When the base is compact, this is the one-point compactification of the total space: fiberwise radial compression identifies the total space with the interior of $D(E)$, and all directions approaching its boundary become the single point at infinity.

Decompose ${\mathbb{C}}^{n+m+2}=V\oplus W$ with $V={\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$, $W={\mathbb{C}}^{m+1}$, so the subspace being collapsed is $\mathbb{P}(V)={\mathbb{CP}}^n$. Every line outside it has a representative $(v,w)$ with $w\ne 0$. Its projection to $W$ gives the line $\ell =\mathbb{C}w\in \mathbb{P}(W)={\mathbb{CP}}^m$, and there is a unique complex-linear map $A:\ell \to V$ such that $A(w)=v$. The line in $V\oplus W$ is precisely the graph of $A$. This construction is unaffected by replacing $(v,w)$ with $(\lambda v,\lambda w)$.

Let $\gamma ={\eta }_1$ be the tautological line over $\mathbb{P}(W)$. The graph construction and its inverse are continuous, indeed smooth in the usual affine charts, and identifyA Hermitian metric gives a complex-linear bundle isomorphism $\bar{\gamma }\cong {\gamma }^{\ast }$. With the Hermitian form linear in its first argument, it sends $\bar{v}$ to the functional $w\mapsto ⟨w,v⟩$. Linearity in the conjugate vector is exactly what makes this a complex, rather than merely real, isomorphism. Thus the bundle is $({\bar{\eta }}_1{)}^{\oplus (n+1)}$, with the conjugation bars present in the original PDF.

Collapsing the closed subspace ${\mathbb{CP}}^n$ in compact Hausdorff space ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n+m+1}$ gives the one-point compactification of its open complement: neighborhoods of the collapsed point have compact complements, and conversely every compact subset of the complement is closed in the ambient space. The graph homeomorphism therefore extends over the added point. This proves the projective-space quotient as a Thom space of conjugate tautological lines:

The graph coordinates also determine the normal complex structures requested in the second part. The copy $\mathbb{P}(W)$ corresponds to the zero section of the graph bundle, whose normal bundle is that bundle itself. For a coordinate embedding ${\mathbb{CP}}^k\subset {\mathbb{CP}}^n$, use $W={\mathbb{C}}^{k+1}$ and its complementary coordinate space $V={\mathbb{C}}^{n-k}$. Then the normal bundle of a linear complex-projective embedding isThe complex structure is the linear structure in these graph coordinates. Equivalently, applying the preceding homeomorphism with its parameters $n-k-1$ and $k$ identifies the Thom space of this normal bundle with ${\mathbb{CP}}^n/{\mathbb{CP}}^{n-k-1}$, after reordering coordinates. Define ${\nu }_m$ in the identical way. The Hermitian-metric identification with the conjugate line does not change the complex normal orientation.

The original coordinate embeddings may be nested, so first move one into transverse position. Keep ${\mathbb{CP}}^k=\mathbb{P}(A)$ for the first $k+1$ coordinates, and move ${\mathbb{CP}}^m$ to $\mathbb{P}(B)$ for the last $m+1$ coordinates. A unitary coordinate permutation accomplishes this. Every unitary matrix can be joined to the identity by diagonalizing it and varying its eigenvalue phases continuously, so this move is an ambient isotopy. Its trace gives a cobordism carrying the transported normal complex structure, and hence leaves the input cobordism class unchanged.

If $k+m\ge n$, thenTheir projectivizations are transverse and meet in ${\mathbb{CP}}^r$, where $r=k+m-n$. The direct-sum normal structure from question 1 restricts toThe quotient map defining the transverse normal-bundle isomorphism is complex-linear here, so it agrees with the standard normal complex structure and contributes no orientation sign. If $k+m<n$, the first and last coordinate subspaces have no nonzero vector in common, so their projectivizations are disjoint.

Consequently the product of linear projective subspaces in complex cobordism isThe product degree is $2(2n-k-m)$, equal to the real codimension of the stated intersection when it exists. In the equality case $k+m=n$, the representative is one point with its complex-oriented normal space.

For a complex bundle $E$, write $c_t(E)={\sum }_{j\ge 0}{c}_j^{MU}(E)t^j$, with $c_0(E)=1$ and $c_j(E)=0$ for $j>{\mathrm{rank}}_{\mathbb{C}}E$. The Whitney sum formula for Chern classes in complex cobordism isProducts are in the complex-cobordism cohomology ring; these classes have even degrees $2j$. The splitting principle for complex vector bundles explains the formula: on a splitting space the Chern classes are elementary symmetric functions of the first Chern classes of the line summands, and joining the two lists multiplies their total Chern polynomials.

Use the line convention for the projective bundle:Its relative tautological line bundle isIt is a complex rank-one subbundle of $p^{\ast }\eta$. Choose a Hermitian metric and let $E=\eta (1{)}^{\perp }$, of rank $n-1$, so $p^{\ast }\eta =\eta (1)\oplus E$.

Throughout, $x=c_1^{MU}(\eta (1))$, the tautological line's class, as specified before the final equation. Put $a_k=p^{\ast }{c}_k^{MU}(\eta )$ and $b_k=c_k^{MU}(E)$, with $a_0=b_0=1$. Since $c_t(\eta (1))=1+xt$, Whitney multiplication givesComparison of coefficients gives $a_k=b_k+x{b}_{k-1}$, hence recursively $b_k=a_k-x{b}_{k-1}$. Therefore the Chern classes of a tautological-line complement areand the classes for $k\ge n$ vanish by the rank.

At degree $n$ the same recursion has $b_n=0$, givingMultiplying by $(-1{)}^n$ proves the projective bundle relation in complex cobordismThese alternating signs come from the inverse formal power series $(1+xt{)}^{-1}$. They do not require identifying the First Chern class of a dual line with $-x$, which is generally incorrect in complex cobordism.

The final sentence's designation $x=c_1(\eta )$ must mean the earlier $c_1(\eta (1))$. If instead one substitutes $p^{\ast }{c}_1(\eta )$ literally, the claimed relation is false even in ordinary cohomology. For example, take $\eta =L\oplus L$ over ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$, with $a=c_1(L)$ a generator. Its projective bundle is ${\mathbb{CP}}^2\times {\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and $p^{\ast }{a}^2\ne 0$. With the incorrect substitution $x=2p^{\ast }a$, the rank-two polynomial evaluates toThe tautological-line interpretation above is the one consistent with the bundle decomposition and the stated relation.

Let $\xi$ have real rank $r$, choose a bundle metric, and write $D(\xi ),S(\xi )$ for its disk and sphere bundles. In a multiplicative generalized cohomology theory, a Thom class in a generalized cohomology theory is a classwhose restriction to each fiber pair $(D^r,S^{r-1})$ is the suspension of the coefficient unit $1\in h^0(\mathrm{pt})$ under the chosen oriented identification. Equivalently, it is a fiberwise generator over the coefficient ring compatible with the $h$-orientation. Cup product with this class gives the Thom isomorphism theoremwhere $X$ is the base.

Let $z:X\to D(\xi )$ be the zero section and let $ȷ:h^r(D(\xi ),S(\xi ))\to h^r(D(\xi ))$ forget relative supports. The Euler class in a generalized cohomology theory isEquivalently, identify relative cohomology with reduced cohomology of the Thom space and pull its Thom class back along the zero section followed by the quotient map.

Suppose $s$ is a nowhere-zero section. Normalize it to $\hat{s}(x)=s(x)/\Vert s(x)\Vert \in S(\xi {)}_x$. The mapsgive a homotopy within $D(\xi )$ from $z$ to the sphere-valued section $\hat{s}$. The image $ȷ(u_h(\xi ))$ restricts to zero on $S(\xi )$, by the exact sequence of the pair. Homotopy invariance therefore yieldsThus a nowhere-zero section annihilates generalized Euler classes:The argument uses the actual nowhere-zero section and is valid for any chosen Thom orientation in the multiplicative theory.

Regard ${\mathrm{Mat}}_n(\mathbb{C})$ as a real vector space of dimension $2n^2$, and let ${\mathrm{Herm}}_n(\mathbb{C})$ be the real vector space of Hermitian matrices, of dimension $n^2$. The smooth Gram maphas $F^{-1}(I)=U(n)$ and differential $D{F}_A(K)=A^{\ast }K+K^{\ast }A$. At a unitary $A$, any Hermitian matrix $H$ is obtained by taking $K=AH/2$. Indeed $A^{\ast }K=H/2$ and $K^{\ast }A=H/2$. Hence $I$ is a regular value, and the regular level set theorem proves the unitary group as a regular level set result:

Similarly let $G(A)=A^{T}A$ from ${\mathrm{Mat}}_n(\mathbb{R})$ to the symmetric real matrices, whose dimension is $n(n+1)/2$. At an orthogonal $A$ its differential is $D{G}_A(K)=A^{T}K+K^{T}A$, again onto by choosing $K=AH/2$ for a symmetric $H$. Therefore the orthogonal group as a regular level set hasMatrix multiplication is smooth on both groups, and inversion is conjugate transpose or transpose, respectively, so these manifold structures also make them Lie groups. Both groups are closed and bounded in their finite-dimensional ambient matrix spaces, hence compact.

Realification identifies a unitary complex matrix with an orthogonal transformation of ${\mathbb{R}}^{2n}$. This is a smooth injective group homomorphism, with closed image, so $U(n)$ is the stated Lie subgroup of $O(2n)$. The assumed maximal-rank quotient map has fibers diffeomorphic to $U(n)$. Consequently the compact homogeneous space, also known as the space of orthogonal complex structures, has dimensionThe original PDF's sphere is $S^{n^2}$, with a square on the exponent; its dimension exceeds $d$ by $n$.

For completeness, maps to a sphere above the dimension of a compact smooth manifold are null-homotopic. Let $X$ be a compact smooth manifold of dimension $d<q$, with $q\ge 1$, and let $f:X\to S^q\subset {\mathbb{R}}^{q+1}$ be continuous. Choose a finite open cover on which $f$ is uniformly close to its value at a chosen point of that open set, and take a smooth partition of unity subordinate to the cover. The weighted sum of those chosen sphere values is a smooth map $g_0:X\to {\mathbb{R}}^{q+1}$ uniformly within $ϵ<1$ of $f$. It never vanishes. Normalize it to $g=g_0/\Vert g_0\Vert$. Normalizing $(1-s)f+s{g}_0$ gives a homotopy from $f$ to $g$, since that vector remains within $ϵ$ of the unit vector $f$.

Every value of $g$ is critical because its differential has rank at most $d<q$. The Sard theorem makes its image have measure zero in $S^q$, so it misses some point $p$. The punctured sphere $S^q\setminus \{p\}$ is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb{R}}^q$ and contractible. Thus $g$, and hence $f$, is null-homotopic. This reasoning does not require $X$ to be connected, and all constant maps are homotopic because $S^q$ is path connected.

Apply it with $X=O(2n)/U(n)$ and $q=n^2$, for positive integer $n$. We obtainThe notation means homotopy classes of maps; no homotopy equivalence between the two spaces is asserted.

Put $L=L_1\cap L_2$, and let $j:L\hookrightarrow M$ be inclusion. The transverse intersection theorem makes $L$ a smooth submanifold without boundary, withIt is compact because it is a closed subset of either compact input submanifold.

Write ${\nu }_r=TM{|}_{L_r}/T{L}_r$. On $L$, consider the bundle mapIts kernel is $TL$, and it is onto because $T{L}_1+T{L}_2=TM$ at every intersection point. Thus the normal bundle of a transverse intersection has the actual bundle isomorphismTransfer the direct-sum complex structure $J_1\oplus J_2$ through this isomorphism. This supplies a complex structure on the normal bundle itself, not merely after stabilization.

Geometrically, multiply the two classes by forming their external product in $M\times M$ and pulling it back along the diagonal $\Delta :M\to M\times M$. The transversality hypothesis is precisely what makes the inverse image of $L_1\times L_2$ under $\Delta$ the submanifold $L$. The normal bundle of this inverse image is the direct sum just calculated. Multiplication of the corresponding Thom classes agrees with the Thom class of this direct sum, so the complex cobordism product represented by transverse intersections isIf the inputs have complex normal ranks $a,b$, the product has degree $2(a+b)$. If they are disjoint, the representative is empty and the product is zero.

A symplectic capacity assigns $c(X,\omega )\in [0,\infty ]$ to symplectic manifolds in a fixed dimension, is monotone under symplectic embeddings, satisfies $c(X,a\omega )=ac(X,\omega )$ for $a>0$, and is nontrivial in the sense thatThe second domain is the standard symplectic cylinder. A normalized symplectic capacity assigns $\pi$ to both unit domains, hence $\pi R^2$ to both radius-$R$ domains. The general axioms already give invariance under symplectomorphisms and quadratic scaling under coordinate dilation. For the rigidity argument, use the assumed existence of capacities in each dimension, including after adding a symplectic plane; normalization is not needed.

Let ${\varphi }_j$ be symplectomorphisms converging locally uniformly to a smooth diffeomorphism $\varphi$. Work in Darboux charts. For a sufficiently small solid ellipsoid $E$ centered at a chosen point and $0<a<1$, uniform convergence and degree of a continuous mapping give, for large $j$,For the second inclusion, ${\varphi }^{-1}{\varphi }_j$ is uniformly close to the identity on the larger ellipsoid. Its boundary stays outside $\overline{E}$ and is homotopic there to the identity, so it has degree one about every point of $E$ and must cover $E$. Monotonicity and scaling now give $a^{2}c(E)\le c(\varphi (E))\le a^{-2}c(E)$. Letting $a$ tend to one proves capacity preservation under uniform limits.

At the chosen point, write $T=D\varphi$. The rescaled maps $(\varphi (tz)-\varphi (0))/t$ preserve capacities of ellipsoids and converge uniformly on compact sets to $T$. Applying the same sandwich argument proves that $T$ preserves the capacities of all solid ellipsoids; so does $T^{-1}$.

We prove the required linear capacity rigidity explicitly. Write the standard symplectic form as $\Omega$. Suppose $\Omega (u,v)=1$ andComplete $u,v$ to a symplectic basis, and complete $T^{T}u/\lambda$, with the appropriately signed $T^{T}v/\lambda$, to another symplectic basis. If their basis matrices are $P,P^{\prime }$, then $A=(P^{\prime }{)}^{-1}{T}^{T}P$ has first two columns $\lambda e_1,\pm \lambda f_1$. Hence $A^T$ sends the unit ball into the symplectic cylinder of radius $\lambda$. This matrix differs from $T$ by symplectic linear maps, so it preserves capacities of ellipsoids. Its first coordinate pair is multiplied by $\lambda$, with a possible sign, and therefore $(A^T{)}^k$ sends the unit ball into the cylinder of radius ${\lambda }^k$. Monotonicity givesfor every $k$, contradicting finiteness of the right-hand unit-cylinder capacity as $k$ tends to infinity. For a normalized capacity, the first iterate already gives the contradiction.

A zero pairing is handled by a small perturbation of $u,v$. A pairing of absolute value greater than one gives the same contradiction for $T^{-1}$, after normalizing the transformed pair. Thusfor every pair. The squared bilinear forms agree, so their difference times their sum is the zero polynomial. The real polynomial ring is an integral domain; consequently one factor vanishes identically. Therefore $T$ is either symplectic or anti-symplectic.

To eliminate the negative sign, repeat the argument for ${\varphi }_j\times {\mathrm{id}}_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$, which are symplectomorphisms for $\omega \oplus {\omega }_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$. If ${\varphi }^{\ast }\omega =-\omega$ at the chosen point, the limit pulls this product form back to $-\omega \oplus {\omega }_{{\mathbb{R}}^2}$, which is neither the product form nor its negative. This contradicts the preceding derivative classification. Thus ${\varphi }^{\ast }\omega =\omega$ everywhere. We have proved the Eliashberg–Gromov rigidity theorem: the symplectomorphism group is closed in the $C^0$ topology on diffeomorphisms.

Finally put $E=W^{\perp }$, with perpendicularity taken for the standard Euclidean inner product. Its dimension is two, so being nonisotropic means that the restricted symplectic form is nondegenerate. For the standard compatible complex structure $J$, $W^{\omega }=JE$. If $Jv\in W\cap JE$, then $v\in E$ and $\omega (v,e)=0$ for every $e\in E$, forcing $v=0$. Thus $W$ is a symplectic subspace and admits a symplectic basis extended to the whole space.

In the resulting linear symplectic coordinates, $W$ is $\{q_1=p_1=0\}$. The projection of the bounded set $U$ to the $(q_1,p_1)$ plane is bounded, so $U+W$ lies in a symplectic cylinder of some finite radius $R$. As $U$ is nonempty and open, it contains a ball of some radius $r>0$, which is also contained in $U+W$. Monotonicity and scaling giveas in capacity of a bounded set thickened by a symplectic subspace. For a normalized symplectic capacity, the two bounds simplify to $\pi r^2$ and $\pi R^2$.

An almost complex structure $J$ is compatible with $\omega$ if $J^2=-I$, $\omega (Ju,Jv)=\omega (u,v)$, and $g_J(u,v)=\omega (u,Jv)$ is a positive-definite inner product. To construct one, choose a Riemannian metric $h$ and define $A$ by $h(Au,v)=\omega (u,v)$. The map $A$ is invertible and skew-adjoint, so $-A^2$ is positive definite. Its positive square root $P=(-A^2{)}^{1/2}$ commutes with $A$, andThe same identities show that $J$ preserves $\omega$. The positive square root depends smoothly on $A$, giving a smooth compatible almost complex structure.

For a compatible $J$, applying this metric construction of a compatible almost complex structure to $g_J$ returns $J$. Given $J_0,J_1$, apply it to $(1-t)g_{J_0}+t{g}_{J_1}$ to obtain a path joining them. In fact interpolation to any fixed auxiliary metric gives a contraction. Thus the space is nonempty and connected, and even contractible, by contractibility of compatible almost complex structures.

Regularity of a J-holomorphic curve $u$ means that its linearized Cauchy–Riemann operator $D_u$ is surjective. Differentiating in coordinates givesup to the harmless factor $1/2$ in the convention for ${\bar{\partial }}_J$. For constant $u$, the last term vanishes, $J(u)$ is constant, and the pulled-back tangent bundle is ${\mathbb{CP}}^1\times T_{u}M$. Identifying $T_{u}M$ with ${\mathbb{C}}^n$, this is a direct sum of $n$ copies of the Dolbeault operator on the trivial line bundle. Its cokernel is $H^{0,1}({\mathbb{CP}}^1,\mathcal{O})=0$, by Dolbeault cohomology of the projective line. Hence constant maps are regular for every compatible $J$.

The Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve says that the energy is ${\int }_{{\mathbb{CP}}^1}{u}^{\ast }\omega$. If the homology class is zero, this integral is zero, forcing $du=0$. Thus every zero-class sphere is constant and regular.

In real dimension four, the Fredholm index of the parametrized sphere operator is $4+2c_1(A)$. At a regular nonconstant sphere, quotienting by the six-dimensional Möbius transformation group gives a local moduli space, or an orbifold for finite stabilizers, of real dimensionThis is the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres.

For a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class $A$, the adjunction inequality for a simple J-holomorphic sphere gives $c_1(A)\le A^2+2$. If $A^2\le -2$, the displayed moduli dimension is negative, so such a regular simple J-holomorphic sphere cannot exist. To cover nonsimple maps as well, interpret regularity here as regularity for all nonconstant maps under discussion. A degree-$m$ cover, $m\ge 2$, of a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class $B$ has $A=mB$, with $B^2\le -1$ and $c_1(B)\le 1$. Its local family of rational covering maps of the projective line modulo domain reparametrization has real dimension $4m-4$, while the predicted dimension isIt therefore cannot be regular. This proves there are no regular spheres in a class with square at most minus two, by negative-square exclusion under full sphere regularity. Regularity only for simple curves would not suffice: multiple covers of an exceptional minus-one sphere are the counterexample.

A symplectic blowup replaces a small symplectic ball around the point by an exceptional divisor ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$, for ${\dim }_{\mathbb{R}}X=2n$. One can construct its form by symplectic reduction. In a Darboux chart, consider ${\mathbb{C}}^n\times \mathbb{C}$ with the circle actionOn ${\mu }^{-1}(R^2/2)$ the action is free because $z\ne 0$. Its quotient therefore carries a smooth symplectic form. Where $w\ne 0$, choose the representative with $w$ positive real; the reduced form is the original form on $|z|>R$. Where $w=0$, the quotient is the Hopf fibration quotient of $|z|=R$, namely ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$. The local quotient is the tautological complex line bundle near its zero section, hence the local blowup. Glue this model to the exterior of the ball to obtain a symplectic form on the blowup.

The area of a projective line in the exceptional divisor is $\epsilon =\pi R^2$. For a closed $X$, changing this size changes the symplectic volume:Consequently the blowup is not determined up to symplectomorphism without a size choice. The underlying smooth blowup is fixed, but the symplectic construction has a parameter, as in symplectic blowup size changes volume.

For the blowdown map $\pi$ and exceptional divisor $E$, the First Chern class isIn real dimension four this becomes ${\pi }^{\ast }{c}_1(TX)-\mathrm{PD}[E]$, the first Chern class formula for a symplectic blowup.

The tangent bundle of the standard four-torus is a trivial complex rank-two bundle, so its symplectic canonical class is zero. For a generic fiber $F$ of a symplectic Lefschetz pencil, the symplectic adjunction formula gives $2g-2=F^2$. Two generic fibers intersect precisely at the base points, each with local intersection number one in the pencil model $[z_1:z_2]$. HenceThis is base-point count for a Lefschetz pencil on a symplectic four-torus.

The symplectic neighborhood theorem says that a symplectomorphism between compact symplectic submanifolds, together with a symplectic vector bundle isomorphism of their symplectic normal bundles, extends to a symplectomorphism of neighborhoods. To outline the proof, use tubular neighborhoods to extend the bundle identification smoothly. The two pulled-back symplectic forms agree as bilinear forms along the zero section. The relative Poincaré lemma writes their difference as $d\alpha$, with $\alpha$ vanishing there. Their linear interpolation ${\omega }_t$ remains nondegenerate on a sufficiently small neighborhood. Solvingand integrating $V_t$ gives the relative Moser theorem; the flow fixes the submanifold and carries one form to the other.

For the symplectic fiber sum along a square-zero surface, the self-intersection is the Euler number of the oriented rank-two normal bundle. Thus each normal bundle is trivial. Rescale one ambient symplectic form if necessary to equalize the areas of the two copies of $C$. The Moser theorem for the surface then supplies a base identification preserving their area forms. The symplectic neighborhood theorem identifies each neighborhood with a product carryingRemove small disk neighborhoods and glue collars with the base identification andfor a suitable positive constant $a$. Both signs reverse, so the normal two-forms match; the base forms already match. They define a closed nondegenerate two-form across the neck, agreeing with the ambient forms elsewhere. This constructs the symplectic sum. Its construction uses the area normalization and the chosen normal-bundle gluing.

For a smooth counterexample, take $X=Y={\mathbb{CP}}^2$, and in a small four-ball in each choose an unknotted sphere bounding a three-ball. These spheres are null-homologous and have self-intersection zero. Their standard smooth fiber sum isIndeed, the complement of the standard $S^2\times D^2$ in $S^4$ is $S^1\times D^3$; doubling these complements gives $S^1\times S^3$, and the two ambient projective-plane summands remain as connected sums. This is the smooth fiber sum along unknotted null-homologous spheres.

In the induced orientation, both summands in $Z={\mathbb{CP}}^2\#({\mathbb{CP}}^2\#(S^1\times S^3))$ have positive positive index of the intersection form. The symplectic connected-sum obstruction therefore rules out a symplectic form: connected-sum vanishing of the Seiberg–Witten invariant of a four-manifold contradicts Taubes nonvanishing theorem. In the opposite orientation the intersection form is negative definite, also ruling out a symplectic form, whose class has positive square. Thus the smooth fiber sum need not be symplectic.

Let ${\Phi }_t$ be the local flow of a vector field $V$. The Lie derivative of a differential form is ${\mathcal{L}}_V\eta ={\frac{d}{dt}|}_{t=0}{\Phi }_t^{\ast }\eta$. We prove Cartan's magic formulaBoth sides are degree-zero derivations of an algebra on the exterior algebra of differential forms. They agree on a function $f$, since ${\iota }_{V}df=V(f)$. They also agree on $df$: pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, so ${\mathcal{L}}_{V}df=d(Vf)$, while $(d{\iota }_V+{\iota }_{V}d)df=d(Vf)$. Locally every differential form is a sum of products of functions and coordinate differentials, proving the identity in every degree.

For a compactly supported Hamiltonian vector field $V_H$, take the convention ${\iota }_{V_H}\omega =-dH$. Since $d\omega =0$, Cartan's magic formula gives ${\mathcal{L}}_{V_H}\omega =0$, so its complete flow of a vector field consists of symplectomorphisms. Given $p$ and $v\in T_{p}M$, a bump function lets us choose a compactly supported $H$ with $d{H}_p=-{\iota }_v{\omega }_p$, and hence $V_H(p)=v$. Choose such fields for a basis of $T_{p}M$. Their successive small-time flows give a map with invertible derivative at the origin. The inverse function theorem makes the orbit of $p$ open. Every orbit is open; because $M$ is connected, there is only one orbit. Thus the compactly supported symplectomorphisms act transitively on points, by Hamiltonian transitivity on a connected symplectic manifold.

On the unit sphere, the standard symplectic area is $4\pi$. The equator has complementary disks of areas $2\pi ,2\pi$, whereas the latitude at height $1/2$ has complementary disks of areas $\pi ,3\pi$: the cap above height $h$ has area $2\pi (1-h)$. A symplectomorphism must preserve the unordered pair of complementary areas. Therefore no such symplectomorphism exists, by complementary areas obstruct symplectic equivalence of separating curves.

An essential right ideal intersects every nonzero right ideal nontrivially. A regular element of a ring is a two-sided non-zero-divisor: both $cr=0$ and $rc=0$ imply $r=0$. Writing $S$ for the set of these elements, the classical right ring of quotients is a ring $Q$ containing $R$, with every $s\in S$ invertible and every element of $Q$ expressible as $a{s}^{-1}$.

Goldie theorem states that a semiprime ring has a semisimple Artinian classical right ring of quotients if and only if it is a right Goldie ring: it satisfies the ascending chain condition on right annihilators and has finite uniform dimension. In particular, every semiprime ring that is a right Noetherian ring satisfies the theorem. We prove the requested case directly using the supplied assumption about essential right ideals.

First let $c\in S$. If a nonzero right ideal $B$ had $B\cap cR=0$, the sumwould be direct. Indeed, a finite relation $b_0+c{b}_1+\cdots +c^m{b}_m=0$ gives $b_0\in B\cap cR$, hence $b_0=0$; cancellation of $c$ repeats the argument. Each $c^{j}B$ is a nonzero right ideal, so the partial sums form a strictly ascending chain. This contradicts right Noetherianity. Thus a regular principal right ideal in a right Noetherian ring is essential, and every right ideal containing $c$ is essential.

For $r\in R$ and $c\in S$, putThis is an essential right ideal. To check this, take a nonzero right ideal $B$. If $rB=0$, then $B\subseteq E$. Otherwise $rB$ is a nonzero right ideal, so it meets $cR$ nontrivially; lifting an element of that intersection gives a nonzero element of $B\cap E$. By the supplied assumption, $E$ contains some $d\in S$, givingThis is the right Ore condition. The set $S$ is multiplicatively closed, and the denominator cancellation condition holds because its elements are non-zero-divisors. Therefore Ore theorem constructs $Q$ and embeds $R$ in it.

For every right ideal $J$ of $Q$,Indeed, if $x=a{s}^{-1}\in J$, then $a=xs\in J\cap R$. Contracting an ascending chain of right ideals of $Q$ to $R$ therefore proves that $Q$ is a right Noetherian ring.

Suppose $J$ is an essential right ideal of $Q$. For a nonzero right ideal $B$ of $R$, choose $0\ne x\in J\cap BQ$. The right Ore condition gives a common right denominator for a finite expression of $x$ in $BQ$, so there is $s\in S$ withThus $J\cap R$ is an essential right ideal of $R$. It contains a regular element of a ring, which becomes a unit in $Q$, and consequently $J=Q$.

Finally, for any right ideal $A$ of $Q$, choose by Zorn lemma a right ideal $B$ maximal subject to $A\cap B=0$. Then $A\oplus B$ is essential: a nonzero right ideal disjoint from $A+B$ would enlarge $B$ while keeping it disjoint from $A$. Hence $A\oplus B=Q$. Every submodule of the right regular module has a complement, making it a semisimple module. Since it is also Noetherian, it is a finite direct sum of simple modules. It is therefore Artinian, and $Q$ is a semisimple Artinian ring. This is semisimplicity of a classical quotient from regular elements in essential ideals.

The Jacobson radical is $J(R)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals. Every proper right ideal $I$ lies in such an $L$: the union of a chain of proper right ideals containing $I$ is a right ideal and remains proper because it omits $1$. Thus Zorn lemma applies.

The right-module form of Nakayama lemma says that a finitely generated module $M$ with $MJ=M$ is zero. More generally, if $N$ is a submodule and $M=N+MJ$, then $M=N$. To prove the first statement, suppose $M\ne 0$ and take a generating set $m_1,\dots ,m_s$ of minimal size. Since $MJ=M$, there are $a_i\in J$ withThe unit criterion for the Jacobson radical makes $1-a_s$ a unit. Hence $m_s$ is generated by the other $m_i$, a contradiction. Apply this result to the quotient module $M/N$ to obtain the general form.

For an injective module endomorphism $f$ of an Artinian module $M$, the descending chain condition givesfor some $n$. Given $x\in M$, write $f^n(x)=f^{n+1}(y)$; injectivity of $f^n$ gives $x=f(y)$. Thus $f$ is surjective, as asserted by Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.

Now $R$ is a semilocal ring and $\overline{V}=V/VJ$ is a finitely generated module over the right Artinian ring $\overline{R}=R/J$. A finite direct sum of copies of $\overline{R}$, and hence its quotient module $\overline{V}$, is an Artinian module. The module endomorphism $\alpha$ induces $\overline{\alpha }$ on $\overline{V}$, and the given inverse-image condition says precisely that $\ker \overline{\alpha }=0$. The preceding argument makes $\overline{\alpha }$ surjective, soThe quotient module $W=V/\alpha (V)$ is finitely generated and satisfies $WJ=W$. Applying Nakayama lemma yields $W=0$. Therefore $\alpha$ is surjective, by surjectivity from injectivity modulo the Jacobson radical.

Suppose first that $M$ is a Noetherian module. An ascending chain of submodules of $N$ is also a chain in $M$, so it stabilizes. A chain in the quotient module $M/N$ lifts to a chain in $M$, so it also stabilizes. Thus both $N$ and $M/N$ are Noetherian modules.

Conversely, let $M_1\subseteq M_2\subseteq \cdots$ be a chain of submodules of $M$. If $N$ and $M/N$ are Noetherian modules, both $M_i\cap N$ and $(M_i+N)/N$ stabilize, say for $i\ge i_0$. For $x\in M_{i+1}$, equality of the images gives $y\in M_i$ with $x-y\in N$. Then $x-y\in M_{i+1}\cap N=M_i\cap N$, and hence $x\in M_i$. This proves the extension direction of Noetherian modules in a short exact sequence.

The left regular module $R$ is Noetherian because $R$ is a left Noetherian ring. Applying the extension result inductively makes each finite direct sum $R^s$ Noetherian. Every finitely generated module on the left is a quotient module of such a direct sum, so it is Noetherian.

A poly-(cyclic or finite) group has a finite subnormal serieswhose factors are cyclic groups or finite groups. We prove that the group ring $R[G_i]$ is a left Noetherian ring by induction. Put $A=R[G_{i-1}]$. A finite factor makes $R[G_i]$ a finite free left $A$-module, using a coset transversal. Its left ideals are $A$-submodules, so finite-module extension preserves Noetherianity handles this case.

If the factor is infinite cyclic, choose a lift $t$ of a generator and let $\sigma (a)=ta{t}^{-1}$. The group ring is the skew Laurent polynomial ring $A[t,t^{-1};\sigma ]$. Here is the required left-sided skew Hilbert basis theorem. For a left ideal $L\subseteq A[t;\sigma ]$, defineEach $I_n$ is a left ideal of $A$. Left multiplication by $t$ gives $I_n\subseteq I_{n+1}$. The ascending chain condition makes these ideals constant for $n\ge n_0$; choose finitely many generators for each $I_n$, $0\le n\le n_0$, and lift them to polynomials $f_{nj}\in L$.

If $f\in L$ has degree $d\ge n_0$ and leading coefficient $a_d$, writeSubtracting ${\sum }_j{\sigma }^d(r_j)t^{d-n_0}{f}_{n_{0}j}$ cancels the leading coefficient. For $d<n_0$, use the lifts for $I_d$ instead. Induction on polynomial degree shows that the finitely many $f_{nj}$ generate $L$. Thus the skew polynomial ring of an automorphism is a left Noetherian ring.

Finally, for a left ideal $K$ of $A[t,t^{-1};\sigma ]$, its intersection with $A[t;\sigma ]$ has finitely many generators. Every $f\in K$ satisfies $t^{m}f\in A[t;\sigma ]$ for some $m\ge 0$, so those same generators generate $K$ after multiplication by $t^{-m}$. This completes the induction and proves that $R[G]$ is left Noetherian, the left-sided form of group rings of poly-(cyclic or finite) groups are Noetherian.