Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 C C2 iv Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 C C2 iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Gauss lemma for quadratic residues states: for , take the least positive residues of modulo , and let be the number greater than . Then
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 C C2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Euler criterion states thatWhen , the power is congruent to or , according as is or is not a quadratic residue.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 C C2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For an odd prime number , the Legendre symbol is zero if , is if is a nonzero square modulo , and is otherwise.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Choose an inscribed regular tetrahedron from one of the regular compounds of five tetrahedra in the dodecahedron, and let be its rotational stabilizer. Its twelve tetrahedral rotations preserve the dodecahedron. Concretely, with , use dodecahedron vertices together with cyclic coordinate placements of . The tetrahedron has the four cube vertices whose coordinate product is . Cyclic coordinate permutations and even numbers of coordinate sign changes preserve both vertex sets, have determinant , and give twelve distinct rotations. No other rotation can preserve this tetrahedron, because a regular tetrahedron has only twelve orientation-preserving symmetries.
Their action on its four vertices is faithful and consists exactly of the even permutations: the eight rotations through induce three-cycles, the three half-turns induce double transpositions, and there is the identity. Thus , independently of part (ii).
Finally a nonidentity element of has order two or three. In the dodecahedron's full rotation group, all fifteen half-turns about opposite-edge axes form one conjugacy class, and all twenty third-turns about opposite-vertex axes form one conjugacy class. These geometric conjugacies follow by carrying the corresponding oriented axes to one another by rotations. A normal subgroup containing such an element must contain its whole class, which already has more than twelve elements. Hence no nonidentity normal subgroup of is contained in , verifying the required extra property.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let act by left multiplication on its five left cosets of . This gives a group homomorphism . Its kernel is the core of a subgroup, : an element fixes every coset precisely when all its conjugates lie in . It is a normal subgroup contained in , so the hypothesis forces the kernel to be trivial. Thus embeds in .
The image has order and index two, hence is the kernel of a surjection . All transpositions are conjugate and generate , so under any such surjection they must all have the same nonidentity image. This determines the map uniquely as the sign homomorphism. Its kernel is , proving .
To prove simplicity directly, the nonidentity conjugacy classes in have sizes . A double transposition has centralizer of order four in ; a three-cycle has centralizer of order three; a five-cycle has centralizer of order five, yielding the two classes of size twelve. The class sizes together with the identity account for all sixty elements. A normal subgroup must be a union of these classes containing the identity, and its order must divide sixty. None of the proper nontrivial sums of these sizes with one is a divisor of sixty. Therefore , and hence , is simple.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A group action assigns to each and a point so that and . The orbit of is . The action is transitive if there is exactly one orbit, equivalently any point can be carried to any other by some group element.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 iv Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The multiplicative group has order , so Lagrange's theorem for finite groups gives for . Including zero, for every . Therefore is the identity. No positive smaller power is the identity by part (iii), soFor this says that Frobenius itself is the identity, as it should be.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Here the iteration index is a positive integer: . If , then fixes and the generator, so it fixes all of . Every element of would then solve . A nonzero polynomial of degree over a field has at most roots, contradicting . Thus . The printed inequality alone omits positivity of ; at the claimed inequality would be false.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Define for every . In characteristic , all intermediate binomial coefficients vanish, so ; multiplicativity and preservation of one are immediate. If , then and the field property gives . Thus this field homomorphism is injective, and finiteness makes it surjective. It is therefore a field automorphism, sending to as required.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For a simple field extension, the powers form a basis when the minimal polynomial has degree : reduction modulo that polynomial spans the extension, and a relation of smaller degree would contradict minimality. Hence . The field is , whose dimension is , giving .
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Regard as a vector space over its prime subfield . Since is finite, a maximal linearly independent list terminates and is a finite basis, of some dimension . Each field element has a unique coordinate vector in , so
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
If the positive characteristic were composite, say with , then while neither factor is zero, by minimality of . This contradicts a field having no zero divisors. Thus the characteristic is a prime .
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P4 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Starting with , choose real shifts , factor , and setEach step is an orthogonal similarity, so the eigenvalues are preserved and all iterates are similar. If , transposing proves symmetry of , completing the induction.
The given matrix is the Householder reflectionIt has eigenvalue along and on its orthogonal complement, hence . In the positive-diagonal QR convention its unshifted factorization is , , so the next iterate is again . Thus unshifted QR is stationary, despite the matrix generally having nonzero off-diagonal entries. If arbitrary diagonal signs are allowed in , a step can instead replace by for a diagonal sign matrix ; every off-diagonal magnitude remains unchanged. Such sign changes still make no progress towards diagonalization.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P4 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Only the first and third coordinates occur in the first two columns. Normalize the first column to get . Removing its component from the second column leaves , of length seven, so . The remaining orthonormal columns can be and . Taking their dot products with the columns of givesThe columns of are orthonormal, and direct multiplication gives the source matrix. Exploiting its two-coordinate first block avoids unnecessary four-dimensional elimination.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P4 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A QR factorization is , where and is upper triangular. If is orthogonal, so is . Its inverse is upper triangular, but is lower triangular, forcing to be diagonal. Orthogonality then givesWith the customary positive diagonal convention, .
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P3 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P3 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The singular weight requires care about the space of admissible polynomials. Since , has finite squared norm. A polynomial has finite error relative to near zero exactly when : a nonzero constant term makes the integrand asymptotic to , whose integral diverges. If , the residual is and the integrand is .
Thus the full space is not a subspace of , so the projection theorem cannot be applied to it as written. Nevertheless a unique best finite-error approximation does exist inFor , this is the zero space and the answer is . For , is finite dimensional and its Gram matrix is positive definite, because a nonzero polynomial cannot vanish on an interval. Solving the normal equations therefore gives its unique orthogonal projection of . All omitted polynomials have infinite error, so this also minimizes the extended error over the full polynomial set. The distinction is an invalid full-space projection premise, not nonexistence of every finite-error best approximation. As throughout weighted , use equivalence classes for the underlying measure.
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Write and . Orthogonality of to and givesThe Gram matrix is positive definite, with determinant , so the solution is unique. Solving yields
Past exam of the options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 P P3 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Use the usual weighted interpretation, identifying functions equal almost everywhere; on raw pointwise functions the displayed integral is only a seminorm. Assume . If is orthogonal to , then for every ,Conversely, suppose minimizes the error. For and every real , compare with :If the linear coefficient were nonzero, a sufficiently small with the appropriate sign would make the expression negative. Thus for every , proving best approximation is equivalent to orthogonality of the residual.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





