For each normal sample, its sample mean is independent of its sample variance, and the scaled residual sum of squares is chi-squared. Independence of the samples also makes their two residual sums independent. Adding their chi-squared distributions gives
Consequently
The pooled variance is also independent of the difference of sample means.
Independence of the two samples makes their sample means independent normal random variables. A difference of independent normal random variables is normal, with the means subtracted and the variances added. Thus
A state is recurrent if the probability of returning to at a strictly positive time, starting at , equals one. It is transient if that probability is less than one. If and communicate, choose with and . Chapman-Kolmogorov gives
If is recurrent, summing over makes the right-hand side diverge, so the allowed recurrence criterion proves recurrent. Interchanging proves recurrence is shared throughout a communicating class, and therefore transience is shared too.
For the simple random walk, an odd number of steps cannot return to its starting point, and
For the return series diverges like , proving recurrence. For , , its tail is bounded by a convergent geometric series since , proving transience. At or the walk is deterministic and never returns. Translation invariance transfers the conclusion to every state. Thus recurrence holds exactly when .
Condition on and apply the Markov property and time homogeneity:
Thus the transition matrices satisfy ; since and , induction gives . Averaging over the initial state gives
If , induction gives , so this probability equals for every . This is stationarity of the initial distribution.
Reflection in the line is . The printed expression has two conjugation bars: . On the line , this is , which is real; hence its stream function vanishes there. Applying this reflection to the dipole gives
Consequently
The image lies at , with moment , on the opposite side of the wall.
Reflection in the real axis replaces a dipole at with an image at of moment . Reflection in the imaginary axis places the image at with moment . Applying both reflections gives the image at with moment . Thus
For example, on the real axis the first two terms are conjugates and the last two are conjugates. On the imaginary axis the first and third terms are conjugates, as are the second and fourth. The potential is real on each wall, so both walls are streamlines. The only singularity in the open first quadrant is the original dipole.
The Milne-Thomson circle theorem says that, when is a complex potential analytic inside and on and all its flow singularities are outside, the potential outside an impermeable circle is
The reflected expression is analytic in the exterior: conjugating a local power series turns its argument into . It creates only interior image singularities. On we have , so is real. The stream function is therefore constant on the circle, which is the impermeability condition. At infinity the reflected term is , so it changes the velocity by and leaves the imposed far flow unchanged. These observations prove the theorem, up to the irrelevant additive potential constant and with no extra circulation introduced.
With , , and unit radius, it gives
The image dipole is at with moment ; writing the image term this way changes only an additive constant.
The Lagrange multiplier condition says that at a constrained local extremum of a continuously differentiable objective on a regular surface , its gradient is normal to the tangent plane: for some scalar multiplier.
First the box must be centred at zero. If the two face coordinates in one direction are , subtracting the ellipsoid equations for two vertices differing only in that coordinate gives . A nondegenerate box has , hence . Its positive half-sides therefore satisfy and its volume is .
The feasible closed octant is compact, the boundary gives zero volume, and some interior box has positive volume, so the maximum is interior. Apply multipliers to there:
Thus the three squared scaled coordinates are equal and sum to one. The unique positive solution gives
The defining function is smooth and has gradient . This cannot vanish on its zero level, since the origin does not lie there. The regular level-set theorem therefore makes a two-dimensional submanifold, with tangent space and normal space
A two-dimensional embedded submanifold is locally flattened by a continuously differentiable coordinate diffeomorphism of an ambient open neighbourhood onto a coordinate plane, or equivalently locally admits a regular two-parameter chart. A tangent vector at is the velocity of a differentiable curve in through . All such vectors form the two-dimensional tangent space , the image of the differential of a regular parametrization. Normal vectors form its orthogonal complement in , which has dimension one.
The claim is false for an arbitrary codomain . Let with its usual topology, let be the Sierpiński space with open sets , and define , for . This is a continuous map: the only nontrivial open-set preimage is , which is relatively open in .
The sets are nonempty, nested and compact. But
Thus the extra generality in the printed codomain changes the assertion materially. This is the failure of nested compact image intersection without closed fibers.
If the codomain is a T1 space, the continuous images of nested compact intersections theorem does give the desired equality. The forward inclusion holds for every map. For the reverse, take and set . The fibers are closed by continuity and the T1 property, so the are nested nonempty closed subsets of the compact set . The finite intersection property gives , with . It is enough that these particular fibers be closed in ; a Hausdorff codomain, as in the native self-map formulation, is a familiar sufficient assumption.
In the usual real line, take for . The sets are closed, nonempty and nested, but no real number belongs to all of them.
Take radius . Part (a) gives one containment. For a point with , define for . Then , while as . Hence every point of the closed ball belongs to the closure of the open ball, proving equality. Positive radius is the standard open-ball convention; a zero-radius open ball would be empty.
Intersect the ambient balls with . All points on the vertical arm have distance at least from the centre, so the open ball is
The closed ball also contains the endpoints of that segment and the lower half of the vertical arm:
The closure of the open ball in is just . Both endpoints are limits of points in the open segment, whereas a vertical point of positive height has a small enough neighbourhood disjoint from it. Thus every point with witnesses strict containment.
Figure 1.
Ambient and relative maximum-norm balls
. The square on the left is the ambient closed ball. On the right, the open ball is the horizontal segment without its endpoints; its closure omits the additional vertical part of the relative closed ball. Details.
The condition gives the closed square
Its four edges and corners are included, as shown in the left panel of the figure below.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact