Yes. Take exterior poles . By part (i), choose a polynomial with
For any fixed , , and therefore . The triangle inequality proves
This is pointwise convergence. It is not uniform convergence on : every polynomial is bounded on the closed diamond, whereas is unbounded as along .
Let . Choose a unit complex number normal to a supporting side of this convex set, with
Such a choice exists explicitly: take , where are the signs of the real and imaginary parts of ; then and the strict inequality is exactly the hypothesis. Set . Since on ,
For sufficiently large , the former is strictly smaller than the latter uniformly on . Consequently .
The geometric series now supplies actual approximating polynomials:
Choose so the right-hand side is below . This proves the required uniform approximation without assuming a general approximation theorem.
Let , the continuous Geometric Asian option average. Under the same risk-neutral measure,
The Brownian integral is Gaussian with mean zero and variance
Thus , where and . Define
The truncated lognormal distribution calculation from (i) gives
For comparison, a lognormal call written in terms of its mean and log-variance is . Differentiation gives and , where is the standard normal density. The terminal stock has and , while . Therefore
since this condition gives and the log-variance is strictly smaller. In particular the requested inequality holds for the usual nonnegative interest rate.
The PDF gives no sign restriction on , so its unconditional comparison needs qualification. If , then , and as the two prices tend to and . By continuity, sufficiently small positive strikes reverse the claimed inequality. Also strictness needs nonzero volatility or another source of a strict mean inequality. These qualifications do not affect the pricing formula.
A standard Brownian motion starts at zero, has continuous sample paths and independent increments, with for .
Assume and ; changing the sign of just changes the sign of Brownian motion. Itô formula gives . In the complete Black-Scholes model, the risk-neutral pricing theorem prices an integrable payoff by , where the discounted asset is a martingale. Girsanov theorem therefore replaces the logarithmic drift by :
Let and . The exercise event is . Completing the square in the Gaussian integral yields
Consequently and . Thus the European call option price is
The physical drift disappears because the price is obtained under the martingale measure. If in an arbitrage-free deterministic model, and the formula is interpreted by its zero-volatility limit.
Let , where . Deleting odd arrivals leaves . Put , so . From the probability generating function ,
Thus and . Therefore
To establish strict underdispersion for every , subtract the mean:
Here and for , because is equivalent to . Hence
which excludes a doubly-stochastic Poisson representation by part (iii).
Put , finite almost surely. Conditional on the intensity process, is Poisson with mean and variance . The law of total expectation and law of total variance give
Consequently for a Cox process,
These identities apply when the moments are finite; if the mean is finite but the integrated intensity has infinite variance, the count variance is infinite and the inequality still holds.
To derive the distribution from the infinitesimal characterization, let . Independent increments give the forward equations
With and , for , these have solution
Substitution verifies each equation, and the probabilities sum to one. Alternatively the probability generating function solves , , giving . For a general locally integrable rate, time-changing a unit-rate Poisson process by gives the same formula.
An Inhomogeneous Poisson process with deterministic, nonnegative locally integrable rate is a counting process with , independent increments, and increment distribution
Equivalently, for continuous rates it is a simple counting process with independent increments and infinitesimal probabilities and . For merely locally integrable rates use the integrated-rate formulation, which avoids a pointwise regularity assumption.
Continue with . For each integer , let . These events decrease with , and their probabilities are at least by (iii). Continuity from above of a measure gives
It is important not to assume that this exact threshold event is automatically a tail event: a vanishing change of partial sums can affect infinitely many exact comparisons at the threshold. Instead use
For any fixed , subtracting shows that . Thus is measurable with respect to every tail sigma-algebra. The event has positive probability by the preceding bound, so Kolmogorov zero-one law makes its probability one. Intersecting over all positive integers gives
For any specified real , this conclusion implies infinitely many with , completing both requests. In the excluded zero-variance case the limsup is zero.
A necessary qualification is . As printed, the assumptions also permit almost surely; then for every , so the asserted positive lower bound is false. Assume the intended nondegenerate case.
The central limit theorem states that independent identically distributed variables with mean zero and finite positive variance satisfy , where . Since the normal distribution has no atom at ,
For example,
Let . These sets are pairwise disjoint and
By countable additivity, . The tails of this convergent nonnegative series tend to zero, so
This proves continuity from above of a measure and explains the finite-measure assumption.
For independent random variables , let , , and let the tail sigma-algebra be . Kolmogorov zero-one law states that every has probability zero or one.
Such an event is independent of each by independence of the variables. The collection of events satisfying is a Dynkin system: it contains the whole space and is closed under complements and disjoint countable unions. It contains the pi-system , which generates . The pi-lambda theorem therefore makes independent of all of . Since itself belongs to ,
Let . The space of Kähler differentials is the -vector space generated by symbols , , with relations
Its elements are rational differentials. A local parameter is a nonconstant element of , so is a rational function field and is finite. In characteristic zero this extension is separable.
For any let be its minimal polynomial over . Differentiating gives
Separability ensures , so is a multiple of , and hence . To show , the derivation on extends uniquely to the separable extension , by the same differentiated minimal-polynomial formula; it sends to , so the universal differential cannot vanish. Thus
For a nonzero differential , define its valuation of a rational differential at by
Concretely with a unit in the local ring, and this valuation is . For one conventionally assigns , not an integer.
For a divisor on the smooth projective curve,
This is a -vector space of rational functions with the prescribed pole bounds. A nonzero rational function on a projective curve has divisor of degree zero. Thus if there can be no nonzero element of .
For any point with coefficient in , use a local parameter at . The linear map sending to the residue-field value of has kernel and target , since is algebraically closed. Therefore . If , successively subtract a point times. The final divisor has degree and no nonzero sections, giving
Equivalently the universally valid bound is . The PDF states the unqualified bound ; literally this is false when , because its right side is negative. For example has .
Let be a homotopy from to . The inverse images form a finite open cover of the compact product. By the Lebesgue number lemma there is such that every subset of diameter less than lies in one of these inverse images.
Choose a barycentric subdivision with all its open stars of diameter less than , and times with gaps less than . For each vertex and each time , the set
(with the evident endpoint conventions) has diameter less than in the product metric. Choose a vertex of whose open star contains its image under , and set .
At time , the star condition makes a simplicial approximation to . Adjacent intervals overlap, so choose a time in their overlap and a point in the interior of any simplex of . Its image belongs to the stars of every and for . As in (i), their vertices lie in one carrier simplex, proving contiguity. Thus the sequence starts with an approximation to , ends with one to , and has contiguous adjacent pairs. Relabeling its indices gives the requested .
Here denotes contiguity, with the endpoint maps approximating respectively.
For contiguous simplicial maps, and lie in a common simplex of for every . Its convexity makes
a well-defined map into , using the ambient Euclidean realization. The formula is continuous globally and agrees across simplex faces. At it equals , so it is the desired homotopy.
A simplicial approximation to is a vertex map satisfying the open-star condition
for every vertex . Here an open star consists of points whose barycentric coordinate at that vertex is positive. This condition ensures that the images of the vertices of every simplex span a simplex of , and the vertex map extends linearly over simplices.
To triangulate , order the vertices of each complex consistently. For each product , use the simplices whose vertices follow monotone lattice paths from to , taking a step in one coordinate at a time. These prism triangulations agree on faces and cover the product.
If both approximate , choose in the relative interior of a simplex . Then belongs to the open star of every vertex of . Hence belongs to every open star of and . Its unique carrier simplex in contains all these vertices. Thus and are faces of that one simplex, proving that are contiguous simplicial maps.
Put and let . The even residues are precisely the negatives, in reverse order, of the odd residues . Hence their product is in the finite field . Applying Wilson theorem gives
The initial factor can be omitted, so
For the product is empty and equals , consistently with the formula.
Lagrange theorem for polynomial congruences says that a nonzero polynomial of degree over a field has at most distinct roots of a polynomial. It follows by repeatedly factoring out at a root. Over the finite field , the only solutions of are and : these are distinct because is odd, and the root bound excludes any others.
Every nonzero element has a unique multiplicative inverse. Pair each element of with its inverse. All pairs of distinct elements contribute to the product; the only unpaired elements are and . Thus Wilson theorem follows:
If Lagrange's theorem is formulated for finite groups, it states that the order of a subgroup divides the order of the group; in particular every element of has order dividing . The inverse-pairing proof above establishes the required congruence directly.
For prime, and the cyclic group has order either or . Therefore
These correspond respectively to being or not being a th power in . In fact it is a th power in precisely when it is a th power in . To see the nontrivial implication, suppose and . Taking the field norm gives with . Then , so is already a rational th power.
Both degrees occur: gives , while is not a rational th power and gives . This includes , with possible degrees and .

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.