Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 2F ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Yes. Take exterior poles . By part (i), choose a polynomial withFor any fixed , , and therefore . The triangle inequality provesThis is pointwise convergence. It is not uniform convergence on : every polynomial is bounded on the closed diamond, whereas is unbounded as along .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 2F i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . Choose a unit complex number normal to a supporting side of this convex set, withSuch a choice exists explicitly: take , where are the signs of the real and imaginary parts of ; then and the strict inequality is exactly the hypothesis. Set . Since on ,For sufficiently large , the former is strictly smaller than the latter uniformly on . Consequently .
The geometric series now supplies actual approximating polynomials:Choose so the right-hand side is below . This proves the required uniform approximation without assuming a general approximation theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 29J ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , the continuous Geometric Asian option average. Under the same risk-neutral measure,The Brownian integral is Gaussian with mean zero and varianceThus , where and . DefineThe truncated lognormal distribution calculation from (i) givesFor comparison, a lognormal call written in terms of its mean and log-variance is . Differentiation gives and , where is the standard normal density. The terminal stock has and , while . Thereforesince this condition gives and the log-variance is strictly smaller. In particular the requested inequality holds for the usual nonnegative interest rate.
The PDF gives no sign restriction on , so its unconditional comparison needs qualification. If , then , and as the two prices tend to and . By continuity, sufficiently small positive strikes reverse the claimed inequality. Also strictness needs nonzero volatility or another source of a strict mean inequality. These qualifications do not affect the pricing formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 29J i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A standard Brownian motion starts at zero, has continuous sample paths and independent increments, with for .
Assume and ; changing the sign of just changes the sign of Brownian motion. Itô formula gives . In the complete Black-Scholes model, the risk-neutral pricing theorem prices an integrable payoff by , where the discounted asset is a martingale. Girsanov theorem therefore replaces the logarithmic drift by :Let and . The exercise event is . Completing the square in the Gaussian integral yieldsConsequently and . Thus the European call option price isThe physical drift disappears because the price is obtained under the martingale measure. If in an arbitrage-free deterministic model, and the formula is interpreted by its zero-volatility limit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 26J iv Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , where . Deleting odd arrivals leaves . Put , so . From the probability generating function ,Thus and . ThereforeTo establish strict underdispersion for every , subtract the mean:Here and for , because is equivalent to . Hencewhich excludes a doubly-stochastic Poisson representation by part (iii).
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 26J iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Put , finite almost surely. Conditional on the intensity process, is Poisson with mean and variance . The law of total expectation and law of total variance giveConsequently for a Cox process,These identities apply when the moments are finite; if the mean is finite but the integrated intensity has infinite variance, the count variance is infinite and the inequality still holds.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 26J ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
To derive the distribution from the infinitesimal characterization, let . Independent increments give the forward equationsWith and , for , these have solutionSubstitution verifies each equation, and the probabilities sum to one. Alternatively the probability generating function solves , , giving . For a general locally integrable rate, time-changing a unit-rate Poisson process by gives the same formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 26J i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
An Inhomogeneous Poisson process with deterministic, nonnegative locally integrable rate is a counting process with , independent increments, and increment distributionEquivalently, for continuous rates it is a simple counting process with independent increments and infinitesimal probabilities and . For merely locally integrable rates use the integrated-rate formulation, which avoids a pointwise regularity assumption.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 25K iv Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Continue with . For each integer , let . These events decrease with , and their probabilities are at least by (iii). Continuity from above of a measure givesIt is important not to assume that this exact threshold event is automatically a tail event: a vanishing change of partial sums can affect infinitely many exact comparisons at the threshold. Instead useFor any fixed , subtracting shows that . Thus is measurable with respect to every tail sigma-algebra. The event has positive probability by the preceding bound, so Kolmogorov zero-one law makes its probability one. Intersecting over all positive integers givesFor any specified real , this conclusion implies infinitely many with , completing both requests. In the excluded zero-variance case the limsup is zero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 25K iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A necessary qualification is . As printed, the assumptions also permit almost surely; then for every , so the asserted positive lower bound is false. Assume the intended nondegenerate case.
The central limit theorem states that independent identically distributed variables with mean zero and finite positive variance satisfy , where . Since the normal distribution has no atom at ,For example,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 25K ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . These sets are pairwise disjoint andBy countable additivity, . The tails of this convergent nonnegative series tend to zero, soThis proves continuity from above of a measure and explains the finite-measure assumption.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 25K i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For independent random variables , let , , and let the tail sigma-algebra be . Kolmogorov zero-one law states that every has probability zero or one.
Such an event is independent of each by independence of the variables. The collection of events satisfying is a Dynkin system: it contains the whole space and is closed under complements and disjoint countable unions. It contains the pi-system , which generates . The pi-lambda theorem therefore makes independent of all of . Since itself belongs to ,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 23H ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . The space of Kähler differentials is the -vector space generated by symbols , , with relationsIts elements are rational differentials. A local parameter is a nonconstant element of , so is a rational function field and is finite. In characteristic zero this extension is separable.
For any let be its minimal polynomial over . Differentiating givesSeparability ensures , so is a multiple of , and hence . To show , the derivation on extends uniquely to the separable extension , by the same differentiated minimal-polynomial formula; it sends to , so the universal differential cannot vanish. ThusFor a nonzero differential , define its valuation of a rational differential at byConcretely with a unit in the local ring, and this valuation is . For one conventionally assigns , not an integer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 23H i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a divisor on the smooth projective curve,This is a -vector space of rational functions with the prescribed pole bounds. A nonzero rational function on a projective curve has divisor of degree zero. Thus if there can be no nonzero element of .
For any point with coefficient in , use a local parameter at . The linear map sending to the residue-field value of has kernel and target , since is algebraically closed. Therefore . If , successively subtract a point times. The final divisor has degree and no nonzero sections, givingEquivalently the universally valid bound is . The PDF states the unqualified bound ; literally this is false when , because its right side is negative. For example has .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 20H iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a homotopy from to . The inverse images form a finite open cover of the compact product. By the Lebesgue number lemma there is such that every subset of diameter less than lies in one of these inverse images.
Choose a barycentric subdivision with all its open stars of diameter less than , and times with gaps less than . For each vertex and each time , the set(with the evident endpoint conventions) has diameter less than in the product metric. Choose a vertex of whose open star contains its image under , and set .
At time , the star condition makes a simplicial approximation to . Adjacent intervals overlap, so choose a time in their overlap and a point in the interior of any simplex of . Its image belongs to the stars of every and for . As in (i), their vertices lie in one carrier simplex, proving contiguity. Thus the sequence starts with an approximation to , ends with one to , and has contiguous adjacent pairs. Relabeling its indices gives the requested .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 20H ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 20H i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A simplicial approximation to is a vertex map satisfying the open-star conditionfor every vertex . Here an open star consists of points whose barycentric coordinate at that vertex is positive. This condition ensures that the images of the vertices of every simplex span a simplex of , and the vertex map extends linearly over simplices.
To triangulate , order the vertices of each complex consistently. For each product , use the simplices whose vertices follow monotone lattice paths from to , taking a step in one coordinate at a time. These prism triangulations agree on faces and cover the product.
If both approximate , choose in the relative interior of a simplex . Then belongs to the open star of every vertex of . Hence belongs to every open star of and . Its unique carrier simplex in contains all these vertices. Thus and are faces of that one simplex, proving that are contiguous simplicial maps.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 1I ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Put and let . The even residues are precisely the negatives, in reverse order, of the odd residues . Hence their product is in the finite field . Applying Wilson theorem givesThe initial factor can be omitted, soFor the product is empty and equals , consistently with the formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 1I i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Lagrange theorem for polynomial congruences says that a nonzero polynomial of degree over a field has at most distinct roots of a polynomial. It follows by repeatedly factoring out at a root. Over the finite field , the only solutions of are and : these are distinct because is odd, and the root bound excludes any others.
Every nonzero element has a unique multiplicative inverse. Pair each element of with its inverse. All pairs of distinct elements contribute to the product; the only unpaired elements are and . Thus Wilson theorem follows:If Lagrange's theorem is formulated for finite groups, it states that the order of a subgroup divides the order of the group; in particular every element of has order dividing . The inverse-pairing proof above establishes the required congruence directly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 18H iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For prime, and the cyclic group has order either or . ThereforeThese correspond respectively to being or not being a th power in . In fact it is a th power in precisely when it is a th power in . To see the nontrivial implication, suppose and . Taking the field norm gives with . Then , so is already a rational th power.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.