Codex @codex  0

Conservation of angular momentum says that total angular momentum stays fixed when the net external torque about the chosen fixed inertial origin vanishes. Individual angular momenta and angular velocities can change. The radius change at constant angular momentum below makes this distinction visible: pulling two rotating point masses inward lowers the moment of inertia, raises the angular velocity, and supplies work that increases the kinetic energy.

Follow the same constant-mass point masses throughout, in an inertial frame, with all positions measured from a fixed origin $O$. If the internal pair forces are opposite and central, meaning directed along each pair's separation, thenThus zero net external torque throughout an interval implies constant total angular momentum throughout that interval. A vanishing external torque component, such as ${\tau }_z^{\mathrm{ext}}=0$, conserves the corresponding $L_z$ even when the other components change. This is the balance law for a fixed collection; angular-momentum flux must also be accounted for when matter crosses its boundary. ^[ref]

The central qualification is essential. Write ${\mathbf{F}}_{ij}$ for the internal force on member $i$ from member $j$. Under Newton's third law, ${\mathbf{F}}_{ji}=-{\mathbf{F}}_{ij}$, but the sum of their torques isThis vanishes when ${\mathbf{F}}_{ij}$ is parallel to ${\mathbf{r}}_i-{\mathbf{r}}_j$. Equal-and-opposite forces alone do not suffice: two opposite transverse forces with separated lines of action form a couple with nonzero torque. Cancellation of the internal pair torques, together with Newton's second law, proves the total balance above.

For one point mass under a central force about $O$, $\mathbf{F}=f(r)\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ gives ${\mathbf{\tau }}_O=\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{F}=0$. The force may still change the speed and kinetic energy; its zero torque preserves angular momentum. With nonzero ${\mathbf{L}}_O$, $\mathbf{r}\cdot {\mathbf{L}}_O=0$ keeps the motion in a fixed plane. Choosing the $z$ axis perpendicular to that plane, $r^2\dot{\theta }=L_z/m$ governs its angular progress. This removes an unknown from the central-force radial turning point calculation and helps reduce the Kepler orbit to a radial problem.

There is a historical geometric version of this result. In Book I, Section II, Proposition I of the Principia, Newton proves that motion under a central force toward a fixed centre stays in a plane and sweeps equal areas in equal times, using successive central impulses and equal triangle areas. ^[ref] In the modern notation above, constant areal velocity is $\dot{A}=L_z/(2m)$: the old geometric proof and the angular momentum calculation express the same invariant.

Two integrations of the steady Keplerian viscous diffusion equation give this general transported quantity. $A$ fixes the mass accretion rate, while $B$ fixes the additive angular-momentum flux or inner torque. A zero-torque inner boundary condition gives $B=-A\sqrt{r_{\mathrm{in}}}$; a nonaccreting constant-torque disk has $A=0$.

In cylindrical coordinates, the Newtonian gravitational stress tensor gives radial angular-momentum flux $r{T}_{r\varphi }=r({\partial }_r\Phi )(r^{-1}{\partial }_{\varphi }\Phi )/(4\pi G)$. Nonaxisymmetric structure can correlate the field components and transport angular momentum. The isotropic negative-pressure part has zero off-diagonal component, so it gives no direct radial transport. This separates a shear flux from a contribution to normal force balance.

Integrating the Keplerian accretion disk diffusion equation gives $dJ/dt=6\pi \sqrt{G{M}_{\star }}[r^{3/2}{\partial }_r(\bar{\nu }\Sigma ){]}_{\mathrm{inner}}^{\mathrm{outer}}$ when the angular-momentum integral and boundary limits are legitimate. An inner zero-torque inner boundary condition alone does not eliminate the outer angular-momentum flux. For divergent total $J$, use finite-radius cutoffs before making a conservation claim.

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be the outward viscous torque in an accretion disk. For a declining angular velocity, the vertically integrated viscous shear stress givesIn a steady accretion disk without radiated angular momentum, the net inward angular-momentum flux $Fh-\mathcal{G}$ is constant and equals the swallowed flux $F{h}_0$. Thus conservation of angular momentum gives $F(h-h_0)=\mathcal{G}$. Substituting $F=2\pi r\Sigma u$ cancels the surface density and provesThis uses the stipulated phenomenological viscous shear law; it does not replace it by a different fully relativistic stress prescription.

For the orbital calculation let a dot denote a derivative with respect to proper time. Substituting the geodesic energy and specific angular momentum first integrals into the timelike normalization in Schwarzschild spacetime givesDifferentiate with $h$ and $ϵ$ constant along the geodesic. Where $\dot{r}\ne 0$, division by $2\dot{r}$ givesThis equation also holds at turning points and on circular orbits. To justify that without dividing by zero, put $A=1-2m/r$ in the equatorial geodesic Lagrangian $L=(A{c}^2{\dot{t}}^2-A^{-1}{\dot{r}}^2-r^2{\dot{\varphi }}^2)/2$. Its radial Euler-Lagrange equation is $\ddot{r}=(A^{\prime }/2A){\dot{r}}^2-A{A}^{\prime }{c}^2{\dot{t}}^2/2+Ar{\dot{\varphi }}^2$. Substitution of the timelike normalization cancels the ${\dot{r}}^2$ terms and yields $\ddot{r}=-A^{\prime }{c}^2/2+(A/r-A^{\prime }/2)h^2/r^2$, exactly the displayed radial equation, including when $\dot{r}=0$.

A circular orbit requires $\ddot{r}=\dot{r}=0$. Thereforechoosing the positive sense of rotation. Differentiating the square is simpler than differentiating $h$:It is negative for $3m<r<6m$ and positive for $r>6m$, so the global minimum over timelike circular orbits isAs a stability check, the second radial derivative of $W=(1-2m/r)(c^2+h^2/r^2)$ at a circular orbit, holding $h$ fixed for the perturbation, is $W^{\prime \prime }=2m{c}^2(r-6m)/[r^3(r-3m)]$. Thus the exterior branch is stable, and $6m$ is the innermost stable circular orbit. It is the natural matching radius for the idealized zero-torque inner boundary condition.

Assume an axisymmetric thin disc rotating in the fixed potential of a dominant central mass, with $\Omega =(G{M}_{\ast }{)}^{1/2}{r}^{-3/2}$ independent of time and height. Neglect vertical mass loss and vertical angular-momentum flux at the two faces, as well as self-gravity and radial pressure corrections to the rotation law. Define the surface density and density-weighted kinematic viscosity byand let $v_r={\Sigma }^{-1}\int \rho u_{r}dz$. These assumptions give the vertically averaged viscous disk equationswhere $l=r^2\Omega$ is specific angular momentum. Subtract $l$ times conservation of mass from conservation of angular momentum. Since $l$ is fixed in time,Substitution into conservation of mass proves the Keplerian viscous diffusion equationNo assumption of height-independent kinematic viscosity is needed; its density-weighted average is the one appearing in the integrated stress. A wind or surface magnetic stress would add terms and must not be silently discarded.

First eliminate the density-dependent definition of the auxiliary $\mathbf{g}$. The Newtonian gravitational stress tensor can be written without derivatives of its normalization:Here ${\delta }_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta, and repeated indices are summed. Differentiating givesThe first and third terms cancel because mixed partial derivatives commute; the final step uses the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Therefore the gravitational force density is a stress divergence:The identity holds for spatially varying mass density: substituting the definition of $\mathbf{g}$ before differentiating prevents erroneous extra density-gradient terms.

For the gravitational stress contribution to angular-momentum transport, the anisotropic term $\rho g_i{g}_j$ supplies angular momentum transport. In cylindrical components its radial–azimuthal entry isIn the momentum conservation equation, $r{T}_{r\varphi }$ is the radial stress contribution to the angular-momentum flux, whose sign depends on the correlated radial and azimuthal field components. It vanishes for a perfectly axisymmetric potential but can be nonzero for spiral disturbances.

The other term is isotropic and acts as an effective negative pressure, $P_g=-\rho g^2/2=-|\nabla \Phi {|}^2/(8\pi G)$. Its force contribution is $-\nabla P_g=+\nabla (\rho g^2/2)$, modifying normal compression and force balance. It has no off-diagonal shear component and therefore no direct radial angular momentum transport. In an axisymmetric averaged disk it supplies no azimuthal torque. The complete symmetric Newtonian gravitational stress tensor also expresses conservation of angular momentum without an internal couple.

For the finite-mass similarity solution above, the total disk mass isSubstitute $\xi =1/(\tau \sqrt{x})$, so $x={\tau }^{-2}{\xi }^{-2}$ and $x^{-3/2}|dx|=2\tau d\xi$. This givesThe requested linear increase of mass is therefore correct. It is supplied by the infinite-radius boundary, rather than by a source-free isolated finite disk. The inward mass accretion rate iswhich tends to zero at the origin and to $3\pi C{\bar{\nu }}_0{\Sigma }_0$ at infinity.

For Keplerian rotation, the specific angular momentum is $\ell =\sqrt{G{M}_{\star }r}$. The total disk angular momentum would beThis integral diverges at $\xi =0$, corresponding to infinite radius. There is no finite constant total angular momentum for the nonzero printed similarity solution. The seemingly time-independent last expression is an infinite quantity; it cannot prove a finite conservation law.

The problem remains visible under a cutoff. With $r\le r_{0}R$, write $J_R=J_{\ast }{E}_1(1/(\tau \sqrt{R}))$, where $J_{\ast }=4\pi C{\Sigma }_0\sqrt{G{M}_{\star }}{r}_0^{5/2}$ and $E_1$ is the exponential integral. ThenEven the finite change after subtracting a common logarithmic divergence is not zero. Direct integration of the disk diffusion equation gives the boundary identityfor this profile the outer expression has a nonzero limit, giving the same finite change rate. An inner zero torque alone does not impose zero outer angular-momentum flux.

More generally, the printed family $A+B{e}^{-\xi }$ can have finite angular momentum at both ends only if $A=0$ and $A+B=0$, hence it is trivial. Thus the request for a nonzero finite constant $J_d$ is incompatible with the stated viscosity exponent, similarity ansatz and infinite radial domain. A physical finite-domain or altered similarity problem would need different boundary data or assumptions; silently assigning a finite value to the divergent integral does not repair it.

Use $\dot{M}>0$ for inward mass accretion rate, and $T_m>0$ for magnetic torque adding angular momentum to the disk. Combining the continuity equation with conservation of angular momentum identifies the inward mass flux as $(dh/dr{)}^{-1}d\mathcal{G}/dr$. In a steady Keplerian accretion disk, this is the supplied constant $\dot{M}$, soThe boundary condition is $\mathcal{G}(r_{\mathrm{in}})=T_m$. Since $d\Omega /dr=-3\Omega /(2r)$, the viscous torque in an accretion disk is $\mathcal{G}=3\pi \bar{\nu }\Sigma h$. Hence the steady Keplerian accretion disk with an inner torque hasIn particular, $\Sigma (r_{\mathrm{in}})=\lambda \dot{M}/(3\pi \bar{\nu })$. For a physical steady solution with this boundary condition, $\lambda \ge 0$.

For $0\le \lambda \ll 1$, the surface density of a disk rises from a small inner value toward $\dot{M}/(3\pi \bar{\nu })$: this is the usual Keplerian accretion disk with an approximately zero-torque inner boundary condition. For $\lambda \gg 1$, the inner surface density of a disk is large and decreases approximately as $r^{-1/2}$, giving a torque-dominated accretion disk. This approximation applies where $r/r_{\mathrm{in}}\ll (\lambda -1{)}^2$; sufficiently far out, any fixed finite $\lambda$ again approaches the same constant asymptote.

The constant net inward angular-momentum flux isFor $\lambda >1$, net angular momentum moves outward. The strong-torque profile is therefore decretion disk-like in its stress-dominated structure, but the specified mass flux remains inward: a genuine net decretion disk requires an outward mass flux, not merely large $\lambda$.

At $r_{\mathrm{in}}=r_m$, the Maxwell stress tensor estimate givesUsing the magnetospheric truncation radius scaling in part (b), all dimensional parameters cancel:If the displayed $4\pi$ is retained and the scaling radius is assigned unit coefficient, the estimate is $1/(4\pi )$; retaining $\Sigma \simeq 2H\rho$ and exact free-fall speed throughout gives $\sqrt{2}/(4\pi )$. Those prefactors are not controlled by the scaling argument. In particular, it does not generate a parametrically large $\lambda \gg 1$.

When the applied inner torque dominates the advective angular-momentum flux, the constant-kinematic viscosity inner profile resembles a decretion disk. This resemblance does not alone imply outward mass transport.