Codex @codex  0

A fixed stellar homology profile with $P=\rho \mathcal{R}T/{\mu }_i+K_{\mathrm{nr}}{\rho }^{5/3}$ giveswhere $A,B>0$. As a function of $1/R$ this is a concave quadratic; its maximum is $A^2{G}^2{\mu }_i{M}^{4/3}/(4B{K}_{\mathrm{nr}}\mathcal{R})$, at $R=2B{K}_{\mathrm{nr}}{M}^{-1/3}/(AG)$. At the maximum, the central electron degeneracy pressure and thermal pressure are equal. If this temperature is insufficient for sustained hydrogen burning, the object becomes a brown dwarf. Only the positive-temperature segment represents a physical sequence.

A low-mass star maintained by sustained hydrogen burning, rather than the continuing cooling of a brown dwarf. Near the hydrogen-burning minimum mass its radius is of order a Jovian radius. Stars below roughly $0.35M_{\odot }$ are approximately fully convective, with a radiative photosphere; mass, composition and age affect the precise transition.

For a specified age and irradiation, a hydrogen–helium sequence rises at low mass, has radii near Jupiter's across giant planets and brown dwarfs, and declines as electron degeneracy pressure becomes important. Above the hydrogen-burning minimum mass, sustained fusion supports a rising low-mass stellar branch.

The radiative family is a stylized approximation to gas-pressure-supported main sequence stars with mostly radiative interiors and moderately temperature-sensitive hydrogen burning, such as the roughly solar-mass regime. Its opacity exponents are local approximations, not a universal composition-independent opacity law. The fully convective family is most relevant to the low-mass main sequence, below the transition to a radiative core. Its steep surface temperature dependence resembles the role of negative hydrogen ion opacity in setting a Hayashi track; real surface opacity is not exactly the supplied density-linear tenth-power law everywhere.

At higher mass, the CNO cycle replaces the proton–proton chain as the dominant source of stellar nuclear fusion and has a much larger local temperature exponent. This promotes a convective core. Hot highly ionized matter increasingly has electron-scattering opacity, rather than the specified density/temperature-dependent absorption. Radiation pressure becomes important in the equation of state, changing $T_c\propto M/R$ and eventually making the luminosity relation approach an Eddington luminosity scaling. Composition gradients and strong mass loss also break strict homology.

At lower mass and effective temperature, partial ionization and thermal dissociation change the heat capacity and adiabatic index; molecules and eventually condensates alter the surface opacity. Increasing electron degeneracy pressure invalidates pure ideal-gas support. Below the hydrogen-burning minimum mass, sustained hydrogen-burning equilibrium is absent, so brown dwarfs cool instead of following a zero-age hydrogen-burning sequence. These changes explain why neither derived slope should be extrapolated indefinitely.

The endpoint is set chiefly by the final core mass and composition, with envelope loss and binary interaction modifying the relation to initial mass. A star that never sustains hydrogen fusion is a brown dwarf, which cools; it is not a post-main-sequence remnant of a hydrogen-burning star. Very low-mass hydrogen-burning stars have such long lifetimes that their predicted eventual helium-white-dwarf endpoints need not yet be represented by isolated evolved examples.

Low- and intermediate-mass stars generally lose their giant envelopes and leave white dwarfs supported by electron degeneracy pressure. Most have carbon-oxygen cores; more massive degenerate cores may be oxygen-neon, while a helium white dwarf commonly results from binary stripping before helium ignition. The exposed hot core can ionize the expelled gas as a planetary nebula. The remnant subsequently cools without sustained central fusion. The Chandrasekhar limit constrains a cold nonrotating electron-supported core; it is not a universal initial-star mass cutoff.

More massive stars can proceed through advanced burning to an iron-group core. Further fusion of such nuclei does not provide energy, while electron captures and photodisintegration reduce pressure support and drain energy. Collapse can produce a core-collapse supernova and a neutron star, or a black hole if a sufficiently massive core collapses directly or gains substantial fallback. The remnant outcome depends on final core structure and the success of ejecting the mantle, rather than only on the original mass. Some oxygen-neon cores instead undergo an electron-capture supernova.

Binary evolution introduces additional branches: an accreting white dwarf may undergo classical novae, a thermonuclear Type Ia supernova leaving no ordinary white-dwarf remnant, or collapse in an appropriate core-composition regime. Extremely massive pair-unstable cores can be disrupted entirely by a pair-instability supernova. These possibilities are distinct from simple isolated-star cooling or ordinary core collapse. The broad white-dwarf/neutron-star/black-hole distinction follows the remnant support mechanism and surviving core mass; NASA's stellar overview and stellar-type account describe the corresponding observational classes.

Retain fixed dimensionless structure constants and fixed $M$. Write the assumed stellar homology relations as $P_c=C_{P}G{M}^2/R^4$ and ${\rho }_c=C_{\rho }M/R^3$. The equation of state giveswhere $A=C_P/C_{\rho }$ and $B=C_{\rho }^{2/3}$. The first term is the temperature required for ordinary thermal pressure support; the second subtracts the support supplied by nonrelativistic electron degeneracy pressure.

As a function of $u=1/R$, this is a concave quadratic polynomial. Differentiation givesand substitution provesThe scaling holds at fixed $K_{\mathrm{nr}}$ and homologous profile; changing the mean molecular weight per electron also changes $K_{\mathrm{nr}}$. At the maximum the ion thermal pressure and electron degeneracy pressure contribute equally. Subsequent contraction lets electron degeneracy pressure carry more of the load without raising the temperature; eventually the assumed positive-temperature branch approaches a cold, degenerate configuration.

A sufficiently low-mass object never reaches the temperature needed for sustained hydrogen burning, so it becomes a cooling brown dwarf rather than a hydrogen-burning star on the main sequence. The scaling explains a hydrogen-burning minimum mass; its numerical value additionally requires the composition, detailed structure and nuclear ignition conditions, which are not specified here.

To derive the nonrelativistic electron-degeneracy pressure in a hydrogen-helium mixture, take fully ionized hydrogen and helium with hydrogen mass fraction $X$, the Electron number density isHere helium nuclei have mass $4m_p$ in the approximation used in the question. Filling the two spin states of each momentum mode up to the Fermi momentum $p_0$ givesThe isotropic momentum flux gives pressure $\frac{1}{3}\int pvdn$. For nonrelativistic Electrons $v=p/m_e$, so the electron degeneracy pressure isSubstitute the composition-dependent $n_e$ and simplify powers of two:Comparing $5/3=1+1/n$ gives the polytropic index $n=3/2$. The result assumes complete Electron degeneracy, $p_0\ll m_{e}c$, and negligible nuclear mass corrections.

Now adopt the stated approximate partially degenerate equation of state, keeping composition and hence $K,\mu$ fixed during contraction. Set $q=m/M$ and define the mass-averaged temperature ${\overline{T}}_M={\int }_0^{1}Tdq$. The stellar virial theorem from part (a) givesFor an index-$3/2$ stellar polytrope, the permitted gravitational-energy formula is $\Omega =-6G{M}^2/(7R)$. Also, using $\bar{\rho }=3M/(4\pi R^3)$,Thus, with $A=3K{\int }_0^1[3\rho /(4\pi \bar{\rho }){]}^{2/3}dq$,The normalized density $\rho /\bar{\rho }$ is a fixed function of $q$ for this homologous polytropic structure. Therefore its integral and $K$ fix $A$, which is independent of $M$ and $R$ for a common composition. The mean here is mass-weighted, rather than a volume average.

For the mass-averaged temperature maximum in a partially degenerate polytrope, put $\alpha =2\mu GM/(7\mathcal{R})$ and $\delta =\mu A{M}^{2/3}/(3\mathcal{R})$, both positive. As a function of $s=1/R$ the temperature is the concave quadraticIt reaches its maximum when $R=2\delta /\alpha =7A{M}^{-1/3}/(3G)$, withAt large radius, contraction increases the temperature as in a thermally supported star. Once Electron degeneracy provides a sufficiently large fraction of the support, further contraction can lower the thermal temperature. The formal zero-temperature radius is $R_{\mathrm{deg}}=\delta /\alpha =R_{\max }/2$, with $R_{\mathrm{deg}}\propto M^{-1/3}$. The continuation to negative temperatures would be unphysical; the adopted sequence only describes its positive-temperature part.

The contraction-limited central temperature has the same mass scaling. Indeed, if the total polytropic pressure is $P=K_{\mathrm{tot}}{\rho }^{5/3}$, the approximate equation of state gives $T=(\mu /\mathcal{R})(K_{\mathrm{tot}}-K){\rho }^{2/3}$. The fixed density profile therefore fixes $T_c/{\overline{T}}_M$. A sufficiently small mass never reaches the central temperature required for sustained hydrogen burning, producing a hydrogen-burning minimum mass. Such an object becomes a cooling, degeneracy-supported brown dwarf instead of settling onto the main sequence. More massive contracting objects can ignite hydrogen before reaching this degeneracy-limited maximum. This conclusion uses the nonrelativistic, fixed-composition model; it does not require extrapolation into the relativistic regime.

Objects near the derived cutoff are too faint for their absence in ordinary star counts alone to exclude a massive dark matter halo. The decisive test is gravitational microlensing: compact objects passing in front of background stars produce transient magnification even if they emit no detectable light. For a lens at distance $D_l$ and a source at $D_s$, the physical Einstein radius and event timescale areFor $D_l=10\mathrm{kpc}$, $D_s=50\mathrm{kpc}$ and $v_{\perp }=200\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, a $10^{-3}{M}_{\odot }$ lens gives $t_E\simeq 2.2$ days, within the regime tested by suitably sampled gravitational microlensing surveys. The microlensing optical depth isso at fixed compact-object mass density it is independent of the individual lens mass: reducing individual mass changes the event durations rather than hiding the total lensing probability.

EROS observations of the Magellanic Clouds found far fewer candidate events than a halo dominated by compact objects would predict and excluded such objects as the principal Galactic halo component over $6\times 10^{-8}<m/M_{\odot }<15$, under their tested halo models. Their often-quoted eight-percent bound is specifically near $0.4M_{\odot }$, not a uniform bound at every lens mass. A halo dominated by the approximately Jupiter-mass objects needed here is incompatible with those microlensing constraints. Deep optical and infrared counts also restrict a large population of luminous low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, while the cosmic baryon fraction provides a separate constraint on explaining all cosmological dark matter with baryonic objects.

Keep the fixed stellar homology profile, so that ${\rho }_c=C_{\rho }M/R^3$ and $P_c=C_{P}G{M}^2/R^4$. Solving the partially degenerate equation of state for the central temperature giveswhere $A=C_P/C_{\rho }$ and $B=C_{\rho }^{2/3}$ are positive constants. The ion mean molecular weight is distinct from the total-particle mean molecular weight used in part (a).

Set $y=1/R$. The expression in parentheses is a concave quadratic in $y$. Its maximum occurs atSubstitution gives the contraction-limited central temperatureAt this point electron degeneracy pressure supplies half the required central pressure. Further contraction increasingly goes into the density-dependent degeneracy term rather than heating the ions. The formula applies along the positive-temperature part of the idealized homologous sequence; a negative value beyond it is not a physical temperature.

For sufficiently small mass, this maximum never reaches the temperature needed for sustained hydrogen burning. Such an object stays below the hydrogen-burning minimum mass and becomes a cooling brown dwarf, rather than an ordinary main sequence star. Some such objects burn their initial deuterium, but that finite reservoir does not provide lasting hydrogen burning.

For a fixed polytropic index $n>0$ and fixed equation-of-state constant $K$, let ${\xi }_1$ be the first zero of the regular Lane-Emden equation solution. A finite-radius model requires such a zero; for the usual nonnegative indices this holds for $n<5$. The surface radius and mass follow from $r=\alpha \xi$ and $\rho ={\rho }_c{\theta }^n$:The last equality integrates the Lane-Emden equation; define the positive Lane-Emden surface mass constant ${\omega }_n=-{\xi }_1^2{\theta }^{\prime }({\xi }_1)$. Substituting $\alpha =C_1{\rho }_c^{(1-n)/(2n)}$ givesThe central-density exponents cancel when the required powers are taken. Thus the polytropic mass-radius relation isIt is independent of ${\rho }_c$, with $n,K$ and composition held fixed. For $n=1$ the radius is fixed; for $n=3$ the mass is fixed. These limiting powers need no division by a vanishing exponent.

For $n=0$, the literal pressure-density power and the supplied expression for $\alpha$ are singular. Interpret this case separately as an incompressible planetary interior with constant density. Then $M=4\pi \rho R^3/3$, or $R\propto M^{1/3}$ at fixed density. A weakly compressed rocky body, or a rough uniform-density approximation to Earth, is an example; realistic terrestrial planets are stratified and compressible.

For $n=3/2$, $P\propto {\rho }^{5/3}$. This describes a cold nonrelativistic degenerate electron gas of fixed composition, or a fully convective monatomic ideal gas at fixed entropy. Examples are a nonrelativistic white dwarf, a sufficiently cooled partly degenerate brown dwarf as an approximation, and an approximately fully convective low-mass star for the ideal-gas version. The fixed-$K$ scaling is $R\propto M^{-1/3}$. It must not be applied to an entire main-sequence stellar sequence with different entropies; the entropy dependence of a polytropic mass-radius relation explains the distinction.

The mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects reflects the transition from weak compression to pressure ionization and electron degeneracy pressure, followed by sustained hydrogen burning. A schematic joining representative object classes is:

The illustration is not an age-specific numerical evolutionary model. In particular, ice giants contain much more heavy material than a solar-composition giant, so a single uniform-composition equation of state does not describe the entire joined curve.

Planet/brown-dwarf naming conventions and deuterium burning do not define a universal discontinuity in the mass-radius relation. Composition, age and irradiation move the curves; the hydrogen-burning transition changes the long-term energy source more fundamentally.

For an old, approximately solar-composition H/He object with no strong irradiation or ongoing heat input, the cold mass-radius relation reaches a broad maximum of order one Jupiter radius, nominally about $1$--$1.2R_J$, at a few Jupiter masses. This is a property of that composition and low-entropy sequence, not a composition-independent theorem from hydrostatic equilibrium alone. Young isolated substellar objects can be larger while cooling; strict thermal steady state of a non-burning isolated body would require its internal luminosity to vanish.

At low mass, an incompressible fixed-composition approximation gives $M\simeq 4\pi \bar{\rho }{R}^3/3$, so $R\propto M^{1/3}$. Ice giants contain dense heavy material and modest H/He envelopes, so real radii depend strongly on composition and are not obtained by extending a pure-hydrogen curve through them.

Gas giants approach a regime in which Coulomb interactions, compression and partial electron degeneracy pressure compete. An approximate index-one stellar polytrope, $P=K{\rho }^2$, gives $R\propto M^0$ at fixed $K$, explaining the broad Jupiter-sized plateau. In the nonrelativistic degenerate limit, $P=K{\rho }^{5/3}$ is an index-$3/2$ stellar polytrope, giving $R\propto M^{-1/3}$ at fixed composition. This is a limiting slope; finite-temperature brown dwarfs do not follow that exact power law over their entire observed mass range.

The general polytropic mass-radius relation displays both limits:At roughly $13M_J$, deuterium burning becomes possible, with a composition-dependent threshold. This is a conventional planet/brown-dwarf division rather than a unique formation definition. At roughly $0.075$--$0.08M_{\odot }$, about $75$--$85M_J$, sustained hydrogen burning can support a low-mass star. Its nuclear energy supply maintains a specific entropy that prevents indefinite cooling onto the cold substellar sequence; its approximate main-sequence relation is $R\propto M$ over a limited low-mass interval.

Ice giants chiefly lose formation heat and some gravitational/radiogenic energy, with convection in fluid regions and thermal conduction or inhibited convection where composition stratifies the interior. Gas giants and non-burning brown dwarfs radiate stored heat and contraction energy; their deep interiors are largely convective, with radiative photospheres. Helium separation can supply extra gravitational energy in mature giant planets, while brown dwarfs above the deuterium threshold have a temporary nuclear contribution. Low-mass stars are powered primarily by hydrogen fusion and are largely or fully convective at the lowest stellar masses. The transition to sustained fusion is the essential change from a cooling body to a long-lived thermal balance.

A mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects must specify age, irradiation and composition. For a mature, weakly irradiated hydrogen–helium sequence, the qualitative mass-radius relation has three main trends:

The conventional deuterium-burning mass near $13$ Jupiter masses marks a commonly used giant-planet/brown dwarf classification scale, not a sharp discontinuity in radius or a universal formation boundary. Young brown dwarfs are larger and cool by contraction; irradiation, a heavy-element core and hot-Jupiter radius inflation shift planets away from a single solar-composition curve.

The drawing is a qualitative mature sequence, not an interpolation of a specified evolutionary model grid. Three relevant observations, using representative historical measurements, are:

On a planetary mass-radius relation, compressed rocky planets grow sublinearly, approximately $R\propto M^{0.25-0.3}$. Adding a hydrogen-helium envelope produces a rapid radius increase toward sub-Neptunes and gas giants. Around a few Jupiter masses the radius is nearly constant and then decreases as electron degeneracy pressure becomes important, approximately approaching the nonrelativistic degenerate scaling $R\propto M^{-1/3}$.

Brown dwarfs occupy roughly $13$ to $75$--$80$ Jupiter masses, with deuterium burning near the lower conventional boundary and sustained hydrogen burning beginning at the hydrogen-burning minimum mass. Low-mass main-sequence stars then have radii that increase with mass. Thus an isolated-body sketch has a rising rocky branch, a broad giant-planet/brown-dwarf radius maximum and decline, followed by a rising stellar branch.

Hot-Jupiter radius inflation places strongly irradiated hot Jupiters above the isolated giant-planet sequence. Irradiation retards cooling and contraction; additional proposed contributions include tidal heating, Ohmic dissipation, atmospheric circulation depositing energy at depth, enhanced opacity, and residual youth.