For , the product rule and chain rule give
The positive exponential factor makes increasing for and decreasing for . Its only interior stationary point is therefore a maximum at . Checking it together with both endpoints,
Consequently
Checking the endpoints is necessary for extrema on a closed interval.
Use integration by substitution with , so . Then
Differentiating the answer by the chain rule gives , confirming the antiderivative. The real constant of integration is arbitrary.
The chain rule gives
For this to vanish for every differentiable , its coefficient must be zero:
The resulting is a profile transported to the right at unit speed by the transport equation.
Apply the product rule and the chain rule once more to each expression in part (i). The second derivative chain rule gives
and
For example, the coefficient of in the mixed partial derivative is , while the final term is . The symmetry is used in combining the mixed terms under the usual twice-continuously-differentiable interpretation.
The chain rule gives and . Since , , and , the answer is
Every partial derivative of on the right is evaluated at , .
First express the function in the original variables:
The chain rule gives
Taking its partial derivative with respect to yields
The numerator in the second fraction reduces to , reproducing
Both logarithms are defined for every real because their arguments are at least one.
Write and . The chain rule gives
The condition ensures . Since , also and . Hence the first two nonzero terms are the constant and linear terms:
The inequality , together with continuity of , makes the logarithm defined on a neighbourhood of zero. The remainder is written in Big O notation.
The curl of is . Thus for it cannot be a gradient field, while for it is zero and all its vector-field potentials are constants. This zero-vector case is allowed by the question.
For the radial vector field , write . Choose a radial primitive
For , the chain rule gives
Hence all vector-field potentials on a connected domain where the field is defined are
The assumed existence of the needed derivatives and integrals justifies this construction. If the domain includes the origin and the field is regular there, choose and extend the primitive there. Any two vector-field potentials differ by a constant on each connected component.
The chain rule gives and . The partial differential equation becomes
For this to hold for every twice differentiable , the coefficient must vanish:
For an affine alone any would work, but the requirement is for arbitrary .
Let . The product rule and the chain rule give the partial derivatives
Hence the terms containing cancel:
This also follows from the Euler theorem for homogeneous functions, because for .
The chain rule expresses the coordinate differential operators as
The coefficients are constant, so a second application gives
and
Adding cancels the mixed partial derivatives, and gives
The transformation has rotation matrix , so this identity expresses the rotational invariance of the Laplacian.
The original PDF specifies . The quotient is the difference quotient for the function at the positive point . The chain rule gives , so
The chain rule and the quotient rule give
The exponential function and denominator are positive, so the stationary points occur exactly at . Their values are
The derivative is negative for and positive for , so is a local minimum and a local maximum. They are also global extrema, since .
Put . Apply implicit differentiation with respect to and , using the chain rule:
Consequently
At a point where the assumed differentiable function exists, the first equation forces . Combining the equations therefore gives
The assertion is understood on such differentiable branches of the implicit function; arbitrary parameter choices need not produce one everywhere.
The scaling relation says that is a homogeneous function of degree . Fix and differentiate the identity with respect to the positive parameter . The chain rule gives
Setting proves the Euler theorem for homogeneous functions identity
Differentiate once more with respect to , using equality of the mixed partial derivatives for the assumed twice continuously differentiable function:
At this is the second-order Euler identity for homogeneous functions:
The repeated parameter differentiation accounts for the factor , rather than .
Holding fixed when taking the antiderivative with respect to gives
Use the product rule and the chain rule to differentiate this explicit expression:
This agrees term by term with part (i).
Write . For , differentiation under the integral sign gives
Indeed, on any compact parameter interval with , the differentiated integrand is bounded by the integrable function . The dominated convergence theorem therefore justifies the operation despite the improper lower endpoint. The apparent singularity at is removable.
Since , the chain rule gives the first-order linear differential equation
The chain rule gives
Since , the exponent is at most , with equality precisely at . The exponential function is increasing, so
The sign of the derivative, positive for and negative for , gives the same conclusion.
The chain rule gives , so the given total differential is exact. Thus ; two such functions differ by a constant because their gradient difference vanishes on the connected plane. The assigned value at the origin forces , giving