Codex @codex  0

An axial charge is the spatial integral of the time component of an axial current. For a Dirac field and an internal generator $t$, it is $\int {\psi }^{†}{\gamma }_{5}t\psi d^{3}x$. Its canonical action rotates left- and right-handed fields oppositely. It is conserved only when the current divergence and flux at infinity vanish; Dirac masses and a chiral anomaly can obstruct conservation. The nonsinglet quark generators have no color anomaly and obey the nonsinglet axial charge algebra of quark densities.

For the Dirac equation with two equal quark masses $m$, the equations for $q$ and $\bar{q}$ give the divergence of the nonsinglet axial current as $im\bar{q}{\gamma }_5{\tau }_{a}q=m{P}_a$. The color chiral anomaly is absent in this nonsinglet identity because the quark flavor generator is traceless. Equivalently, the mass term in the Hamiltonian is $m\int S{d}^{3}x$, and the nonsinglet axial charge algebra of quark densities gives ${\dot{Q}}_{5,a}=m\int P_a{d}^{3}x$.

The gauge-covariant kinetic term for two massless quarks separates into left- and right-handed parts. Independent constant unitary quark flavor rotations preserve these terms, giving classical $U(2{)}_L\times U(2{)}_R$ internal symmetry in addition to local color $SU(3)$. The singlet axial $U(1{)}_A$ has a chiral anomaly, while the nonsinglet chiral symmetry and vector baryon number remain exact quantum symmetries, up to their shared discrete identifications. Equal nonzero quark masses reduce the continuous flavor symmetry to $SU(2{)}_V\times U(1{)}_V$.

An instanton is a localized finite-action classical solution of a Euclidean field theory. Its role differs from that of a static spatial classical field-theory soliton: an instanton is localized in Euclidean spacetime and contributes to quantum transition amplitudes, rather than persisting as a stationary real-time particle. Wick rotation changes the oscillatory weight $e^{iS/\hslash }$ into $e^{-S_E/\hslash }$ when the continuation and boundary conditions are valid. The Euclidean path integral is consequently dominated semiclassically by stationary Euclidean configurations. Perturbation theory around one vacuum misses other saddles whose weights have the nonanalytic form $e^{-S_I/\hslash }$.

A useful first example is quantum tunnelling between two degenerate minima in quantum mechanics. For coordinate $q$ with mass $m$, the Euclidean action iswith the vacuum energy subtracted from $V$. Its Euler-Lagrange equation is $m\ddot{q}=V^{\prime }(q)$, equivalent to motion in the inverted potential $-V$. A finite-action trajectory joining zero-energy minima has conserved Euclidean energy $m{\dot{q}}^2/2-V=0$. A forward instanton therefore satisfies $\dot{q}=\sqrt{2V/m}$, while an anti-instanton has the opposite orientation. Completing the square gives the action boundwhich these zero-energy paths saturate. This is the Euclidean counterpart of the first-order kink argument, with Euclidean time replacing the spatial coordinate.

For the quartic double-well instanton, chooseThe first-order equation in the interval $-a<q<a$ is $\dot{q}=\omega (a^2-q^2)/(2a)$. Separation givesThe center ${\tau }_0$ is arbitrary. Its derivative ${\dot{q}}_I$ is an instanton translation zero mode: differentiating the Euclidean field equation shows that it lies in the kernel of the quadratic fluctuation operator $-m{\partial }_{\tau }^2+V^{\prime \prime }(q_I)$. A naive Gaussian determinant therefore has a zero eigenvalue. Replace its integration by the collective-coordinate integral over ${\tau }_0$, and take the determinant only over nonzero modes. The resulting instanton fluctuation prefactor combines that Jacobian with the determinant ratio against the vacuum. The action controls the exponential suppression; the prefactor is essential for a quantitative rate or splitting.

When $S_I/\hslash \gg 1$, crossings are rare and their typical separations greatly exceed their widths. In the dilute instanton gas, ordered center integrals for $n$ well-separated crossings over Euclidean duration $\mathcal{T}$ produce ${\mathcal{T}}^n/n!$. If a single-crossing rate is $\kappa =K{e}^{-S_I/\hslash }$, a symmetric two-well system has even-crossing and odd-crossing sums proportional to $\cosh (\kappa \mathcal{T})$ and $\sinh (\kappa \mathcal{T})$. The spectral interpretation gives levels $E_{\mathrm{well}}\mp \hslash \kappa$ andThis is a real tunnelling level splitting. A Euclidean bounce instead describes false vacuum decay: it leaves and returns to a metastable vacuum, and a characteristic negative fluctuation mode supplies the imaginary part interpreted as decay. A bounce must not be confused with a stable double-well instanton merely because both use Euclidean saddles.

The central gauge-theory example is a Yang-Mills instanton on Euclidean four-space. State conventions carefully: take anti-Hermitian generators $T_a=-i{\sigma }_a/2$, with $\mathrm{Tr}(T_a{T}_b)=-{\delta }_{ab}/2$, connection $A=A_{\mu }d{x}^{\mu }$, and gauge curvature $F=dA+A\wedge A$. With coupling $g$, the positive Yang-Mills action isThe Hodge star operator squares to one on Euclidean two-forms. Under the usual finite-action boundary conditions, the connection approaches a pure gauge at infinity, defining a map $S_{\infty }^3\to SU(2)\simeq S^3$. Its winding degree is the integer instanton numberThis is unchanged by smooth deformations preserving the boundary sector. Geometrically this is, up to the stated sign convention, the second Chern number of the compactified bundle. Different sign conventions for trace, curvature or orientation must be changed together.

Use the positive norm $\Vert F{\Vert }^2=-\int \mathrm{Tr}(F\wedge \ast F)$. Decomposition into self-dual and anti-self-dual curvature givesThe Yang-Mills instanton Bogomolny bound is saturated by $F=\ast F$ for positive $k$, or $F=-\ast F$ for negative $k$. These first-order equations imply the full Yang-Mills equations: the Bianchi identity $D_{A}F=0$ becomes $D_A\ast F=0$ when $\ast F=\pm F$. Thus the topological minimum is a genuine classical saddle, not just an arbitrary field with integer charge. Self-duality alone is a local differential condition; finite action is an additional requirement.

An explicit unit-charge example is the BPST instanton. Let $y=x-x_0$, $\rho >0$, and choose the self-dual symbols ${\eta }_{ij}^a={ϵ}_{aij}$, ${\eta }_{i4}^a={\delta }_{ai}$ and ${\eta }_{4i}^a=-{\delta }_{ai}$ for $i,j=1,2,3$, using orientation $d{x}^1\wedge d{x}^2\wedge d{x}^3\wedge d{x}^4$. In regular gauge,The curvature is self-dual. Since ${\sum }_{a,\mu ,\nu }({\eta }_{\mu \nu }^a{)}^2=12$, its squared component curvature is $192{\rho }^4/(y^2+{\rho }^2{)}^4$. Radial integration yieldsso $k=1$. Replacing self-dual symbols by anti-self-dual ones produces the opposite charge with the same positive action.

The center has four coordinates and $\rho$ is an instanton size modulus. Classical four-dimensional Yang-Mills action is scale invariant, so varying $\rho$ changes the action-density width but not the total action. If gauge transformations must tend to the identity at infinity, three global gauge orientations also remain, giving eight parameters for the one-instanton framed instanton moduli space. If those global orientations are quotiented out, the unframed one-instanton space has five parameters. A zero-size limit is a singular concentration of curvature, not another smooth instanton. Higher-charge solutions likewise possess instanton moduli spaces; their collective-coordinate integrals replace the corresponding zero-mode determinants.

In a Euclidean-time description, topologically distinct gauge vacua are separated by a change of Chern-Simons number; an instanton interpolates between them, with the change equal to $k$ in compatible orientation conventions. Theta-weighted instanton sectors give $Z(\vartheta )={\sum }_k{e}^{ik\vartheta }{Z}_k$, connecting topology to the vacuum angle. With fermions, the gauge-field topology also controls fermionic zero modes and chiral selection rules through the chiral anomaly. These phenomena explain why instantons encode physics beyond small fluctuations around a single vacuum.

Instantons link Euclidean classical solutions, topological sectors and exponentially suppressed quantum effects. Their interpretation requires the boundary conditions, normalization, fluctuation spectrum and measure over collective coordinates. A dilute approximation is controlled only when its individual-action suppression and separation assumptions hold; classical scale moduli and their quantum corrections can make size integrals delicate rather than automatically finite.

Let the masses of $\Phi$ and $\varphi$ be $M$ and $\mu$, respectively. Write their external four-momenta as $P=k_1+k_2$, with $P^2=M^2$ and $k_1^2=k_2^2={\mu }^2$. The condition $M>2\mu$ opens the two-body decay phase space. Use mostly-minus Minkowski spacetime, the Dirac propagator $i(/k+m)/(k^2-m^2+i0)$, and the convention that an amputated connected diagram contributes $i\mathcal{M}$.

There is no tree-level three-scalar Feynman vertex in the displayed interaction. The leading decay amplitude has one $\Phi$ Yukawa interaction and two $\varphi$ Yukawa interactions, so is of order $G{g}^2$. The Yukawa fermion triangle is:

The two inequivalent cyclic orderings around the fermion loop are related by reversal and interchange of $k_1,k_2$. They give equal integrals: reversing all internal four-momenta leaves the masses and denominators unchanged, and the scalar gamma matrix trace identities below give the same numerator. Both must be included. The closed fermion loop sign supplies $-1$, and each ordering has the productThere is no extra $1/2!$ in the decay amplitude. Such a factor belongs to integration over the identical-particle final phase space when calculating a decay rate.

Route $a=\ell$, $b=\ell +k_1$, $c=\ell -k_2$ and define $D_a=a^2-m^2+i0$, and similarly for $D_b,D_c$. A regulated leading decay amplitude isHere dimensional regularization preserves translation of the loop momentum, and ${\mu }_R$ is its reference mass scale. Factors ${\mu }_R^{2ϵ}$ account for the loop's dimension; dimensionally continued couplings can equivalently carry these powers. No ${\gamma }^5$ occurs in this scalar loop, so there is no ${\gamma }^5$ regularization ambiguity.

Using gamma matrix trace identities, traces with an odd number of gamma matrices vanish, while $\mathrm{tr}1=4$ and $\mathrm{tr}({\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^{\nu })=4g^{\mu \nu }$. Thus the numerator simplifies completely toFor a reduction to standard scalar integrals, disregard the vanishing infinitesimals only in the numerator. Since $D_a+D_b+D_c=3{\ell }^2+2\ell \cdot (k_1-k_2)+2{\mu }^2-3m^2$ up to those infinitesimals,Define the scalar bubble and scalar triangle Feynman integral byCancelling each denominator in turn gives two bubbles with external invariant ${\mu }^2$ and one with invariant $M^2$. ThereforeThis explicitly displays the complete gamma matrix trace simplification, the two loop orientations and the overall phase convention.

There is a renormalization qualification to this answer. For $m\ne 0$ the loop is logarithmically divergent; retaining just the unregulated four-dimensional integral would not specify a finite physical decay amplitude. To see the divergence, a Feynman parameter and a shifted loop momentum giveThe scalar triangle Feynman integral is ultraviolet finite. HenceA cubic counterterm from a Yukawa fermion triangle, ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{ct}}=-\delta h\Phi {\varphi }^2/2$, contributes $-\delta h$ to $\mathcal{M}$ and cancels the pole with $\delta h_{\mathrm{div}}=-24mG{g}^2/(16{\pi }^2\overline{ϵ})$. This is an instance of counterterm closure of a massive Yukawa theory. After subtraction the physical answer is $\mathcal{M}=-h_R+{\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{loop},\mathrm{ren}}$, where a renormalization condition fixes the finite cubic coupling $h_R$. The displayed interaction alone does not supply that condition. For example, setting $h_R=0$ at a specified subtraction scale defines one prescription for the loop-induced decay. The regulated expressions above remain the lowest-order loop answer without such extra data. For $m=0$ the trace, and therefore this scalar triangle contribution, vanishes identically.

Now take the Hermitian pseudoscalar Yukawa interaction with the sign printed in the PDF. Varying with respect to the Dirac adjoint gives the Dirac equationVarying with respect to $\psi$ and integrating by parts gives the adjoint Dirac equationThe factor $i$ in the coupling matters: $\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^5\psi$ is anti-Hermitian, so this factor makes the interaction Hermitian for real $G$.

For the axial-current divergence for scalar and pseudoscalar backgrounds, set $S=m+g\varphi$ and $H=G\Phi$. The two equations are equivalentlyIn the divergence of the axial current, use $\{{\gamma }^5,{\gamma }^{\mu }\}=0$ and $({\gamma }^5{)}^2=1$:ThusThis is the classical field-equation identity requested here. It includes explicit breaking by both backgrounds; it is not a claim that a renormalized quantum axial current has no chiral anomaly when gauge interactions are present.

In quantum electrodynamics, gauge invariance connects local phase freedom, electric-charge conservation and the restrictions on photon interactions. For definiteness takeThe gauge transformationhas $D_{\mu }\psi \mapsto e^{-ie\alpha }{D}_{\mu }\psi$: the derivative of the local phase cancels the added gauge potential. Also $F_{\mu \nu }$ is unchanged because mixed partial derivatives commute. Consequently every term in the Lagrangian density is invariant. This derives the minimal electromagnetic coupling of a Dirac field, including the interaction $-e\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }\psi A_{\mu }$. A fermion mass is compatible with the symmetry, whereas a local Proca photon mass $m_{\gamma }^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }/2$ is not.

The classical Maxwell equations are ${\partial }_{\mu }{F}^{\mu \nu }=j^{\nu }$, with $j^{\nu }=e\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\nu }\psi$. Taking a divergence gives ${\partial }_{\nu }{j}^{\nu }=0$ because $F^{\mu \nu }$ is antisymmetric. The same conservation law follows directly from the charged Dirac equation and its adjoint. For vanishing flux at spatial infinity, $Q=\int d^{3}x{j}^0$ is conserved. Gauss law identifies this charge with the electric flux through a surrounding surface. Particle-antiparticle creation is allowed, but its net electric charge is zero.

Local gauge invariance is also a redundancy in the potentials, rather than an extra propagating degree of freedom. The canonical momentum of $A_0$ vanishes, and its field equation enforces the Gauss law constraint in gauge theory, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=j^0$. After imposing the constraint and quotienting gauge freedom, a massless photon has two transverse physical polarizations. Gauge transformations vanishing at the boundary identify equivalent descriptions; constant phase transformations at infinity can act on charged states and generate their conserved charge. This distinction explains why gauge redundancy and electric charge are compatible.

In perturbative QED, the quadratic photon operator cannot be inverted before gauge fixing. Adding $-({\partial }_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }{)}^2/(2\xi )$ gives the covariant gauge propagatorThis propagator contains longitudinal and timelike components, but these are not external physical photon states. A Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient, or the equivalent BRST construction, removes them. In linear Lorenz gauge, $\delta ({\partial }_{\mu }{A}^{\mu })=\square \alpha$, so the Faddeev-Popov determinant is independent of $A_{\mu }$ and the Faddeev-Popov ghost fields decouple. This last statement concerns the linear gauge; Abelian gauge groups alone do not guarantee decoupling in a nonlinear gauge condition.

At the quantum level, the vector symmetry gives a Ward identity. One way to obtain it is to change variables by a localized phase in a time-ordered correlation function containing $\psi (y)$ and $\bar{\psi }(z)$. The action variation becomes a current divergence; the two field insertions contribute opposite contact terms, since their charges are opposite. Fourier transformation turns the divergence into the photon momentum, and amputating the external fermion propagators turns the two contact terms into the difference of their inverse propagators. With the charge removed from the proper vertex and the overall propagator factor $i$ removed from its inverse, the result is the proper-vertex Ward-Takahashi identity in QEDAt tree level this is simply $k_{\mu }{\gamma }^{\mu }=(/p+/k-m)-(/p-m)$. Between on-shell external spinors, the inverse propagators vanish, so the full physical scattering amplitude satisfies $k_{\mu }{\mathcal{M}}^{\mu }=0$. Therefore replacing a photon polarization vector by ${\epsilon }_{\mu }+c{k}_{\mu }$ leaves the amplitude unchanged. The identity applies to the complete required sum of diagrams, not necessarily each diagram separately. It also ensures cancellation of the gauge parameter from physical observables when all terms at the chosen perturbative order are included.

For the photon two-point function, the Ward identity implies transverse photon vacuum polarization:Thus ultraviolet subtraction renormalizes the gauge-invariant kinetic term, rather than requiring a local photon-mass counterterm. Perturbative unbroken QED retains a massless photon. Transversality by itself would not exclude a nonlocal massless pole in a different theory; the assertion here includes the perturbative QED setting.

Taking $k\to 0$ in the proper-vertex identity gives ${\Gamma }^{\mu }(p,p)=\partial S^{-1}(p)/\partial p_{\mu }$. Matching the divergent coefficients of the derivative and vertex terms yields the Ward identity for QED renormalization constants, $Z_1=Z_2$, in a gauge-preserving prescription. If ${\psi }_0=\sqrt{Z_2}\psi$ and $A_0=\sqrt{Z_3}A$, comparison of the interaction coefficients givesHence charge renormalization is fixed by photon wave-function renormalization. Gauge invariance constrains counterterms and relates renormalizations; it does not make the electric charge independent of scale.

The Soft photon theorem gives another physical manifestation. Attaching a photon of small momentum $k$ to the external charged legs gives the leading factorwhere $Q_i$ is charge in units of $e$ and ${\eta }_i=+1$ for outgoing and $-1$ for incoming legs. Replacing $\epsilon$ by $k$ makes this factor proportional to ${\sum }_i{\eta }_i{Q}_i$, which vanishes by electric charge conservation. Massless photons also cause infrared divergences; physical inclusive measurements combine unresolved real emission with virtual corrections, rather than treating either contribution alone as an observable.

Finally, the vector gauge symmetry of a Dirac fermion in QED is anomaly-free, so it can be maintained by regularization and renormalization. This must be distinguished from the axial current: its divergence has explicit mass terms, as in Question 3, and can additionally have a quantum chiral anomaly. Conservation of the gauge current does not imply axial-current conservation. The resulting picture is that gauge invariance simultaneously organizes the physical photon states, enforces electric-charge conservation and ties together amplitudes and ultraviolet subtractions.

For a massless Dirac fermion,The local gauge symmetry gives the vector current $J^{\mu }=e\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }\psi$. The global chiral transformation $\psi \mapsto e^{i\beta {\gamma }^5}\psi$ gives the classical axial currentUsing the massless Dirac equation and $\{{\gamma }^5,{\gamma }^{\mu }\}=0$ gives ${\partial }_{\mu }{J}_{\mathrm{ax}}^{\mu }=0$ classically.

Quantum mechanically, a gauge-invariant regulator for the fermion measure is not invariant under the axial rotation. In the Fujikawa form, its infinitesimal Jacobian containsThe first nonzero term in the heat kernel expansion is quadratic in $F_{\mu \nu }$. Usingand the Gaussian momentum integral gives the chiral anomalyThe overall sign follows the gamma-matrix, charge, and Levi-Civita conventions stated in the question. The same coefficient is obtained from the one-loop axial-vector-vector triangle diagram.

With the Standard Model field content, every gauge-invariant, Lorentz-invariant operator of dimension at most four automatically preserves baryon number and total lepton number. They are therefore accidental symmetries, rather than symmetries imposed in constructing the renormalizable Lagrangian. This explains perturbative conservation in ordinary reactions. They are not exact principles: the electroweak chiral anomaly violates $B+L$, the dimension-five Weinberg operator violates lepton number, and dimension-six proton-decay operators can violate baryon number. The combination $B-L$ is anomaly free when a right-handed neutrino is included in each generation.

A gauge anomaly breaks a redundancy needed to remove unphysical states and makes a quantum gauge theory inconsistent unless it cancels. A chiral anomaly is instead the quantum violation of a classical global axial current; the theory remains consistent, but processes such as ${\pi }^0\to \gamma \gamma$ and instanton-induced charge violation become possible. A 't Hooft anomaly is an obstruction to gauging a global symmetry. It is compatible with a consistent theory but is invariant under renormalization-group flow, so any infrared phase must reproduce it through massless fields, spontaneous symmetry breaking, or topological degrees of freedom.

For $m_u=m_d=0$ and electromagnetism neglected, the classical flavour symmetry isup to finite quotients. The chiral anomaly breaks $U(1{)}_A$ quantum mechanically, while $U(1{)}_V=U(1{)}_B$ remains. The quark condensatespontaneously breaksSmall quark masses and electromagnetism explicitly break parts of this approximate symmetry.

A gauge anomaly breaks a redundancy required to remove unphysical polarizations. It violates the Ward identities and makes the quantum gauge theory inconsistent, so all gauge anomalies must cancel. A chiral anomaly, or Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly, instead breaks a classically conserved global axial symmetry; it is physically allowed and explains effects such as anomalous pseudoscalar decays and instanton-induced charge violation. A 't Hooft anomaly is an obstruction to gauging a global symmetry. It is invariant under renormalization-group flow, so 't Hooft anomaly matching constrains the infrared theory to reproduce it through massless fields, symmetry breaking, or a topological sector.

For the chiral transformation $\psi \mapsto e^{i\alpha {\gamma }^5}\psi$, one also has $\bar{\psi }\mapsto \bar{\psi }{e}^{i\alpha {\gamma }^5}$. The massless kinetic and vector-current terms are invariant because $\{{\gamma }^5,{\gamma }^{\mu }\}=0$. Since ${\gamma }^5$ commutes with $[{\gamma }^{\mu },{\gamma }^{\nu }]$, the Pauli bilinear transforms with $e^{2i\alpha {\gamma }^5}$ and is not invariant. Thus the continuous classical axial symmetry requires $\lambda =0$.

A fermion mass also breaks the symmetry, so in the massive theory one additionally needs $m=0$, which contradicts a genuinely massive fermion. Making $\alpha$ local produces $({\partial }_{\mu }\alpha )\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^5\psi$. No choice of the vector coupling $e$ or Pauli coupling $\lambda$ cancels this term; gauging it requires an axial gauge field, and at the quantum level one must also address the chiral anomaly.

A gauge anomaly makes gauge redundancy inconsistent and must cancel. A chiral anomaly is the quantum nonconservation of a classically conserved axial current and may be a physical effect. A 't Hooft anomaly is an obstruction to gauging a global symmetry; it is preserved by renormalization-group flow and must be reproduced by the infrared theory, through massless degrees of freedom, symmetry breaking, or topological order.

For massless fermions the classical axial rotation has Noether currentPromote $\beta$ to a spacetime-dependent parameter. The classical variation, after integration by parts, is $-\int d^{4}x\beta {\partial }_{\mu }{J}_A^{\mu }$. The chiral anomaly is equivalently encoded by the stated shift $\theta \mapsto \theta +2N_f\beta$, which changes the theta action byThe anomalous Ward identity is thereforeso $\alpha =N_f{g}^2/(8{\pi }^2)$ in the trace convention of the question.

Classically the $p$ antifundamentals admit $U(p)$ flavour rotations and $\lambda$ admits an independent phase rotation, giving $SU(p)\times U(1{)}_{\psi }\times U(1{)}_{\lambda }$ up to finite quotients. A $U(1)$ with charges $q_{\lambda },q_{\psi }$ is free of the mixed $SU(N{)}^{2}U(1)$ anomaly whenUsing $p=N-4$, chooseThe orthogonal axial phase has a chiral anomaly, while this combination survives. The continuous quantum global symmetry is therefore $SU(p)\times U(1)$, again up to possible finite central quotients.