A nearly confined cylinder in Couette flow is driven by the unequal lubrication resistances of its two gaps. If their minimum widths are proportional to and , force balance weights the relative wall velocities by the inverse square roots of those widths.
For inviscid plane Couette flow between impermeable walls at , the nonzero real streamwise wavenumber gives no nontrivial smooth discrete vertical-velocity modes. Instead, the vorticity variable obeys . Localized vorticity sheets give generalized eigenfunctions with real frequencies . Their closure forms a neutral continuous spectrum.
Newtonian fluid stress tensor Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For isotropic incompressible flow of a Newtonian fluid, the stress tensor is the displayed expression, with pressure , dynamic viscosity , velocity , and identity matrix . In Couette flow, its off-diagonal component is the shear stress.
A thin layer of subglacial till idealized as a Newtonian fluid of dynamic viscosity and thickness undergoes Couette flow between stationary bedrock and ice moving at speed . Its resisting basal shear stress has magnitude and acts opposite to the sliding motion. Combining this drag with the hydrostatic driving force gives the bulk approximation used in the friction-dominated grounding-line evolution law.
For this steady unidirectional flow, the convective acceleration vanishes because depends only on . The axial Navier-Stokes equation reduces to , with . The no-slip boundary conditions therefore give
This is a superposition of Couette flow and pressure-driven Poiseuille flow.
Integrate the axial ordinary differential equation twice: . The no-slip boundary condition at zero gives , and the one at gives . Hence
The first term is Couette flow; the second is Poiseuille flow driven in positive when . Their addition is valid because the reduced Stokes equation is linear.
This is a squeezing motion, not the rotational motion of the previous part. The gap changes at rate . The Reynolds lubrication equation therefore gives
The outer wall also has tangential speed , but its local Couette flow flux is compared with the squeezing flux and does not affect the leading force. Thus at leading order. Periodic pressure gives , because the integral of vanishes over a full circle. Balancing pressure traction on the fixed inner cylinder and using integration by parts,
The supplied integral gives the squeeze resistance of an eccentric journal bearing:
The fluid tends to pull the inner cylinder upwards with the moving outer wall, so a downward holding force is required when . At concentricity the translation resistance is . The omitted wall-tangential flux and shear traction give smaller thin-gap contributions.
Let increase upwards, so the bed is at , the surface is at , and . In the shallow-shelf approximation the incompressible flow has nearly depth-uniform horizontal speed and vertical strain . The Newtonian fluid stress tensor, together with the hydrostatic approximation, then gives
The factor four includes both horizontal extension and the pressure correction required by vertical compression. Integrating horizontal force balance over depth, using zero surface shear and the bed traction, gives the membrane-stress derivative and the gravitational driving force . The thin subglacial till layer is idealized by Newtonian till lubrication and undergoes Couette flow, with resisting basal stress . Hence force balance and mass conservation yield
Since is fixed, . No accumulation or ablation is included.
At the grounding line, the first boundary condition is ice-sheet flotation:
For an unbuttressed ice shelf, the second is the extensional stress required to balance the difference between the integrated ice and seawater hydrostatic pressures. The ice contribution is , while the water contribution is . On using ice-sheet flotation, their difference is , with . Equivalently, shelf force balance integrates to ; absence of a buttressing force sets this constant to zero. Thus the unbuttressed Newtonian grounding-line stress condition is
Here is kinematic viscosity; it appears in the printed target formula without an explicit definition.
The ratio of longitudinal stress divergence to till drag is of order . The given small-parameter limit therefore yields the friction-dominated bulk relation
The coefficient depends on the basal lubrication, and gives seaward motion. This is a bulk reduction: longitudinal stress has been neglected in the differential equation but its boundary traction remains specified. A complete uniformly valid approximation close to the grounding line could require a membrane-stress boundary layer. In the remainder, use the pointwise friction closure and retain the shelf stress condition as the boundary data, as requested in the paper.
Differentiate the ice-sheet flotation condition along the moving grounding line:
Now . Substitution of the friction-dominated speed and the shelf stress boundary condition gives the friction-dominated grounding-line evolution law:
The coefficient of is the spatial derivative of the flotation deficit, up to sign. If it vanishes, the implicit equation remains the correct compatibility condition but division to determine a finite speed is invalid; tangential contact needs separate analysis.
In a steady state, volume flux per unit width is constant: . The friction relation gives
Differentiating and using at the grounding line gives
Put , and . Substitution and cancellation of yield the steady friction-dominated grounding-line thickness relation:
For and a bed deepening seaward (), the polynomial is strictly increasing for , starts negative and tends to infinity, so it has exactly one positive root. At that root and , as required by steady outward extension. The relation belongs to the specified friction closure; it is not a flux law for arbitrary till rheology or arbitrary membrane-stress matching.
Let the upper plate in flow A move at speed , with the lower plate fixed. The Couette flow profile is
so its mid-plane speed is and its total viscous dissipation per unit plate area is
Write for the constant pressure-gradient magnitude in flow B. The plane Poiseuille flow profile is
Equality of the mid-plane speeds gives
Since ,
Hence
When , the small-argument expansion gives
Therefore
The viscous diffusion time is then short compared with the oscillation period. Viscosity communicates the wall motion across the entire layer almost instantaneously, producing the linear profile of quasi-steady Couette flow.
Near the closest point, the cylinder–plane gap is
For translation parallel to the cylinder axis, the leading flow is Couette flow. Its shear traction is , so
Hence .
For transverse translation, the local Couette-Poiseuille flow in a thin gap and mass conservation give the Reynolds lubrication equation. Writing and using pressure recovery at both ends determines its integration constant. The pressure and viscous contributions to the horizontal traction reduce to
where the final term is the direct Couette shear contribution. Therefore
On , the traction exerted by the outer fluid on the inner fluid is
The inner fluid exerts the opposite traction on the outer fluid. Its couple is therefore
Using
and the supplied spherical integral,
we obtain
Thus the radius cancels:
This is the Torque in rotational Stokes flow between concentric spheres.
When ,
the rotational drag torque for a sphere in an effectively unbounded fluid. If , then
so
the inverse-gap growth expected from a thin Couette flow.