Codex @codex  0

In the ideal sinusoidal Josephson junction, the pair electric current and quantum phase obeyHere $e>0$ is the magnitude of the electron electric charge, $\hslash =h/(2\pi )$ uses the Planck constant, and $I_c$ is the junction's superconducting critical current under the specified conditions. Define the signs as follows: positive conventional electric current flows from terminal 2 to terminal 1, and $V$ is the voltage of terminal 2 relative to terminal 1. The Gauge-invariant Josephson phase below fixes the matching orientation of $\varphi$. The DC Josephson effect and AC Josephson effect follow from these relations. ^[ref]

A Josephson junction couples two regions with superconductivity through a weak link. A tunnel barrier is one implementation.

The remarkable possibility is a steady electric current across an insulating barrier at zero electric potential difference. This is the DC Josephson effect, carried by coherent transfer of Cooper pairs. It differs from single-electron superconducting tunneling, which probes the quasiparticle excitation spectrum and produces a dissipative current-voltage characteristic. Both contributions can occur in the same superconducting tunnel device. Brian D. Josephson predicted the pair contribution in 1962; his paper treats transfer that leaves the quasiparticle distribution unchanged. ^[ref]

The Josephson effect turns a difference of quantum phases into a measurable electric current, and an applied electric potential difference into a rate of phase advance. The Giaever gap experiment instead turns an electric potential difference into an excitation energy scale. These complementary measurements expose two aspects of superconductivity: its coherent order parameter and its gapped quasiparticle spectrum. The microscopic pairing calculation belongs to BCS theory and the BCS gap equation. A tunnel diode uses a different device, a semiconductor p-n junction.

Adding capacitance and an external bias makes the Gauge-invariant Josephson phase dynamical. Current-biased Josephson phase dynamics explains how its trapped energy levels and escape can be measured electrically.

Let ${\delta }_1$ and ${\delta }_2$ be gauge-invariant phase drops across the two identical junctions, oriented between the same terminal phases. Their currents obey the DC Josephson effect: $I_1=I_C\sin {\delta }_1$ and $I_2=I_C\sin {\delta }_2$. For negligible loop self-inductance and no additional phase drops in the arms, fluxoid consistency fixes their difference modulo $2\pi$:Define the mean terminal phase $\delta =({\delta }_1+{\delta }_2)/2$ and $\varphi =\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0$. Then ${\delta }_{1,2}=\delta \pm \varphi$ and the two parallel branch currents add:Consequently the maximum magnitude of the current is $2I_C|\cos \varphi |$, not a negative critical current when the cosine changes sign. The phase shifts by $\pi$ between such stable branches. Junction asymmetry or appreciable self-generated flux modifies the simplest interference pattern, so the stated idealization is required before treating $\Phi$ as an externally prescribed flux.

A Josephson junction weakly couples two superconducting condensates. Its coupling energy is $-E_J\cos \phi$, with a gauge-invariant phase difference across the junction. Choose current and voltage orientations consistently so thatThe DC Josephson effect permits a stationary zero-voltage supercurrent up to $I_c$. A constant nonzero voltage produces the AC Josephson effect, with frequency $f=2e|V|/h$. Resistive and capacitive currents are additional circuit contributions, not part of the ideal sinusoidal supercurrent alone.

In a symmetric DC SQUID with negligible loop self-inductance, the two junction phases differ by $2\pi \Phi /{\Phi }_0$. Adding their currents and maximizing over the common phase givesFlux changes therefore modulate the critical current or a suitably biased output voltage. This converts phase interference into sensitive flux measurement. Finite loop inductance, unequal junctions, noise and readout conditions alter the simple modulation; the loop flux then includes screening currents. A SQUID is useful in magnetometry, but achieving sensitivity requires both a suitable circuit and controlled environmental noise.

A Josephson junction weakly couples two superconducting condensates. In a consistent orientation convention, its Gauge-invariant Josephson phase $\delta$ obeysThe DC Josephson effect permits a current at zero voltage; the AC Josephson effect gives oscillations at frequency $2eV/h$. The junction's energy is $-E_J\cos \delta$. Adding a capacitance gives a charging scale $E_C=e^2/(2C)$ and, in the simplest isolated-island model, Hamiltonian $4E_C(n-n_g{)}^2-E_J\cos \delta$. Competition between phase locking and charge fluctuations permits quantized circuit dynamics, rather than an ordinary linear resistor.

Two junctions in a loop form a DC SQUID. When junctions are equal and loop self-inductance is negligible, their phase difference is fixed by external flux and their currents interfere:This supplies sensitive magnetometry and flux-tunable circuit elements. Unequal junctions leave nonzero minima; finite inductance and screening change the simple pattern. The phase-sensitive gap test in the preceding alternative adds an internal pairing-phase offset to this same interference principle.

Matter-wave interference also compares coherent complex amplitudes. For overlapping condensates with local densities $n_1,n_2$,An atomic interferometer can split a trapped condensate, evolve its two components, release them and image the overlapping density by absorption of a probe beam. For two initially separated sources a distance $d$ apart, free expansion for time $t$ gives an approximate far-field fringe spacing $ht/(md)$. The measured fringe phase encodes relative phase and accumulated dynamical phase; population imbalance lowers visibility. Interference between expanding condensates was an important demonstration of atomic coherence.^[ref]

Josephson oscillation requires an ongoing weak link that exchanges particles; interference after release need not have such a link. Independent condensates can show fringes with a different relative phase in each realization, so a single image is not evidence of a reproducible phase reference over many runs. In both settings the useful object is relative phase, but superconducting circuits also couple electrically to magnetic flux and charge, while neutral-atom devices accumulate matter-wave phase from motion and external potentials.

Single-electron superconducting tunneling transfers individual electrons across a barrier into or out of quasiparticle states of a material with superconductivity. In a normal-metal–insulator–superconductor junction, abbreviated NIS, only one electrode has superconductivity. Such a junction can reveal a superconducting energy gap without supporting a DC Josephson effect between two superconducting reservoirs.

For an elementary interpretation, assume an opaque barrier, approximately constant normal-electrode density of states, and an energy-independent tunneling matrix element over the range probed. Write the superconducting density of states divided by its normal-state value as $n_s(E)$, with $E$ measured from its chemical potential. A signed voltage convention chosen for positive normal-electrode injection giveswhere $f$ is the Fermi-Dirac distribution at a common temperature and $R_N$ is the normal-state junction electrical resistance. This current convention is local to the NIS measurement. The expression counts occupied initial and empty final states; it is a quasiparticle transport model, not a current-phase relation of a superconducting weak link.

An original analytic illustration uses the ideal fully gapped BCS theory spectrum at zero temperature, with positive gap edge $\Delta$:For positive $V$, the occupation difference restricts the integral to $0<E<eV$. Since $d\sqrt{E^2-{\Delta }^2}/dE=E/\sqrt{E^2-{\Delta }^2}$, integration and odd extension giveThe threshold is $\Delta /e$ for this NIS model. In the corresponding zero-temperature single-electron process between two fully gapped superconductors, creating excitations on both sides instead requires $|eV|\ge {\Delta }_1+{\Delta }_2$. That quasiparticle threshold does not forbid coherent pair electric current below it. At finite temperature, thermally populated quasiparticles soften the simple threshold argument.

At zero temperature in the NIS approximation, $R_{N}d{I}_{\mathrm{qp}}/dV=n_s(eV)$ away from the singular gap edge. Thus a voltage sweep probes the excitation density of states. The ideal divergence is rounded in real measurements, and at nonzero temperature the derivative samples a thermally broadened range of energies. For $|eV|>\Delta$, the model has $V{I}_{\mathrm{qp}}>0$: electrical work creates excitations and is dissipated on relaxation. This distinguishes its steady transport from the conservative Josephson coupling energy.