Use implicit differentiation, treating as a function of :Where , this is . At the two points where , the ellipse has vertical tangent lines rather than a finite slope.
Maximizing the squared distance avoids differentiating a square root. The Lagrange multiplier equations for areAdding and subtracting the first two gives and . The feasible stationary points therefore lie on or . The first case gives and squared distance . The second gives and , with squared distance .
The integrand field is exactly the curl computed in part (a), so use its polynomial vector potential . The upper cap meets the plane in an ellipse. Since the parameters are only assumed nonzero, set and to use positive semiaxes. Its correctly oriented boundary isOn that boundary, and , so only contributes. The Stokes theorem therefore givesThe last integral follows by expanding . ThusThe result is independent of . A sign check uses the divergence theorem: closing the cap with its base disk adds outward normal there. Since , the cap flux equals , consistent with the boxed expression and its absolute values.
For a smooth oriented surface with piecewise smooth boundary and a continuously differentiable vector field , the Stokes theorem statesThe boundary orientation is fixed by the right-hand rule: curling the fingers along the positive boundary direction makes the thumb point along the surface normal. For an outward upper cap, its boundary ellipse is traversed counterclockwise when viewed from the positive direction. The figure shows two possible caps with the same oriented boundary, anticipating the last part.
The modified upper surface has exactly the same ellipse at and the same boundary orientation. The field retains the global polynomial vector potential from part (a). By the Stokes theorem, both surface fluxes equal the same boundary line integral; the cap's height and interior shape do not enter. HenceThis is an instance of the fact that solenoidal flux depends on the oriented boundary, with the domain condition automatically satisfied by the smooth polynomial field on all of . When are chosen positive, the formula simplifies to ; the absolute-value form respects the original allowance of arbitrary nonzero signs.
Write for any differentiable . The multivariable chain rule gives and . ConsequentlyThus solves the homogeneous equation. The method of characteristics also explains completeness on the full plane: the characteristic curves are the connected ellipses , and is constant on each one. These are the elliptic characteristics of a planar transport equation.
Substitution of into the general solution givesThus for . Choosing this same formula everywhere gives the polynomial solutionIt directly satisfies the differential equation and .
The boundary condition does not determine a unique solution on the entire plane. Every characteristic ellipse misses the data line . More generally, is arbitrary for , subject to matching the chosen regularity at and at the origin. The displayed polynomial is one global extension; it is forced on . A smooth function supported strictly inside may be added to without changing the boundary data.
There is a global-domain issue in the printed question. Write away from the origin. Direct partial differentiation givesThus the differential one-form is a closed differential form for every real . The Poincaré lemma makes it locally an exact differential form on small neighborhoods avoiding the origin. There is no additional condition such as .
However, the stated domain is the whole punctured plane, which is not simply connected. To test global exactness, use the closed ellipse , , . Here andThe line integral of a globally exact differential form around any closed curve would be zero. ConsequentlyThe distinction is precisely that of the elliptically scaled angular one-form. The remaining parts can be answered consistently using a local angle branch, as follows.
The seven requested parabolas are for ; the case is the horizontal axis. Positive opens upward, negative downward, and larger gives a narrower parabola. All pass through the origin with a horizontal tangent line.
To find orthogonal trajectories, use the continuous family containing these seven representative members. Its slope is away from . Two finite slopes of perpendicular tangents multiply to , so the orthogonal slope isThis separable differential equation gives , henceThese ellipses are the regular real trajectories; is a single point, not a regular curve, and has no real points. One example is , with semiaxes horizontally and vertically.
The implicit tangent relation also describes points with vertical tangents, where the slope quotient is unavailable. At intersections with the member , the ellipse has a vertical tangent line and is perpendicular to that horizontal axis. The common origin of the parabolas is not on any regular trajectory with . The sketch shows the requested seven members and the example ellipse.
Seven parabolic family members and an elliptical orthogonal trajectory
. Details. Write . Then and , so the condition fixes the sum of distances from and . It is an ellipse with centre , vertical semimajor axis , and focal distance . Its horizontal semiminor axis obeys . Thus the locus isThe vertices are and ; the horizontal extremities are . The complex conjugation places the second focus above the origin.
By implicit differentiation of the ellipse equation,The tangent line through is thereforeIts normal vector is , parallel to the gradient of at that point.
At a differentiable interior stationary point, all first-order changes of the scalar field vanish. In particular, the directional derivative along each coordinate axis vanishes, so and hence . Equivalently, the first-order differential vanishes for every displacement. A differentiable interior maximum or minimum must satisfy this condition; a stationary point need not be an extremum.
The standard nondegenerate local contour plot models are for a maximum, for a minimum, and for a saddle point of a scalar function. Near a maximum, nested contours have lower values farther from the centre; near a minimum they have higher values. Near a saddle, hyperbolas occur on opposite sides of the critical level, whose contour has two intersecting tangent directions. More general nondegenerate quadratic forms deform these circles into ellipses; degenerate stationary points can have more complicated contours.
For , completing the square gives the conic sectionThe possible levels follow fromFor , the contours are ellipses centred at , shrinking to the maximum as . The zero contour is the parabola from part (c). For , the contours are vertical-opening hyperbolas. At they degenerate into the intersecting straight lines, and for they are horizontal-opening hyperbolas. These descriptions specify the remaining contour families and their symmetry about the axis. The lower bound is approached as at fixed but is never attained.
Contours and an ascending gradient trajectory
. Original contours of the rational scalar field. The critical points are marked; the green parabola is the zero contour and the crossing dashed lines have level . The red trajectory starts at and follows the positive gradient towards the maximum, as discussed in part (e). Details.Adding is a translation by in the complex plane. The ellipse of part (i) therefore keeps its semiaxes and axis directions, with new centre . Writing , its equation isThe third panel in the figure in part (b) shows the translated ellipse.
Write and use the complex conjugate . ThenThus the real part is stretched by a factor of two while the imaginary part is unchanged. If , substitution into the circle equation givesThis is an ellipse with centre , horizontal semiaxis and vertical semiaxis . It is the second panel in the figure in part (b).






