The evanescent field in total internal reflection oscillates and advances in wave phase along the boundary while its wave amplitude decays away from it. With the coordinates above and time dependence , a TE polarization has complex amplitude
The physical electric field is . The decaying sign excludes a field that grows without bound at . Dielectric-interface boundary conditions determine ; for nongrazing incidence it is generally nonzero.[ref]
Zero normal energy flux follows directly from Maxwell equations. The wavevector is ; the relation gives
Consequently, the cycle-averaged Poynting vector is
The electric field and are a quarter-cycle apart, so their product has zero cycle average. Tangential energy flux survives. This is a local calculation for the single decaying evanescent wave in the infinite second half-space.
To check reflected power independently, put . The existing transverse-electric Fresnel reflection coefficient becomes . Its numerator and denominator are complex conjugates, so , while supplies the surface electric field relative to the incident wave amplitude. Thus a unit optical reflectance does not require a zero transmitted field. The same normal power balance holds for TM polarization; its reflected wave phase generally differs from the TE polarization phase. A mixture can therefore change its polarization of an electromagnetic wave on reflection even though all normal incident power returns.
Frustrated total internal reflection occurs when a nearby second high-index dielectric couples to the evanescent field in total internal reflection, allowing power to cross a finite low-index gap. The extra boundary changes the dielectric-interface boundary conditions; the gap field need not be a single decaying evanescent wave. Consequently, the zero normal Poynting vector calculation for two infinite half-spaces does not forbid transmission in this three-medium geometry.
Harvard’s actual demonstration uses two right-angle glass prisms, a helium-neon laser, a small clamp and two perpendicular screens as detectors. The contact faces are cleaned and placed opposite each other, with the clamp protecting the corners. Increasing pressure narrows the intervening air film; the observed beam routing changes gradually from total internal reflection toward onward transmission. The broad-gap reflecting configuration supplies the comparison for the narrow-gap transmitting configuration. This is a qualitative readout: the page explicitly says the gap is not measured.[ref]
The inference is that the lower-index region can mediate electromagnetic energy transfer when another boundary is nearby. The demonstration does not determine a numerical evanescent penetration depth, resolve gap uniformity, or establish a three-layer transmission coefficient. For the constructed example, identifies the scale over which the isolated-interface field remains appreciable; substituting for a gap transmission fraction would omit the changed boundary fields and their interference. A quantitative gap calculation must solve the full Maxwell equations with both boundaries.
An incident electromagnetic wave generally produces reflected and transmitted waves because the two media have different electromagnetic response. Consider a flat interface between homogeneous, linear, lossless media with permittivities and magnetic permeabilities . Their wave speeds and wave impedances are
For each plane electromagnetic wave, . With no free surface charge or current, the interface conditions for electromagnetic fields require continuous tangential and normal . Equality of the phase at every point on the boundary gives equal angular frequencies and tangential wavevectors. Hence the reflection angle equals the incidence angle and Snell's law is
where and each angle is measured from the normal.
At normal incidence use the same tangential axis for all electric amplitudes. The two independent boundary equations are
Solving gives the amplitude Fresnel equations
For nonmagnetic media, these become and . Reflection into a medium of larger refractive index therefore reverses the electric amplitude's sign at normal incidence.
The normal Poynting vector determines the reflected and transmitted fractions of incident power. At normal incidence,
It is the power fractions, rather than the squared electric amplitudes alone, that add to unity.
At oblique incidence separate transverse electric polarization (, electric field perpendicular to the incidence plane) from transverse magnetic polarization (, electric field in that plane). For nonmagnetic media, writing and , the Fresnel equations are
Here choose a common direction and, for each ray, the direction as . This makes the reflected basis reverse its tangential direction at normal incidence, explaining why the displayed then has the opposite sign to . Physical reflectance is independent of this sign convention. For either polarization with propagating transmission,
For polarization, zero reflection occurs at the Brewster angle . If , incidence above the critical angle for total internal reflection produces an evanescent field in total internal reflection and for an isolated lossless interface. A lossy second medium requires complex response coefficients and an absorption term in the energy balance.
Total internal reflection Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-18
Total internal reflection occurs when a wave travels from higher to lower refractive index above the critical angle for total internal reflection, leaving no propagating transmitted plane electromagnetic wave normal to the interface.
At an infinite planar interface, total internal reflection returns all incident normal power in the reflected plane electromagnetic wave. Assume homogeneous dielectrics with isotropy, linearity, no dielectric loss, magnetic permeability , and positive real refractive indices . Above the critical angle for total internal reflection, both TE polarization and TM polarization have unit optical reflectance despite the external evanescent wave.[ref]
This makes total internal reflection useful for guiding light in an optical fiber: suitable internal incidence angles keep energy inside successive boundaries. Its more surprising feature is that perfect optical reflectance coexists with an external electric field. The evanescent field in total internal reflection can interact with a nearby object, as the frustrated total internal reflection experiment demonstrates.
For an original idealized example, choose , at vacuum wavelength . At angle of incidence , Snell law for electromagnetic waves gives an angle of refraction , so a transmitted light ray still emerges. At , its direction becomes tangent to the boundary. At , the proposed sine of a real angle of refraction would be : the transmitted wavevector must instead have an imaginary normal component. These are predictions for the stipulated media, not measured properties of a particular block.
Figure 1.
Constructed ray geometry just below, at, and above the critical angle for refractive indices 1.5 and 1; arrows indicate directions rather than relative powers
. Details.
A real semicircular-block experiment isolates this threshold. The University of Maryland laboratory instructions place a laser, motor-driven rotation stage and photodetector together; an aperture limits the detector voltage. The semicircular block is centered on the rotation axis, with the photodetector aligned along its flat face. The instructions identify a strong grazing-beam signal and a weaker signal just before the critical angle for total internal reflection. The readout is detector voltage versus stage angle. Retracing the incident laser beam identifies normal incidence for alignment.[ref]
The semicircular shape supplies a geometric control: a light ray passing radially through the curved face enters at normal incidence, avoiding additional entrance refraction. The weaker signal near the flat face locates a limiting angle of refraction; a vanishing remote-detector signal alone would not establish that the external electric field vanishes. Beam width and alignment limit angular resolution; no measured threshold or decay depth is supplied.[ref]