Centre the infinite square well at zero. Its ground state wavefunction is inside the well and zero outside. The momentum representation in quantum mechanics gives the wavevector amplitude
Consequently the unnormalised wavevector distribution of an infinite-well ground state is
The apparent singularities at are removable. The normalized probability density is times the boxed expression and has limit there. Translating the well changes only the Fourier transform's phase. The wavevector is continuously distributed; a box energy eigenstate is not a free momentum eigenstate.
Inside the infinite square well, the orbital and spin operators act on different factors of the tensor product. Write . The identity
shows that the exchange interaction commutes with and . The sum of the one-particle kinetic energies also commutes with them and with particle exchange. Thus one may use orbital quantum numbers together with the total-spin sector and projection , with physical .
For identical spin one-half particles the Pauli exclusion principle further restricts the states. The spin-one-half singlet state is antisymmetric in spin and must multiply a symmetric spatial wavefunction; a spin-one-half triplet state must multiply an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. Thus label unordered orbital occupations in symmetry-adapted states, not arbitrary ordered product states. This gives the labels , with the paper's last label expressed in units of .
The unperturbed infinite square well is invariant under the parity operator. Its one-dimensional energy eigenvalues are nondegenerate, so each energy eigenstate has definite parity. Its position expectation value therefore vanishes: is even, while is odd. The first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory correction is consequently
The electric field does mix opposite-parity quantum states, and second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory contains two factors of . Its leading contribution is thus proportional to : this is a quadratic Stark effect. More generally, applying the parity operator changes into , so their corresponding energy eigenvalues agree. An analytic expansion about zero electric field contains only even powers of . We assume is small compared with the unperturbed excitation scale.
Use zero-based labels to agree with in the later parts. The normalized infinite square well energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues are
The position matrix elements in a symmetric infinite square well, obtained by integrating the product of the two wavefunctions against , are
The integral in the question uses positive integer labels; replacing them by is essential here. Only opposite-parity states, odd, contribute, as also follows from the parity operator selection rule.
Second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory now gives the requested infinite sum:
In fully explicit form this is
The symbol here denotes the electron mass, not a summation index. For the ground state , every denominator in the first form is negative, so the ground energy level moves downward. For excited states, contributions from lower and higher energy levels have opposite signs.
Inside the infinite square well, the stationary wavefunctions can be chosen real:
They vanish outside the well and at its impenetrable endpoints. A sine meets the left boundary condition; the right one requires . The putative function is identically zero, so it is not a quantum state. The constants are fixed by wavefunction normalization.
Inside the infinite square well, the Hamiltonian is purely the kinetic energy operator,
Its admissible wavefunctions obey the boundary conditions and vanish outside the interval. Equivalently write with inside and an infinite confining wall outside. The boundary conditions are part of the specification of this Hamiltonian; the differential expression alone does not determine the spectrum.
Twice differentiating gives , so inside the infinite square well
The boundary condition at zero is automatic. The other requires , hence . A nonzero eigenfunction can therefore be labelled by
If desired, its normalized form is . The positive lowest energy follows from confinement and the required spatial variation of a nonzero wavefunction.
Assume type-I confinement of both carriers, and first use an infinite square well as an explicit estimate. For thickness nm and each carrier mass , confinement measured from the corresponding well band edge is
Thus the first three infinite-well levels are approximately , and meV for each carrier. Interband envelope overlap favors matching quantum numbers when the electron and hole well profiles are the same. Ignoring exciton binding energy initially, their absorption thresholds are
The first two lie in the requested optical window. Two-dimensional subband joint densities of states produce step-like onsets, with excitonic peaks just below them, rather than only a bulk three-dimensional onset. Confinement strengthens electron–hole binding: the ideal strict-two-dimensional hydrogen ground binding is meV, while a finite-width well interpolates toward the bulk value near meV. The nm width is comparable to the bulk exciton radius, so neither limiting binding value is exact. A schematic based on the infinite-well estimate therefore has first exciton peaks around – eV and – eV, followed by their subband continua; the eV barrier absorption is another feature near the top of the requested window.
The barrier gap alone does not specify the finite confinement energies. Under type-I alignment it supplies only eV. It does not give their division or the barrier effective masses, and a larger gap by itself does not prove type-I alignment. Infinite-well levels are consequently estimates, not uniquely determined measured levels.
For a concrete conditional comparison, assigning equal eV electron and hole barriers and taking the same mass on both sides gives finite square well levels , and meV per carrier. These follow from for even levels and for odd levels, with , . The corresponding unbound-pair optical thresholds would be , and eV before exciton shifts. This example is deliberately conditional and demonstrates why band offsets must not be invented to make a unique finite square well spectrum. The requested schematic below states which approximation it uses.
Figure 1.
Conditional quantum-well levels and a low-temperature subband absorption sketch
. Original infinite-barrier estimate for a 5 nm well with equal carrier masses. The optical sketch uses two subband thresholds and illustrative exciton peaks; it is not a reconstruction of the source bulk spectrum or a unique prediction without band-offset data. Details.
Infinite walls impose the Dirichlet boundary conditions . Inside the infinite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is . Its nonzero solutions satisfying both endpoint conditions have wave numbers , . Since
the normalized energy eigenstates are the sine modes with prefactor . They are orthonormal by sine orthogonality and complete by the Fourier sine series on an interval of length . Differentiating twice gives
Interpret the box as an infinite square well, with zero potential on and impenetrable walls. The wavefunction vanishes at both walls. The time-independent Schrödinger equation inside is . Multiplying by and integration by parts shows for any nonzero state with the wall conditions.
For , put . The condition at zero gives , and the condition at requires . The zero value of gives only the zero wavefunction, so the allowed energy eigenvalues are
The corresponding normalized energy eigenstates are . Each level is nondegenerate in this one-dimensional problem. A nonzero constant interior potential would add that constant to all energies.
Inside the infinite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is with . For the exponential solutions cannot satisfy both conditions except trivially, and for neither can a linear function. For put . The first boundary condition selects , and the second gives . Thus
on , with outside. Their squared integrals are one, and the sine orthogonality identity gives an orthonormal set. The sine Fourier basis on the interval is complete: odd extension to an interval of length reduces this to completeness of the Fourier series basis. Hence these are a complete set of normalized energy eigenstates.
Choosing the harmless sign of the second energy eigenstate so that and , the specified wave function is . The Born rule therefore gives
with no other possible measured energies. The two energy eigenvalues are and .
After the first measurement gives the ground state, the old state is . Doubling the width puts the walls at , and the new normalized ground state is . The stipulated unchanged state is zero outside the original interval, so the probability amplitude is
Squaring gives
The ground-state overlap after sudden expansion of a square well stays unchanged during subsequent evolution in the fixed new well, because the energy-basis coefficients acquire only phases. The answer is conditional on the already observed old ground state; its earlier probability is not another factor in this conditional question.
The squared sine has integral over the interval of length , since it contains an integer number of half-wavelengths. A real positive phase convention therefore gives
Inside the infinite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is . The wavenumber is , so
The stationary states vanish at both walls and form an orthonormal basis of the square-integrable state space. A common arbitrary phase on each basis function does not alter any energy or measurement probability.
For the Hamiltonian , the real-time configuration-space path integral is
with its measure defined by time slicing. Wick rotation gives the Euclidean path integral and the thermal trace.
For the infinite square well on , the Dirichlet boundary conditions select the normalized energy eigenstates
There is no state: the corresponding sine is identically zero. Taking the trace in this orthonormal basis gives the canonical partition function
Use the normalized eigenfunctions of the infinite square well,
The sine identity expands the initial wavefunction as
The normalization factor yields precisely these coefficients. By the Born rule, the energy measurement probabilities are for and for . Thus the energy expectation is
The two probabilities sum to one, also checking the wavefunction normalization.
Inside the infinite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is . The infinite exterior potential imposes . For , the first condition leaves a sine and the second requires . A zero or negative energy gives only the zero solution under these conditions. The normalized energy eigenstates and eigenvalues are
The wavefunctions vanish outside the well, and a constant phase is immaterial. Normalization uses .
Inside the infinite square well, the stationary Schrödinger equation for unit mass is
Its normalized eigenstates and energies are
The general normalized time-dependent solution is
Immediately after removing the barrier, the normalized wavefunction is
Its Fourier sine series coefficients in the full-well basis are
They are
The Born rule therefore gives
A stationary state has the form
For a time-independent quantum observable , the global phases cancel in the expectation value:
It is therefore independent of time.
For the infinite square well,
The possible energy measurement results are
with respective Born rule probabilities and . Normalization gives .
At time ,
The required matrix elements are
Consequently
where the angular frequency is
Finally, , so
Inside the infinite square well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation has Dirichlet boundary conditions at and . Its normalized energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues are
Use the intended infinite square well interpretation: the kinetic-energy operator on with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions. The variational energy is most safely evaluated through its quadratic form,
The boundary term vanishes because the trial function vanishes at both walls. Its zero extension has derivative jumps there, so the form interpretation avoids assigning an unrestricted full-line second derivative to it.
Set and . Apart from an irrelevant factor , the trial function is . Polynomial integration gives
Hence the polynomial Rayleigh-Ritz trial space for a one-dimensional box has energy
The denominator is strictly positive, since . Differentiation gives
The two stationary parameters are . The smaller is a local maximum; the larger is a local minimum. Since the energy tends to as , the latter is the global minimum:
The upper stationary value is . Exact roots give a slightly tighter bound than substituting the rounded hints.
There are two qualifications to the printed operator and comparison energy. For the box with Dirichlet boundary conditions and width , the actual ground-state energy is
which lies just below the variational result. The coefficient printed as an exact eigenvalue is inconsistent with this box problem. Also, merely declaring the differential expression to be zero outside the interval does not impose hard-wall confinement or specify a self-adjoint domain. Read literally on a space admitting exterior-supported states, it has zero-energy states outside and does not have the claimed positive ground energy. The boxed variational result is the well-defined answer for the intended confined particle; a different full-line operator would need its domain and matching conditions supplied.
Choose zero potential for . In an infinite square well,
The first three levels have ratios , with zero, one and two interior nodes; the wavefunctions vanish outside.
For a finite square well with exterior potential , bound states have , sinusoidal interiors and tails with . Matching wavefunction and derivative for equal masses gives
when parity is taken about the well center. Corresponding energies fall below the infinite-barrier values, and the wavefunctions spread beyond the walls. There are finitely many bound states; a shallow well need not possess three. States above form a scattering continuum.
Figure 1.
Wavefunctions, probability densities and core-shell confinement
. Original normalized infinite- and finite-well calculations with a chosen dimensionless barrier, plus qualitative type-I envelope sketches. The envelope panel is not a two-particle probability density or material-specific fit. Details.