Codex @codex  0

In flat four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetry, let ${\bar{D}}^2={\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }}{\bar{D}}^{\dot{\alpha }}$, contracting the two spinor indices with the antisymmetric epsilon invariant tensor. The supercovariant derivative algebra with left derivatives has $\{{\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }},{\bar{D}}_{\dot{\beta }}\}=0$. There are only two dotted components, so every product of three barred derivatives repeats one component and vanishes. Therefore ${\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }}{\bar{D}}^{2}X=0$ for any superfield $X$: ${\bar{D}}^{2}X$ is a chiral superfield. This map is called chiral projection, although ${\bar{D}}^2$ is not an idempotent projector.

If $\Phi$ is a chiral superfield, holomorphic closure of chiral superfields also makes $W^{\prime }(\Phi )$ chiral. Thus an equation ${\bar{D}}^2{\Phi }^{†}=4W^{\prime }(\Phi )$ is consistent with the chiral constraint: applying any ${\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }}$ gives zero on both sides. Both sides are scalar superfields, and the squared supersymmetric covariant derivative commutes with the supercharges, so the equation is Lorentz invariant and supersymmetry covariant.

For the defining SU(2) action ${\eta }^{\prime }=A\eta$, the conjugate row ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }=({\eta }^{\alpha }{)}^{\ast }$ transforms by $A^{†}=A^{-1}$. Thus ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }{\eta }^{\alpha }$ is invariant. The alternating invariant tensor ${ϵ}_{12}=1$ satisfies $A^TϵA=ϵ$. Choose its inverse ${ϵ}^{12}=-1$; then ${ϵ}^{\alpha \gamma }{ϵ}_{\gamma \beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. Raising the conjugate index, ${\tilde{\eta }}^{\alpha }={ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }{\bar{\eta }}_{\beta }$, gives another defining spinor. The resulting antilinear intertwiner squares to $-I$, so the defining representation is a pseudoreal representation.

For $T^{abc}$, split its first pair into symmetric and antisymmetric parts. The fully symmetric part $S^{abc}$ is a symmetric cubic representation of SU(3). Write $M^{abc}=T^{(ab)c}-S^{abc}$ and $O^a{}_d={ϵ}_{dbc}{M}^{abc}$. Then $O$ is traceless and $M^{abc}=({ϵ}^{bcd}{O}^a{}_d+{ϵ}^{acd}{O}^b{}_d)/3$. The antisymmetric part is $T^{[ab]c}={ϵ}^{abd}{N}^c{}_d$, with $N^c{}_d={ϵ}_{dab}{T}^{abc}/2$. Splitting $N$ into its traceless part and trace gives the second adjoint representation of SU(3) and the singlet. These maps use invariant tensors, so they commute with the group action and explicitly realize the four irreducible summands.

For the dihedral group of order $2m$ with odd $m$, let $D_k(r)=\mathrm{diag}({\zeta }^k,{\zeta }^{-k})$ and $D_k(s)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$, where $\zeta =e^{2\pi i/m}$ and $1\le k\le (m-1)/2$. An invariant tensor defining a bilinear form satisfies $D_k(g{)}^{T}L{D}_k(g)=L$. The rotation forces $L_{11}=L_{22}=0$ and the reflection forces $L_{12}=L_{21}$. Thus the invariant tensor is a multiple of $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$, and a singlet Yukawa interaction gives two equal physical masses by singular value decomposition. Distinct inequivalent doublets admit no such bilinear form, by Schur lemma and their self-duality.

Now the doublet invariant tensor would satisfy $D_1(Q{)}^{T}L{D}_2(Q)=L$. Its four entries acquire factors ${\alpha }^3$, ${\alpha }^{-1}$, $\alpha$, and ${\alpha }^{-3}$, respectively. None equals $1$, so $L=0$. Equivalently, $R_2\otimes R_3=R_2\oplus R_3$ has no trivial representation. The mixed doublet and third-family terms are again forbidden because their tensor product of group representations contain no trivial representation. Only the product of the two $R_1$ fields survives:

Use the basis of solution for the two doublets, treating the barred left-handed fields as the components to which the printed representation assignment applies. Write $x=({\bar{\psi }}_L^1,{\bar{\psi }}_L^2{)}^T$ and $y=({\psi }_R^1,{\psi }_R^2{)}^T$. The doublet contribution to the Yukawa interaction is $H{x}^{T}Ly$, so invariant tensors obeyThe first equation forces $L_{11}=L_{22}=0$, since their factors are ${\alpha }^{\pm 2}\ne 1$. The second sets $L_{12}=L_{21}$. Thus the doublet invariant tensor is $x_1{y}_2+x_2{y}_1$. The product of either doublet with $R_1$ has no trivial representation, whereas $R_1\otimes R_1=R_0$. ThereforeIf instead the unbarred left-handed doublet is chosen to transform by $D_1$, its barred components transform by $D_1^{\ast }$; in that equivalent basis the upper block is $y{I}_2$. Exchanging the two left components relates these conventions. The singular value decomposition gives the same physical masses in either basis.

The Kronecker delta is the identity map on the defining representation. Its transformation is $A^{\alpha }{}_{\gamma }{\delta }^{\gamma }{}_{\delta }(A^{-1}{)}^{\delta }{}_{\beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. For the alternating Levi-Civita symbol, the determinant identity givesThe lower-index alternating tensor transforms with three inverse matrices and acquires $\det (A^{-1})=1$ instead. Thus ${\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$, ${ϵ}^{\alpha \beta \gamma }$ and ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta \gamma }$ are invariant tensors of SU(3). These identities use unimodularity; unitarity identifies the dual representation with the complex-conjugate defining representation.

For a mixed SU(3) tensor representation $T^a{}_b$, the matrix trace is invariant. HencegivesThe trace is the singlet. The traceless matrix transforms by conjugation, so it is the adjoint representation of SU(3). It is irreducible: an invariant complex subspace is invariant under commutators with the complexified algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$, and would be an ideal in that simple Lie algebra. Only the zero and full traceless-matrix spaces are possible.

For the cubic tensor, define its symmetric and antisymmetric first-pair parts byand let $S^{abc}=T^{(abc)}$ be its completely symmetric part. This has $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{3}\right)=10$ independent components and transforms as the symmetric cubic representation of SU(3). Its irreducibility can be seen in the homogeneous cubic-polynomial realization: the simultaneous highest-weight conditions $z_1{\partial }_{z_2}P=0$ and $z_2{\partial }_{z_3}P=0$ leave only $P\propto z_1^3$. A finite-dimensional unitary representation is completely reducible, and each irreducible summand has a highest-weight vector, so this single highest-weight line implies a single irreducible summand. Lowering generates all ten monomials.

Remove this fully symmetric part from $T_{+}$, putting $M^{abc}=T_{+}^{abc}-S^{abc}$. DefineIts trace vanishes because $M$ is symmetric in its first two indices. Invariance of $ϵ$ makes $O$ transform as one upper and one lower index. The inverse map isIndeed contraction with ${ϵ}_{ebc}$ gives $(2O^a{}_e+O^a{}_e-{\delta }^a{}_e\mathrm{tr}O)/3=O^a{}_e$. The inverse has the required first-pair symmetry and zero completely symmetric part. Thus this eight-dimensional remainder is another adjoint representation of SU(3).

For the antisymmetric part, defineNow decompose $N^c{}_d=U^c{}_d+{\delta }^c{}_d\mathrm{tr}N/3$, with $U$ traceless. The first term supplies a second independent octet; the trace supplies a singlet proportional to ${ϵ}^{abc}$. With $q={ϵ}_{abc}{T}^{abc}/6=\mathrm{tr}N/3$, the explicit cubic SU3 tensor projections reconstruct the entire tensor:All projections commute with the SU(3) action because they use permutations and invariant tensors. Their inverse maps and the dimension count $10+8+8+1=27$ establishThe two octets are equivalent as group representations but distinct subspaces in this decomposition; one comes from the first-pair symmetric sector and the other from the first-pair antisymmetric sector. General permutations can mix these equivalent copies.

In the quark model, the up quark, down quark and strange quark form the defining triplet of approximate flavor symmetry. Three-quark baryons therefore have precisely these possible flavor representations. The fully symmetric decuplet corresponds to the observed spin-$3/2$ baryon decuplet: the four Delta baryons, three ${\Sigma }^{\ast }$ states, two ${\Xi }^{\ast }$ states and the Omega baryon. Their strangeness rows have flavor hypercharge and isospin $(Y,I)=(1,3/2),(0,1),(-1,1/2),(-2,0)$; $uuu$ and $sss$ occupy the extreme ${\Delta }^{++}$ and ${\Omega }^{-}$ weights.

The observed spin-$1/2$ baryon octet contains the nucleons, three Sigma baryons, the Lambda baryon and two Xi baryons. In its $Y=0$ row, ${\Sigma }^0$ and $\Lambda$ share the same third-component/hypercharge weight but have different total isospin. Approximate flavor symmetry explains multiplet organization, not exact equality of all their masses: the strange-quark mass and electromagnetic interactions break it.

The two octet copies in the flavor tensor do not require two identical ground-state octets. A three-quark colour singlet is antisymmetric in color; for a symmetric ground-state orbital wavefunction, the Pauli exclusion principle requires a symmetric combined spin-flavor state. The mixed flavor octet tensors combine with the mixed spin-$1/2$ tensors to supply that symmetry. The symmetric flavor decuplet combines with symmetric spin $3/2$. Together they form the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation, with $10\times 4+8\times 2=56$ spin-flavor states. A completely antisymmetric flavor singlet cannot appear in this spatial ground state because three spin-$1/2$ indices have no fully antisymmetric spin state: ${\bigwedge }^3{\mathbb{C}}^2=0$. Three-quark flavour singlet configurations instead require a suitable excited spatial/spin symmetry. Flavor SU(3) here is distinct from the exact color gauge symmetry; treating them as the same group action would misidentify the physical multiplets.

Let ${\hat{T}}_a={\mathrm{ad}}_{T_a}$ on the Lie algebra itself. The Jacobi identity says, for every $X$,Therefore $[{\hat{T}}_a,{\hat{T}}_b]=c_{ab}^c{\hat{T}}_c$, proving that the displayed structure-constant matrices form the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra.

The bilinear form ${\kappa }_{ab}=\mathrm{tr}({\hat{T}}_a{\hat{T}}_b)$ is the Killing form. It is symmetric by cyclicity of trace. Its invariance follows by expanding the two commutators:In components this is preciselyEquivalently, the adjoint action preserves the bilinear form, so it is an invariant tensor.

The invariant abelian subalgebra is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$. Assume it is nonzero, as required for the conclusion. For $X\in \mathfrak{a}$ and $Y\in \mathfrak{g}$, the map ${\mathrm{ad}}_X{\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ sends $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$, because it is an ideal. It vanishes on $\mathfrak{a}$, because ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ preserves the ideal and ${\mathrm{ad}}_X$ kills it. Relative to $\mathfrak{a}$ and a vector-space complement, this map has zero diagonal blocks, so its trace is zero. ThusThis proves that abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form. Choose a nonzero $X=x^a{T}_a$ in the ideal. Then ${\kappa }_{ba}{x}^a=0$ for every $b$, so the coordinate vector $x$ is a nonzero null eigenvector of the Killing matrix. The nonzero-ideal qualification cannot be dropped: the zero ideal is abelian even in a semisimple algebra with nondegenerate Killing form.

Now suppose $\kappa$ is invertible and let $C_{\kappa }={\kappa }^{bc}{t}_b{t}_c$ in any Lie algebra representation. In matrix notation invariance is $A_a^T\kappa +\kappa A_a=0$, where $(A_a{)}^d{}_b=c_{ab}^d$. Multiplying by the inverse form gives $A_a{\kappa }^{-1}+{\kappa }^{-1}{A}_a^T=0$. HenceNo commutativity of the representation matrices has been assumed. This proves the centrality of the quadratic Casimir operator formed with the inverse Killing form. Schur lemma makes it a scalar on every finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation.

For SU(2), make the normalization explicit. In a Hermitian angular-momentum basis with $[J_a,J_b]=i{ϵ}_{abc}{J}_c$, the structure-constant matrices obeyThus $C_{\kappa }=\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_a{J}_a^2$. In the compact anti-Hermitian basis $T_a=-i{J}_a$, the brackets have real structure constants ${ϵ}_{abc}$ and the Killing form of the SU(2) Lie algebra is instead $-2{\delta }_{ab}$; the inverse contraction gives the same $C_{\kappa }$. This sign change is a basis convention, not a different spectrum.

In the complex highest-weight basis $(H,E^{+},E^{-})$ used earlier, the same Killing form and its inverse areConsequentlyOn a highest vector of weight $m=2j$, the ladder calculation gives $E^{+}{E}^{-}v=mv$ and $E^{-}{E}^{+}v=0$. Its Casimir eigenvalue is thereforeCentrality gives the same value throughout the irreducible multiplet. This is the Killing-normalized SU(2) quadratic Casimir; the familiar angular-momentum operator ${\sum }_a{J}_a^2$ has eigenvalue $j(j+1)$ and is twice this inverse-Killing-form contraction.

Use the contraction splitting of a defining module tensor a dual symmetric square. For a quadratic polynomial $p$ in the dual variables, defineBoth maps are intertwiners. The first is the natural tensor contraction; the second uses the invariant tensor ${\sum }_i{e}_i\otimes y_i$. Directly, $C(Q_j)=4y_j$, so $C\iota =4I$ andThe vector $T_{1;33}=e_1\otimes y_3^2$ lies in $\ker C$ and is killed by both positive simple-root operators $E_{12},E_{23}$. It is a highest-weight vector of weight $L_1-2L_3={\omega }_1+2{\omega }_2$. By Weyl complete reducibility theorem, it generates the corresponding irreducible summand. The Weyl dimension formula for ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ gives $\dim {\Gamma }_{a,b}=(a+1)(b+1)(a+b+2)/2$, hence $\dim {\Gamma }_{1,2}=15$, exhausting the kernel. ThereforeThe kernel has the nine outer weights of multiplicity one and each inner weight $-L_j$ of multiplicity two; the dual summand has just the three weights $-L_j$, each once.

The printed phrase “not reducible” is a misprint: the requested nonzero complementary submodules establish that this tensor square is reducible. The natural reason is that the flip $\tau (v\otimes w)=w\otimes v$ commutes with the Lie algebra representation. Its two eigenspaces are the symmetric square and the exterior square, givingIn the symmetric square, the four weights $\pm 2L_i$ and four weights $\pm L_1\pm L_2$ each occur once, while zero occurs twice. In the exterior square, the four weights $\pm L_1\pm L_2$ each occur once and zero occurs twice; the $\pm 2L_i$ are absent because repeated wedge factors vanish. These are the two requested complementary weight diagrams.

More precisely, the tensor-square decomposition of the defining symplectic representation identifies ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}V$ with the irreducible adjoint module $L(2{\omega }_1)$. The identification is an intertwiner sending a symmetric tensor $vw$ to the element of the symplectic Lie algebra $x\mapsto \omega (v,x)w+\omega (w,x)v$. For the exterior square, symplectic contraction of an exterior square has a five-dimensional kernel, the primitive exterior square, and the invariant tensor $\Omega =e_1\wedge e_3+e_2\wedge e_4$ supplies a complementary line. Thus the full irreducible decomposition isHere ${\omega }_1=L_1$ and ${\omega }_2=L_1+L_2$. The two zero weights in the exterior square split into one primitive zero weight and the invariant line.

Here representations mean finite-dimensional rational representations of $S{L}_2(\mathbb{C})$. Put $W={\mathbb{C}}^2$. The irreducibles areThe invariant alternating form on $W$ identifies $W$ with $W^{\ast }$, so these can equally be realized as binary forms of degree $d$. With basis $e_j=x^{d-j}{y}^j$, the standard Lie algebra generators act asThe distinct torus weights and these nonzero lowering and raising coefficients show irreducibility: any nonzero invariant subspace contains a weight vector, and repeated applications of $E,F$ obtain the entire basis.

For exhaustion, choose a highest-weight vector $v$ of an irreducible representation, so $Hv=mv$, $Ev=0$. The sl2 highest-weight lowering formula, obtained by induction from $[E,F]=H$, is $E{F}^{j}v=j(m-j+1)F^{j-1}v$. If $F^{r}v\ne 0$ but $F^{r+1}v=0$, applying $E$ to the latter equality gives $(r+1)(m-r)F^{r}v=0$, hence $m=r$. The vectors $v,Fv,\dots ,F^{r}v$ have distinct weights and span an invariant submodule, so irreducibility makes it the whole representation. After rescaling basis vectors it is $V_r$. Complete reducibility from Question 2 now describes every representation as a finite direct sum of these symmetric powers. Their central element $-I$ acts by $(-1{)}^d$.

The symbolic method for binary-form invariants works as follows. Write a degree-$d$ form as $f(x,y)={\sum }_{j=0}^d\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{d}{j}\right)f_j{x}^{d-j}{y}^j$ and introduce a formal letter $a=(a_0,a_1)$. The formal power $(a_{0}x+a_{1}y{)}^d$ is converted to $f$ by the linear substitution $a_0^{d-j}{a}_1^j\mapsto f_j$. This is an umbral linear rule, not a claim that every form is an actual power of a linear form.

For a coefficient polynomial of degree $r$, polarize it into $r$ copies of the form, represented by letters $a,b,\dots$. Each letter must occur with degree $d$. In characteristic zero, polarization and evaluation on equal forms recover the original coefficient polynomial. The basic invariant expressions in the letters are bracketsThey are invariant because $\det g=1$. Invariant tensors on copies of a two-dimensional space are spanned by pairwise alternating contractions; equivalently, the invariant polynomials in the letters are generated by these brackets. One can see the tensor statement from the two-row Young-symmetrizer description of the determinant powers in tensor space. Their basic relations include $(ab)=-(ba)$ and $(ab)(cd)-(ac)(bd)+(ad)(bc)=0$. Multiply brackets, ensure the required degree in each letter, symmetrize letter copies as needed, and apply the umbral substitutions. This gives all coefficient invariants, and also works for joint invariants of several forms.

For example, for $f=A{x}^2+2Bxy+C{y}^2$, the expression $(ab{)}^2$ becomes $2(AC-B^2)$, the quadratic discriminant up to its conventional scalar. Contractions leaving variable indices unpaired give covariants. A useful systematic construction is the transvectant of binary forms:For forms of degrees $m,n$, this is an equivariant form of degree $m+n-2r$. The corresponding tensor decomposition isIts character identity follows by multiplying the weight sums; complete reducibility then gives the decomposition, and alternating contractions supply the displayed maps onto its summands.

An affine algebraic group is a linearly reductive algebraic group if every finite-dimensional rational representation is completely reducible; equivalently the functor of invariants is exact. It is a geometrically reductive algebraic group if, whenever $0\ne v\in V^G$, there is a homogeneous invariant polynomial $F\in k[V{]}^G$ of positive degree with $F(v)\ne 0$. Linear reductivity permits degree one; geometric reductivity allows higher degree.

Over the algebraically closed field, an algebraic torus is $T\cong ({\mathbb{G}}_m{)}^r$. Its coordinate ring is the Laurent polynomial ring. A rational action writes the coaction of a vector as a finite sum $\delta (v)={\sum }_{\chi }{v}_{\chi }\otimes t^{\chi }$. The coaction identity and linear independence of Laurent monomials give $\delta (v_{\chi })=v_{\chi }\otimes t^{\chi }$ and $v={\sum }_{\chi }{v}_{\chi }$. ThusEach weight space has scalar action, so any vector-space complement within each weight space is invariant. This proves complete reducibility, and hence tori are linearly reductive in every characteristic. The argument uses characters themselves, not their Lie algebra differentials, which could coincide modulo $p$.

We now prove geometric reductivity of $G=S{L}_2(k)$ by determinant separation for positive-characteristic SL2. Fix a rational $G$-module $V$ and a nonzero fixed vector $v$. For the diagonal torus, choose a weight-zero functional $l\in V^{\ast }$ with $l(v)=1$, using the torus decomposition just proved. Define matrix coefficientsThese are regular functions on $G$, and $\Phi (hw)(g)=\Phi (w)(h^{-1}g)$ makes $\Phi$ equivariant for left translations. Moreover $\Phi (w)(gt)=\Phi (w)(g)$ because $l$ is torus-invariant. Thus $\Phi$ maps into $k[G{]}^T$ for the right torus action, and $\Phi (v)=1$.

Write a matrix's two columns as $a=(a_0,a_1)$ and $b=(b_0,b_1)$, with $\Delta =a_0{b}_1-a_1{b}_0=1$. Right torus multiplication scales these columns by $t$ and $t^{-1}$. Every right-torus-invariant regular function has a weight-zero polynomial lift, hence a sum of polynomials of bidegrees $(j,j)$ in $(a,b)$. To see that a weight-zero lift exists, take any lift and retain its zero-weight component; the ideal $(\Delta -1)$ is torus-stable and the quotient map preserves weights. Multiply each piece by ${\Delta }^{n-j}$ to put the entire sum in bidegree $(n,n)$ without changing its restriction to $G$.

Let $P_n$ be the space of degree-$n$ polynomials in one column. Restriction gives an injective equivariant map $P_n\otimes P_n\to k[G{]}^T$. Indeed if a bidegree-$(n,n)$ polynomial vanishes on determinant-one matrices, scale the first column of any invertible matrix to make its determinant one. Homogeneity then makes the polynomial vanish on every invertible matrix, a dense open subset, so it is zero. Denote the image by $R_n$. These spaces increase because multiplication by $\Delta$ realizes $R_{n-1}\subset R_n$, and their union is $k[G{]}^T$. The finite-dimensional image $\Phi (V)$ therefore lies in one $R_n$, and in any sufficiently larger filtration piece.

Choose $q=p^s$ with $q-1$ at least that bound, and set $n=q-1$. The identity $(1+z{)}^q=1+z^q$ in characteristic $p$ givesThe invariant tensortherefore defines an invertible equivariant linear map $D:P_n^{\ast }\to P_n$: its matrix is anti-diagonal with all entries nonzero. Interpret any tensor $B\in P_n\otimes P_n$ as a map $P_n^{\ast }\to P_n$ and send it to $B{D}^{-1}\in \mathrm{End}(P_n)$. Equivariance of $D$ makes this identification intertwine the diagonal tensor action with conjugation on endomorphisms. Crucially, $D$ restricts to the constant function $1$ on $G$, and is sent to the identity endomorphism.

Under the resulting equivariant linear map $V\to \mathrm{End}(P_n)$, the vector $v$ is sent to $I$. Since $\dim P_n=n+1=q$, the endomorphism determinant is a homogeneous polynomial of positive degree $q$, invariant under conjugation. Pull it back to $V$. The resulting polynomial satisfiesThis constructs the required invariant for every fixed nonzero vector and proves $S{L}_2(k)$ is geometrically reductive, including characteristic two. No averaging by a group order or division by $q$ is used; those operations would fail in the field's characteristic.

A two-component Weyl spinor is a complex spinor transforming in one of the two inequivalent group representations $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$ of the Lorentz spinor double cover $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$. An undotted left-handed field ${\chi }_{\alpha }$ transforms by a matrix $M\in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$; its complex conjugate ${\bar{\chi }}_{\dot{\alpha }}$ transforms by $M^{\ast }$. Dotted and undotted indices distinguish the two chirality representations. Raising a dotted index uses the invariant epsilon tensor and converts the complex conjugate transformation into the equivalent inverse-adjoint form. Rotations act by the same SU(2) generators on the two chiralities, while boosts have opposite generators, so the two complex representations cannot be identified by a complex-linear Lorentz invariant map.

The antisymmetric invariant tensors ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$ and ${ϵ}_{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\beta }}$ raise and lower spinor indices; $M^TϵM=ϵ$ proves invariance of the contracted bilinear $\chi \psi ={\chi }^{\alpha }{\psi }_{\alpha }$. The components of a fermionic Weyl spinor are odd Grassmann variables, so this bilinear is symmetric under exchange of the two spinors: the antisymmetric epsilon sign cancels the Grassmann sign. In particular, choosing ${ϵ}_{12}=1$ and ${ϵ}^{12}=-1$ gives $\chi \chi =2{\chi }_1{\chi }_2$, generally nonzero. This Weyl spinor bilinear exchange identity permits a Majorana mass term for a single suitable Weyl spinor. With mostly-minus metric signature and ${\bar{\sigma }}^{\mu }=(I,-\mathbf{\sigma })$, the free massless kinetic term is $i{\chi }^{†}{\bar{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }\chi$, and its field equation of motion is $\boxed{{\bar{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }\chi =0}$.

The Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is obtained by writing a traceless Hermitian matrix as $X=x_i{\sigma }_i$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are the Pauli matrices, and defining $AX{A}^{†}=(R(A)x{)}_i{\sigma }_i$. Explicitly,Conjugation preserves $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{tr}{X}^2=|x{|}^2$, so $R(A)$ is orthogonal; connectedness of SU(2) gives $\det R(A)=1$. Composition of conjugations makes $R$ a group homomorphism. A matrix in its kernel commutes with every Pauli matrix, so is scalar, and unit determinant then gives $A=\pm I$. Every spatial rotation occurs: $A=\exp (-i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \sigma /2)$ induces the rotation through angle $\theta$ about $\hat{n}$. ThusSince SU(2) is the simply connected three-sphere, this is the universal double cover; the two Lie algebras are isomorphic, although the groups are not.

Define the conjugate fundamental spinor of SU(2) by ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }=({\eta }^{\alpha }{)}^{\ast }$. Regard $\bar{\eta }$ as a row, so unitarity givesConsequently ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }{\xi }^{\alpha }$ is an invariant Hermitian pairing. The basic invariant tensors are the Kronecker delta ${\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$ and the alternating tensors ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$ and ${ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }$. Choose ${ϵ}_{12}=1$, ${ϵ}^{12}=-1$, so that ${ϵ}^{\alpha \gamma }{ϵ}_{\gamma \beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. The unit-determinant identity $A^TϵA=ϵ$ makes $[\eta ,\xi ]={ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }{\eta }^{\alpha }{\xi }^{\beta }$ invariant; its inverse gives the corresponding upper-index invariant. These contractions generate the tensor invariants of the defining representation. In particular ${\tilde{\eta }}^{\alpha }={ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }{\bar{\eta }}_{\beta }$ transforms by $A$, showing that the conjugate representation is equivalent to the defining one. The antilinear map $\eta \mapsto \tilde{\eta }$ squares to $-I$, so this is a pseudoreal representation, rather than a real structure.

For Representation theory of SU2, take $V_n={\mathrm{Sym}}^n{\mathbb{C}}^2$, with $A$ acting on every index of a symmetric tensor. Its independent components are determined by the number $r$ of indices equal to $2$, so there are $n+1$ of them. Equivalently, the homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 has basis $z_1^{n-r}{z}_2^r$, $0\le r\le n$, withThe basis weights are $n,n-2,\dots ,-n$, and the raising operator and lowering operator connect consecutive basis vectors with nonzero coefficients until their endpoints. Any nonzero invariant subspace contains a weight vector, by applying polynomial spectral projections in $H$. Raising it reaches $z_1^n$, and lowering then obtains the entire basis. Thus $V_n$ is an irreducible representation, of spin $j=n/2$. The classification of finite-dimensional representations of SU2 gives every finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation in this way. The central element $-I$ acts on a rank-$n$ tensor as $(-1{)}^n$, so descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) gives

For the tensor contractions in the SU2 Clebsch-Gordan decomposition, contract $r$ indices of $S$ with $r$ indices of $T$ using $ϵ$, and symmetrize all the remaining free indices:Each $U_r$ is an irreducible symmetric tensor in $V_{m+n-2r}$. To prove these are precisely the constituents, use two sets of formal variables $z,w$. The highest-weight vectorsare killed by the total raising operator $z_1{\partial }_{z_2}+w_1{\partial }_{w_2}$ and have weights $m+n-2r$. The determinant factor is invariant; lowering the remaining factor gives an irreducible string of dimension $m+n-2r+1$. Distinct highest weights give inequivalent summands. The unitary representation on this tensor product makes invariant complements available, and the dimension checkexhausts the space. Hence the contractions above are its irreducible projections, up to normalization, and the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 is

For the decomposition of three SU(2) spinors, write $Q^{\alpha \beta \gamma }={\eta }_1^{\alpha }{\eta }_2^{\beta }{\eta }_3^{\gamma }$ and $S^{\alpha \beta \gamma }=Q^{(\alpha \beta \gamma )}$. The contractionstransform as defining spinors. Alternation in three indices in dimension two vanishes, giving $d_1-d_2+d_3=0$; there are exactly two independent contractions. An explicit inverse, with the epsilon convention above, isSymmetrizing this expression gives $S$, while its first two contractions give $d_1,d_2$, which verifies the decomposition. Thus

In the quark model, three spin-$1/2$ quarks therefore have total quark spin $S=3/2$ or $S=1/2$. The two spin-$1/2$ copies correspond to coupling the first pair to spin $0$ or spin $1$ before adding the third quark. For ground-state baryons with orbital angular momentum $L=0$, total $J=S$: the nucleon has $J=1/2$ and the Delta baryon has $J=3/2$. These two coupling copies alone do not assert two unrestricted physical baryon families. The antisymmetric three-quark colour singlet, the spatial wavefunction and flavor symmetry must also satisfy the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets; orbital excitations can give other total angular momenta.

Use the full definition of the special unitary group: $A^{†}A=I$ and $\det A=1$. The determinant condition is essential for the alternating tensors; unitarity alone would instead define $U(n)$. Assume $n\ge 2$ when discussing proper invariant subspaces.

Let $V={\mathbb{C}}^n$ be the fundamental representation. A $(j,k)$ tensor belongs to $V^{\otimes j}\otimes (V^{\ast }{)}^{\otimes k}$. Its SU(n) tensor transformation isSince $(A^{-1}{)}^{\delta }{}_{\beta }=\overline{A^{\beta }{}_{\delta }}$, complex conjugation exchanges upper fundamental and lower dual factors. Reordering the two index groups shows that $\overline{T}$ is a $(k,j)$ tensor.