Isoperimetric inequality 2026-10-14
The isoperimetric inequality bounds enclosed volume in terms of boundary size. In the plane it gives , with equality for disks; higher-dimensional forms bound the boundary area of a region of prescribed volume.
For a regular isoperimetric constraint, introduce a constant Lagrange multiplier and set . With fixed endpoint values, the Euler-Lagrange equation is
If and have no explicit dependence, the Beltrami identity gives the first integral
The regularity assumption excludes the exceptional case in which the constraint itself has zero first variation for every admissible perturbation.
Parametrize the surface of revolution by . The magnitude of is . Integrating the resulting surface area element over , and integrating the circular cross-sectional areas for the volume, gives
Here because it is a radius. For a regular connected closed surface, take in the interior; the closing endpoints can have unbounded even when the surface itself is smooth.
After dividing by , its integrand is . The Euler-Lagrange equation and Beltrami identity become
As tends to zero at an endpoint, also tends to zero, so . On the positive interior this implies and, writing ,
The Euler-Lagrange equation also yields . Therefore
including at the maximum where . Integrating and using the first integral gives
Thus the regular extremal is a sphere. The two zeros fix its center and radius:
Equivalently, the prescribed volume fixes . If are fixed in advance, their separation and the prescribed volume must be compatible with these equations; there is no positive regular stationary profile of the stated type for an incompatible volume.
For minimality, the three-dimensional isoperimetric inequality states that every sufficiently regular closed surface enclosing volume has
with equality precisely for a sphere. Our extremal has and , so it attains equality and is a global minimum of area at the fixed volume. This also makes clear the connected-surface assumption behind uniqueness: allowing several disconnected components introduces stationary collections of spheres, rather than the single positive generating profile used here.
For a normal constrained extremal, introduce a constant Lagrange multiplier and use . The Euler-Lagrange equation is
When both integrands have no explicit dependence, the Beltrami identity gives , as follows by differentiating this expression and using the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Parametrize the surface by . The cross product of its two coordinate tangents has magnitude , so integration in gives . Integrating the cross-sectional disk areas gives .
Dividing the augmented functional by , use
The Euler-Lagrange equation is
The Beltrami identity becomes . At an endpoint , the absolute value of the first term is at most , so , even if the profile has an infinite endpoint slope. For a nondegenerate regular closed surface take on . Then , and, with ,
Combining this identity with the Euler-Lagrange equation yields . Consequently . The two zero endpoint values uniquely determine
The positive radius profile is therefore a semicircle and generates a sphere, centred at height , with radius . In particular
The graph is smooth in the interior; its vertical slopes at the two poles are compatible with a smooth spherical surface. Its volume is , the volume associated with this stationary candidate.
For minimality, the three-dimensional isoperimetric inequality says that every closed surface enclosing volume has , with equality for a sphere. The displayed extremal attains equality, proving that it minimizes area at its fixed enclosed volume. The uniqueness above concerns the regular connected positive profile with the two stated endpoint heights.
Planar isoperimetric inequality Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
This is the planar case of the isoperimetric inequality. Every bounded planar domain with a sufficiently regular boundary of length and area satisfies
Equality holds exactly for circular domains.
Surface energy Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
For a liquid interface with constant surface tension , the mechanical surface energy is the energy associated with its surface area :
The additive constant does not affect the work needed to change surface area. For several interfaces with the same surface tension, means their total surface area; the two faces of a thin soap film must both be counted. [ref]
With assumed , creating of one interface requires of reversible work. In the sliding-rim example illustrated under surface tension, moving a rim outwards by creates across the two faces and requires . Independently, multiplying its holding force by the displacement gives the same work.
This makes the preference for a round isolated droplet precise. At fixed volume , the three-dimensional isoperimetric inequality gives
with equality for a sphere. Thus a sphere minimizes surface energy among sufficiently regular closed shapes enclosing the same volume, when surface tension is uniform and other energy contributions are negligible. This is an application of the isoperimetric inequality, rather than a proof of it. Walls, wetting, and gravity can change the shape by adding constraints or other energy contributions. [ref]
The differential rule integrates directly to because surface tension is constant. At fixed liquid volume, decreasing surface area can drive viscous fluid flow; the released surface energy can supply viscous dissipation. This mechanical bookkeeping is useful for predicting which deformations can release energy. If surface tension depends on temperature or composition, distinguish this mechanical area-work relation from the complete interfacial thermodynamic free energy and internal energy.