Quantum escape of a current-biased Josephson junction is decay of a trapped collective quantum phase state through a barrier in the tilted Josephson washboard potential. This barrier lies in the potential energy of an electrical circuit coordinate. Transfer of Cooper pairs across the physical insulating layer already supplies the Josephson coupling energy; it does not by itself demonstrate this further collective escape. Single-electron superconducting tunneling is a third, distinct process.
At higher temperature , thermal activation instead lifts the coordinate over the barrier. In the rare-escape regime its characteristic form is the Kramers escape ratewhere is the Boltzmann constant and the prefactor depends on damping and thermal equilibration. Cooling suppresses this route. For a quasistationary energy level at energy , the leading conservative WKB approximation instead haswith the two turning points bracketing the forbidden barrier. This is an exponential estimate requiring a large action compared with , slow escape compared with intrawell motion, and weak environmental corrections. It is not a complete rate prediction near the barrier top or with substantial damping.
The familiar cubic-barrier exponent can be checked independently. Choose , with . Its top is at and . At the well-bottom reference energy ,Substitution reduces the dimensionless integral to . This leading semiclassical action uses a cubic potential and a well-bottom reference; actual ground-state escape also needs the zero-point correction, prefactor and environment. In the chosen washboard example it gives after matching the exact barrier and curvature. This matching is an illustrative approximation, not an exact action integral for the cosine potential.
Escape need not yield a sustained voltage: the coordinate can become trapped again. The running-state readout assumes sufficient underdamping and bias to avoid such retrapping. The parallel model has quality factor ; large makes energy loss per oscillation small. Low-temperature rate saturation alone cannot distinguish quantum tunnelling from unwanted heating or external noise.
Single-electron superconducting tunneling 2026-10-18
Single-electron superconducting tunneling transfers individual Electrons across a barrier into or out of quasiparticle states of a material with superconductivity. In a normal-metal–insulator–superconductor junction, abbreviated NIS, only one electrode has superconductivity. Such a junction can reveal a superconducting energy gap without supporting a DC Josephson effect between two superconducting reservoirs.
For an elementary interpretation, assume an opaque barrier, approximately constant normal-electrode density of states, and an energy-independent tunneling matrix element over the range probed. Write the superconducting density of states divided by its normal-state value as , with measured from its chemical potential. A signed voltage convention chosen for positive normal-electrode injection giveswhere is the Fermi-Dirac distribution at a common temperature and is the normal-state junction electrical resistance. This current convention is local to the NIS measurement. The expression counts occupied initial and empty final states; it is a quasiparticle transport model, not a current-phase relation of a superconducting weak link.
An original analytic illustration uses the ideal fully gapped BCS theory spectrum at zero temperature, with positive gap edge :For positive , the occupation difference restricts the integral to . Since , integration and odd extension giveThe threshold is for this NIS model. In the corresponding zero-temperature single-electron process between two fully gapped superconductors, creating excitations on both sides instead requires . That quasiparticle threshold does not forbid coherent pair electric current below it. At finite temperature, thermally populated quasiparticles soften the simple threshold argument.
At zero temperature in the NIS approximation, away from the singular gap edge. Thus a voltage sweep probes the excitation density of states. The ideal divergence is rounded in real measurements, and at nonzero temperature the derivative samples a thermally broadened range of energies. For , the model has : electrical work creates excitations and is dissipated on relaxation. This distinguishes its steady transport from the conservative Josephson coupling energy.
Tilted Josephson washboard potential 2026-10-18
At fixed positive bias ratio with , the Josephson coupling energy and work of the ideal bias source combine intoThis is the effective potential energy for an unwrapped Gauge-invariant Josephson phase; it includes the bias source and decreases by on advancing one period. A local minimum and the adjacent downhill barrier areTo verify the barrier, solve , select and , and subtract their potential energies. The small-oscillation angular frequency is fixed by the curvature:Thus the barrier and oscillation frequency both vanish as , but with different powers. For , expanding and givesThe first approximation is for a nearly critical bias. At the exact downhill barrier is ; at there is no confining local minimum in this model.
A tilted phase potential confines low energy levels and permits escape
. Original chosen model with , and . Three horizontal lines are quantum harmonic oscillator approximations , for ; they are not exact energy levels or measured data. The horizontal axis is a quantum phase, not distance through an insulator. Arrows distinguish over-barrier thermal activation and below-barrier quantum tunnelling. Details.For those stipulated parameters, direct evaluation gives , , and . Hence . The nearly critical barrier approximation gives , about below the exact result. These are original circuit calculations, not parameters assigned to the historical samples.
