Use Minkowski metric signature and natural units. With no lepton mixing, choose the weak charged current convention
Its conjugate convention exchanges and without changing the interaction. The relevant four-fermion interaction gives the muon decay amplitude, up to an overall phase,
Here is the Fermi constant; the factors are twice the left chiral projector, so there is no additional factor of two to insert.
For the final-spin sum let , where . It already describes the specified initial polarization; there is no further initial-spin average. The two gamma matrix traces are
The electron-mass term vanishes in its chiral trace. In the muon trace, anticommutation with gives
For the chiral fermion trace contraction, define
The supplied trace conventions imply and , where . The factor four in the second trace follows from the polarization projector. The symmetric parts contract to . The Levi-Civita symbol contraction, including , contributes . Mixed symmetric-antisymmetric contractions vanish. Thus , and
Now neglect as well. Put and . The given moment integral over two-neutrino relativistic two-body phase space yields
In the muon rest frame, , , and . Substitution gives
Combining this with the Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure, whose one-particle denominator is , and , gives the polarized muon decay distribution
Consequently , , . Integration over the electron direction removes the polarization term, and , recovering .
The spin vector is axial and the momentum direction is polar: under parity, stays unchanged while reverses. Their scalar product therefore changes sign. Its nonzero coefficient demonstrates parity violation in polarized muon decay, arising from the left-chiral weak charged current. At the upper endpoint the negative muon's electron is preferentially emitted opposite the spin, providing a sign check on the result.
The 1972 paper Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains by J. C. Hafele and others reports four cesium-beam atomic clocks flown around the world in October 1971, eastward and westward. Their readings were compared with the U.S. Naval Observatory reference time scale before and after travel. An electronic time-interval counter resolved differences to the nearest nanosecond; intercomparisons among the flying clocks continued during travel. The final ensemble results were eastward and westward; the quoted spreads are standard deviations. These are corrected clock offsets, not raw readings or aircraft travel times. Four clocks allowed identification of individual rate changes through patterns in their mutual differences. The authors also report magnetic shielding and laboratory orientation checks. Their analysis could not detect a disturbance common to every flying clock, and the small ensemble limits statistical conclusions. This is a concrete reunited-clock experiment with apparatus, readout and drift controls.[ref]
The companion paper Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains by J. C. Hafele and others computes eastward and westward from the recorded flight paths. These are predictions, with flight-data uncertainty estimates. Both time dilation from motion and gravitational time dilation matter: aircraft clocks at altitude experience a different gravitational potential, while the rotating Earth means a ground clock is not the inertial home clock of our simple model. Eastward and westward motion change the aircraft's velocity relative to an approximately nonrotating inertial frame, not merely its speed relative to the ground. The measured agreement therefore tests combined special relativity and general relativity; the westward gain does not contradict the maximum-proper time result for fixed endpoints in Minkowski spacetime.[ref]
A complementary microscopic test is Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in a circular orbit by J. Bailey and others. The authors measured muon decay lifetimes in a storage ring at Lorentz factor : for positive muons and for negative muons. The reported positive-muon lifetime agrees with the independently measured lifetime at rest and special relativity to a fractional error of at 95% confidence. This is a decay-lifetime readout under continuous centripetal acceleration, rather than a reunion of portable clocks. It supports the clock hypothesis for this physical process and regime; the inspected abstract does not establish universal immunity of every clock mechanism to acceleration. [ref]