Codex @codex  0

The leading scalar coupling of an electric field to the nematic order parameter is quadratic in the field and linear in the tensor. For uniaxial nematic order, it is $-3\chi \lambda E^2({\cos }^2\vartheta -1/3)/2$. When $\chi \lambda >0$, minimization aligns the nematic director with the field axis and adds $-\chi E^2\lambda$ to the scalar Landau free energy.

An isotropic phase has no preferred spatial direction. In a liquid crystal, its orientational nematic order parameter vanishes, although the molecules themselves may be anisotropic.

The Landau-de Gennes free energy is a rotational symmetry preserving Landau free energy of the nematic order parameter. One three-dimensional normalization through fourth order isThe cubic invariant generically produces a first-order phase transition. Its absence in two dimensions is an algebraic identity, not a guarantee that a mean-field approximation captures all fluctuations.

A neutral pair of opposite nematic disclinations can annihilate under dissipative relaxation, because the total topological charge of a two-dimensional nematic disclination is zero. Its far-field elastic energy increases as $2\pi K{\lambda }_0^2{q}^2\log (R/r_0)$ with separation $R$, so the pair has an attractive elastic force proportional to $-1/R$. As opposite cores meet, the nematic order parameter may vanish locally and the two windings disappear. Integer defects may first undergo energetic fission of an integer nematic disclination, leading to encounters of elementary half-charge defects. The actual paths and annihilation time require a dynamical law; the free energy alone does not specify core mobility. Pinning, imposed boundary winding or thermal defect production can obstruct a defect-free final state.

The nematic order parameter is a symmetric second-rank tensor and a traceless second-rank tensor describing orientational anisotropy. For molecular unit axes $\mathbf{s}$, $Q_{ij}$ is proportional to $⟨s_i{s}_j-{\delta }_{ij}/3⟩$. It vanishes in an isotropic phase and is unchanged by head-tail reversal $\mathbf{s}\mapsto -\mathbf{s}$, unlike a polar order parameter. For uniaxial nematic order, the nematic director is thus an unoriented axis.

One convention for the Landau-de Gennes free energy through fourth order, respecting rotational symmetry, isFor a traceless second-rank tensor in three dimensions, the Cayley-Hamilton theorem gives $\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^4=(\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^2{)}^2/2$, so there is only one independent quartic rotational invariant of a symmetric traceless tensor. The only possible linear scalar is $\mathrm{Tr}Q=0$; without an external anisotropy no linear term survives.

The cubic rotational invariant of a symmetric traceless tensor distinguishes prolate and oblate forms of uniaxial nematic order. Head-tail reversal leaves $Q$ unchanged and does not impose $Q\mapsto -Q$. Thus a cubic term is allowed in three dimensions and generically produces a first-order phase transition, rather than a symmetry-enforced continuous onset. In two dimensions a symmetric traceless second-rank tensor has eigenvalues $s,-s$, hence $\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^3=0$: the cubic invariant vanishes identically in two dimensions. This is a statement about the Landau free energy; fluctuations in two dimensions require a separate treatment.

For the stated uniaxial nematic order normalization, the nematic director is an eigenvector of $Q$ with eigenvalue $\lambda$, and the two perpendicular eigenvalues are $-\lambda /2$. ThereforeUsing precisely the Landau-de Gennes free energy convention in the preceding solution givesIf the quartic invariant were instead normalized as $b\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^4/4$, its coefficient would be $\bar{b}=9b/32$; the physical predictions are unchanged after redefining $b$.

For a nonzero global minimizer of the free energy, compare opposite values of the scalar nematic order parameter:The lower one has $\bar{c}\lambda <0$, soThe claim concerns the stable ordered phase, not every metastable stationary point. For $\bar{c}=0$ the two signs are degenerate. For $\bar{c}\ne 0$, equality of the ordered and isotropic free energies, together with stationarity, gives ${\lambda }_t=-\bar{c}/(2\bar{b})$ and ${\bar{a}}_t={\bar{c}}^2/(4\bar{b})>0$. The finite jump ${\lambda }_t$ exhibits the first-order phase transition driven by the cubic invariant.

A scalar coupling linear in the nematic order parameter requires a second-rank anisotropy. A single electric field supplies no such tensor, while $E_i{E}_j$ does. Its isotropic part gives $E^2\mathrm{Tr}Q=0$. Hence the lowest joint order in $E$ and $Q$ of the electric-field coupling to nematic order isTerms depending only on $E$ do not affect minimization over $Q$. With $\vartheta$ the angle between the nematic director and the electric field,For $\chi \lambda >0$, the lowest free energy occurs at ${\cos }^2\vartheta =1$, so the nematic director aligns along either $+\mathbf{E}$ or $-\mathbf{E}$. Then $E_i{Q}_{ij}{E}_j=\lambda E^2$, givingUnlike the linear composition term in a conserved binary fluid mixture, this term changes the equilibrium nematic order parameter: its spatial integral is not fixed.

A polar liquid crystal distinguishes the two ends of each constituent. Its orientational order is described by a vector $\mathbf{p}$, and $\mathbf{p}$ and $-\mathbf{p}$ represent different states. A nematic liquid crystal has head-tail symmetry, so its director obeys $\mathbf{n}\sim -\mathbf{n}$. Its lowest-rank faithful nematic order parameter is the symmetric traceless tensorwhich is unchanged by $\mathbf{n}\mapsto -\mathbf{n}$.

A phase transition is a qualitative change of thermodynamic phase as control parameters such as temperature, pressure or chemical potential are varied. A genuine equilibrium singularity is a nonanalyticity of the appropriate thermodynamic potential in the thermodynamic limit; finite systems generally show rounded crossovers instead.

An order parameter is a macroscopic quantity that distinguishes the phases. It often vanishes in a symmetric disordered phase and becomes nonzero after spontaneous symmetry breaking, although density-driven transitions need not have that simple symmetry interpretation. It can be a scalar, vector or tensor. At a first-order phase transition an appropriate first derivative of the free energy is discontinuous, and the order parameter commonly jumps; at a continuous phase transition the order parameter can approach zero continuously while a susceptibility or a higher derivative becomes singular.

Three examples are:

These examples also illustrate why an order parameter must reflect the physical distinction between phases rather than merely be any quantity that changes with temperature.

For a planar nematic director $\mathbf{n}=(\cos \chi ,\sin \chi )$ and constant amplitude ${\lambda }_0$, the nematic order parameter isDifferentiation gives $\nabla \cdot Q={\lambda }_0(-\sin 2\chi {\chi }_x+\cos 2\chi {\chi }_y,\cos 2\chi {\chi }_x+\sin 2\chi {\chi }_y)$. The coefficient matrix is orthogonal, proving the identity. Hence $K|\nabla \cdot Q{|}^2/2$ is the angle-gradient energy with effective modulus $K{\lambda }_0^2$. The full tensor-gradient norm instead obeys ${\sum }_{ijk}({\partial }_k{Q}_{ij}{)}^2=2{\lambda }_0^2|\nabla \chi {|}^2$ in this normalization; the two local densities must not be confused.

A second-rank Cartesian tensor is traceless when the contraction $T_{ii}$ vanishes. For a symmetric second-rank tensor, this is equivalent to its eigenvalues summing to zero. The orientational nematic order parameter is both symmetric and traceless, excluding an isotropic scalar contribution.

A uniaxial nematic order parameter has one distinguished nematic director and equal eigenvalues in its perpendicular plane. In the displayed normalization the eigenvalues are $\lambda ,-\lambda /2,-\lambda /2$, giving $\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^2=3{\lambda }^2/2$ and $\mathrm{Tr}{Q}^3=3{\lambda }^3/4$. Positive and negative $\lambda$ describe prolate and oblate orientational anisotropy, respectively; reversing the nematic director leaves the tensor unchanged.