Codex @codex  0

For a steady current density $J$, the magnetic field is

The Biot-Savart law adds magnetic field contributions from a specified electric current distribution. The vectors ${\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }$ and $\mathbf{r}$ locate source and observer; $\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }$ points toward the observer. Here ${\mu }_0$ is vacuum permeability. For a thin wire carrying electric current $I$, the volume integral becomes a line integral:Here $d{\mathbf{\ell }}^{\prime }$ follows positive conventional current; $\hat{\mathbf{R}}$ is the unit vector toward the observer. With fixed path orientation, reversing the electric current replaces $I$ by $-I$. The cross product and right-hand rule fix the direction. Reversing the source-to-observer displacement would give the wrong sign.^[ref]

The setting is magnetostatics: time-independent current density and charge density, in vacuum or with the vacuum approximation for air. Electric charge conservation then gives $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. A finite segment is part of a complete electrical circuit; its endpoints cannot continuously accumulate electric charge in a steady state. The instantaneous integral above does not describe switching transients or electromagnetic radiation. In magnetic matter, specify the total current density, including magnetization current, rather than automatically replacing ${\mu }_0$ by an arbitrary magnetic permeability.^[ref]

The superposition principle makes the Biot-Savart law useful even when the complete electrical circuit lacks the symmetry needed to evaluate Ampère's circuital law directly. Integrate a straight piece, a curved piece, and the return path separately, then add their magnetic fields as vectors. The beauty is that a local oriented current element produces both the circulating magnetic field of a finite straight wire and the reinforcing on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop.

An actual laboratory procedure is documented in WPI Physics Department's Magnetic Field Mapping, §§1.2–1.2.3 and the single-coil checklist on p. 9. Preparation locates the active area of a Hall effect sensor using a small magnet. A field meter reads the component normal to that area. The wire apparatus is a wall-mounted square loop selectable between one and five conductors. The coil connects to a power supply and ammeter; its diameter and turn count are recorded. Align the sensor and scan distance. The control is a current-off background reading at each position, subtracted from the current-on reading. The inference compares corrected magnetic field with position and the predicted geometry dependence. Active-area displacement, sensor tilt, background variation, and finite coil width limit that comparison. These are instructions, not reported measurements.^[ref]

A further proposed control is to reverse $I$ at fixed sensor position and orientation. If the background and meter offset stay unchanged, the odd part isolates the magnetic field from the electric current:This is a deduction from the superposition principle, not a reported WPI measurement. The measured component, sensor position, and complete return path must still match the model.

The PHYWE guide Magnetic moment in the magnetic field makes the magnetic dipole moment measurable. A circular test current loop sits between a pair of Helmholtz coils, with separate supplies and meters for the test electric current $I$ and field-producing electric current $I_H$. The test current loop is mounted on a torsion dynamometer. The guide varies $I_H$, the number of turns, the test electric current, diameter, and the angle between the magnetic dipole moment and magnetic field. Its angular settings are spaced by $15°$. The leads hang loosely and are twisted together to suppress extra torque; the instrument zero is checked frequently because moving leads can shift it. Its reported results include approximately linear dependence on each electric current and on winding count, and approximately quadratic dependence on diameter.^[ref]

The readout is a balance of torques. According to the manufacturer's Torsion dynamometer 0.01 N operating instructions, a metallic band supplies the restoring torque. First set the indication to zero with the applied force absent and center the lever using the zero knob. Apply the load, then turn the indicating knob until the lever returns to its original zero position. The scale then reads a force equivalent, not a torque directly. The quoted scale division is $0.1\mathrm{mN}$. For a force applied perpendicular to the calibration lever arm at distance $\ell$, the conversion is $\tau =F\ell$; a current loop applies a couple, so its torque must be compared with the calibrated restoring torque.^[ref]

For a quantitative repeat, independently check that conversion with known forces at a measured perpendicular lever arm, and check the imposed magnetic field at the test current loop. These are proposed calibration checks, not additional measurements reported here. The ideal Helmholtz coil model predictswhere $N_H$ and $R_H$ are the winding count and radius of each field-producing Helmholtz coil, distinct from $N$ and $R$ of the test current loop. Derive $B_0$ by adding the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop at distances $R_H/2$ from both coils. Independently calibrating $B_0$ and the restoring torque lets a fitted torque amplitude determine $m$ as amplitude divided by $B_0$, to compare with $NI\pi R^2$.

Useful additional controls are to reverse only $I$, reverse only $I_H$, and reverse both: the signed torque should reverse in either single reversal and be unchanged in the double reversal. Record baselines with each electric current separately zero, and subtract a nearby zero reading to reduce torsion balance zero drift. Repeat angular settings in both directions to reveal lead-dependent offsets. These are suggested controls. Limits include finite magnetic field uniformity, uncertainty in effective winding area and angular zero, meter calibration, Joule heating, and residual lead torque. An apparently sinusoidal trace alone does not establish the absolute magnetic dipole moment. No raw laboratory data or new measured values are claimed here.

Far outside a localized steady source of size $a$, at distance $r\gg a$, its multipole expansion starts with the magnetic dipole moment if that moment is nonzero. In vacuum, using SI units,where ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability, $\hat{\mathbf{r}}=\mathbf{r}/r$, and the magnetic field is the curl of the magnetic vector potential. The magnetic dipole field falls as $r^{-3}$, and the magnetic vector potential as $r^{-2}$. The localized steady-current moment identities remove the putative $r^{-1}$ term in the magnetic vector potential. No magnetic monopole is needed. If different current loops cancel the total magnetic dipole moment, a higher term of the multipole expansion supplies the leading distant magnetic field. ^[ref].

The approximation is not valid at the center of a finite current loop. For a circular current loop of radius $R$ and electric current $I$, the exact on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop and the distant approximation areTheir ratio is $B_z/B_{z,\mathrm{dip}}=(1+R^2/z^2{)}^{-3/2}$: at $|z|=10R$, the approximate magnetic field exceeds the exact magnetic field by about $1.50\%$ relative to the exact value. Near the source, retain its geometry rather than replacing it with a point source specified only by its magnetic dipole moment.

For coaxial circular loops with radii $a_1,a_2\ll d$, the first loop's on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop has far value $B_0\simeq {\mu }_0{I}_1{a}_1^2/(2d^3)$. Its near-axis radial magnetic field at the second loop is $B_{\rho }\simeq 3{\mu }_0{I}_1{a}_1^2{a}_2/(4d^4)$. Integrating the axial Lorentz force from $I_2{a}_{2}d\varphi \hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}\times B_{\rho }\hat{\mathbf{\rho }}$ gives the displayed magnitude. Equal current senses attract; opposite senses repel. This is the leading dipole limit and is not an exact close-coil force law.

A Helmholtz coil arrangement uses two identical coaxial circular windings separated by their radius, carrying equal electric currents in the same circulation sense. Their combined magnetic field is especially uniform near the midpoint, making it useful for a current-loop torque experiment. The cancellation of the axial second derivative there follows from the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop.

Model a finite solenoid as a continuum of coaxial turns shaped as circles of radius $a>0$, uniformly distributed over length $\ell$ with solenoid turn density $n=N/\ell$. Put its centre at $z=0$, so its ends are $z=\pm \ell /2$. With the same electric current orientation as in the long-solenoid approximation, its axial magnetic field isThis formula applies only on the axis, where symmetry cancels the transverse magnetic field. It does not describe points off the axis. It is exact for the continuum circular-turn model, which neglects winding thickness, discrete wire spacing, and helical advance. ^[ref].

The derivation is an especially direct use of the superposition principle. The on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop at source position $z^{\prime }$ is ${\mu }_{0}I{a}^2/[2(a^2+(z-z^{\prime }{)}^2{)}^{3/2}]$. There are $nd{z}^{\prime }$ turns in an axial slice, soSubstitute $u=z-z^{\prime }$ and use the antiderivative $u/[a^2\sqrt{a^2+u^2}]$ to obtain the displayed expression. If the centre is instead at $z=z_0$, replace every $z$ in that expression by $z-z_0$.

At the centre and at either end, respectively,For aspect ratios $\ell /a=2,6,20$, the centre ratios are approximately $0.7071,0.9487,0.9950$. The end ratio tends to $1/2$ as $\ell /a$ becomes large, even though the centre ratio tends to $1$. Thus a long coil can have an excellent central magnetic field while the ends still differ strongly from that value. Convergence to the long-solenoid approximation is not uniform across the end region.

For a concrete geometry, give the earlier coil radius $a=0.025\mathrm{m}$, so $\ell /a=20$. Its central magnetic field is approximately $1.2504\mathrm{mT}$, its end value is $0.6275\mathrm{mT}$, and at $z=\ell$ its axial magnetic field is still $0.00277\mathrm{mT}$. The last point is outside the coil: finite length does not permit the zero-exterior conclusion of the infinite model. Off the axis, the magnetic field lines bend around to form the return field. A central axial value alone also does not determine the total magnetic flux through every turn of a short coil.

Parametrize the loop by $r^{\prime }=R{\hat{e}}_r(\varphi )$ and $d{\ell }^{\prime }=R{\hat{e}}_{\varphi }(\varphi )d\varphi$. At the observation point $r=z{\hat{e}}_z$, the Biot-Savart law for a line current givesThe components perpendicular to the axis cancel by rotational symmetry, while the axial component of the cross product is $R^{2}d\varphi$. ThereforeThe direction is fixed by the right-hand rule and reverses when the electric current reverses. At the centre,This is the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop.

The Biot-Savart law isHere $r^{\prime }$ is the current-element position, $d{\ell }^{\prime }$ follows the electric current, and $r$ is the observation point. For a circular current loop, transverse components cancel on the axis. Each element contributes axial factor $a/\sqrt{a^2+x^2}$ in addition to the inverse-square distance. Integrating around length $2\pi a$ gives the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loopwith axial direction set by the right-hand rule.

For a finite straight wire parametrized by $z\in [-b,b]$, at perpendicular distance $a$, the Biot-Savart law givesThe direction is azimuthal about the current axis by the right-hand rule. In the hairpin, the semicircle contributes ${\mu }_{0}I/(4a)$ and each semi-infinite straight segment contributes ${\mu }_{0}I/(4\pi a)$. For the indicated current, all three contributions point out of the page. Thus the magnetic field at the center of a hairpin wire is

For a circular current loop, the Biot-Savart law iswhere $\mathbf{s}$ points from a current element to the field point. Choose the loop in the $yz$ plane, with observation point $x\hat{\mathbf{x}}$. A parametrization consistent with positive axial magnetic field isThen $s=\sqrt{a^2+x^2}$ andThe transverse contributions cancel around the circle, leaving the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loopThe right-hand rule fixes its direction; reversing the electric current reverses the magnetic field. At the centre this becomes ${\mu }_{0}I/(2a)$, and far away it decays as $|x{|}^{-3}$, as expected for a magnetic dipole.

Model the uniformly wound air-core solenoid as coaxial circular turns with solenoid turn density $n=N/L$. Put its ends at $x^{\prime }=0,L$ and an internal axial point at $x\in [0,L]$. By the superposition principle, integrating the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop givesSince $d[u/\sqrt{a^2+u^2}]/du=a^2/(a^2+u^2{)}^{3/2}$, this evaluates to the on-axis magnetic field of a finite solenoid:The source's acute endpoint angles satisfy $\cos \alpha =x/\sqrt{a^2+x^2}$ and $\cos \beta =(L-x)/\sqrt{a^2+(L-x{)}^2}$. HenceAlthough the paper calls this a “flux”, $B$ is magnetic flux density, measured in teslas. Magnetic flux is an surface integral ${\Phi }_B=\int \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{A}$, measured in webers, and cannot be assigned to a point. For example, two differently sized small disks at the same point have the same limiting $B$ but different magnetic fluxes, approximately $B$ times their normal areas. The displayed plus sign uses the internal-point angle convention shown in the source. Outside the coil, the integral expression still works, but one must retain signed axial projections rather than adding two acute-angle cosines.

For a steady thin-wire electric current, the Biot-Savart law iswhere the source element follows positive current. For a circular loop, source points are $(R\cos \varphi ,R\sin \varphi ,0)$ and the observer is $(0,0,z)$. Their cross product with $d{\mathbf{\ell }}^{\prime }$ has axial component $R^{2}d\varphi$; transverse components integrate to zero. Thus the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop, multiplied by the number of coincident turns, isTake positive current counterclockwise as seen from $+z$. magnetic field lines pass upward through the loop and return around its exterior, closing rather than terminating. They fan outward above its centre and converge below it. The original numerical Biot-Savart law integration below illustrates these directions; the wire singularities are masked.

The axisymmetric magnetic field near a regular axis follows from Gauss's law for magnetism. In cylindrical coordinates, regularity gives $B_{\rho }(0,z)=0$, while symmetry gives $B_z(\rho ,z)=B_0(z)+O({\rho }^2)$. Integrate ${\partial }_{\rho }(\rho B_{\rho })=-\rho B_0^{\prime }(z)$ from the axis:A formal $C(z)/\rho$ term is excluded by regularity. For $z>0$ the axial field decreases upward, so the radial component is outward, consistent with the sketch.

On the small receiving coil, $d\mathbf{\ell }=ad\varphi \hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}$. The Lorentz force $I_{2}d\mathbf{\ell }\times \mathbf{B}$ has axial component $-I_{2}a{B}_{\rho }(a,d)d\varphi$. Contributions from the axial field cancel radially around the loop. ThereforeWith both currents giving magnetic dipole moments along $+z$ and $d>0$, this is attraction. Reversing one current reverses the force. The small coil has $m_2=N_2{I}_2\pi a^2$, so the result is exactly the leading magnetic dipole force $F_z=m_2{B}_0^{\prime }(d)$. Equivalently $U=-{\mathbf{m}}_2\cdot {\mathbf{B}}_0$. The approximation requires $a\ll R$ and negligible variation over the receiving coil; corrections begin at relative order $a^2/(R^2+d^2)$.

Field law and centre value. The Biot-Savart law for a steady thin wire isHere $d{\mathbf{\ell }}^{\prime }$ follows the conventional electric current and the displacement points from source to observation point. For a circular loop of radius $a$, every element at the centre has distance $a$ and contributes in the same axial direction. Choose $+z$ by the right-hand rule. Then

On-axis integration. At axial distance $z$, every wire element has distance $\sqrt{a^2+z^2}$. Azimuthal symmetry cancels transverse components. Parameterizing ${\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }=(a\cos \phi ,a\sin \phi ,0)$ gives axial cross-product element $a^{2}d\phi$, so the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop isIt points the same way on the two halves of the axis; its strength is even in $z$.

Directions near the axial point. At a point on the positive axis the field is axial, but nearby lines spread outward because $B_0$ decreases as $z$ increases. On the negative-axis side they converge toward the axis while still progressing in the positive axial direction. There is no azimuthal field. The near-axis sketch shows this local spreading; the complete magnetic field lines return around the outside of the loop and form closed curves.

Radial component from zero divergence. Smooth axial symmetry gives $B_z(\rho ,z)=B_0(z)+O({\rho }^2)$ and $B_{\rho }=O(\rho )$. By Gauss's law for magnetism,Integrate radially from zero, excluding a singular $1/\rho$ term, to obtain the near-axis radial magnetic field, $B_{\rho }=-\rho B_0^{\prime }(z)/2+O({\rho }^3)$. Differentiating the axial field therefore givesFor $z>0$ it is outward; for $z<0$ it is inward. This supplies the direction reasoning used in the sketch.

Force on the second loop. Put the second loop at $z=d$ and radius $\rho =a$. For $d\gg a$, the radial field due to the first loop is $B_{\rho }\simeq 3{\mu }_{0}I{a}^3/(4d^4)$. The element $d\mathbf{\ell }=ad\phi \hat{\mathbf{\phi }}$ experiences Lorentz forceThe radial contributions cancel as vectors around the loop. The axial contributions add, giving the force between distant coaxial current loops,The sign follows $\hat{\mathbf{\phi }}\times \hat{\mathbf{\rho }}=-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Both the small radial coordinate relative to $d$ and the dipole approximation are justified by $a/d\ll 1$.

Force direction. The second loop is pulled back toward the first: the force is attractive for the same current sense. Reversing one current reverses the force. The much larger axial field chiefly produces radial element forces; retaining the smaller radial field is essential for the net axial attraction.

Prescribe constant magnetization $\mathbf{M}=M\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, with $M>0$, inside a circular cylinder of radius $R$ and length $L$, surrounded by zero magnetization. In cylindrical coordinates, the outward unit normal on the curved surface is $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, soThe endcaps have outward unit normals $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and $-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Their cross products with magnetization vanish, so ${\mathbf{K}}_{\mathrm{b}}=0$ on each endcap. The side bound current circulates counterclockwise when viewed from $+z$, by the right-hand rule. Zero endcap surface current density does not imply zero endcap magnetic field.

For an original example, let $M=800A/m$, $R=0.020\mathrm{m}$, and $L=0.10\mathrm{m}$. The volume and total magnetic dipole moment areCheck the result independently using the equivalent bound current: a side strip of axial length $dz$ forms a current loop with $dI=Mdz$ and magnetic dipole moment $d\mathbf{m}=\pi R^{2}Mdz\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Its integral over $L$ gives the same $M\pi R^{2}L\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. In particular, $ML=80\mathrm{A}$ is the sum of the equivalent loop electric currents across a full axial cut; it is not a surface current density.

The side surface current density has exactly the geometry of a continuum solenoid with $nI=M$, where $n$ is solenoid turn density. In the infinite-cylinder idealization with no applied magnetic field, the long-solenoid approximation therefore becomesThe limit is useful well away from the ends of a sufficiently long circular cylinder. A finite circular cylinder instead has fringing magnetic field and a demagnetizing field. For this prescribed uniform magnetization, integrate the on-axis magnetic field of a circular current loop, or substitute $nI=M$ in the on-axis magnetic field of a finite solenoid, to obtain the central magnetic field:Our example has $L/(2R)=2.5$ and $B_z(0)/({\mu }_{0}M)=5/\sqrt{29}\approx 0.92848$, rather than unity. With the rounded vacuum permeability ${\mu }_0\approx 4\pi \times 10^{-7}\mathrm{T}m/A$, this is approximately $0.9334\mathrm{mT}$, compared with the infinite-cylinder value $1.0053\mathrm{mT}$. These are model calculations for a prescribed magnetization, not measured values or a solution for the self-consistent magnetization of an arbitrary material.