A concrete quantum quench experiment loaded a Bose-Einstein condensate of chemical atoms from a magnetic field trap into an optical lattice: three orthogonal laser standing waves, with approximately beam waists. An loading ramp preceded a increase in lattice depth. This suppressed quantum tunnelling while retaining each well's vibrational ground state. The switch preserved atom-number populations rather than freezing every motional degree of freedom.[ref]
Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose-Einstein condensate by Markus Greiner and others. Greiner and others, manuscript pp. 3–4: preparation and switching; p. 7, Methods: wavelength, beam waists and lattice geometry
After variable hold times, releasing the traps and taking photon absorption images after of flight revealed disappearance and return of interference peaks. Background-subtracted peak counts supplied a coherent fraction. Varying final depth tested the predicted revival period ; varying initial depth tested the collapse's sensitivity to atom-number statistics. Peak broadening outside counting windows and spatial variation of limited later signals.[ref]
Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose-Einstein condensate by Markus Greiner and others. Manuscript p. 4 and figure 2 caption on p. 11: flight and image extraction; figure 3 caption on p. 12: readout limitations; figures 4–5 captions on pp. 13–14: final-depth and initial-depth comparisons
Here is the on-site interaction energy. The approximate isolated-well Hamiltonian operator , with number operator , gives different quantum phases to its number states, which later rephase. This is a many-level realization of the distinction between fixed populations and changing quantum phases.[ref]
Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose-Einstein condensate by Markus Greiner and others. Manuscript pp. 2–3, equations (1)–(2): isolated-well Hamiltonian and number-state phase evolution
Cold-atom realization of the Haldane model 2026-10-18
Gregor Jotzu and collaborators realized an artificial Haldane model in 2014. They loaded spin-polarized potassium-40 fermions into a laser-made honeycomb lattice. Piezoelectric mirrors shook the optical lattice along two axes; their relative phase controlled time-reversal symmetry breaking. Optical phase control adjusted the sublattice offset.[ref]
A magnetic field gradient drove Bloch oscillations. Band mapping measured interband transfer to locate valley-gap closures. Opposite-force drift measurements distinguished cancelling from reinforcing Berry curvature contributions; reversing shaking handedness reversed the drift. Interband transfer and harmonic confinement affected this readout, including drift beyond ideal transition lines. This neutral-atom Floquet Hamiltonian realization did not measure electrical sheet conductivity. Magnetic fields were used for preparation and forcing.[ref]
The five DiVincenzo criteria are: a scalable collection of well-characterized qubits; preparation in a known fiducial quantum state; relevant coherence times long compared with quantum gate times; a universal quantum gate set; and qubit-specific quantum measurement. The criterion is useful control of the whole computation, including errors, rather than merely observing two resolved levels.[ref]
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation by David P. DiVincenzo. Section III, numbered requirements 1–5; Section IV's two communication requirements are additional
For trapped ions, the implementation is:
- Scalable characterized qubits. Two long-lived hyperfine structure levels or an optical ground/metastable pair in each ion encode . An ion trap confines individually addressed ions. Extending a chain adds qubits, but increasing motional complexity, addressing errors and heating limit straightforward scaling; segmented traps and transport can help.
- Initialization. Optical pumping prepares the internal quantum state. Doppler cooling and, where required, resolved sideband cooling prepare the shared motion used for quantum gates.
- Coherence. Long-lived internal levels give coherence much longer than controlled pulse times. Magnetic noise, laser noise, scattering and motional heating cause quantum decoherence; suitable clock-state encodings and control reduce these errors.
- Universal control. Resonant optical, microwave or Raman transitions give arbitrary one-qubit rotations. Shared motional normal modes, coupled through the Coulomb force, mediate entangling two-qubit gates. Together these supply a universal quantum gate set.
- Readout. State-selective cycling fluorescence, often with electron shelving, produces a bright/dark signal resolved for individual ions.
For trapped neutral atoms, the corresponding implementation is:
- Scalable characterized qubits. Long-lived ground-state hyperfine structure levels encode qubits in an optical lattice or an array of optical tweezers. Large arrays are feasible, but random loading, vacancies, atom loss and individual addressing must be controlled.
- Initialization. Cooling plus optical pumping prepares the internal quantum state. Filling or rearranging traps prepares a usable register; motional cooling is needed when the chosen quantum gate depends on motion.
- Coherence. Weak environmental coupling of neutral ground-state chemical atoms allows long coherence. Trap-light scattering, differential light shifts and magnetic noise limit it; switching traps or choosing suitable encodings can reduce these effects.
- Universal control. Microwave or Raman transitions implement one-qubit rotations. Ground-state chemical atoms do not have the ions' long-range Coulomb force, so that motional-bus construction cannot simply be copied. Controlled collisions or Rydberg blockade can nevertheless supply entangling two-qubit gates.
- Readout. State-dependent fluorescence or state-selective removal followed by imaging identifies a chosen qubit. Optical resolution, cross-talk and atom loss constrain repeated measurements.
Thus neither platform is forbidden from meeting a criterion in principle. Weak neutral-ground-state interactions make entangling control harder, but claiming that trapped neutral atoms cannot implement a universal quantum gate set would be false. Gate-model quantum algorithms using Rydberg blockade had already been demonstrated in a programmable neutral-atom processor by 2022.[ref]
Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer by T. M. Graham and others. Nature 604, 457–462 (2022), abstract and controlled-phase gate implementation
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 83 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the stationary quantum vortex fieldwith no dependence on the coordinate along the vortex line. The polar Laplacian contributes . ConsequentlyA regular vortex with nonzero integer winding number has near the origin. The angular phase gives the superfluid velocity outside the core. For , the exterior amplitude responds to the periodically varying potential; it is not generally a constant bulk value. The radial potential here is not a Cartesian translation-invariant optical lattice, so the Cartesian Bloch theorem is not an exact theorem for its full radial equation.
Recoil energy 2026-10-14
Recoil energy is the kinetic energy gained by an initially stationary atom absorbing a photon of momentum . In a standing-wave optical lattice of spacing , the photon wavenumber is , giving .
In 2006, Zoran Hadzibabic, Peter Krüger, Marc Cheneau, Baptiste Battelier and Jean Dalibard split a cooled rubidium-87 cloud into two independent planar gases using an optical lattice. After release, the expanding sheets overlapped; absorption imaging recorded their matter-wave interference. Smooth fringe waviness revealed thermal phase fluctuations, while sharp dislocations indicated isolated vortices. The initial evaporative-cooling endpoint controlled the preparation; central fringe contrast served as a degeneracy proxy because direct thermometry in the lattice was difficult.[ref]
Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Crossover in a Trapped Atomic Gas by Zoran Hadzibabic and others. Pages 1–2, preparation and readout; Fig. 1; temperature control and Fig. 2
Loss of extended coherence coincided with increased vortex signatures. The optical trap and finite cloud produced a crossover; tightly bound pairs were unresolved, and short-wavelength modes could contaminate high-temperature counts. These were observations of the vortex-unbinding mechanism, not a direct measurement of phase stiffness or a sharp homogeneous universal stiffness jump. The authors left the sample's superfluidity open.[ref]
Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Crossover in a Trapped Atomic Gas by Zoran Hadzibabic and others. Pages 3–4, Figs. 3–4; geometry, invisible pairs, detection limits and final paragraph on unmeasured superfluidity