With zero tension and zero distributed load, a free interval satisfies . Before contact the entire elastic beam is free, so is a cubic polynomial. The four end boundary conditions determine it uniquely. Reflection preserves those boundary conditions, so the unique solution is an even function and its odd terms vanish. Direct substitution gives
For , its minimum occurs at and is . The constraint is therefore satisfied exactly when . The first contact is at the midpoint:
At equality the normal contact force is still zero. The uniqueness used here can also be checked by integrating for the difference of two solutions with homogeneous clamped boundary conditions, which gives and hence .
Seek an even function with isolated contact at . On , the contact and reflection conditions impose and , while the free interval still has . Write
The two end boundary conditions give
and therefore the full displacement field is
The jump condition at zero gives the upward point force
It is nonnegative precisely when . In that range . Nonpenetration near zero requires , equivalently . Conversely, when both inequalities hold,
with strict inequality away from zero. Thus this is an admissible isolated-contact solution throughout
At the upper endpoint the contact curvature vanishes, and the profile remains above the obstacle for because . Increasing further would make , forcing penetration near zero. An interval of contact must then develop.
The admissible solution is unique within this linear model: the bending elastic energy is strictly convex on the convex set of admissible profiles with the prescribed end data. Integration by parts shows that a solution with nonnegative contact point forces satisfies the corresponding minimum condition, since every admissible variation lifts a point already on the obstacle. Reflection therefore justifies the assumed even function also after contact.
Let the contact interval be , where . Its slope and curvature vanish. Continuity of the displacement field, slope and bending moment at gives
On the free interval , the cubic polynomial satisfying these three conditions is . Put . The end boundary conditions become
Consequently
This requires , with at the transition. The full displacement field is
It satisfies nonpenetration. In the open contact interval the distributed normal contact force is , since the obstacle is flat and . The normal contact force is concentrated at the two endpoints. At , jumps from zero to ; at , it jumps from to zero. Both upward point forces are therefore
At they merge into the single midpoint point force of the preceding regime. These formulae belong to the small-slope model; interpreting arbitrarily large as a finite physical rotation would exceed its assumptions.
The net upward force is the sum of the contact point forces, since the distributed normal contact force vanishes in every regime here. Before contact it is zero. During isolated contact it is . For an interval of contact it is , with . Therefore
The formulae agree at both transitions. At they give , and their first derivatives also agree there. As a check on the sign and normalization, integrating the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation over the whole elastic beam gives , which yields the same values.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.