Past exam of the physics A course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / Paper 1 / Section C

A density operator describes both a quantum state prepared in one pure state and a statistical preparation whose members occupy different pure states. If normalized vectors $|{\psi }_i⟩$ occur with probabilities $p_i$, defineThe resulting operator is Hermitian, positive semidefinite and has trace one. Positivity follows because $⟨v|\rho |v⟩={\sum }_i{p}_i|⟨{\psi }_i|v⟩{|}^2\ge 0$. Conversely, the spectral theorem gives such a representation of any finite-dimensional operator with these properties, using its eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The matrix representing $\rho$ depends on the chosen basis; the operator and its predictions do not.

One operator gives every measurement probability. For a projective measurement with orthogonal projections ${\Pi }_a$ and outcomes $a$,For example, the first formula follows by averaging $⟨{\psi }_i|{\Pi }_a|{\psi }_i⟩$ over the preparation. The trace expression is basis independent. A general measurement replaces ${\Pi }_a$ by positive measurement effects that sum to the identity, without changing the probability formula. Thus $\rho$ specifies the statistics accessible to measurements on that system.

The distinction between pure and mixed states is especially transparent in the eigenvalues. A pure state has $\rho =|\psi ⟩⟨\psi |$, ${\rho }^2=\rho$, and $\mathrm{Tr}{\rho }^2=1$. A mixed state has at least two positive eigenvalues and $\mathrm{Tr}{\rho }^2<1$. For a qubit,pure states lie on the Bloch sphere; mixed states lie inside the Bloch ball. The maximally mixed qubit $\rho =I/2$ can be prepared by choosing equally between the two $z$ spin eigenstates, or equally between the two $x$ spin eigenstates. These ensembles are different preparation procedures but give the same density operator. No measurement on the resulting qubit alone can identify which ensemble was used.

quantum coherence must be distinguished from merely having two populated levels. In the $z$ basis, the state $|+x⟩$ hasBoth give equal probabilities for the two $z$ outcomes. A measurement along $x$ gives the positive result with probability one for the first state and one half for the second. The off-diagonal entries encode the relative phase information responsible for this difference. Whether a matrix entry is off diagonal is basis dependent; purity is not.

For an isolated system, each component evolves with the same unitary time-evolution operator. Therefore $\rho (t)=U(t)\rho (0)U^{†}(t)$ andUnitary evolution preserves the eigenvalues and purity of $\rho$. A density operator commuting with a time-independent Hamiltonian operator is stationary. A thermal equilibrium example is the canonical ensemble ${\rho }_{\beta }=e^{-\beta H}/Z$, where $Z=\mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta H})$ and $\beta =1/(k_{\mathrm{B}}T)$. expectation values then reproduce quantum statistical mechanics without assigning the system a definite energy eigenstate on every run.

A mixed state can also arise without classical randomness in the joint preparation. For a bipartite quantum system, the reduced density operator ${\rho }_A={\mathrm{Tr}}_B{\rho }_{AB}$ gives every measurement probability accessible to subsystem $A$. For the Bell state $(|00⟩+|11⟩)/\sqrt{2}$, the joint state is pure, whereas ${\rho }_A=I/2$. Its local mixedness reflects entanglement with the inaccessible system; the partial trace discards correlations that matter for joint measurements. More generally, interaction with an environment can suppress off-diagonal entries in a selected basis, producing decoherence while the combined system still evolves unitarily.

Finally, state evolution conditional on a measurement outcome differs from isolated evolution. An ideal projective measurement yielding $a$ updates the state by the Lüders rule $\rho \mapsto {\Pi }_a\rho {\Pi }_a/P(a)$. Discarding the outcome gives ${\sum }_a{\Pi }_a\rho {\Pi }_a$, which generally removes coherence between different eigenspaces. The Von Neumann entropy $-\mathrm{Tr}(\rho \ln \rho )$ quantifies mixedness: it vanishes for pure states and reaches $\ln d$ for $I/d$. Multiplying by $k_{\mathrm{B}}$ gives thermodynamic entropy units. These uses make the density operator a common language for preparation uncertainty, measurement, thermal states and entangled subsystems, while retaining their distinct physical origins.

With two coherent paths, the probability amplitude at a screen is ${\psi }_1(x)+e^{i\varphi }{\psi }_2(x)$. The Born rule givesThe final term shifts when the relative phase changes, producing interference fringes. For slit separation $d$ in the far field, the phase difference is approximately $2\pi d\sin \theta /\lambda$; constructive interference occurs at $d\sin \theta =n\lambda$. Finite slit widths add a diffraction envelope, so an ideal equally bright, infinitely narrow slit model does not predict the full observed envelope.

single-electron interference pattern buildup starts with isolated localized detector events at sufficiently low source intensity. Repeated events accumulate the interference probability distribution. Thus detection is discrete while propagation is described by coherent probability amplitudes. The effect cannot be explained by interference between different particles if the apparatus is occupied by at most one particle at a time. A motivating realization used a field-emission electron source, an electron biprism to recombine two paths, electron lenses and a position-sensitive electron counter; it recorded individual arrivals building up the fringes. This was a biprism realization of two-path interference, not a plate with two literal slits.^[ref]

The crucial comparison is between both coherent paths open and a preparation that supplies which-path information. If the paths become correlated with detector states $|D_1⟩,|D_2⟩$, the joint state is ${\psi }_1|D_1⟩+e^{i\varphi }{\psi }_2|D_2⟩$. Ignoring that detector multiplies the interference term by $⟨D_1|D_2⟩$. Orthogonal detector states remove the term completely, while identical detector states preserve it. This is a consequence of entanglement and the partial trace; a human need not read the detector.

In a real test, check the single-path distributions, detector background, source coherence and stability of the relative phase. Classical phase drift can wash out fringes without supplying which-path information. Conversely, localized detections alone do not establish coherent two-path propagation; the controlled phase dependence of their accumulated distribution provides the discriminating evidence.

orbital angular momentum generates spatial rotations and is $\mathbf{L}=\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{p}$. With $\mathbf{p}=-i\hslash \nabla$, its components satisfyThus $L^2$ and one component, conventionally $L_z$, have simultaneous eigenstates, while all three components cannot generally have sharp values. On ordinary single-valued spatial wavefunctions,The spherical harmonics form an orthonormal angular basis. The integer restriction is specific to orbital wavefunctions; half-integer spin is an intrinsic degree of freedom, not the angular dependence of a scalar spatial wavefunction.

The angular momentum ladder operators obeyThe ladder ends at $m=\pm \ell$, producing $2\ell +1$ states. A state with specified $m$ has a sharp projection $\hslash m$, but the angular momentum magnitude is $\hslash \sqrt{\ell (\ell +1)}$, not $\hslash \ell$. No classical picture of a vector with simultaneously fixed Cartesian components reproduces all these measurement properties.

In a central potential, rotational symmetry gives $[H,L_i]=0$. separation of variables yields $\psi (\mathbf{r})=R_{\ell }(r)Y_{\ell m}(\theta ,\varphi )$. The radial Schrödinger equation includes a centrifugal potential ${\hslash }^2\ell (\ell +1)/(2m{r}^2)$, which suppresses small-radius amplitude for nonzero $\ell$. The energy is independent of $m$ when rotational symmetry is intact, but need not be independent of $\ell$. A magnetic field can break that degeneracy. Spatial inversion gives $Y_{\ell m}(-\hat{\mathbf{r}})=(-1{)}^{\ell }{Y}_{\ell m}(\hat{\mathbf{r}})$, connecting orbital angular momentum to parity and to the even/odd rotational restriction for the hydrogen spin isomers.

For a nonrelativistic spinless particle in a scalar potential, the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation isAn initial wavefunction together with boundary conditions specifies the evolution. The Hamiltonian operator must be self-adjoint on the appropriate domain for closed-system evolution to be unitary. The equation is linear, so a superposition of solutions is another solution. Its complex wavefunction predicts probability amplitudes; the Born rule separately supplies the connection to measurement probabilities.

For a time-independent potential, separation $\psi (\mathbf{r},t)=\varphi (\mathbf{r})e^{-iEt/\hslash }$ gives the time-independent Schrödinger equation $H\varphi =E\varphi$. Normalizability and boundary conditions select the allowed energies of bound states; scattering states instead use incoming and outgoing boundary conditions and generalized normalization. A general state is a superposition of energy eigenstates, with a spectral integral as well if there is a continuous spectrum. Different energies accumulate different phases, allowing time-dependent position densities and oscillatory expectation values even though a single energy eigenstate has a stationary density.

For a real scalar potential, combining the equation with its complex conjugate yields probability conservation:With no current escaping the boundary, $\int |\psi {|}^2{d}^{3}r$ is constant. Matching conditions at a finite potential step follow from the differential equation and enforce the flux balance used in B6.

The Schrödinger equation is a dynamical postulate of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, not a consequence of classical mechanics alone. The substitutions $E\mapsto i\hslash {\partial }_t$ and $\mathbf{p}\mapsto -i\hslash \nabla$ motivate its free-particle form from the dispersion relation, but do not derive the measurement postulates. The scalar equation omits intrinsic spin and relativistic particle creation. Spinful or relativistic problems require the corresponding extended theory. Nor does its deterministic unitary evolution, by itself, prescribe conditioning on a particular observed measurement outcome.