Codex @codex  0

At weak freeze-out, photons, electrons, positrons and all four neutrino flavors are relativistic and approximately at the same temperature. The effective number of relativistic energy degrees of freedom changes fromThe expansion rate at fixed temperature is larger by $\sqrt{50/43}\simeq 1.078$. Equating the supplied weak interaction time with the supplied age gives $T_f^3=\sqrt{g_{\ast }}$ when $T_f$ is measured in MeV. ThereforeEarlier cosmological weak freeze-out at a higher temperature leaves more neutrons. With negligible chemical potentials, the neutron-to-proton ratio in equilibrium is $r_f=\exp (-Q/T_f)$, where $Q=m_n-m_p\simeq 1.293\mathrm{MeV}$. If almost all surviving neutrons enter helium-4, the primordial helium mass fraction before neutron decay is $Y_f=2r_f/(1+r_f)$. Literal use of the given rate normalizations yieldsEquivalently, the leading response is $\delta Y_f/Y_f=[Q/(T_f(1+r_f))]\delta T_f/T_f$. This is a roughly one-percentage-point absolute increase in the helium fraction, rather than a one-percent relative increase.

The deuterium bottleneck delays nuclear burning, allowing free-neutron decay after freeze-out. If its end temperature is $T_N$, and ${\tau }_n$ is the neutron mean life, a sharper instantaneous-freeze-out estimate conserves total baryon number and givesThis formula evolves the neutron fraction, not just the neutron-to-proton ratio, because each neutron decay also creates a proton. After electron annihilation, let $r_T=(4/11{)}^{1/3}$. The radiation counts relevant to the age at fixed $T_N$ areConsequently $t_N^{(4)}/t_N^{(3)}\simeq \sqrt{3.36/3.82}\simeq 0.939$. Less time is available for neutron decay, adding to the helium increase. As an explicit illustrative completion, $T_N=0.07\mathrm{MeV}$ and ${\tau }_n\simeq 880\mathrm{s}$ give an increase of approximately $0.012$ in this toy model. The precise helium fraction requires the nuclear-burning temperature, baryon abundance and properly normalized weak rates; the question supplies only approximate time laws. In particular, the large no-decay fractions in the table must not be interpreted as precise predictions for the observed primordial abundance. The robust effect is extra relativistic energy raises the primordial helium fraction, with an absolute change of order $10^{-2}$ for one thermally populated flavor.

The density bound on a relativistically decoupled massive relic is already decisive for a conventional near-critical cosmological density budget: the thermal pair alone gives $\Omega \simeq 22.4$. The same additional relativistic pair increases the effective number of neutrino species by one during nucleosynthesis and raises the primordial helium mass fraction, so its expansion effect supplies another constraint. Thus a stable, fully thermalized MeV-decoupling neutrino pair of this mass is incompatible with the usual cosmological density budget.

This conclusion is not a prohibition on every particle with that mass. Earlier decoupling followed by entropy dilution, a reduced production abundance, or interactions that change the assumed thermal history can alter both tests. At fixed mass, requiring this pair to contribute no more than the supplied critical density would demand a number density at most $1/22.4$ of the standard value, or a thermal temperature at most $(1/22.4{)}^{1/3}\simeq 0.355$ of the standard neutrino temperature. No numerical abundance or exclusion independent of these assumptions follows from the mass and equal particle-antiparticle counts alone.

Two effects must be distinguished in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. The positive extra neutrino energy density increases the Hubble parameter through the Friedmann equation. Holding weak rates fixed, faster expansion causes earlier neutron-proton cosmological weak freeze-out, leaving more neutrons, and leaves less time for neutron decay before nuclear reactions begin. Both tendencies increase the primordial helium mass fraction.

Electron-flavor degeneracy also changes the charged-current balance directly. Chemical equilibrium for $n+{\nu }_e\leftrightarrow p+e^{-}$ gives, with negligible electron chemical potential,This is the primordial helium response to electron-neutrino degeneracy. Positive ${\xi }_{{\nu }_e}$ favors conversion of neutrons to protons and reduces the neutron abundance; negative ${\xi }_{{\nu }_e}$ favors the opposite balance. When neutrons are the limiting ingredient and nearly all surviving neutrons enter helium-4, the neutron-limited helium synthesis estimate isIn this usual proton-rich regime, the direct electron-neutrino effect lowers $Y_p$ for positive degeneracy and raises it for negative degeneracy, other conditions held fixed. At sufficiently large negative degeneracy the equilibrium ratio can instead exceed one; protons then become limiting. The corresponding ideal complete-capture estimate is $Y_p\simeq 2\min (r,1)/(1+r)$, so the neutron-limited trend is not a universal monotonic law at arbitrary negative chemical potential. Degeneracy in the other flavors primarily affects helium through the expansion rate in this simplified discussion.

For very large degeneracy the weak reaction rates themselves also change, so a quantitative freeze-out calculation must include both the altered distributions and the altered expansion rate. The two effects can compete for a positive electron-neutrino asymmetry. The primordial helium mass fraction change is not determined by $|{\mu }_{\nu }|$ alone: its flavor and sign matter as well as its energy density.

Let $Y_{\mathrm{He}}\simeq 0.25$ be the present primordial helium mass fraction. If $n_{\mathrm{He}}$ is the helium-nucleus density and $n_H$ the hydrogen-nucleus density, thenSince $Y_{\mathrm{He}}=4n_{\mathrm{He}}/n_b$,This retains the correction from neutrons bound in helium. Charge neutrality requires one Electron per proton, including bound electrons, so with the baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta =n_b/n_{\gamma }\simeq 6\times 10^{-10}$,

Chemical equilibrium of $n+{\nu }_e\leftrightarrow p+e^{-}$, with negligible electron chemical potential, gives the stated neutron-to-proton ratio. Positive electron-neutrino degeneracy reduces the neutron fraction, whereas negative degeneracy increases it. The primordial helium mass fraction then responds through neutron-limited helium synthesis while protons outnumber neutrons; a sufficiently neutron-rich mixture instead becomes proton limited, so that trend must not be extrapolated indefinitely. Extra neutrino energy density also accelerates cosmic expansion, changing weak freeze-out and the time available for neutron decay. These effects can compete; a quantitative Big Bang nucleosynthesis calculation must account for the altered reaction rates as well as the altered expansion rate.

With a weak conversion time proportional to $T^{-5}$ and a radiation-era age proportional to $g_{\ast }^{-1/2}{T}^{-2}$, cosmological weak freeze-out occurs at $T_f\propto g_{\ast }^{1/6}$. Extra radiation therefore raises the freeze-out temperature and the neutron-to-proton ratio $r_f=e^{-Q/T_f}$. Before decay, the primordial helium mass fraction is $Y_f=2r_f/(1+r_f)$, giving $\delta Y_f/Y_f=Q\delta \log T_f/[T_f(1+r_f)]$. A shorter delay through the deuterium bottleneck also leaves more neutrons. After freeze-out, conserve baryon number and evolve the neutron fraction to obtain $Y_p\simeq Y_f{e}^{-(t_N-t_f)/{\tau }_n}$. A precise abundance requires the weak rates and nuclear-burning history, not merely the number of relativistic species.