Bouquet of circles 2026-10-25
A bouquet of circles identifies one point of each of a family of circles to a common point, using the quotient topology. As a CW complex it has one vertex and one graph loop for each circle. The empty family means a single point. Its fundamental group is the free group on the family, as described by the fundamental group of a bouquet of circles.
Collapsing a subset to a point 2026-10-31
For a nonempty subset of a topological space , identify all points of and leave each point of in its own equivalence class. The resulting quotient space is denoted . For every subset , its saturation of a subset isThe quotient topology therefore gives a useful test: is a closed set if and only if the displayed saturation of a subset is a closed set of . In particular, every closed set disjoint from has closed image, even if is not closed. When is closed, is a closed map, because both possibilities in the formula are then closed sets for closed .
Geometric realization of a simplicial complex Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-31
Take one copy of the standard geometric simplex for every face of an abstract simplicial complex , label its vertices by , and identify equally labelled common faces. Give the result the quotient topology from the disjoint union of all these simplexes. Equivalently, a point is a finitely supported family of barycentric coordinates with and .
The weak topology of a simplicial realization makes open precisely when is open in every closed simplex. This definition determines the topology even for infinite complexes, when a metric realization of a simplicial complex may give a different topology.[ref]
Topology and Groups by Marc Lackenby. Definitions I.17–I.18, printed pp. 8–9: labelled simplexes and gluing of their faces
Hausdorff reflection by continuous maps 2026-10-31
For a topological space , the displayed relation is an equivalence relation. Give its quotient the quotient topology. Every inverse image under a continuous map from to a Hausdorff space is a saturation of a subset. Distinct quotient classes can be distinguished by some such map; disjoint open neighborhoods of their images pull back to disjoint saturated open sets, whose quotient images are open. Thus the quotient is Hausdorff. Each continuous map from to a Hausdorff space factors uniquely through this quotient, and the factor is continuous by the quotient topology. This is its universal reflection property.
Indiscrete topology 2026-10-06
Metric on the antipodal sphere quotient Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
The displayed metric on antipodal classes of the unit sphere induces its quotient topology. Triangle inequality follows by choosing the signs that realize each minimum and applying the Euclidean triangle inequality. Distinct classes have disjoint saturated unions of small balls, proving the quotient is Hausdorff; compactness follows from the continuous quotient map.
Choose , possible because each interval is uncountable. Every tail is closed and disjoint from . Therefore is an open saturated set for collapsing a subset to a point, so its image in the quotient topology is open. These increasing images cover the quotient, but no finite selection covers it, because the largest selected image still misses an infinite tail of distinct singleton classes. This is an open cover with no finite subcover, proving noncompactness. The argument does not require the countable subset to be closed or nondense. For the empty subset, read the quotient as the original line.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 21 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The determinant-one cyclic quotient of the affine plane has the closed embeddingHere denotes the cyclic group generated by the given diagonal matrix. We establish the presentation of the polynomial invariant ring and verify that its fibres really are the group orbits.
On the coordinate ring , the inverse-pullback action multiplies by . Since these monomials are a basis, a polynomial is invariant precisely when each of its nonzero monomials satisfies . If , such a monomial is ; if , it is . ThereforeThese generators give a surjective homomorphism , and lies in its kernel of a ring homomorphism. To prove there are no further relations, reduce any monomial using . The result is a linear combination ofTheir images are respectively , and . All have distinct exponent pairs, so they are linearly independent in . Any polynomial in the kernel of a ring homomorphism has zero reduced expression and hence belongs to . ConsequentlyThis proves the claimed closed subvariety embedding of the affine quotient.
For surjectivity of , if choose and set . Then . If , the relation forces ; choose and any th root of for . If two points have the same image and , equality of their th powers gives and equality of gives . If , both first coordinates vanish, and the same argument using gives the orbit relation; the case has only that one point in its fibre. Thus every fibre is exactly one group orbit.
The map is finite: and satisfy the monic equations and , and the finitely many monomials , , span as a module over its polynomial invariant ring. A finite morphism is closed when it is surjective as here and therefore gives the quotient topology. For a principal open subset defined by an invariant , its regular functions pull back to andIndeed, because is invariant, an invariant fraction with denominator has invariant numerator. These principal open subsets cover the affine hypersurface, proving the required local equality of invariant regular functions. Together with the orbit fibres, this verifies the geometric quotient, not merely a bijection of underlying sets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 26 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A monad on a category consists of an endofunctor , a unit natural transformation , and a multiplication , satisfyingAn algebra for a monad is with and . A morphism of algebras for a monad satisfies . These objects and arrows form the Eilenberg-Moore category .
For an adjunction with , the monad induced by an adjunction is , with . The Eilenberg-Moore comparison functor is and . The functor is monadic when this comparison is an equivalence of categories; this is a monadic adjunction.
The precise monadicity theorem says that is monadic exactly when it has a left adjoint, reflects isomorphisms, and satisfies the following condition: whenever the image of a parallel pair in admits a split coequalizer in , the pair has a coequalizer in and preserves that coequalizer. Equivalently, these coequalizers are created up to the canonical isomorphism identifying their underlying coequalizer objects. Here a split coequalizer of consists of , , and withThese equations prove its universal property: if , then , and is the unique factor through . Every functor preserves these equations, so every functor preserves split coequalizers.
First consider the forgetful functor . It has the free algebra functor as a left adjoint: the inverse transposition formulas are and . An monad algebra morphism whose underlying arrow is invertible has an algebra-morphism inverse, by rearranging its structure equation. Thus reflects isomorphisms.
Suppose have an underlying split coequalizer . Applying gives a coequalizer of . The equation therefore gives a unique with . The monad algebra laws follow by cancellation: composing with the epimorphism reduces it to , and composing with reduces it to . Both and are epimorphisms because they remain split coequalizers. Thus is an algebra for a monad and is an monad algebra morphism. If an algebra map equalizes , its underlying factor obeys , since this equation becomes after composition with . This proves that creates the required coequalizers. An equivalence of categories transfers these properties to any monadic , proving necessity.
Conversely assume the three conditions and write . Given , take the pairIts image is , with split coequalizer : the splittings are and , becauseLet be its coequalizer in . Preservation gives a canonical isomorphism under which . Transporting the algebra action of along this isomorphism gives . Naturality of the adjunction counit says that is an monad algebra morphism, hence . But too, and is a split epimorphism, with section . Therefore . Every algebra is consequently isomorphic to some .
It remains to establish full faithfulness, rather than merely construct objects. For , put . The adjunction counit coequalizes . The coequalizer supplied by the hypothesis has underlying coequalizer . The induced arrow from that coequalizer object to is therefore sent by to an isomorphism; reflection of isomorphisms makes it invertible. Thus itself is this coequalizer.
Now let be an monad algebra morphism, and put . The arrow coequalizes the two arrows in the preceding presentation. To check this directly, use transposition along : the transposes of and are respectively and , which agree by the algebra-morphism equation. Hence a unique satisfies . Applying gives ; cancellation of the split epimorphism yields . Finally, any arrow satisfies by naturality, so two arrows with equal image under are equal by the coequalizer property. The comparison is full and faithful and essentially surjective, hence an equivalence of categories. This proves the theorem.
For the application, the free compact Hausdorff space on a set is the Stone-Čech compactification of the corresponding discrete space. Its standard extension property says that every set map , for compact Hausdorff , extends uniquely to a continuous map . This constructs the required left adjoint. Also a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, so reflects isomorphisms.
Take continuous maps whose underlying functions have a split coequalizer with splittings . The splittings need not be continuous. LetThe set is compact and hence closed. Since , it is contained in . Conversely . ThusThe set of triples on the right is closed in the compact Hausdorff space , so its projection onto the first two coordinates is compact and closed. This proves that the equivalence relation is closed, without assuming continuity of either splitting.
Give the quotient topology. The allowed closed-relation criterion makes it a compact Hausdorff space. If a continuous map equalizes , the split-coequalizer property makes it constant on the fibres of ; its unique factor is continuous by the quotient topology. Hence this is a coequalizer in compact Hausdorff spaces, preserved by . Its topology is forced uniquely, since any continuous surjection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a quotient map. All three conditions hold, and therefore the forgetful functor from compact Hausdorff spaces to sets is monadic.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 29 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Adjoin to the complex upper half-plane. Ordinary points retain their usual neighborhoods. At a rational boundary point , a neighborhood basis consists of together with , with arbitrarily large. Different choices of change it by a translation and sign, so give the same neighborhood system. Give the quotient topology. The modular group acts properly discontinuously on ; its modular cusp neighborhoods descend to punctured neighborhoods with their modular cusp point filled in. This quotient is Hausdorff: interior orbits can be separated by proper discontinuity, and a sufficiently high modular cusp neighborhood avoids any prescribed compact interior neighborhood.
Away from fixed points of the effective group , a small disk is disjoint from its nonidentity translates, so its coordinate gives a holomorphic quotient coordinate. At an elliptic fixed point , useIts effective stabilizer rotates by an th root of unity, where at and at . The quotient coordinate is , not . All rational boundary points lie in one modular cusp class. At infinity the stabilizer acts by , andis a punctured-disk coordinate; adjoining fills in the modular cusp. These charts and their holomorphic transition maps define the complex structure of the compactified modular curve.
For compactness use the standard regionIts part with , , is compact: the imaginary part is at least . The quotient of its upper tail, with its two vertical sides identified and infinity added, is the closed disk . These two compact images cover , including the boundary-edge identifications. Thus is a compact Riemann surface.
The function also extends over the modular cusp with one simple pole, since . Its local expressions at elliptic points descend to holomorphic functions of . By Question 1 it maps the remaining quotient bijectively onto , so its extension is a degree-one holomorphic map . A degree-one map of compact Riemann surfaces is biholomorphic: any local ramification would already give degree at least two. Therefore is the Riemann sphere; this will also identify the base genus in Question 5.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 2 4F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use three compactness facts: a closed subset of a compact space is compact; a continuous image of a compact space is compact; and a compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed. For a closed , these facts show that is closed in . Therefore the bijection is a closed map, and proves continuity of its inverse. Thus is a homeomorphism. This proves the compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem without requiring itself to be Hausdorff.
Let be the quotient map and . The map is continuous and identifies precisely the equal parameters and the endpoint pair. Hence it induces a bijection from the quotient space to the unit circle, with ; the definition of the quotient topology makes continuous. The quotient is compact as a continuous image of , while the circle is Hausdorff as a subspace of . Applying the preceding theorem gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 3 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Throughout, rings are commutative with identity and ring homomorphisms preserve identity. The spectrum of a commutative ring is . For an ideal , put ; these are the closed sets of the Zariski topology. Its axioms follow fromFor the last equality, a prime ideal containing must contain or : if it contained neither, choose and , contradicting . The other equalities follow directly from containment. Thus arbitrary intersections and finite unions of closed sets are closed, proving that this is a topology.
The Zorn lemma says that a nonempty partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element. For , apply it to proper ideals ordered by inclusion. The zero ideal is proper. The union of a nonempty chain is an ideal and is proper, because containing one would put one in a member of the chain; the empty chain has the zero ideal as an upper bound. There is therefore a maximal ideal . If , then , so the class of in is invertible. This quotient ring is a field, making a prime ideal. Hence .
For a ring homomorphism , define by . The inverse image is proper because , and primality follows from . Moreoverwhere is the ideal generated by . This proves continuity. Inverse images also give and . Thus is a contravariant functor from rings to topological spaces.
For the specified inclusion, the fundamental theorem of algebra gives the points and of . Over , the nonzero prime ideals are generated either by with , or by with , ; all irreducible real polynomials have degree one or two. Contraction gives the spectrum map for the complexification of a real polynomial ring:Indeed, a real polynomial vanishing at a nonreal also vanishes at , and is divisible by their quadratic factor; the converse is immediate. This map is surjective. Its fibers contain one point over a real linear factor, two conjugate points over an irreducible quadratic factor, and only the generic point over zero. It identifies complex-conjugate pairs. Since each proper Zariski-closed set in either one-variable polynomial ring is a finite set of closed points, images of closed sets are closed; hence the Zariski topology on the target is the quotient topology for this identification.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 ib Paper 1 12G ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
The quotient map is continuous and surjective by the quotient topology, so is compact as a continuous image of a compact space. To prove the Hausdorff property explicitly, let and set . Choose . The saturated open setsare disjoint by the triangle inequality. Each contains both antipodes of every one of its points, so and similarly for . Consequently are disjoint open quotient neighborhoods separating the classes. Thus the quotient is compact and Hausdorff. It is the real projective plane; equivalently the metric on the antipodal sphere quotient is and induces this topology.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 4 13E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A quotient topological space of a topological space is obtained by an equivalence relation : its points are the classes , and the canonical surjection is . The quotient topology declares a subset of the quotient open exactly when is open in . More generally a surjection onto a set specifies the same topology by this condition.
For a Hausdorff source with a non-Hausdorff quotient, use and when . Any nonempty open inverse image is a nonempty open subset of invariant under rational translations. It contains an interval , and for every real there is a rational with ; hence it contains every . Thus has the indiscrete topology.
It has distinct points, for instance the classes of and , but neither has a proper nonempty open neighbourhood. The quotient is not Hausdorff, even though is a Hausdorff space.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 4 13E b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For the torus quotient, a point has the same image as a point of precisely when they differ by an integer lattice vector. ThereforeThis union is open in , so is open by the quotient topology. Distinct integer lattice vectors are at least distance one apart, whereas . Thus these open balls are disjoint, with a positive gap between any two.
Each ball is connected, since it is convex. It is both open and closed relative to the displayed union: its complement there is the union of all the other open balls. No connected component can meet two such relatively separated pieces. Consequently the components are exactly the infinitely many balls . Translation by is a homeomorphism from each component onto . The statement uses the intended positive radius .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 309 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Let denote the quotient map and write for a point of Real projective space. For , take the open setIt is open in the quotient topology because its inverse image under is the open set . These sets cover, since a nonzero vector has at least one nonzero coordinate. Define the manifold chartThe hat means that the th coordinate is omitted. Ratios are unchanged by multiplying by any nonzero real number, so the chart is well defined. Its inverse inserts into position and takes the resulting equivalence class. The ratios and this inverse are continuous, giving a homeomorphism .
For a compact description of the smooth transition maps, write and let for . On one has , andEach coordinate is a rational smooth function on the open domain ; reversing gives a smooth inverse. Thus these charts form the standard affine atlas of real projective space.
For completeness, the underlying space is Hausdorff: normalizing identifies it with the antipodal quotient of the unit sphere, and the continuous injective map into the space of symmetric matrices separates any two distinct classes by disjoint open neighborhoods. It is also a second-countable space: pull back the countable bases of rational balls in these finitely many charts, and take their union. Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ib Paper 4 13G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
If , the subspace topology on isIf is an equivalence relation on and is the natural projection, the quotient topology declares open exactly when is open in . For topological spaces and , the product topology on has as a basis all sets with open in and open in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 2 21F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be the canonical inclusion and defineThis is well-defined because in the mapping cylinder, and continuity follows from the universal property of the quotient topology. Clearly .
DefineThe formula respects the gluing relation at , so it descends from the disjoint union to a continuous homotopy. It satisfies and . Thusindeed is a deformation retract of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ib Paper 4 2F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The quotient topology on isSince inverse images preserve arbitrary unions and finite intersections,Also and . The displayed collection therefore satisfies all the topology axioms.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 1 21F c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Choose a contractionApply the homotopy extension property to the initial map and to , regarded as a homotopy into . It suppliessuch that
At , the map sends every point of to . It is therefore constant on the equivalence classes of the quotient topology . By the universal property of the quotient topology, there is a continuous mapsuch thatwhere is the quotient map. The homotopy immediately gives
For every , the map is constant on , because . It therefore descends toThis descended map is continuous: the product is a quotient map because is compact Hausdorff, and is constant on its fibres.
At the endpoints,ThusThe maps and are homotopy inverses, soThis proves the theorem on collapsing a contractible cofibration.
At the endpoints,ThusThe maps and are homotopy inverses, soThis proves the theorem on collapsing a contractible cofibration.