Coupling 2026-10-13
A coupling of probability distributions is a joint probability distribution of random variables whose marginal distributions are . It lets us choose the statistical dependence between two random constructions while preserving the individual laws. This choice can make a comparison much easier: giving two simulations the same random input may keep their paths close, even though separately generating both paths would hide that relationship.[ref]
Markov Chains and Mixing Times, second edition by David A. Levin and others. §4.2, coupling definition and Example 4.6, printed pp. 49–50
For example, two fair coin tosses can be generated independently, with mismatch probability , or by tossing once and setting , with mismatch probability zero. Both constructions have the same two Bernoulli distributions as marginals. Their joint laws differ. A maximal coupling makes the values agree as often as possible; a coalescing coupling arranges permanent agreement of two processes after a random time. Minimizing expected geometric separation instead leads to Wasserstein distance.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 7 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove Kantorovich duality theorem here by a positive-functional extension argument; it produces the minimizing transport plan at the same time as equality of the values. Let and . This is a bounded continuous function because is a compact metric space. Write for the real space of continuous functions on a compact space, and letOn this vector subspace define . It is well-defined: two representations differ by a constant in the first variable and the opposite constant in the second, and both measures have mass one. It is positive, since implies and hence . Also .
Define the majorant envelope, which is a sublinear functional:Constants majorize every , and positivity gives , so this quantity is finite. Taking approximate minimizing majorants proves subadditivity; rescaling majorants proves positive homogeneity. Moreover for , and subtracting from a majorant provesThe dual value in the question is exactlySubadditivity at gives .
On , assign the value to . If the representation is unique. If , then , so the assignment is still well-defined. It is dominated by : for , use ; for , positive homogeneity gives . Together with the translation identity, these verify domination in both cases.
The real Hahn-Banach theorem extends this functional to with . If , then , so . Thus is a positive linear functional, with and . Positivity also gives , so is continuous. The Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem supplies a Borel probability measure on the compact space , satisfying .
For every , its pullback belongs to , so . Likewise . Uniqueness in the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem shows that these are exactly the two marginal distributions. Finally, every feasible pair gives a lower bound for the cost of every transport plan, by integration. Our constructed plan achieves that bound:This Kantorovich duality by positive extension establishes the requested existence and equality without assuming an optimal plan in advance.
The metric structure additionally gives the Kantorovich–Rubinstein theorem formulation. For a feasible pair define . The triangle inequality for makes one-Lipschitz continuous, , and . Hence the dual objective is at most . Conversely is feasible for every one-Lipschitz . ThereforeNormalizing for a fixed gives a uniformly bounded equicontinuous family; it is closed and compact in the uniform topology by the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem. The objective is uniformly continuous on this family, so the supremum is attained as well. In particular, is the first Wasserstein distance between the two measures.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 348 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The Kantorovich–Rubinstein theorem concerns a Polish space and probability measures with finite first moments, meaning for one, hence every, . It statesHere means for every . The Wasserstein distance with ground cost therefore equals a supremum over functions with Lipschitz constant at most one. One may normalize , since adding a constant does not change the difference of integrals. This normalization bounds by , so finite first moments ensure integrability. The supremum is unchanged if an absolute value is placed around the difference, because is admissible whenever is.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 348 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For , define the probability measures with finite th absolute moment bywhere is any fixed reference point. The condition is independent of the choice of . The p-Wasserstein distance isThe infimum is over all transport plans, rather than only transport maps. The product measure gives a finite upper bound usingFor this is the Wasserstein distance with the metric of Euclidean space; for it is the second Wasserstein distance. “Bounded moment” here means a finite integral, and does not require to be bounded.