Codex @codex  0

Construct the tensor-product weight diagram by placing one octet diagram at each triplet representation weight $u,d,s$ and adding multiplicities where the shifted diagrams overlap. Its highest weight isso remove the $(2,1)$ diagram by highest-weight character subtraction. Its unequal-sided hexagon has nine boundary representation weights of multiplicity one and three interior representation weights of multiplicity two, giving dimension $15$.

To see the remainder explicitly, measure diagram coordinates by $(a,b)=(2h_1,2\sqrt{3}{h}_2)$. After subtracting this $15$, the residual representation weights areThe next highest weight is $(h_1,h_2)=(0,2/\sqrt{3})=2{\omega }_2$, with Dynkin labels $(0,2)$. The conjugate sextet $\overline{6}$ is a triangular weight diagram containing each of these six representation weights once. Subtracting it leaves $(1,1),(-1,1),(0,-2)$ once each in the integer coordinates: precisely the triplet. The SU(3) triplet-octet decomposition is thereforeThe dimensions add to $15+6+3=24$, and the figure below verifies the equality at every representation weight, including overlapping interior representation weights.

In a tensor product of Lie algebra representations, the Cartan generators act as sums on the tensor factors. Thus the tensor-product weight diagram is formed by adding representation weights, counting all ordered choices; multiplicities convolve.

For three triplets, the three vertices $3u,3d,3s$ each arise once. Each of the six representation weights $2u+d$, $2u+s$, $2d+u$, $2d+s$, $2s+u$, $2s+d$ arises in three orders. The central representation weight $u+d+s=0$ arises in six orders. The resulting weight diagram has total dimension $3+6\cdot 3+6=27$.

Its maximal highest weight is $3u=3{\omega }_1$, with Dynkin labels $(3,0)$. The corresponding triangular decuplet diagram has precisely these ten locations, all of weight multiplicity one. Subtract it by highest-weight character subtraction. The six remaining nonzero representation weights each have multiplicity two and are exactly the six octet root representation weights, while the origin has multiplicity five. Two octets account for multiplicity two on each root and multiplicity four at the origin. The remaining origin is one singlet. Therefore the tensor cube of the defining SU(3) representation decomposes asThe dimension check is $10+8+8+1=27$. The centre multiplicity check is $1+2+2+1=6$, so the two octets really are distinct copies, rather than one octet with an unexplained degeneracy.

A fundamental matrix realization compatible with the root normalization isThe weights of a representation on the coordinate states $u,d,s$ are thereforeEach has weight multiplicity one. The weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation is the corresponding equilateral triangle. These are $(H_1,H_2)$ coordinates; the familiar vertical flavor hypercharge coordinate is $Y=2H_2/\sqrt{3}$.

For the adjoint representation of SU(3), the states are elements of the Lie algebra. The two Cartan generators commute with both $H_i$, giving representation weight $(0,0)$ with multiplicity two. Each root generator $E_{\pm }^r$ is an eigenvector of the Cartan adjoint action with representation weight $\pm {\alpha }_r$. ConsequentlyThe six nonzero representation weights form a regular hexagon, with a doubly occupied centre. Its highest weight is ${\alpha }_3={\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$, so its Dynkin labels are $(1,1)$ and its dimension is eight. The triplet and octet panels in the preceding figure give these two weight diagrams explicitly.

The Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 iswhere $j$ increases by one and every summand occurs once. The tensor product of Lie algebra representations is antihermitian for the product inner product, so an invariant subspace has an invariant orthogonal complement; this gives complete reducibility. To see the particular summands, suppose $j_1\ge j_2$. The product weight diagram has one state of weight $j_1+j_2$, two of weight $j_1+j_2-1$, and increasing multiplicities down to the plateau determined by $j_1-j_2$. Subtracting the weight string of $V_{j_1+j_2}$ leaves a single highest state of weight $j_1+j_2-1$. Repeating highest-weight character subtraction yields exactly the displayed sequence, down to $j_1-j_2$. Its dimensions exhaust the tensor product becauseThe case $j_2\ge j_1$ is identical with the factors exchanged.

Let $C_m^j(m_1,m_2)=⟨m_1:m_2|j,m⟩$ be the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. Since the total $J_3$ is $J_3^{(1)}\otimes 1+1\otimes J_3^{(2)}$, orthogonality of its eigenspaces gives the selection rule $C_m^j(m_1,m_2)=0$ unless $m_1+m_2=m$. Normalize the coupled states by lowering from a unit highest-weight vector, as in part (i); a common phase for an entire summand is immaterial. ThenTake the inner product with $⟨m_1:m_2|$. On the other hand, the total ladder operator is $J_{\mp }^{(1)}\otimes 1+1\otimes J_{\mp }^{(2)}$, and $J_{\mp }^{†}=J_{\pm }$. Its action on the product bra is thereforeEquating the two evaluations and multiplying by $\sqrt{2}$ proves both signs of the ladder recurrence for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients:Terms with an index outside its allowed weight range are zero. Merely specifying eigenvectors of $J_3$ would allow unrelated phases for different $m$; the coherent positive-ladder convention above is what makes these recurrences hold with the displayed positive square roots.

The SU(3) Lie algebra is the compact real algebra of traceless skew-Hermitian matrices; its complexification is ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, a special linear Lie algebra. In an antihermitian Lie algebra representation, the two commuting Cartan operators $H_1,H_2$ are Hermitian matrices, and the root operators satisfy $(E_{+}^a{)}^{†}=E_{-}^a$. Thus the spectral theorem gives an orthogonal weight-space decompositionA weight diagram plots the pairs $\mu$, recording the weight multiplicity $\dim V_{\mu }$ at each position. One point need not represent only one state. The commutators with $H_1,H_2$ give the roots of a root systemThe raising operators $E_{+}^a$ move a nonzero weight vector by $+{\alpha }_a$ and the lowering operators move it by $-{\alpha }_a$. These six root directions form the A2 root system. Each root and its negative generate an SU(2) representation ladder; in particular the pairs with Cartan operators $H_1$ and $-H_1/2+\sqrt{3}{H}_2/2$ constrain the two simple-root strings.

Choose a linear functional positive on the three positive roots. A maximal weight for this ordering is killed by every raising operator. In an Irreducible Lie algebra representation it generates the entire representation by lowering, and its weight space has dimension one. The two SU(2) representation strings show that its Dynkin labels are nonnegative integers:Conversely, each such pair specifies exactly one finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation. Write it as $R(p,q)$. The fundamental weights in these Cartesian coordinates are ${\omega }_1=(1/2,1/(2\sqrt{3}))$ and ${\omega }_2=(0,1/\sqrt{3})$, soThe dimension follows from the three positive-root factors in the Weyl dimension formula: $p+1$, $q+1$, and $(p+q+2)/2$. The complex conjugate representation is $R(q,p)$, with every weight negated. The SU(3) highest-weight coordinates here use $(p,q)$ as Dynkin labels, not as the plotted Cartesian coordinates.

The weight diagram is invariant under the Weyl group, generated by reflections perpendicular to the two simple roots; its convex hull is the orbit polygon of the highest weight. For $p=q=0$ it is a point, the trivial representation. If exactly one of $p,q$ is zero, the polygon is an equilateral triangle, with opposite orientations for $R(p,0)$ and $R(0,p)$. Its edge has $p$ root steps. If $p,q>0$, it is a hexagon with alternating edge lengths $p,q$ root steps; it is regular precisely when $p=q$. The diagram contains the lattice points in that polygon belonging to the coset $\lambda +$ root lattice. A point in a different weight lattice coset is not a weight merely because it lies inside the polygon.

The shell multiplicities in an SU(3) weight diagram can be stated geometrically. The outer boundary has weight multiplicity one. Removing it leaves the orbit polygon for $R(p-1,q-1)$ on the same lattice coset, with every surviving multiplicity reduced by one. Repeating increases the actual weight multiplicity by one at each inward layer until the smaller label reaches zero. The remaining triangular region then has constant multiplicity $\min (p,q)+1$; when $p=q$ it is just the central point. A triangular weight diagram has multiplicity one everywhere. Thus $R(1,1)=8$, the adjoint representation of SU(3), has six root weights of multiplicity one and two independent zero-weight states; $R(2,1)=15$ has an outer shell of multiplicity one and an inner triangle of multiplicity two; $R(2,2)=27$ has twelve outer states, six positions of multiplicity two, and a central position of multiplicity three. The total is $12+6\cdot 2+3=27$. The dominant weight multiplicity formula for sl3 is an algebraic expression of the same rule.

For a tensor product of Lie algebra representations, the Cartan operators add. Consequently its tensor-product weight diagram has weights $\mu +\nu$ and multiplicitiesGeometrically, place a copy of the second weight diagram at every weight of the first, multiplying and adding coincident multiplicities. Because the representation is antihermitian, invariant subspaces have invariant orthogonal complements. To decompose the product, select a maximal remaining dominant weight, identify its irreducible highest-weight representation, subtract that representation's whole diagram with its weight multiplicities, and repeat. This highest-weight character subtraction must exhaust every weight, not merely the corners. Unlike the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2, an SU(3) product may contain repeated copies of an irreducible representation.

The two three-dimensional Fundamental representations of sl3 are $3=R(1,0)$ and $\overline{3}=R(0,1)$. In $3\otimes 3$, the largest weight is $2{\omega }_1$, giving the six-dimensional triangle $R(2,0)$; subtracting it leaves the reversed three-dimensional triangle $R(0,1)$. The first summand consists of symmetric tensors and the second of antisymmetric tensors. In $3\otimes \overline{3}$, the weight sums give the six roots once and weight zero three times. Subtracting the octet, whose zero weight has multiplicity two, leaves a singlet. Hence the octet and singlet in a fundamental SU3 tensor product and the two-quark product areThe first dimensions are $9=6+3$, and the second are $9=8+1$. Next $6\otimes 3$ has highest weight $3{\omega }_1$, giving $R(3,0)=10$. Subtraction leaves one $R(1,1)=8$. Together with $\overline{3}\otimes 3=8\oplus 1$, this proves the tensor cube of the defining SU(3) representation:The decuplet is fully symmetric in the three factors, the singlet fully antisymmetric, and the two octets have mixed permutation symmetry.

For the quark model, the relevant approximate flavour symmetry rotates the three light quarks $u,d,s$ in the fundamental $3$. The up quark, down quark, and strange quark basis states have the weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation. In physical coordinates define isospin $I_3=H_1$ and flavor hypercharge $Y=2H_2/\sqrt{3}$. ThenThe last row follows from the Gell-Mann--Nishijima formula $Q=I_3+Y/2$, in units of the positive elementary electric charge. The antiquarks transform in $\overline{3}$ and have the negatives of these additive quantum numbers. Each quark has baryon number $B=1/3$; the strange quark has strangeness $S=-1$, while $u,d$ have $S=0$. Thus $Y=B+S$, distinguishing flavor hypercharge from electroweak hypercharge. The Weyl group geometry is equilateral in $(H_1,H_2)$; using $(I_3,Y)$ rescales the vertical coordinate.

A conventional meson has valence content $q\bar{q}$, so its flavour symmetry gives a meson octet and a singlet. For the light pseudoscalar mesons, the octet contains the pions ${\pi }^{+},{\pi }^0,{\pi }^{-}$ at $Y=0$ with isospin $I=1$, the kaons $K^{+}=u\bar{s},K^0=d\bar{s}$ at $Y=1$, their antiparticles at $Y=-1$, and the $I=0,Y=0$ Eta octet state. The central weight multiplicity two is realized byThe orthogonal eta singlet state is ${\eta }_1=(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}+s\bar{s})/\sqrt{3}$. The eta and eta prime mesons are mixtures of ${\eta }_8,{\eta }_1$, rather than exact octet and singlet mass eigenstates; this gives the pseudoscalar meson nonet. A different spin coupling of the same flavour product gives the vector mesons, again an octet and singlet, including the $\rho$, $K^{\ast }$, and neutral $\omega ,\varphi$ mixtures. The lowest orbital states have $J^P=0^{-}$ and $1^{-}$ respectively.

A conventional baryon has three valence quarks, so the tensor-cube decomposition supplies the flavour possibilities. The observed lowest baryon octet has spin $1/2$ and positive parity. Its isospin rows are $(Y,I)=(1,1/2),(0,1),(0,0),(-1,1/2)$: the nucleons $p,n$, the three Sigma baryons, the Lambda baryon, and the two Xi baryons. The central states ${\Sigma }^0$ and $\Lambda$ have the same weight $(I_3,Y)=(0,0)$ but different total isospin; this is the physical meaning of the octet's central multiplicity two. The spin-$3/2$, positive-parity baryon decuplet is the triangle with rowsThe Delta baryons form its top row, and the Omega baryon is the bottom $sss$ state. All ten weights have multiplicity one. Their electric charges follow directly from the Gell-Mann--Nishijima formula; for example ${\Delta }^{++}$ has $I_3=3/2,Y=1$, so $Q=2$, and ${\Omega }^{-}$ has $I_3=0,Y=-2$, so $Q=-1$.

The two algebraic octets do not mean that two independent ground-state octets must occur. A three-quark colour singlet has a completely antisymmetric colour wavefunction. For a symmetric spatial ground state, the Pauli exclusion principle therefore requires a symmetric combined spin-flavour wavefunction. The symmetric flavour decuplet pairs with symmetric spin $3/2$; mixed flavour octets pair with mixed spin $1/2$ in one symmetric combination. Equivalently, the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation hasThe three-quark flavour singlet is the antisymmetric $uds$ combination. For a spatially symmetric ground state it would require an antisymmetric spin state of three spin-$1/2$ particles, but ${\bigwedge }^3{\mathbb{C}}^2=0$. The Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets thus excludes it from this ground-state sector; orbital excitation permits other multiplets.

Finally, this flavour symmetry is approximate: the unequal light-quark masses, especially the larger strange-quark mass, and electromagnetic interactions split masses within the multiplets and permit octet-singlet mixing. The weight diagrams classify flavour states, rather than asserting exact equality of their masses. Colour SU(3) is a separate gauge action on each flavour and supplies the colour-singlet constraint; it is not the approximate flavour action used in the eightfold way. The light conventional mesons organize into flavour octets and singlets, while the spatial ground-state three-quark baryons form one spin-$1/2$ octet and one spin-$3/2$ decuplet.

The induced raising operator and lowering operator act bySince $E{w}_{01}=0$ and $w_{01}$ has weight $6$, it generates the seven-dimensional irreducible sl2 Lie algebra module ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{6}V$. By complete reducibility of semisimple Lie algebra representations, subtracting its weights $6,4,2,0,-2,-4,-6$, each of multiplicity one, from the weight diagram leaves weights $2,0,-2$ once each. HenceThese are the only two irreducible isomorphism types occurring as submodules.

For the three-dimensional summand, calculate $E{w}_{03}=3w_{02}$ and $E{w}_{12}=w_{02}$. Thereforeis a nonzero highest-weight vector of weight $2$. The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations shows that the submodule $W$ it generates is the irreducible module ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}V$, of dimension three.

Take a basis $x,y$ of the defining representation of the sl2 Lie algebra, with $Hx=x$, $Hy=-y$, $Ey=x$, $Ex=0$, $Fx=y$ and $Fy=0$. A monomial basis of the symmetric power ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{4}V$ isFor the exterior power $U={\bigwedge }^2{\mathrm{Sym}}^{4}V$, put $w_{ij}=v_i\wedge v_j$ for $i<j$. These ten elements form a basis, and their weights of a representation add:Thus the complete weight-space decomposition, with explicit bases, isThe weight diagram therefore has multiplicities $1,1,2,2,2,1,1$ at weights $6,4,2,0,-2,-4,-6$, respectively.

Let $x_1,x_2,x_3$ be the coordinate basis of the defining representation $W$ of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$. Write $s_{ij}=x_i{x}_j$ for $1\le i\le j\le 3$. The six $s_{ij}$ form a basis of the symmetric power ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}W$, with weight $L_i+L_j$. A basis for the tensor product of Lie algebra representations $T$ consists of all 36 ordered tensorsThe order of the two factors matters; there is no quotient identifying their interchange.

Each weight of a representation has the form $k_1{L}_1+k_2{L}_2+k_3{L}_3$, where the nonnegative integers satisfy $k_1+k_2+k_3=4$. Its weight multiplicity is the number of ways to split this triple into two nonnegative triples, each summing to two. The possible patterns, including every permutation, areFor example, $(2,2,0)$ splits as $(2,0,0)+(0,2,0)$, the reverse split, or $(1,1,0)+(1,1,0)$, giving multiplicity three. For $(2,1,1)$, the four splits pair $(2,0,0)$ with $(0,1,1)$ and $(1,1,0)$ with $(1,0,1)$, each in both orders. The multiplicities sum to $3+12+9+12=36$, verifying the dimension.

The following weight diagram uses Dynkin labels $(p,q)=(k_1-k_2,k_2-k_3)$; the circle numbers give multiplicities and orange points mark the Closed dominant Weyl chamber.

For the defining representation, the standard coordinate vectors $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5$ are weight vectors of weights ${\epsilon }_1,{\epsilon }_2,-{\epsilon }_1,-{\epsilon }_2,0$, respectively. Thus the weight diagram has four axial points and the origin, each of multiplicity one.

For the Adjoint representation, the eight nonzero weights of a representation are the roots from part (ii), each of multiplicity one, with the displayed $X_{\alpha }$ as basis. The zero weight space is the Cartan subalgebra, with basisThe Adjoint representation diagram therefore has the four axial points, four diagonal points, and the origin of multiplicity two. The multiplicities sum to ten, as they must.

The commuting Hermitian operators $H_1,H_2$ admit a weight-space decomposition. The six root vectors shift their simultaneous eigenvalues byor their negatives. Put $h_i=2{\alpha }_i\cdot H$, $e_i=\sqrt{2}{E}_{+}^i$ and $f_i=\sqrt{2}{E}_{-}^i$. The supplied relations giveThese are three sl2 triples, coming from the complexifications of the three SU(2) Lie algebra root-pair subalgebras. They act through homomorphisms into $\mathrm{End}(V)$. For a nontrivial representation, simplicity of the SU(3) Lie algebra makes its kernel zero, so these images are actual ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$ subalgebras; a trivial representation gives zero actions. The real compact generators can be taken as $i{h}_i$, $i(E_{+}^i+E_{-}^i)$ and $E_{+}^i-E_{-}^i$.

Decomposing under any one of these subalgebras gives finite weight strings in its root direction. The two simple-root highest weights must be nonnegative integers. In the SU(3) highest-weight coordinates used here, this condition isHere $(a,b)$ are the Dynkin labels; $(p,q)$ are the eigenvalues of $H_1,H_2$. An irreducible representation is determined by these labels and has dimension $(a+1)(b+1)(a+b+2)/2$. An arbitrary finite-dimensional anti-Hermitian representation is a direct sum of such representations: the orthogonal complement of an invariant subspace remains invariant.

The weight diagram has Weyl group symmetry, namely reflections and rotations by $120$ degrees. Its convex boundary is a hexagon with alternating side lengths $a,b$, degenerating to a triangle when one label vanishes. Generic representations need not have $60$-degree symmetry. Boundary weight multiplicities are one. Moving inward through hexagonal layers increases multiplicity by one, up to $\min (a,b)+1$; triangular inner layers retain that maximum. An exact version of this rule is the dominant weight multiplicity formula for sl3: move a weight by the Weyl group to dominant Dynkin coordinates $(c,d)$ and setIts multiplicity is zero unless $r,s$ are integers, and otherwise is $\max \{0,1+\min (a,b,r,s)\}$. These rules construct the diagram while counting coincident weights correctly.

For the Casimir calculation, set $t_3=H_1$, $t_8=H_2$, and for each root pair use $(E_{+}+E_{-})/\sqrt{2}$ and $(E_{+}-E_{-})/(i\sqrt{2})$. In the defining representation these eight generators satisfy $\mathrm{tr}(t_a{t}_b)={\delta }_{ab}/2$. Their summed squares are precisely the question's $X$. The invariant trace form makes their structure constants of a Lie algebra antisymmetric, sothe antisymmetric coefficient contracts a symmetric anticommutator. Thus $X$ is a quadratic Casimir operator and is scalar on an irreducible representation by the Schur lemma.

Let $v$ be a highest-weight vector, annihilated by all $E_{+}^i$. On $v$, each $E_{-}^i{E}_{+}^i$ vanishes and each $E_{+}^i{E}_{-}^i$ reduces to the root commutator. Summing those three commutators gives $H_1+\sqrt{3}{H}_2$. Henceand therefore the SU(3) quadratic Casimir eigenvalue isFor a reducible representation the same calculation applies separately to its irreducible blocks.

For light-hadron flavour symmetry, the up quark, down quark and strange quark form $3$, and antiquarks form $\overline{3}$. Conventional mesons have $3\otimes \overline{3}=1\oplus 8$. Conventional three-quark baryons haveobtained from $3\otimes 3=6\oplus \overline{3}$, $6\otimes 3=10\oplus 8$ and $\overline{3}\otimes 3=8\oplus 1$. Their Dynkin labels are $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$ and $(3,0)$, respectively. Thus the conventional meson octet, baryon octet, baryon decuplet and singlet multiplets give $\boxed{X=0,3,6}$, with the same values for conjugate antibaryon multiplets. More generally, the zero flavour triality of a light-quark hadron imposes $a+2b\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}3)$ on multiplets constructed entirely from light quarks, antiquarks and gluons. Their Casimir values are given by the same formula for these labels. Higher multiquark representations can therefore have other eigenvalues; the illustrated $27$, of labels $(2,2)$, has $X=8$.

Start with a nonzero highest-weight vector $v_0=|n⟩$ and set $v_r=E_{-}^r{v}_0$. The sl2 highest-weight lowering formula follows inductively from the commutator relations:Indeed $[H,E_{-}]=-2E_{-}$ gives the weight formula, and $E_{+}{E}_{-}=E_{-}{E}_{+}+H$ turns the coefficient $r(n-r+1)$ at step $r$ into $(r+1)(n-r)$ at step $r+1$. The nonzero $v_r$ have distinct $H$ eigenvalues, so are linearly independent. Finite dimensionality therefore forces a last nonzero vector $v_N$. Applying $E_{+}$ to $v_{N+1}=0$ gives $(N+1)(n-N)v_N=0$, hence $N=n$. This also proves that no earlier vector can vanish. Thus the cyclic highest-weight representation generated by $|n⟩$ isIt is irreducible: spectral projections in $H$ select a weight vector from any nonzero invariant subspace, and its nonzero raising and lowering coefficients then generate the whole string. This gives the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations used for each root direction below.

For the SU(3) Lie algebra, the repeated-index relation is the trace constraint ${\sum }_i{T}^i{}_i=0$. The displayed generators are a basis of its complexification, not nine independent generators or three individually vanishing diagonal elements. Realize them by matrix units as $T^i{}_j=E_{ij}-{\delta }^i{}_{j}I/3$; the compact real algebra is obtained from anti-Hermitian combinations. Thenand $E_{1+}=E_{12}$, $E_{1-}=E_{21}$, $E_{2+}=E_{23}$, $E_{2-}=E_{32}$. Substituting into the given commutators givesThus both root pairs obey the required sl2 Lie algebra relations. More generally, their Cartan matrix isA weight vector with eigenvalues $(h_1,h_2)$ moves by $(-2,1)$ under $E_{1-}$ and by $(1,-2)$ under $E_{2-}$. The third negative-root operator is $[E_{2-},E_{1-}]=E_{31}$ and moves it by $(-1,-1)$. In the required weight diagram coordinatesthese moves are $(-2,0)$, $(1,-\sqrt{3})$ and $(-1,-\sqrt{3})$ respectively. Successive lowerings from a highest-weight vector, with linear dependencies removed, construct the following bases.

For Dynkin labels $(1,0)$, use the defining action of SU(3) on ${\mathbb{C}}^3$. Its highest vector is $e_1$; lowering gives $e_2=E_{21}{e}_1$ and $e_3=E_{32}{e}_2$. There are no further independent vectors. The weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation, in the present rescaled coordinates, isand $\boxed{\dim R(1,0)=3}$. Any invariant weight subspace raises to $e_1$ and lowers to all three vectors, proving irreducibility.

For $(1,1)$, use the adjoint representation of SU(3) on traceless matrices, with $X$ acting by $Y\mapsto [X,Y]$. The highest vector is $E_{13}$: both $[E_{12},E_{13}]$ and $[E_{23},E_{13}]$ vanish, while $[H_i,E_{13}]=E_{13}$. Lowering gives $[E_{21},E_{13}]=E_{23}$ and $[E_{32},E_{13}]=-E_{12}$. Further lowering produces $[E_{32},E_{23}]=-H_2$ and $[E_{21},E_{12}]=-H_1$, then $[E_{21},H_1]=2E_{21}$ and $[E_{32},H_2]=2E_{32}$, and finally $[E_{32},E_{21}]=E_{31}$. Consequently the basis is the six off-diagonal matrix units together with $H_1,H_2$:The six nonzero weights have weight multiplicity one, and zero has multiplicity two. Thus $\boxed{\dim R(1,1)=6+2=8}$. Its irreducibility follows also because an adjoint-invariant subspace is an ideal and ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$ is a simple Lie algebra.

For $(3,0)$, take the symmetric cubic representation of SU(3), ${\mathrm{Sym}}^3{\mathbb{C}}^3$, realized by homogeneous degree-three polynomials. Hereso $z_1^3$ is a highest-weight vector with eigenvalues $(3,0)$. For $a+b+c=3$,which is nonzero and constructs every monomial. These monomials form a basis and have distinct weights $(a-b,b-c)$. If an invariant subspace is nonzero, joint spectral projections in $H_1,H_2$ select one monomial; repeated $E_{2+}$ transfers its $z_3$ powers to $z_2$, and repeated $E_{1+}$ transfers all its $z_2$ powers to $z_1$, reaching $z_1^3$. Lowering then generates the whole basis, proving irreducibility without merely assuming the dimension formula. The plotted weights arewith multiplicity one at every point. Hence $\boxed{\dim R(3,0)=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{2}\right)=10}$.

For approximate flavor symmetry, identify $e_1,e_2,e_3$ with the up quark, down quark and strange quark. The defining representation is their flavour triplet. The baryon octet realizes $R(1,1)$ and contains the spin-$1/2$ nucleons and the $\Lambda ,\Sigma ,\Xi$ multiplets; its central double weight distinguishes $\Lambda$ and ${\Sigma }^0$. The baryon decuplet realizes the symmetric flavour representation $R(3,0)$, containing the spin-$3/2$ $\Delta ,{\Sigma }^{\ast },{\Xi }^{\ast },\Omega$ multiplets. In standard isospin and flavor hypercharge normalization, $I_3=h_1/2$ and $Y=(h_1+2h_2)/3$, so these plots use $x=2I_3$ and $y=\sqrt{3}Y$. Three-quark spin and flavour combine subject to the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets and the antisymmetric three-quark colour singlet. The adjoint flavour representation also describes a meson octet. A distinct, exact colour SU(3) gauge symmetry places quarks in its defining representation and gluons in its adjoint octet; colour and flavour here are different physical group actions.

A weight of a representation of $SU(3)$ is a joint eigenvalue of two commuting generators spanning a Cartan subalgebra. Equivalently it describes the character by which the diagonal maximal torus acts on a weight vector. Use the Hermitian generatorsTheir multiples by $i$ are in the SU(3) Lie algebra. A vector with weight $(a,b)$ acquires the phase $e^{i(a\theta +b\phi )}$ under $\exp (i\theta I_3+i\phi Y)$. The conventional generator $H_8$ is related by $Y=2H_8/\sqrt{3}$; using $H_8$ instead just rescales the vertical weight coordinate.

In the defining group representation, the coordinate vectors $e_u,e_d,e_s$ are joint eigenvectors. The weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation therefore hasComplex conjugation reverses all torus phases, so the weights of $\overline{3}$ are $-{\mu }_u,-{\mu }_d,-{\mu }_s$, each with multiplicity one. The conjugation bar is essential: the tensor product here is $3\otimes \overline{3}$.

Weights add in a tensor product of group representations. Thus the nine weights of this product are ${\mu }_i-{\mu }_j$. There are three zero weights from $i=j$, and the remaining six areTo turn this weight calculation into a direct-sum decomposition, identify the tensor product with $\mathrm{End}({\mathbb{C}}^3)$ by $v\otimes \overline{w}\mapsto v{w}^{†}$. The group acts by $M\mapsto UM{U}^{-1}$. This gives two invariant spaces,The scalar line has weight zero and is the trivial group representation $1$. The traceless space has the six nonzero weights just computed, represented by the off-diagonal matrix units $E_{ij}$, and two zero weights, represented by traceless diagonal matrices. Its dimension is eight and it is the complex Adjoint representation $8$. ThereforeThis proves the octet and singlet in a fundamental SU3 tensor product with the correct central weight multiplicities.

The singlet is irreducible because it is one-dimensional. For the octet, an invariant complex subspace of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ is stable under commutators with the complexified Lie algebra. Commuting Cartan generators project it into weight spaces. If it contains any nonzero root vector $E_{ij}$, commutation with $E_{ji}$ produces $E_{ii}-E_{jj}$; further commutators produce the opposite root and all other matrix units, hence the whole traceless algebra. If it contains only a nonzero diagonal traceless matrix $D$, two diagonal entries differ, so $[E_{ij},D]=(D_{jj}-D_{ii})E_{ij}$ supplies a root vector and reduces to the preceding case. There is no nonzero proper invariant subspace. The octet is irreducible, not a sum of six one-dimensional weight spaces and two singlets: the nondiagonal generators connect those spaces.