Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, with Christopher M. Hirata, produced the HyRec model of primordial hydrogen and helium recombination. It combines an effective multilevel-atom treatment with detailed photon transport while exploiting the sparse coupling structure to make repeated cosmological calculations practical.[ref]
This connects atomic transition rates to cosmological inference: a changed recombination history changes the probability that a cosmic microwave background photon scatters before reaching the observer.
Christopher M. Hirata developed the HyRec calculation of cosmological recombination with Yacine Ali-Haïmoud. Their method couples atomic level populations, the free electron fraction and radiative transfer, including two-photon transitions and diffusion near the Lyman-alpha line.[ref]
The scientific need is predictive accuracy: the free electron population sets the Thomson scattering history that shapes Cosmic microwave background anisotropy. Equilibrium ionization alone cannot capture the entire decoupling process.
Carlos S. Frenk used gravitational N-body simulations with Julio F. Navarro and Simon D. M. White to investigate dark-halo structure. Their 1997 study found a common fitted radial shape over a broad range of simulated halo masses, now represented by the Navarro--Frenk--White profile.[ref]
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering by Julio F. Navarro and others. Abstract: simulated density profiles and characteristic-density correlations
Lower-mass haloes were typically denser, which the authors related to earlier assembly at a higher cosmic background mass density. The profile is an empirical fit over resolved radii, rather than a proof of a universal central singularity.
Paul Schechter introduced an analytic description of the galaxy luminosity function in 1976. The Schechter function combines a power law at low luminosity with an exponential high-luminosity cutoff:Here is the characteristic turnover luminosity, a number-per-volume normalization, and the faint-end exponent.[ref]
An Analytic Expression for the Luminosity Function for Galaxies by Paul Schechter. Section I, equation (1), and section II(a)
Separating the turnover from the faint-end slope makes populations comparable. Extrapolating the fit to arbitrarily faint galaxies needs care: total number converges only for , while total luminosity converges for .
N. W. Evans developed analytic models of galaxies and dark haloes with J. An. Their hypervirial distribution function has the form , where is specific angular momentum and is relative binding energy.[ref]
Hypervirial Models of Stellar Systems by N. W. Evans and J. An. Abstract and section 2.2: phase-space distribution and moments
The resulting hypervirial models connect an adjustable central density cusp to an explicit dynamical population, extending useful features of the Plummer model beyond its finite-density core.
J. An constructed analytic hypervirial models of stellar systems with N. W. Evans. Their 2005 family combines explicit gravitational potentials, cusped density profiles and simple phase-space distribution functions, with the special property that a local virial relation holds at every radius.[ref]
Hypervirial Models of Stellar Systems by N. W. Evans and J. An. Abstract and section 2: potential-density family and moments
Such models provide controlled examples for relating density cusps and velocity anisotropy. The phase-space distribution function must remain integrable and nonnegative; an attractive density formula alone does not guarantee a physical stellar system.
Steven A. Balbus, working with John F. Hawley, established the astrophysical importance of the magnetorotational instability in weakly magnetized accretion disks. Their local linear stability analysis identified an instability associated with outward-decreasing angular velocity, even where the unmagnetized flow would pass the Rayleigh centrifugal stability criterion.[ref]
The result offered a route from differential rotation to fluid fluctuations and outward angular momentum transport, allowing gas to accrete without attributing the transport to molecular viscosity alone.
John F. Hawley helped explain angular-momentum transport in accretion disks through the magnetorotational instability. With Steven A. Balbus, he showed in 1991 that even a weak magnetic field can destabilize differentially rotating disks whose angular velocity decreases outward.[ref]
A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis by Steven A. Balbus and John F. Hawley. Abstract and sections 2.1–2.5: local instability and magnetic-tension interpretation
In the spring model of magnetorotational instability, magnetic tension couples displaced fluid elements and transfers angular momentum. This can amplify their separation despite stability under the corresponding unmagnetized rotational test.
C. J. A. P. Martins, with E. P. S. Shellard, extended the velocity-dependent one-scale model of cosmic string networks. Their 2002 paper refined the curvature-related momentum parameter and incorporated radiation backreaction to study scaling solutions under different expansion histories.[ref]
A scaling state maintains fixed dimensionless ratios between the network's characteristic length and cosmological scales. It is a dynamical outcome of expansion, string motion and losses, rather than a consequence of dimensional analysis alone.
E. P. S. Shellard modeled the evolution of cosmic string networks with C. J. A. P. Martins. Their velocity-dependent one-scale description evolves a characteristic network length together with a typical string velocity, incorporating expansion, energy loss into loops and curvature-driven acceleration.[ref]
Extending the Velocity-dependent One-scale String Evolution Model by C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard. Section II.A: averaged length, velocity and loss equations
This replaces the full network by a small set of macroscopic variables, making scaling behaviour and cosmological evolution tractable while leaving model coefficients to physical arguments and simulation tests.
Juan Maldacena calculated three-point correlations of primordial scalar and tensor fluctuations in single-field cosmic inflation. His 2003 analysis gave explicit leading slow-roll predictions for primordial non-Gaussianity and showed that certain squeezed limits are fixed by the scale dependence of the two-point spectrum.[ref]
Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models by Juan Maldacena. Abstract and section 4: three-point functions and long-wavelength limits
A squeezed bispectrum configuration compares one long wavelength with two short ones. In the applicable single-field regime, the long fluctuation acts locally as a coordinate rescaling, producing the single-field inflation squeezed-limit consistency relation. The statement depends on the inflationary model and limiting assumptions, rather than applying to every primordial three-point function.
David Wands and collaborators gave a conservation-based account of long-wavelength fluctuations in linear cosmological perturbation theory. Their 2000 work treated slowly varying regions as locally homogeneous expanding universes and identified the conditions for conserved uniform-density curvature perturbations, without selecting particular gravitational field equations.[ref]
A new approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales by David Wands and others. Abstract and separate-universe interpretation
The important qualifications are negligible spatial gradients and negligible non-adiabatic pressure perturbations; large wavelength alone is insufficient.
Wayne Hu developed physical descriptions of Cosmic microwave background anisotropy, including the 1997 damping-tail analysis with Martin White. Their work calibrated photon-diffusion and reionization damping while separating model-dependent changes in acoustic structure.[ref]
Photon diffusion smooths fluctuations on scales photons traverse before decoupling. Its angular imprint therefore connects microscopic scattering and the expansion history to the measured small-scale Cosmic microwave background anisotropy.
The cosmologist Martin White analyzed small-scale Cosmic microwave background anisotropy with Wayne Hu. Their damping-tail calculation separated Silk damping and reionization effects from acoustic modulation and gravitational enhancement, so different physical processes could be compared with observed angular structure.[ref]
Karim A. Malik developed the treatment of gauge-invariant cosmological curvature with David Wands, David H. Lyth and Andrew R. Liddle. Their 2000 analysis derived large-scale evolution from stress-energy conservation, exposing how a non-adiabatic pressure perturbation can change the uniform-density curvature perturbation.[ref]
A new approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales by David Wands and others. Sections II–V: pressure source and generalized adiabatic perturbations
David H. Lyth helped establish when large-scale cosmological curvature is conserved. With David Wands, Karim A. Malik and Andrew R. Liddle, he showed that negligible non-adiabatic pressure perturbations preserve the uniform-density curvature perturbation when spatial-gradient effects are negligible.[ref]
A new approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales by David Wands and others. Abstract and sections II–III: conservation derived from local energy conservation
The result specifies when primordial fluctuations can be carried forward without solving every intervening gravitational detail.
Onno Pols developed a systematic teaching account of stellar structure and stellar evolution. His 2011 notes connect hydrostatic equilibrium, energy transport and stellar thermodynamics, including the distinct adiabatic exponents needed when gas and radiation pressure both contribute.[ref]
Stellar Structure and Evolution by Onno Pols. Sections 3.3–3.4, especially the definitions of the adiabatic exponents
For example, a derivative describing how pressure responds to compression is not interchangeable with one describing the temperature response. Distinguishing them makes stability and energy-transport calculations usable beyond a single fixed-index ideal gas.
Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones developed a statistical treatment of estimating stellar Euclidean distances from noisy stellar parallaxes. His 2015 analysis showed why simply taking the reciprocal of a measured parallax can behave poorly when the fractional uncertainty is appreciable.[ref]
A Bayesian inference combines the parallax likelihood with a physically chosen distance prior. A positive-distance prior can assign sensible posterior probabilities even to negative measured parallaxes; a negative noisy measurement does not imply a negative physical Euclidean distance.
Takenori Nakano investigated magnetic support against gaseous-disk collapse with Takashi Nakamura. For their 1978 thin-disk configuration with perpendicular frozen-in magnetic field, the critical mass-to-flux ratio isin Gaussian units, with surface mass density and field magnitude . Below the threshold, magnetic support prevents the modeled gravitational instability; gas pressure also suppresses short wavelengths.[ref]
Gravitational Instability of Magnetized Gaseous Disks by Takenori Nakano and Takashi Nakamura. Abstract: stability threshold and short-wave pressure support
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





