Put . Away from the source, the radial Laplacian in three dimensions gives
Thus . At the source it is a distribution, not a smooth function; its outward gradient flux through a small sphere is , giving .
Expand the solution and the forcing in the orthonormal Sturm-Liouville eigenfunction expansion. The forcing coefficients are
Every is nonzero, so the solution coefficient is . Thus
As an independent check, solving directly with the two endpoint conditions gives
It satisfies both Dirichlet boundary conditions and the forced ordinary differential equation.
Use a logarithmic change of variable in a Sturm-Liouville problem: set and . The chain rule gives
The endpoint conditions become . Multiplying by and integrating shows that for a nonzero solution. Put . The first endpoint selects and the second requires , . Hence
These eigenfunctions are orthonormal in the specified weighted inner product, because and
Factor out from the differential expression:
Comparing with gives
Multiplying all three by the same positive constant would give the same Sturm-Liouville operator.
First, setting in the self-adjoint operator identity shows that is real, so every eigenvalue is real. For two eigenfunctions,
Distinct eigenvalues therefore imply
This is orthogonality of Sturm-Liouville eigenfunctions.
The weight cancels the denominator in the Sturm-Liouville operator. Two integrations by parts, with real , give the Lagrange identity for a Sturm-Liouville operator
Thus the boundary form must vanish for every pair in the operator domain:
Separated real Robin boundary conditions at , with , make each endpoint contribution vanish. This includes Dirichlet boundary conditions and Neumann boundary conditions. Coupled conditions can also work: periodic and cancel the two endpoint contributions. For the regular problem, imposing a complete pair of such self-adjoint boundary conditions gives a self-adjoint differential operator; the displayed identity is the boundary-form criterion.
Take the fixed source and receiver to be and on the same side of the mirror, with . In the uniform medium, the Fermat principle minimizes the length through a reflection point :
Its stationary equation is
The two fractions are the signed tangential components of the ray directions. Equality of their magnitudes gives , where both angles are measured from the normal vector to the mirror and lie in . Hence the law of reflection is
For uniqueness, differentiate once more:
Thus is a strictly convex function, its derivative increases from to , and it has exactly one stationary point, its global minimum. Explicitly,
Substitution gives , verifying the reflection angles and the existence of that unique solution. Equivalently it is the point where the line from to the mirror image crosses the mirror.
The Fermat principle states that the actual path of a light ray makes its travel time stationary under small admissible variations with fixed endpoints. Equivalently, its optical path length is stationary:
where is the local light speed, is the refractive index, and the two integrals differ by the constant vacuum light speed. In a uniform medium this reduces to stationarity of geometric path length. The principle is a stationarity statement; for the planar reflection considered next the stationary path is also the unique minimum.
Apply the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem to the power series coefficients for :
For example, taking logarithms gives . Therefore
Any convention for the isolated coefficient has no effect on the radius of convergence.
For , split the Green's function integral where the absolute value changes sign:
The two terms inside the bracket are respectively
Adding them yields
The affine term gives , while both exponential terms are homogeneous solutions. The values at the joins are and , agreeing with parts (i) and (ii). Their first derivatives also match: and . Thus the pieces introduce no unwanted Dirac delta distributions.
For , every forcing point has . Hence the Green's function gives
Since , the remaining integral is . Therefore
This decays at positive infinity.
For , all forcing points satisfy , so the Green's function formula becomes
An integration by parts gives . Consequently
The exponential has the required decay as .
Let , so . The sum and product of roots of the characteristic polynomial in (i) give
Eliminating yields
Therefore the octave tuning in a two-mass complete spring graph has two positive solutions:
The two values are reciprocals. Both meet the requested frequency ratio; substituting either into the expressions in (i) gives .
For two bars, after subtracting the gravitational equilibrium,
A normal mode requires the generalized eigenvalue problem . With ,
Thus, for ,
Both squared angular frequencies are positive. A corresponding eigenvector is , from the first row of the matrix equation.
For this real integral choose , so the upper bank of the positive real axis has . Use a counterclockwise keyhole contour with inner radius and outer radius , enclosing . The upper-bank contribution tends to . On the lower bank, , and the reversed orientation makes its contribution .
The large arc is because , while the small arc is . Both vanish, giving
The residues on this branch are
The residue theorem yields
Therefore
The branch cut in (a) was arbitrary; here placing it on the integration axis makes the bank contributions directly proportional to the desired positive-real integral.
The factor has algebraic branch points at zero and infinity. Near zero the leading behaviour is ; with , the behaviour near infinity is . These are four-sheeted branch points.
The polynomial denominator vanishes at , with nonzero derivative , and the fractional factor is finite and nonzero near either point on any chosen local branch. Hence
A single-valued holomorphic branch is obtained by choosing a branch cut joining zero to infinity. Points along the chosen cut mark its discontinuity, rather than additional isolated poles.
Write . The analytic solution has with , so the integrand in the reduction of order formula satisfies
Integrating with respect to gives . Multiplication by therefore gives
Any solution independent of has a nonzero coefficient of this second solution. Hence
An added multiple of stays bounded and cannot cancel this logarithm. On the real side , the corresponding statement uses .
For the normal-form coefficient , Abel's identity gives the Wronskian
Use reduction of order: if , then . Absorbing a nonzero Wronskian constant into the second integration constant, the general solution is
This local representation applies on intervals where , in particular sufficiently near because .
Put and . The differential equation becomes
Substitute the Frobenius solution . The lowest power has coefficient , so
Equating successive coefficients gives, with ,
Thus is the only free coefficient: , , and so on. Since every denominator is nonzero, there is exactly one independent pure Frobenius solution of this form. The repeated root supplies no second free coefficient; the other solution is logarithmic, as parts (iii) and (iv) demonstrate.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact