Expanding the determinant along the first row gives
The eigenvalues and normalized spatial eigenvectors, in increasing frequency order, are
For each mode both signs of give the same cosine displacement. An arbitrary overall mode amplitude remains free. These vectors are the instances of the sine eigenvectors of the fixed-end spring chain.
With , the eigenvalue equation is
The dimensionless matrix is the stiffness matrix divided by ; its eigenvalues determine squared angular frequencies.
Each proposed displacement has second derivative . Matching the coefficients of the common time factor in the three equations gives
These algebraic relations hold for the entire oscillation, including the isolated times when the common cosine vanishes.
An eigenvalue equation has the form , where is an eigenvector and its eigenvalue. It means that the linear map preserves the vector's line and acts there by multiplication by . Nonzero solutions occur precisely when ; the zero vector is excluded because it would satisfy the equation for every .
Put , so . On an interval with , substitution and cancellation give
Since , no constant- solution is lost when separating. Integrate
to obtain
After restoring , a local implicit general solution is
The inverse tangent is chosen continuously on a solution branch. Using the continuous polar angle of extends the expression to charts through when the original equation permits it. A differentiable graph cannot pass through , because there the original equation would require .
For a continuously differentiable differential one-form, exactness requires . It is locally sufficient, and globally sufficient on a simply connected domain; on a domain with holes, closedness alone need not imply exactness.
An integrating factor for a differential one-form depending only on must satisfy
Thus, where ,
If the ratio depends only on , this defines a nonzero factor and makes it a closed differential form, hence locally exact. For a factor depending only on , the analogous calculation gives
provided the ratio is a function only of on the region where . A nonzero constant multiple of either factor works equally well.
The repeated factor in the differential operator suggests . Direct differentiation gives , so and
The first value gives . The second gives , hence and . Therefore
Under the same independence assumption, inclusion-exclusion gives
On ,
There is one interior inflection point, where the curvature changes from positive to negative:
At the graph reaches one with zero slope and then stays constant. There is no further change from one sign of curvature to the opposite sign there.
Figure 1.
Failure densities and cumulative probabilities, with independent lifetimes for the joint curves
. Details.
Without independence, still holds, but only is forced by the marginals. Its inflection behaviour is then not determined. The shared- construction in (e), for example, gives before the plateau.
The product formula requires independent failure times. This assumption is not stated in the original PDF. Under that intended assumption, put and use the failure probabilities for two independent lifetimes:
Its graph is a cubic increasing from to , convex before reaching its plateau.
Without independence, the marginal distributions do not determine . The Fréchet inequalities give the sharp pointwise bounds
For example, taking and with the same uniform random variable preserves both prescribed marginals but gives , rather than .
The second cumulative distribution function is the integral of its density:
Its graph is an upward-curving parabolic arc from to , followed by a horizontal plateau. Both cumulative functions are continuous at their upper support endpoints.
Integrating the first probability density function gives the cumulative distribution function
Its graph is a straight ramp from to , followed by a horizontal plateau.
Normalization requires . Therefore
The graph rises linearly from zero to the left-hand limit , then drops to zero beyond . Its enclosed triangular area is one. The combined sketch in (f) uses dimensionless time and shows this density together with the cumulative probabilities.
A uniform distribution has constant density on its support, fixed by normalization. Thus
The density's assigned values at the endpoints do not affect probabilities.
Parametrize the diagonal by for . Then
The second expression is , immediately giving . The first differs from it by . Two applications of integration by parts give
Hence
The changed value for explicitly demonstrates path dependence, while gives the same endpoint-dependent result.
On the first straight segment, and only is nonzero, so both integrals vanish. On the second segment, and only is nonzero; each integrand is one, contributing . On the last segment, and only is nonzero; each integrand is , contributing . Thus
The second result also follows from the fundamental theorem for line integrals, using the potential found in (a). Agreement on this one path does not make conservative.
The curl of the first vector field is
which is not identically zero. Thus is not conservative on and cannot equal a negative gradient there.
For the second field, direct differentiation shows
Therefore is conservative, and the requested negative-gradient potential is
Its curl vanishes, consistently with the curl of a gradient identity.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact