A metric outer measure on a metric space is an outer measure satisfying
Here . Every Borel set is measurable for a metric outer measure. Consequently its measurable sigma-algebra contains the Borel sigma-algebra; it may be strictly larger.
The Caratheodory measurability criterion yields a complete sigma-algebra , and restricted to it is a countably additive measure. Completeness means that every subset of a measurable null set is measurable.
For the requested algebra proof, and plainly satisfy the criterion. Replacing by merely exchanges the two terms, proving closure under complements. If are measurable, apply their splitting identities successively to any :
Subadditivity applied to the first two pieces implies
The reverse inequality is outer subadditivity. Hence is measurable, proving closure under finite unions and therefore the algebra of sets property. The argument never subtracts infinite values.
An outer measure on is a function satisfying , monotonicity, and countable subadditivity:
Its measurable sets are those satisfying Caratheodory measurability criterion:
The test runs over all subsets , including nonmeasurable ones.
The absolute continuity of measures condition is
The Radon-Nikodym theorem says that if both positive measures are sigma-finite measures, then this condition is equivalent to the existence of a nonnegative measurable function , unique up to equality -almost everywhere, such that
One writes , the Radon-Nikodym derivative. Under these hypotheses is finite -almost everywhere. If is finite, then . A finite signed measure absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure likewise has an integrable signed Radon-Nikodym derivative.
The sigma-finiteness hypothesis on the dominating measure cannot simply be omitted. On the Borel subsets of , let be counting measure and Lebesgue measure. Absolute continuity holds because the only -null set is empty. A Radon-Nikodym derivative would satisfy at every point, contradicting . Here counting measure is not sigma-finite.
The given angular momentum commutation relations imply and . By linearity,
Similarly,
For the remaining commutators, the commutator product rule gives, for each ,
The last sum vanishes because the Levi-Civita symbol is antisymmetric under , while is symmetric. Taking and then linear combinations with proves
If and , these identities yield
One must also prove that this candidate eigenstate is nonzero. Since the angular momentum operators are self-adjoint operators, , and expanding the product gives
Therefore
This is nonnegative and, by the assumed inequality, nonzero. Hence it is positive. The angular momentum raising operator really does produce a nonzero simultaneous eigenstate with the claimed eigenvalues.
To prove that raising terminates, let be any nonzero state reached after steps, with projection . Positivity gives
so . Thus the sequence cannot remain nonzero for every integer . At its last nonzero state , one has , and the squared norm identity gives
Under the paper's initial inequality the first step is nonzero, so in fact . An angular momentum ladder endpoint must therefore be reached: bounded projection follows from positivity, and the final raising norm fixes the total angular momentum eigenvalue. Writing , the complementary product gives , also showing .
Put . If is a normalized energy eigenstate at , the factorization from part (a) gives
It follows inductively that has squared norm . The commutator with establishes its energy eigenvalue at each step. Hence
is normalized and has . Distinct levels are orthogonal because is a self-adjoint operator. In particular,
To decompose the specified initial wavefunction, retain this exact phase convention for the creation and annihilation operators. Their difference gives
Since and ,
This quadratic excitation of an oscillator ground state, , contains only the and energy eigenstates. The printed initial function has an unspecified overall normalization, so the Born rule requires division by its squared norm. After wavefunction normalization the state is
The minus sign is consistent with the paper's convention: its is times the usual real-coordinate raising operator multiplied by , so its has the opposite sign to the usual real second harmonic oscillator eigenfunction. The energy measurement probabilities are independent of this choice of phase.
Therefore the complete answer is
Every other energy has probability zero. At any later time the two coefficients only acquire their separate dynamical phases, so these probabilities remain the same. A direct check of the normalization is
This also confirms the factor of three in the squared norm of the two-component expansion.
On a smooth wavefunction , the position operator and momentum operator give
Thus the canonical commutation relation is . Since and are self-adjoint operators and are real, the adjoint operator of is
Expanding the products in the stated order is essential:
Subtracting gives . These identities initially hold on smooth rapidly decaying functions, which contain the quantum harmonic oscillator energy eigenstates used below.
The factorization also proves a lower bound: for a normalized energy eigenstate ,
Therefore . The commutator product rule, applied to , gives
So a nonzero application of the creation operator raises the energy eigenvalue by , while the annihilation operator lowers it by the same amount.
Begin with any energy eigenstate, whose existence is assumed. Repeated lowering must terminate: otherwise it would eventually produce a nonzero energy eigenstate below , contradicting the lower bound. More explicitly, if with integer and , the first lowering steps are nonzero. If , one further step is also nonzero by its positive squared norm and has energy , an impossibility. Thus and the last state satisfies . This proves
Every level exists as well: , so repeated raising from never vanishes. The same factorization bounds the energy expectation of any normalized state in the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator form domain below by , proving that the terminated state really is a ground state.
To find its probability density, solve the first-order equation
Its solutions are . With , the supplied Gaussian integral gives
Taking fixes an irrelevant global phase. Consequently
The ground-state energy is positive even though the potential minimum is zero: it is the oscillator's zero-point energy.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact