Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2009 B 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let and take an observable with no explicit time dependence. In the Schrödinger picture, and . In the Heisenberg picture, and . For the interaction picture choose a time-independent splitting , put , and defineThen and . Unitarity gives the identical expectation in all three descriptions:Different choices of the split interpolate between pictures; makes the state constant, while gives the Schrödinger description.
Differentiate to obtain the Heisenberg equation of motionFor an explicitly time-dependent observable there is additionally . Thus is constant. In a normalized energy eigenstate, , so the expectation of its Heisenberg derivative vanishes whenever the products are defined.
For the harmonic oscillator, the canonical commutator givesThe last identity follows from the operator product rule without commuting and . Although is not itself self-adjoint, the same calculation can be applied to the self-adjoint dilation observable and gives the same derivative.
Stationarity of the three expectations gives and . Substitution into yields the quantum virial theoremThe vanishing means make the variances equal to the second moments, soThis satisfies the position-momentum Heisenberg uncertainty relation, with equality only for the ground state.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2009 A 3 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
With the specified ladder-operator normalization, andTherefore . This proves , with equality exactly when . In position representation this equation is , whose general solution isFor a unit vector ; its phase is arbitrary. The commutators make raise and lower energies by . Repeated raising of the Gaussian produces all levels . Conversely lowering any nonzero energy eigenvector must eventually terminate, since otherwise it would produce an energy below the lower bound. A terminating vector is annihilated by and hence has energy . Thus no other eigenvalues occur.
Bilinearity of the two-dimensional commutators giveswhile all momentum-momentum and position-position commutators remain zero. Equal angles give a canonical position-momentum pair. Perpendicular angles give commuting components, which belong to independent coordinate directions.
The orthogonal coordinates , preserve the kinetic sum, andHence and . Every cross-mode position/momentum pair commutes, so . On the tensor-product oscillator basis,For each , allowed pairs have and . ThusEach pair contributes one product eigenvector; counting them accounts for the energy-level degeneracy.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2009 A 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let . Multiplication of the radial equation by gives . With the constant terms cancel, leavingThe indicial equation is , with roots and . The usual physical Coulomb radial origin condition selects : it imposes the regular reduced radial boundary condition . Normalizability alone at the origin is insufficient to make this selection when an irregular branch is locally square-integrable, notably at .
Write . Coefficient comparison givesA nonterminating regular series has the exponentially growing asymptotic branch, suggested by : it supplies an component, which the prefactor cannot normalize. Equivalently the regular confluent-hypergeometric solution grows unless its first parameter is a nonpositive integer. Thus a bound state requires the numerator to vanish at some , givingThis is series-termination quantization of the Coulomb radial equation. It requires for the assumed ; at there are no such negative-energy Coulomb bound states.
For , . The angular integral cancels when computing , while the radial volume element contributes . ConsequentlyThe ratio follows by one integration by parts and remains valid for real ; no integer-only factorial identity is needed. Since now ,For a classical particle with that negative total energy, nonnegative kinetic energy requires , hence . This is a necessary radial bound; extra angular momentum can impose a stronger restriction.
At , and the classical boundary is . The normalized radial probability density is . With , the exterior quantum probability isThe final integration gives . This is the nonzero quantum tail beyond the classical turning region.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2009 A 1 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Inside the infinite well, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is with Dirichlet endpoints. Negative or zero energy gives no nonzero solution satisfying both endpoints. For , the sine solution requires . ThusThe normalization follows from . These functions form an orthonormal basis. Substitute the expansion into and take the inner product with each basis vector: orthonormality gives , equivalentlyFor a general infinite expansion this is interpreted in the usual Hamiltonian domain or its unitary evolution; the particular state below has only two terms.
Put . The identity gives , , all others zero. Their squared magnitudes sum to one. HenceThe evolved state is . Its position probability includes an interference term with frequency . Specifically,The three required integrals are , and , respectively. ThereforeThe energy expectation is constant while the spatial probability oscillates, because relative energy phases affect interference but not the energy probabilities.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 8 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Put and , with nonnegative integer so the register exists. The geometric sum satisfiesConsequently the matrix with entries has . This proves unitarity andFor a binary output string , expansion of the printed tensor product gives coefficientThus the printed product is exactly . It is a correct product decomposition of a Fourier phase state, but the printed recovery identity has inconsistent signs:by the square of the quantum Fourier transform. To recover instead, use , replacing every product phase by its complex conjugate. Equivalently one may reverse the sign in the definition of . The discrepancy is visible for by taking concentrated at : the printed expression returns the basis vector at . The recovery display also uses as the summation variable on its right while its summand uses ; that dummy variable should be .
For factorization first check . Successive residues areThe first return is . Its half power is , which is neither nor modulo . Therefore
In Shor's algorithm prepare a uniform exponent register of size , conveniently , and reversibly compute into a second register. Measuring that second register, or tracing it out, leaves periodic exponent correlations of period . Conditional on one measured residue, the first register is a superposition over an arithmetic progression of exponents separated by . The quantum Fourier transform converts this periodic structure into peaks near . Continued fractions recover ; when is coprime to , its denominator is . Verify by modular exponentiation and repeat when the reduced denominator is insufficient. For this example is suitable, and useful peaks include those near and . Either transform sign gives the same period information, so the source's inverse-sign error does not invalidate the order-finding mechanism.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 7 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A density operator is a positive self-adjoint trace-class operator with . A finite expectation is . It represents a pure state exactly when for a unit vector, equivalently or .
For a finite-dimensional spectral decomposition , introduce an auxiliary space with orthonormal vectors and use the enlarged space . DefineThen and . This purification shows that subsystem mixedness can arise from entanglement with an unobserved environment even when the total state is pure. Subsystem measurements alone cannot distinguish these two descriptions.
A nonzero pure bipartite vector is entangled when it cannot be written as a tensor product of two vectors; equivalently its Schmidt rank exceeds one. For mixed bipartite states, entanglement means absence of a convex decomposition into product density operators.
For the nonorthogonal expansion in the question, the unnormalized reduced operator isIndeed . Positivity follows because , and . Thus is a density operator; if is already normalized, . The Gram factors cannot be dropped merely because the vectors are called bases. For unnormalized , physical expectations likewise divide its raw quadratic form by .
For the Schmidt decomposition diagonalize in an orthonormal basis with its positive eigenvalues . Expand with . The reduced matrix gives . Therefore are orthonormal andZero-eigenvalue components vanish because their squared norms are zero. This proves the decomposition for an arbitrary nonzero vector; the zero vector uses the empty sum. For a unit vector .
In the numerical example the coefficient matrix in the two product bases is . Taking the first-subsystem trace yieldsThe vector is in its nullspace, so rank is at most two; its leading minor has determinant one, so . This is the rank of and the Schmidt rank, proving entanglement. The displayed source ket has norm squared , and the displayed reduced matrix has trace . The physical density operator is ; its nonzero eigenvalues are , since . The raw matrix is correct for the unnormalized quadratic form actually printed.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 6 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Choose an orthonormal eigenbasis and the phase convention . Comparing coefficients of the eigenvalue equation at first order yieldsProjecting onto and the other eigenvectors givesProjection of the next-order equation onto givesThese are coefficients of the printed series, so denotes the quadratic coefficient rather than the second derivative itself. Without a phase convention an arbitrary purely imaginary multiple of can be added to the first vector correction. Continuous spectrum, if present, requires the corresponding spectral integral; the oscillator has a discrete complete eigenbasis.
Put and let denote the ground-state density. Then and . Because , integration by parts yieldsThus the two first-order shifts areThe first is the supplied ground-state expression; the second follows because the excited-state density is , so .
Subtracting, and using , givesThe bracket is zero at , tends to one at infinity, and has derivative . Therefore the first-order predicted level gap isFor every it becomes negative for all sufficiently large , crossing when . It is still positive at : the stated conclusion must be read with the large- regime, rather than for every interval width.
For the inner potential curves downward, placing a central barrier between two symmetric minima at . The even unperturbed ground state has its greatest density at the central barrier, while the odd first excited state has a node there and is less penalized. This explains the relative first-order shifts. A negative predicted gap signals failure of that perturbation approximation, not inversion of the exact lowest two states: the true one-dimensional ground state remains nodeless and even, with the odd state above it. At a high barrier the actual low levels instead form a close double-well pair. The apparent level crossing from a finite-interval oscillator perturbation is useful precisely as a diagnostic of the approximation's range.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 5 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let and write in the Schrödinger picture, with observables constant unless they have an explicit time dependence. In the Heisenberg picture the state is andDifferentiate the two unitary factors to obtain the equation. Unitarity gives .
For the interaction picture choose a reference split , put , and define , . Then , , while evolves with (and its explicit time dependence). AgainThese are different unitary allocations of the same dynamics between states and observables, so measured expectations agree.
The canonical commutation relation now givesMultiplication of the last equation by and integration givesSince and , both initial expectations of vanish. ThereforeThe printed positive displacement endpoint has the wrong sign for the Hamiltonian's positive term. The two turning values are and ; their ordering depends on the sign of . The result oscillates about the displaced equilibrium , exactly as the force predicts.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Take a normalized vector in the required common operator domains. Expanding the squared norm and using self-adjointness givesThus its final term is . Set , , . If , minimizing the nonnegative quadratic at givesEquality holds precisely when the minimum norm vanishes, that is . If , however, then and , so equality is automatic even when . The printed equality criterion needs this zero-vector exception. For example , , saturates the inequality but admits no such real . The exact general criterion is linear dependence of together with vanishing real part of their inner product, as in the uncentered second-moment commutator inequality.
Apply the same calculation to , , whose commutator is unchanged. This gives the Robertson uncertainty principleIf is an eigenvector of , its dispersion is zero; finite dispersion of then forces .
In the position representation, and . The product rule gives , hence . Since commutes with ,For an energy eigenstate, , so . For the oscillator , and the same argument gives . These expectation identities require the stated finite moments and commutator domains; formal position eigenvectors are not normalizable exceptions.
Apply the Robertson uncertainty principle to each angular-momentum pair:If is an eigenvector of , then . The inequalities for and force , assuming the relevant moments exist.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 3 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Write , and , for nonnegative integer . The angular Laplacian satisfies . Direct radial differentiation givesBecause , the contribution cancels the Coulomb potential in the Hamiltonian. ThereforeThe volume element contributes . The squared state factors into radial, polar and uniform azimuthal densities, so the angular normalization cancels in every radial expectation. With ,The supplied integration-by-parts recurrence gives . HenceIn particular . Put . Chebyshev's inequality gives
For the polar variable set . The polar density is proportional to , soAn exact expression for the requested tail, as well as its useful estimate, isThe inequality is Markov's inequality applied to . If a finite expression is desired, expand : the numerator is and the denominator is the same sum with .
By the union bound, with probability at least both and . The height above the equatorial plane is then at most . The cylindrical radius differs from by at most . Thus the distance from the circle of radius in the equatorial plane is with probability tending to one. This is relative concentration around a growing circle; it does not assert an absolutely shrinking thickness. The probability concentration of a circular Coulomb eigenstate is a precise version of the large-angular-momentum orbit picture.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For a normalized state the position probability density is . With a real potential, the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its conjugate giveThis is the continuity equation . Integrating over the line yields under the stated decay. A real-valued wave function gives , so its instantaneous current vanishes; the same is true up to a spatially constant phase.
Put . Complete the square in the overlap:The Gaussian integral is , also for complex displacement by analytic continuation. HenceThe product of square roots fixes the branch convention implicit in the printed square root of . At the norm squared is , which becomes one for the stated . In particularThe centre is and its position variance is .
When differentiating in , keep fixed on the chosen constant-radius orbit. ThenSubstitution gives . Since , the chain rule gives . Continue continuously along the time orbit; its sign after a full orbit supplies the usual oscillator zero-point phase. The case of zero displacement is obtained as a limit, since the separate printed and expressions are singular at .
Finally . For real nonzero this isThe printed final current omits the Gaussian normalization factor . Retaining that factor is required both by the normalized state and by the continuity equation. This current is the Gaussian probability density times the velocity of its moving centre, .
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 1 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Use periodic plane waves on the ring. For ,They are orthonormal on one circumference and complete by Fourier series. Thus , with degeneracy : the two signs of nonzero angular momentum have the same energy. Equivalently one may use normalized sine and cosine eigenfunctions for each positive .
For the position measurement put . Direct integration givesThe energy measurement requires projection onto whole degenerate eigenspaces, rather than just onto one traveling wave. The expansion coefficients areFor instance the imaginary integral vanishes by reflection about , and the product-to-sum identity evaluates the real integral as . ConsequentlyEvery numerator is positive and no integer makes a denominator zero, so every energy has nonzero probability. Parseval's identity guarantees that these probabilities sum to one. The supplied state is a valid normalized periodic state; its derivative need not obey the operator-domain periodic condition for the spectral probabilities to be defined.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 B 8 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The no-cloning theorem states that no fixed deterministic quantum operation can perfectly duplicate every unknown pure state. For a unitary copier with a fixed blank, suppose it cloned two normalized vectors . Preservation of inner products would give , impossible for a nonorthogonal distinct pair with overlap strictly between zero and one in modulus. Including an environment does not help: its final overlap has modulus at most one, so one would require . Thus a universal perfect copier is impossible. Orthogonal known alternatives do not contradict this restriction.
Label the three qubits as input , Alice's entangled qubit and Bob's qubit . Initially their joint state isThe controlled-NOT gate from to changes this toApply and to the first qubit and group by Alice's two computational-basis outcomes. The result isIn expanded form the last two Bob factors are and . Their Alice labels must be and ; the repeated labels in the source are printing errors.
Alice measures her two qubits and sends the two classical bits to Bob. Each outcome has probability and Bob's conditional state is . He applies to recover the input, up to physically irrelevant global phase. Explicitly the corrections for are . This is quantum teleportation: Alice's input is consumed by measurement, so no second surviving copy is created. Before her classical message, Bob's reduced density operator is , independent of the input, so the protocol also supplies no faster-than-light communication.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 B 7 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let and take the reduced positive operator . Choose orthonormal eigenvectors for its positive eigenvalues . DefineThe defining identity of the partial trace gives , so the are orthonormal. Expansion in a full eigenbasis of yields ; zero-eigenvalue terms have zero squared norm and contribute nothing. ThusThe zero vector has the empty decomposition. Unit normalization would give , but no normalization is needed for the theorem itself.
For the given vector, the coefficient matrix is . Its second reduced operator is , whose eigenvalues are and eigenvectors , . The corresponding normalized first-factor vectors areTheir norms are one and their inner product is zero. HenceExpanding the two terms returns the original three contributions. The vector has squared norm ; if a normalized state is wanted, divide by two and the Schmidt coefficients become and .
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 B 6 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Use the normalized Rayleigh quotient . Its real directional derivative in an arbitrary complex direction isIt vanishes for every direction precisely when , since testing gives its squared norm. Conversely an eigenvector makes every derivative zero. Stationarity over all states is stronger than stationarity in a restricted trial family.
Normalize the Gaussian as , with . Its moments are , and . The printed potential energy consequently givesPut . Then , whose second derivative is . It diverges at both positive endpoints, so its sole stationary point is the unique global minimum. Its equation isThe variational principle therefore yields the optimized upper boundThe printed minimizer is inconsistent with the printed quartic coefficient. At the derivative is , so this is not the stationary Gaussian for that potential energy. It is nevertheless a legitimate trial vector and gives the simple, weaker bound . If the quartic coefficient were instead , four times the printed value, then would indeed minimize the family and its energy would be . This possible coefficient correction is identified explicitly rather than silently used. The reusable calculation is Gaussian trial for a quadratic-plus-quartic oscillator.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 B 5 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The orthogonal coordinate change preserves the kinetic energy and takes the particle exchange operator to . Thus the spatial wave function is even in for bosons and odd for fermions.
The total potential energy and Hamiltonian separate asAssume so the relative oscillator is confining. Its spectrum is , and its parity in the two-particle relative coordinate is .
The lowest boson state uses , whereas the lowest fermion state uses , . ThereforeFor an oscillator of frequency , . Since ,The factor three is the extra relative-coordinate excitation required by antisymmetry. The supplied oscillator wave functions correspond to kinetic energy ; the extra factor printed before that term in the hint is inconsistent with those functions and the stated energies. The calculation uses the conventional kinetic energy dictated by particle mass .
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 A 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A pure state is a unit vector in a complex Hilbert space, with vectors differing by a global phase representing the same physical state. An observable is a self-adjoint operator, with measurement probabilities determined by its spectral projections. For vectors in the relevant operator domains,A squared norm vanishes exactly when its vector vanishes. Therefore zero dispersion is equivalent to .
For two observables set , , . For real ,If , nonpositivity of its discriminant yields . Equality holds exactly when the minimum squared norm vanishes, namelyThe degenerate case must also be included: if , then and equality holds for every . Thus the complete criterion is that , or that the displayed real- relation holds. This includes by choosing when .
Apply the inequality to centred operators , . Their squared norms are the variances and their commutator is , givingAn eigenvector of either operator would have its corresponding dispersion zero, contradicting this positive lower bound if the other dispersion were finite and the stated domain conditions held. In the usual representation there are in fact no normalizable exact position or momentum eigenvectors; their generalized eigenvectors are not counterexamples. The equality condition above is the uncentered second-moment commutator inequality.
Past exam of the quantum mechanics quantum theory and quantum computers course of the University of Oxford 2007 A 3 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For a decaying bound state take . Substituting gives . The term involving the energy cancels , leaving the displayed equation withAt the lowest power of a series from the Frobenius method , the indicial equation is . Its roots are and . The latter makes and the radial probability density integral diverge for positive integral . Hence .
Equating the remaining coefficients givesUnless the numerator vanishes, the regular confluent-hypergeometric series contains a large-radius growing branch with the exponential factor . Multiplication by the external then leaves exponential growth, so it cannot be a normalizable bound state. Equivalently, the recurrence at large has , indicating that growing exponential scale; regularity at the origin has already fixed the combination of solutions, leaving termination as the way to remove it.
If the polynomial ends at degree index , its last recurrence numerator gives . With ,For the separate angle-independent exponential, normalization includes the full solid angle:Thus one can choose , up to an overall phase. Angle independence corresponds to the extension, distinct from the positive- family used in the indicial discussion.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





