V. Cannella and J. A. Mydosh measured low-field magnetic susceptibility of gold-iron alloys using a mutual inductance bridge. Moving samples into and out of the pickup arrangement separated their signal from the background. Cooling revealed sharp susceptibility cusps; changing concentration, sample shape and applied magnetic field tested their interpretation. Larger fields rounded the peaks. Their 1972 paper interpreted low-concentration ordering in antiferromagnetic terms: the cusp alone did not demonstrate Parisi's later theory.[ref]
This experiment measures a response to a small applied perturbation, rather than directly photographing frozen spins. Comparing field strengths is essential because the probing magnetic field itself changes the response.[ref]
Charles-Édouard Guillaume sought affordable, stable length standards. His 1920 lecture describes two micrometer microscopes on stone supports sighting marks on a rod immersed in water. Their separation was not fixed: one method alternated the sample with a reference in a second trough at nearly constant temperature. His relative method compared sample and platinum–iridium reference in the same bath, adding the reference's known expansion to the measured difference. Composition and treatment affected the nickel–iron alloys; low expansion held over a limited temperature range.[ref]
Figure 1.
Functional reconstruction of the water-bath comparison described by Charles-Édouard Guillaume, with movable rods and an instrument baseline that can drift
. Details.
The differential length comparator calculation explains why a calibrated reference is needed even when its expansion is larger than the sample's. Keeping both rods in the same bath targets one source of systematic error; allowing for changes in the instrument baseline targets another. Discovering a low-expansion alloy and demonstrating its dimensional stability are connected experimental tasks.
Invar 2026-10-18
A nickel–iron alloy with unusually small thermal expansion over a limited temperature range. Composition and treatment matter; its name does not mean every specimen has zero expansion. The Guillaume thermal expansion experiment explains how the effect was measured.[ref]
Awarded to Charles-Édouard Guillaume for precision measurement through anomalous properties of nickel–steel alloys. The Guillaume thermal expansion experiment explains how a reference comparison reveals low thermal expansion.[ref]