Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 3 14A d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Take the Fourier transform in . The wave equation becomes the ordinary differential equationwith initial data and . Therefore
Part (c) and the Translation property of the Fourier transform invert the first term toFor the second term choose an antiderivative of . By part (b), , and henceIts inverse transform isCombining the terms gives the D'Alembert formula
The function solves the linear ordinary differential equation. Apply reduction of order by writing . Substituting and and cancelling the terms in givesFor , this becomes a first-order linear ordinary differential equation:A partial fraction decomposition provides the required antiderivative:ThereforeThe logarithm has positive argument on the required interval. The Wronskian of and is , proving their linear independence and hence completeness of this general solution.
Enforce the fixed-end Dirichlet boundary condition by taking the odd extension of the initial velocity to the whole line:This agrees with the specified initial condition for . To derive the relevant form of D'Alembert's formula, the zero initial displacement in b gives , up to a cancelling constant. The initial velocity then gives . HenceAn antiderivative, valid across , isEvaluation therefore gives the solution throughout :For , replace by ; for , replace it by . Thus the same expression includes the reflected wave after it reaches the fixed end.
At the two terms agree, so . At they again agree, so . Differentiating the integral with respect to giveswhich recovers . Since is a continuously differentiable function, the formula is twice continuously differentiable even across , and satisfies the wave equation there as well.
The core contributes no change in , since there. Integrating the radial gravitational field across the shell, with , givesUsing the supplied antiderivative,HenceThe negative sign agrees with in the material shell under the paper's gravitational potential sign conventions.
The printed arguments and assume unit wave speed. For the stated wave equation with general , the correct arguments are and , as in the paper's subsequent formula. Equivalently, use rescaled time to obtain the printed unit-speed form.
Introduce coordinates , along the characteristic lines for the one-dimensional wave equation, and write . The chain rule givesso the wave equation becomesThus is independent of , and integration gives the countertravelling decomposition of the one-dimensional wave equationConversely, differentiating this expression twice verifies the wave equation for any sufficiently differentiable .
The two initial conditions giveDifferentiating the first and solving these two equations for the derivatives givesFor a fixed reference point , their antiderivatives can be writtenSubstituting the two travelling arguments cancels the constants and combines the integrals. This proves D'Alembert's formula with initial velocity:At the integral vanishes, giving ; differentiating by the fundamental theorem of calculus gives there. These checks also fix the sign and the factor .
We prove the symmetric derivative criterion for monotonicity using an antiderivative. Fix and defineThe fundamental theorem of calculus gives because is continuous. For each interior ,Since , the definition of symmetric derivative gives such that for . Therefore, for ,
We next show that is a convex function. On any closed interval let be the affine function joining to . If were positive anywhere, the extreme value theorem would give a positive maximum at an interior point . For every sufficiently small , that maximum would implyThe affine function contributes zero to this symmetric difference, contradicting the strict positive inequality above. Thus on every such interval, exactly convexity.
For a differentiable convex function, secant slopes bound endpoint derivatives. Explicitly, the chord inequality at and at , followed by , givesSo is nondecreasing. If for some , monotonicity would make constant on , forcing for , a contradiction. Consequently : is strictly increasing. This proof requires no continuity of and never applies the ordinary mean value theorem to a merely symmetrically differentiable function.
We verify that the augmented partition of an interval in part i has vanishing mesh of a partition. Define for . Its derivative isSince for , we have . The mean value theorem therefore givesThe appended interval has length , so for the augmented partition of an interval.
The sine is continuous, hence Riemann integrable on . By the Riemann sum convergence theorem, , using the fundamental theorem of calculus and the cosine antiderivative. As , the answer is
Divide by . The product rule turns the linear ordinary differential equation intoEquivalently, is an integrating factor after division by . An antiderivative gives . The initial condition at gives , henceIts derivative is , so substitution gives , and . Every solution of a differential equation has the integrated form above, and the initial condition fixes its only constant. This agrees with the uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations on the stated interval.
Let . Positivity allows the squared integral to be written as a first-quadrant double integral. In polar coordinates the Jacobian determinant is , soUsing integration by parts, with the boundary term vanishing at both endpoints,The substitution also gives the two antiderivativesThese values also follow from the Gaussian moment recurrence and can be checked by differentiation.
The upper boundary follows until its intersection with at , then follows the hyperbola to . The lower boundary is . Therefore the two vertical-slice descriptions are , , and , .
Integrating with respect to first reduces the double integral toUsing the antiderivatives from part (a),
The region lies in the first quadrant, inside the unit circle and above the positive branch of . In polar coordinates, , so its radial bounds are . Such an interval exists when , henceAt the intersections with the circle, and , giving exactly the two stated polar angles. Their Cartesian coordinates are and the swapped pair.
The Jacobian determinant contributes , while . Thus the double integral isIts antiderivative is . Evaluating the bounds gives
Two applications of integration by parts give and . Thus an antiderivative is . Evaluating its endpoints gives
For , strict decrease gives , while for it gives . Integrating over these unit intervals provesSumming the rectangle bounds givesThe partial sums and the improper integral are nondecreasing. These bounds show that one is bounded exactly when the other is bounded, proving the integral test for convergence. In the convergent case, sum the same interval inequalities for to obtainFor , the antiderivative is , which grows without bound, so the first series diverges. For , the antiderivative is , whose tail integral is finite, so the second series converges, withBoth functions are positive and strictly decreasing on , as required.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2008 Paper 1 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Use the change of variables , . ThenDifferentiating verifies this antiderivative on the whole real line.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2009 Paper 1 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Again the function is even, so all sine coefficients vanish. Its constant term is . With , an antiderivative isThus . In the requested factored notation,This is the period-two specialization of the Fourier series of periodic hyperbolic sine and cosine. The function values match at the endpoints, although its derivative has a jump in the periodic extension.
Set , so . This integration by substitution givesThe antiderivative is taken on either interval separated by . Differentiating verifies the sign and factor .
The integrand is a continuous function, so the fundamental theorem of calculus differentiates the upper limit directly:No explicit antiderivative is needed.

