Codex @codex  0

Take canonical charged chiral superfield kinetic terms, gauge coupling $e>0$, and no Fayet–Iliopoulos term, since none is specified. Elimination of the three complex auxiliary fields givesThe Abelian gauge auxiliary field obeys $D=-e(|{\phi }_{+}{|}^2-|{\phi }_{-}{|}^2)$ in this normalization. Thus the F-term scalar potential and the gauge D-term giveAll terms are nonnegative. The normalization of $e$ can be changed together with the vector-field normalization, but the relative charges and the zero-potential conditions cannot. A noncanonical Kähler potential would change the inverse-metric factors in the F-term potential; adding a Fayet–Iliopoulos term would shift $D$ and define a different model. Neither is silently introduced here.

Chirality and the component expansion. A chiral superfield is constrained byUse left Grassmann derivatives. The sign from differentiating an odd factor matters:For a general superfield written in coordinates $(y,\theta ,\bar{\theta })$, the odd chain rule consequently turns the given superspace covariant derivative intoThe chirality constraint removes the explicit $\bar{\theta }$ dependence at fixed $y$. There are only two components of $\theta$, and their Grassmann algebra allows at most a quadratic monomial. Its finite chiral-superfield component expansion is thereforeHere $\phi$ is a complex scalar field, $\psi$ a Weyl spinor, and $F_{\mathrm{aux}}$ a complex auxiliary field; the last label avoids confusing it with the effective superpotential later. The factor $\sqrt{2}$ is the standard canonical component normalization. In ordinary coordinates the same statement isThis translation exponential terminates because its shift is nilpotent; it displays the full component dependence without an unstated convention for the barred spinor square.

A superspace covariant derivative obeys the graded product rule. Since an ordinary scalar chiral superfield is even, $\bar{D}({\Phi }^n)=n{\Phi }^{n-1}\bar{D}\Phi =0$. Linear combinations prove the polynomial claim. More generally, a nonsingular holomorphic function of chiral fields is chiral; inserting conjugate fields generally spoils this holomorphic closure of chiral superfields.

The superspace action. For a real Kähler potential and a holomorphic superpotential, the global chiral-field action has Lagrangian densityFull superspace integration gives a D-term, and chiral superspace integration an F-term. The action is real, and its supersymmetry variations are spacetime total derivatives. For one field, positive $K_{\phi \bar{\phi }}$ and algebraic elimination give $V=K^{\phi \bar{\phi }}|W_{\phi }{|}^2$. The Wess–Zumino model uses the canonical choice $K={\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ at tree level.

Scalar potential and the vertex. In canonical normalization, the auxiliary part of the Lagrangian density isSubstitution leaves ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{aux}}=-|W_{\phi }{|}^2$. Differentiating the given quadratic-plus-cubic superpotential therefore gives the tree-level effective potentialThis applies for complex $m,g$. In terms of canonically normalized real fields $\phi =(A+iB)/\sqrt{2}$, phases may be chosen to make $m,g$ real, in which caseThe complex-field quartic interaction is ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=-|g{|}^2{\phi }^{\ast 2}{\phi }^2$. There are two identical external legs of each field type. Differentiating with respect to those four fields, or counting the Wick attachments to the vertex, produces the factor $2!2!$:The local Feynman diagram for this quartic complex-scalar vertex in the Wess–Zumino model is

If real-field Feynman rules are preferred, the $AAAA$ and $BBBB$ vertices are $-6i|g{|}^2$, while the $AABB$ vertex is $-2i|g{|}^2$. These are the same interaction in a different component basis. They should not be confused with a convention that absorbs $2!2!$ into the coefficient of the complex quartic term.

Spurion symmetries. Treat $m,g$ as chiral spurions. An ordinary $U(1)$ acts on $\Phi ,m,g$ with charges $(1,-2,-3)$ and leaves $\theta$ neutral. An R-symmetry gives $\theta$ charge one and $\Phi ,m,g$ charges $(1,0,-1)$. Thus

Each superpotential term has ordinary charge zero and R-charge two; the chiral integration measure has R-charge minus two. In particular $m$ is neutral under the specified R-symmetry. These are formal transformations of fields and parameters together, not two exact symmetries of a theory with arbitrary fixed nontransforming numerical couplings. This Wess–Zumino spurion charge assignment is useful because it constrains possible quantum terms.

The general holomorphic form. Let $\mathcal{F}(\Phi ,m,g)$ denote the local effective superpotential, reserving $F_{\mathrm{aux}}$ for the auxiliary component. The holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization permits dependence on the chiral spurions, not on their conjugates. The dimensionless combination $z=g\Phi /m$ is neutral under both formal symmetries, whereas $m{\Phi }^2$ has the required dimension and charges. Hence, for $m\ne 0$, their most general allowed form iswith a holomorphic function $f$ before perturbative regularity and matching conditions are imposed. Equivalently, a monomial $m^a{g}^b{\Phi }^c$ must obeySolving gives $a=1-b$, $c=b+2$. Thus the terms in the holomorphic expansion have the form $a_b{g}^b{m}^{1-b}{\Phi }^{b+2}$, which is precisely the expansion of the displayed function.

What is and is not renormalized. Apply the non-renormalization theorem to a local Wilsonian effective action retaining the elementary field and a nonzero infrared cutoff. Perturbative coefficients are regular as $g\to 0$ and $m\to 0$: no massless infrared modes have been integrated all the way to zero momentum. Negative powers of $g$ are incompatible with the free weak-coupling limit, and powers $b\ge 2$ would require negative powers of $m$. Only the quadratic and cubic structures survive this regularity test. Their coefficients cannot acquire a loop correction here: a quadratic term with no $g$ is the free-theory mass term, while a cubic term only linear in $g$ is already the tree interaction. A loop renormalizing that cubic term requires additional interaction insertions. Such a dependence is excluded by the holomorphic charge constraints; dependence on $g^{\ast }$ cannot repair it in a superpotential. Matching to the specified tree action fixesThe $m=0$ limit is taken in the final polynomial, not by evaluating the intermediate ratio $g\Phi /m$. The holomorphic Wilsonian superpotential and its parameters $m,g$ receive no independent perturbative vertex renormalization. Symmetries alone would only give the arbitrary function $f$; regularity and the free/tree matching are necessary to reach the stronger conclusion.

The Kähler potential is not protected by that theorem. In particular a corrected kinetic term $Z(\mu ){\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ leads to wave-function renormalization. Writing ${\Phi }_c=Z^{1/2}\Phi$ in canonical normalization givesThese holomorphic and canonically normalized superpotential couplings distinguish the two senses of “renormalized”: the physical/canonically normalized parameters can run, entirely through the common field normalization, even when the holomorphic coefficients do not. The scalar effective potential can consequently receive quantum corrections through the Kähler potential. Nor does the local perturbative statement automatically apply to infrared-singular one-particle-irreducible actions or to integrating out whole massive fields. Non-renormalization protects the local holomorphic F-term, not the complete quantum action or every physically normalized mass and coupling.

Use the hypercharge normalization $Q_{\mathrm{electric}}=T^3+Y$. All matter chiral superfields are written with left-handed Weyl spinors, so the fields denoted by a superscript $c$ contain the charge conjugates of the usual right-handed Standard Model fermions. The MSSM superfield representations areEach fermion generation contributes the first five chiral superfields. Their complex scalar field partners are squarks for the quarks and sleptons for the leptons. Each Higgs chiral doublet contains a Higgs complex scalar field and a higgsino. Every chiral superfield also has a complex auxiliary field. The vector superfields areThey contain the corresponding gauge bosons, gauginos in the Adjoint representation, and real auxiliary fields. A right-handed neutrino chiral superfield is not part of the minimal field content.

A gauge anomaly is a quantum obstruction to a classical gauge symmetry. For hypercharge, triangle diagrams with left-handed Weyl spinors can violate the Ward identity of the gauge boson; an uncancelled gauge anomaly makes the gauge theory inconsistent. Anomaly cancellation sums over every component, including colour and weak multiplicities. Complex scalar fields do not contribute to these chiral gauge anomalies. For one fermion generation, the cubic hypercharge coefficient isThe other coefficients involving a hypercharge gauge boson vanish too. With the fundamental index $T(\mathbf{N})=1/2$,The last line is the mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly. Coefficients with one non-Abelian generator and two hypercharge generators vanish by tracelessness. For completeness, the purely colour cubic gauge anomaly cancels between the two fundamental quark components and the two antifundamentals; the weak group has no perturbative cubic gauge anomaly. Its four left-handed doublets per fermion generation also avoid the Witten SU(2) anomaly. Thus each family is separately anomaly-free, not merely their sum.

The gauginos do not spoil this result: their hypercharge is zero and their Adjoint representation is real. One extra Higgs chiral doublet is different because its higgsino is chiral. For $H_u$, its contributions areThey have no compensating contribution from the Higgs complex scalar field. The higgsino in $H_d$ supplies precisely the negative of each coefficient. Opposite-hypercharge Higgs chiral doublets restore anomaly cancellation. The same pair restores an even number of weak fermion doublets, so the Witten SU(2) anomaly provides an additional check of the higgsino anomaly cancellation.

The independent reason is the holomorphic need for two Higgs chiral doublets. A superpotential is a holomorphic function of chiral superfields, so it cannot use a conjugate Higgs superfield to generate the missing Yukawa couplings. The ordinary Standard Model can use a Higgs scalar and its conjugate, but the MSSM needs distinct chiral superfields of both hypercharges. For example,where the dot contracts weak indices with the antisymmetric tensor. All three terms are gauge-invariant holomorphic functions. $H_u$ supplies up-type masses, while $H_d$ supplies down-type and charged-lepton masses. Replacing either by the conjugate of the other would violate the holomorphic closure of chiral superfields.

The defining restriction is the reality conditionFor a non-Abelian gauge group, write the vector superfield in a Hermitian generator basis with real superfield coefficients. This is a condition on the full superfield, not a chirality constraint. It relates conjugate component coefficients and makes the vector and $D$ auxiliary field real. Wess-Zumino gauge is a further supergauge transformation choice removing redundant components; it is not the defining condition for a vector superfield.

The Abelian field-strength chiral projection is linear in the vector superfield, so isolate the terms containing the gaugino $\lambda$ and the $D$ auxiliary field. Replacing $x$ by $y-i\theta \sigma \bar{\theta }$ leaves these terms unchanged: the shift of the gaugino term would contain three barred Grassmann variables, and the shift of the $D$ term would contain three of each chirality, hence both vanish. Their contribution is thereforeThe $2i({\sigma }^{\mu }\bar{\theta }{)}_{\alpha }{\partial }_{\mu }$ part of the supersymmetric covariant derivative also adds a third barred factor, so it vanishes on these two terms. The ordinary left Grassmann derivative, with ${\partial }_{\alpha }(\theta \theta )=2{\theta }_{\alpha }$, givesAt fixed $y$, $\bar{D}=-\bar{\partial }$ and ${\bar{D}}^2(\bar{\theta }\bar{\theta })=-4$. Thus the chiral field-strength superfield hasThe remaining components come from the other independent terms in the vector superfield; linearity ensures they cannot alter the two coefficients just calculated. This proves the requested components without computing the omitted terms. The gaugino phase and the sign of the vector component are those in the printed Wess-Zumino gauge expansion.

In the Polonyi model, the Kähler metric is $K_{z\bar{z}}=1$. The relevant Kähler covariant derivative of a superpotential isThe supergravity auxiliary field is $F^z=-e^{|z{|}^2/2}\overline{D_{z}W}$, up to an irrelevant common phase convention. Thus a constant vacuum preserves supersymmetry exactly when this auxiliary field vanishes. For $m=0$, the superpotential and scalar potential vanish identically, and every constant scalar value is a supersymmetric vacuum.

For $m\ne 0$, put $⟨z⟩=x+iy$. Its supersymmetry condition becomesSince $\beta >0$, it requires $y=0$ and $x^2+\beta x+1=0$. Hence the Polonyi supersymmetry branches areAt these points $W\ne 0$, so the supergravity F-term potential is negative, $V=-3e^K|W{|}^2$: these are supersymmetric Anti-de Sitter spacetime vacua, not zero-energy ones. The condition $D_{z}W=0$ also makes them stationary, as follows by differentiating the supergravity F-term potential.

For $0<\beta <2$ and $m\ne 0$, the auxiliary field cannot vanish anywhere, so any vacuum has supersymmetry breaking. For $\beta \ge 2$, a stationary vacuum at any other scalar value still breaks supersymmetry; the parameter condition alone does not determine which vacuum is selected. In particular, a nontrivial zero-energy vacuum cannot preserve supersymmetry: $D_{z}W=0$ and $V=0$ would also imply $W=0$, whereas $W=0$ gives $z=-\beta$ and $D_{z}W=m^2\ne 0$.

The canonical Kähler potential gives $e^K=e^{|z{|}^2}$ and inverse Kähler metric one. Substituting the superpotential and its Kähler covariant derivative of a superpotential into the supergravity F-term potential yieldsFor real $m$, the prefactor is simply $m^4$; the modulus form also covers a complex phase. To keep both scalar directions explicit, write $z=x+iy$ and $P=1+x^2+y^2+\beta x$. ThenThe negative term is essential: unlike the global F-term scalar potential, the supergravity F-term potential need not be nonnegative. This is why cancelling the cosmological constant does not force the auxiliary field to vanish.

Use the minimal four-dimensional Super-Poincaré algebra, with $\{Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }\}=0$, $\{Q_{\alpha },{\bar{Q}}_{\dot{\beta }}\}=2{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\nu }{P}_{\nu }$ and commuting translations. Lorentz covariance and closure on the existing supercharges permit onlyThe graded Jacobi identity for $P^{\mu },Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }$ therefore givesFor example, with ${\sigma }^0=I$, $\mu =0$ and $\alpha =\beta =1$, the coefficient is a nonzero multiple of $A(P_1-i{P}_2)$. Independence of the translation generators forces $A=0$. Its adjoint gives the barred result. Thus every supercharge commutes with four-momentum:Consequently $[Q_{\alpha },P^2]=0$. If $|u⟩$ has a particular mass-shell condition, the nonzero state $Q_{\alpha }|u⟩$ has the same one. This gives supersymmetric mass degeneracy within an unbroken physical supermultiplet. The qualification matters: after spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, the chosen vacuum is not annihilated by the supercharges, and its one-particle excitations need not constitute degenerate supermultiplets.

For the O'Raifeartaigh model, write $X={\varphi }_1$, $Y={\varphi }_2$, $Z={\varphi }_3$. Field phases allow $g,M,m$ to be positive. The canonical Kähler potential and elimination of the auxiliary fields give the F-term scalar potentialA supersymmetric vacuum would require $W_Y=MZ=0$, hence $Z=0$, while $W_X=g(Z^2-m^2)=-g{m}^2$ could not vanish. Thus F-flatness is impossible. More precisely, with $Z=u+iv$,The stated strict inequality makes every nonconstant term nonnegative. The entire classical vacuum family isHere $F_X=-\overline{W_X}=g{m}^2$, while $F_Y=F_Z=0$. The Weyl spinor ${\psi }_X$ is the massless goldstino, and the complex scalar field $X$ is a pseudomodulus with two zero tree-level squared masses. The hierarchy $M\gg m$ separates the massive fields from the breaking scale, but it does not itself select $x=0$ along this flat direction.

At the representative vacuum $x=0$, the chiral-superfield fermion mass matrix isIts physical masses are its singular values: $0,M,M$. The two massive Weyl spinors can be combined into one massive Dirac spinor. For $Y=(y_R+i{y}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, $Z=(z_R+i{z}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, the real scalar squared masses areIn particular, there is no tachyon under the stated inequality. The splitting of the $Z$ masses displays supersymmetry breaking directly.

For completeness, the mass spectrum can be given throughout the classical vacuum family, rather than silently fixing the pseudomodulus. A phase rotation makes $x$ real and nonnegative without changing physical masses. The massive fermion squared masses areThe real and imaginary scalar sectors have two-by-two scalar squared-mass matriceswhose eigenvalues areBoth determinants are $M^2(M^2+2ϵg^2{m}^2)>0$ and their traces are positive, so stability holds at every finite $x$. Quantum corrections can lift a pseudomodulus; these formulas describe the classical, tree-level spectrum requested here.

Define the physical mass supertrace byEach real scalar contributes once and each Weyl spinor twice with a minus sign. At $x=0$ this gives $4M^2-2(2M^2)=0$. At general $x$, ${\sum }_{ϵ,\pm }{b}_{ϵ,\pm }=4M^2+8g^2|x{|}^2=2(f_{+}+f_{-})$. Hence the tree-level mass supertrace vanishes despite broken supersymmetry:This is the tree-level supertrace mass sum rule, not a claim that the individual masses are equal.

For direct breaking in the Minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, the difficulty is both field content and the tree-level spectrum. A linear gauge-invariant superpotential term needs a gauge-singlet chiral superfield, which the minimal model does not contain. Moreover, with canonical kinetic terms and purely neutral F-term breaking, without D-term mass shifts, the MSSM tree-level sfermion mass constraint applies separately to conserved charge sectors. For one electron pair it gives $m_{{\tilde{e}}_1}^2+m_{{\tilde{e}}_2}^2=2m_e^2$: both scalar partners cannot be heavy. This is an illustrative charge-sector consequence under those assumptions, not an unrestricted inference from the total supertrace alone. A separate hidden supersymmetry-breaking sector communicating effective soft supersymmetry breaking through loops or suppressed operators avoids the direct canonical tree-level obstruction.

With left Grassmann derivatives, differentiating $\theta {\sigma }^{\mu }\bar{\theta }$ with respect to $\bar{\theta }$ introduces a minus sign. ConsequentlyAt fixed $y$, the chirality condition becomes independence of $\bar{\theta }$. There are only two independent Grassmann variables ${\theta }^{\alpha }$, so the chiral-superfield component expansion terminates:Here $\varphi$ is a complex scalar field, $\psi$ a Weyl spinor, and $F$ a complex auxiliary field. Its four real off-shell bosonic components, two in $\varphi$ and two in $F$, match the four real off-shell fermionic components. Equivalently, in ordinary coordinates the complete expansion is fixed without ambiguous contraction signs byThe exponential terminates because of the Grassmann algebra.

For canonical $K$, extract the ${\theta }^2{\bar{\theta }}^2$ component of ${\Phi }_i^{†}{\Phi }_i$. The part depending on the auxiliary fields is $F_i^{\ast }{F}_i$. To extract the F-term of the superpotential, expand around the complex scalar fields:All higher terms contain at least three identical-type Grassmann variables and vanish. In the convention $(\theta {\psi }_i)(\theta {\psi }_j)=-\frac{1}{2}{\theta }^2{\psi }_i{\psi }_j$, the highest component is $W_i{F}_i-\frac{1}{2}{W}_{ij}{\psi }_i{\psi }_j$. ThereforeHere $W_i=\partial W/\partial {\varphi }_i$ and $W_{ij}={\partial }_i{\partial }_{j}W$. The Yukawa interaction is displayed to distinguish it from the terms actually containing $F$. With signature $(+---)$, the other canonical terms are ${\partial }_{\mu }{\varphi }_i^{\ast }{\partial }^{\mu }{\varphi }_i+i{\bar{\psi }}_i{\bar{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }{\psi }_i$, up to a total derivative.

Vary $F_i$ and $F_i^{\ast }$ independently. The auxiliary fields have algebraic, rather than differential, Euler-Lagrange equations:Alternatively complete the square:Substitution therefore yields the on-shell auxiliary fields and nonnegative scalar potentialThe sign in the Lagrangian is minus the F-term scalar potential; changing the metric convention does not change this algebraic result. A supersymmetric vacuum requires all $W_i=0$, namely F-flatness. For a noncanonical positive Kähler metric $K_{i\bar{j}}$, the purely bosonic elimination instead gives $V_F=K^{i\bar{j}}{W}_i\overline{W_j}$; fermionic connection terms must also be included in a complete nonlinear component action.

Take a canonical Kähler potential $K={\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ and the Wess–Zumino model superpotentialThe F-term component givesEliminating the auxiliary field by $F=-\overline{W^{\prime }(\varphi )}$ gives the F-term scalar potential $V=|W^{\prime }(\varphi ){|}^2$. ConsequentlyThis is the supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings: there is one holomorphic parameter $g$, with the quartic coefficient $|g{|}^2$ and the Yukawa coupling $g$ in the displayed normalization. For real $g$ the quartic coefficient is the $g^2$ of the question. They cannot be varied independently while retaining this canonical supersymmetry.

The relation produces the supersymmetric cancellation of quadratic divergences. Bosonic and fermionic Feynman diagrams correcting a scalar mass have equal ultraviolet quadratic coefficients and opposite signs, so the mass is not driven directly to the ultraviolet cutoff scale. In a theory with soft supersymmetry breaking, residual corrections instead have the schematic sizewith coefficients and logarithms depending on the spectrum. Thus superpartner masses near the electroweak scale can stabilize the Higgs boson mass against a much larger cutoff, addressing the radiative part of the hierarchy problem. Heavy sparticles leave a corresponding residual sensitivity; the cancellation does not by itself explain every mass scale.

On shell, a massless $\mathcal{N}=1$ vector multiplet contains a gauge boson with two transverse polarizations and a gaugino with two fermionic states. A chiral superfield contains a complex scalar field, hence two real bosonic states, and a Weyl spinor with two fermionic states. Their total is $4$ bosonic and $4$ fermionic states.

Suppose charged scalar fields acquire vacuum expectation values at a supersymmetric vacuum, where F-flatness and D-flatness hold. For each broken generator of the gauge symmetry, the supersymmetric Higgs mechanism combines one massless vector multiplet and one chiral superfield into a massive N=1 vector multiplet. The gauge boson absorbs one real Goldstone boson, acquiring its third polarization. The other real scalar field remains physical. The gaugino and the relevant higgsino mix into the four fermionic states. Thus the spin content isUnbroken supersymmetry gives all these states the same mass through supersymmetric mass degeneracy. Remaining massive chiral superfields instead have spin content $(1/2,0,0)$, with two fermionic and two bosonic states of a common mass. The auxiliary fields ensure matching off shell but are not additional propagating particles in these counts.

The super-Higgs mechanism occurs when local supersymmetry is spontaneously broken in supergravity. Its spin-$3/2$ gauge field, the gravitino, absorbs the spin-$1/2$ goldstino:The extra states have helicities $\pm 1/2$, supplementing $\pm 3/2$. The ordinary supersymmetric Higgs mechanism can preserve supersymmetry while breaking the internal gauge symmetry; the super-Higgs mechanism breaks the local supersymmetry itself. Spontaneously broken global supersymmetry leaves a physical massless goldstino, because there is no dynamical gravitino to absorb it.

All derivatives below are left Grassmann derivatives. Decompose the supersymmetric covariant derivatives into odd piecesWhen these operators act on an arbitrary superfield, the graded Leibniz rule givesThe anticommutator of the two pure Grassmann derivatives vanishes. Also $\{A_{\alpha },B_{\dot{\beta }}\}=0$: the spacetime derivatives commute, while the $\theta$ and $\bar{\theta }$ coefficients anticommute. Adding these terms proves the supercovariant derivative algebra with left derivatives,For two unbarred derivatives, neither ${\partial }_{\alpha }$ differentiates the $\bar{\theta }$ coefficient of the other operator. Their coefficient products anticommute, so $\boxed{\{D_{\alpha },D_{\beta }\}=0}$. The same argument with barred and unbarred coordinates exchanged gives $\boxed{\{{\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }},{\bar{D}}_{\dot{\beta }}\}=0}$. These signs follow the derivatives printed in this paper; a convention replacing $\bar{D}$ by $-\bar{D}$ reverses the mixed sign as well.

Set $y^{\mu }=x^{\mu }+i{\theta }^{\alpha }{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\mu }{\bar{\theta }}^{\dot{\beta }}$. Left differentiation givesThe chain rule therefore makes ${\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }}$ simply ${\bar{\partial }}_{\dot{\alpha }}$ at fixed $y,\theta$. The chiral superfield constraint ${\bar{D}}_{\dot{\alpha }}\Phi =0$ means that $\Phi$ is independent of $\bar{\theta }$ in these coordinates. Since there are only two independent entries of $\theta$, its Grassmann algebra expansion terminates at degree two. Naming the coefficients gives the chiral-superfield component expansionHere $\varphi$ is a complex scalar field, $\psi$ a Weyl spinor, and $F$ a nonpropagating auxiliary field; the $\sqrt{2}$ is their conventional normalization.

First assume global four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetry, canonical positive Kähler potential, and tree level. Write $W_i={\partial }_{i}W$ and $m_{ij}=W_{ij}$ at the stationary vacuum. The chiral-superfield fermion mass matrix is the symmetric matrix $m$, and the sum of squared Weyl spinor masses is $\mathrm{tr}(m^{†}m)$. From the F-term scalar potential $V={\sum }_k|W_k{|}^2$, its mixed and holomorphic Hessian matrix blocks areFor canonically normalized real and imaginary parts of the scalar fields, the real scalar mass matrix has trace twice the mixed trace. Its holomorphic blocks can split the two real scalar masses but do not change their sum. HenceA Weyl spinor has two spin states, so this proves the tree-level supertrace mass sum rule,The paper defines its supertrace with $(-1{)}^{2j+1}$, the negative of the conventional boson-minus-fermion supertrace used here. The asserted zero is the same in either convention. The result requires the stated canonical tree-level hypotheses; a noncanonical Kähler metric, supergravity, or radiative corrections can change the sum rule.

If vector multiplets are also present, the gauge contributions to the F-term supertrace cancel rather than being omitted. At $D_a=0$, define $C={\sum }_a{g}_a^2\Vert T_{a}v{\Vert }^2$ for the scalar expectation vector $v$. Differentiating $\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_a{D}_a^2$ adds $2C$ to the real-scalar trace. The symmetric gaugino-matter mass matrix has off-diagonal entries $\sqrt{2}{g}_a{T}_{a}v$, giving an extra $4C$ in its fermion squared-mass trace. The covariant scalar kinetic term gives vector squared-mass trace $2C$. Thus their contribution is $2C-2(4C)+3(2C)=0$. The gauge-theory result uses all spin states, including the vector weight three; it is not obtained by dropping massive gauge partners.

The MSSM tree-level sfermion mass constraint explains the phenomenological difficulty with direct visible-sector breaking. If F-term breaking is neutral under an unbroken electric and color gauge symmetry, and no D-term shifts are present, the same trace argument applies within each conserved-charge fermion block. Its corresponding scalar partners cannot all have squared masses above the mean of the light fermion squared masses. Thus canonical tree-level visible-sector supersymmetry breaking alone cannot make every squark and other scalar partner heavy while leaving the observed fermions light. The usual effective soft supersymmetry breaking terms arise after communicating breaking from a separate sector; integrating out that sector, noncanonical interactions and radiative effects evade the hypotheses. The global trace identity alone would not identify a particular light squark without the conserved-charge block argument.

For the specified O'Raifeartaigh model, phases may be chosen so that $\lambda ,\mu ,M$ are real and positive. Its superpotential derivatives areand its F-term scalar potential isFor fixed $x,z$, choose $y=-2\lambda xz/M$ to minimize the final square. Since $|z^2-{\mu }^2{|}^2\ge (|z{|}^2-{\mu }^2{)}^2$,Thus $M^2>2{\lambda }^2{\mu }^2$ makes $z=y=0$ a global minimum with arbitrary $x$. The hierarchy $M\gg \mu$ ensures this for fixed perturbative $\lambda$, rather than for arbitrarily large $\lambda$. The origin is one member of this classically flat family, with $V_0={\lambda }^2{\mu }^4>0$ and $F_X=\lambda {\mu }^2$. The complex field $x$ is a pseudomodulus.

At the origin the chiral-superfield fermion mass matrix, in the $({\psi }_X,{\psi }_Y,{\psi }_Z)$ basis, isIts physical fermion masses are $0,M,M$; the two massive Weyl spinors form one massive four-component fermion. The massless ${\psi }_X$ is the goldstino. More generally, stationarity gives $W_{ij}\overline{W_j}=0$, so the nonzero auxiliary field direction is a null vector of $m$, proving the goldstino zero mode from vacuum stationarity.