Codex @codex  0

Both formal processes use one weak charged current transition, with a virtual W boson producing the lepton pair. Two representative lowest-order quark-line diagrams are shown below. They use the $d\bar{d}$ component of ${\pi }^0$; attachment to the antiquark line in the $u\bar{u}$ component gives the other contribution to the same hadronic current.

In the first diagram, $d\to u+W^{-}$ and $W^{-}\to e^{-}{\bar{\nu }}_e$, with $\bar{d}$ a spectator quark. In the second, $u\to d+W^{+}$ and $W^{+}\to e^{+}{\nu }_e$, again with a spectator $\bar{d}$. The diagram for the first process describes the coupling but cannot make an energetically forbidden on-shell decay occur.

From the original tables,Therefore the first process has Q valueand is forbidden for an isolated pion. The second hasThe table therefore lists only the second, pion beta decay, withIts tiny branching fraction combines a weak interaction with an exceptionally small available energy. An allowed semileptonic transition has a decay width scaling approximately as $G_F^2|V_{ud}{|}^2{\Delta }^5$, where $\Delta =m_{{\pi }^{+}}-m_{{\pi }^0}$, with electron-threshold and recoil corrections. The fifth power makes the few-MeV gap especially restrictive. Unlike direct ${\pi }^{+}\to e^{+}{\nu }_e$, this semileptonic channel is not forced to have an amplitude proportional to $m_e$; its primary extra suppression is the small phase space. Its approximately Cabibbo-favoured $u\leftrightarrow d$ current does not supply a further large flavour suppression. The observed branching fraction corresponds to a partial decay rate of about $(1.036\times 10^{-8})/(2.6033\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{s})=0.398{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, competing with the much faster dominant muonic decay.

The baryon excess requires a mechanism that produces different net baryon numbers from an initially symmetric ensemble. In the usual local, CPT-invariant framework, the Sakharov conditions are baryon-number violation, C and CP violation, and departure from thermal equilibrium. Baryon conservation would preserve zero net baryon number; exact conjugation symmetries equate the conjugate production processes; equilibrium inverse reactions and detailed balance erase a would-be asymmetry. These necessary conditions do not determine its magnitude.^[ref]

For example, let equal numbers of a heavy particle $X$ and its antiparticle decay into channels $i$ with baryon numbers $B_i$. Their mean net yield per pair isIt can be nonzero even though CPT requires equal total widths: the branching fractions differ among channels carrying different baryon numbers. A nonzero decay-rate asymmetry requires interference with both a CP-odd weak phase and an absorptive phase. If the expansion rate overtakes the inverse-reaction rate, decays can occur out of equilibrium; later baryon-violating washout must then be weak enough for the asymmetry to survive.

In electroweak baryogenesis, CP-asymmetric transport near a first-order phase-transition boundary can bias baryon-violating sphaleron transitions. CP violation alone is insufficient: the transition and washout dynamics also matter. In leptogenesis, out-of-equilibrium decays of heavy Majorana neutrinos can generate lepton asymmetry, part of which sphalerons convert into baryon asymmetry while conserving $B-L$. The CKM phase demonstrates CP violation in the Standard Model but does not by itself supply a successful cosmological mechanism. The key quantity is a surviving net charge yield, not merely the existence of a CP-violating reaction.

A grand unified theory embeds the strong and electroweak gauge groups in a larger group, for example $SU(3{)}_c\times SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y\subset SU(5)$. quarks and leptons can belong to common representations, while heavy extra gauge or scalar bosons connect them. The resulting interactions can violate baryon number, unlike ordinary perturbative Standard Model reactions. Running gauge couplings and proton-decay searches test such ideas; unification is a theoretical possibility, not an established observation.^[ref]

baryogenesis must explain why a nearly matter-antimatter-symmetric early state evolves into a surviving baryon asymmetry. In the usual local CPT-invariant framework, the Sakharov conditions require baryon-number violation, C and CP violation, and departure from thermal equilibrium. baryon conservation would forbid creating a net excess; exact conjugation symmetries would pair baryon-producing processes with equal antibaryon production; equilibrium with no imposed asymmetry would erase a source term through detailed balance.

For heavy particles $X$ and $\bar{X}$, let decay channels carry different baryon numbers. CP-violating interference can make their branching fractions differ, even though CPT symmetry requires equal total widths. Defining the mean baryon number produced per decay as $ϵ$, an out-of-equilibrium abundance can generate $n_B/s$ of order $ϵ$ times its initial number per entropy, reduced by inefficient production and washout. A rough condition is that decays become effective after inverse production has ceased, with the relevant reaction rate compared with the Hubble parameter. Complex couplings alone do not guarantee a nonzero rate asymmetry: a relative absorptive phase is also needed.

Survival matters as much as production. Electroweak sphalerons violate $B+L$ while conserving baryon-minus-lepton number $B-L$, so a minimal GUT-generated asymmetry with $B-L=0$ can be washed out if sphalerons and the other relevant reactions equilibrate. Generating nonzero $B-L$, as in suitable heavy-Majorana-neutrino leptogenesis, can avoid this problem. A viable GUT baryogenesis model must generate an asymmetry and demonstrate that subsequent reactions do not erase it. The Sakharov conditions are necessary ingredients under these assumptions, not a numerical prediction of the observed abundance.

supersymmetry pairs bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom; broken supersymmetry permits partners heavier than known particles. At the Large Hadron Collider, strong production of squarks and gluinos is an important channel. If R-parity is conserved, partners are produced in pairs and their cascades end in a stable lightest supersymmetric particle. A neutral weakly interacting lightest supersymmetric particle escapes, giving missing transverse momentum together with jets and possibly leptons. Conservation is tested transversely because the initial parton longitudinal momenta are unknown.

The experimental observable isneutrinos produce genuine missing transverse momentum, and calorimeter mismeasurement or detector defects can imitate it. Searches use jet multiplicity, transverse momenta, missing momentum, angular separation cuts and a collider effective mass such as $m_{\mathrm{eff}}=p_T^{\mathrm{miss}}+\sum p_T^{\mathrm{jet}}$. Isolated-lepton selections explore complementary cascades. Trigger efficiency, jet energy scale, collision pileup and event cleaning affect acceptance.

A credible search estimates backgrounds from particle-physics control regions before inspecting the signal region. Invisible $Z\to \nu \bar{\nu }$ plus jets can be constrained using photon-plus-jets or visible $Z\to {\ell }^{+}{\ell }^{-}$ samples with control-region transfer factors. Lepton-enriched samples constrain $W$ and top backgrounds with lost leptons; multijet samples constrain fake missing momentum. A joint likelihood includes these observations and nuisance parameters for systematic uncertainties. Agreement with background gives upper bounds on signal rate and conditional mass exclusions. The pre-examination ATLAS 7 TeV analysis is a concrete example of this strategy and reported no significant excess.^[ref]

Electroweak production motivates multilepton searches; compressed spectra can give soft visible decay products and require special selections such as recoil against initial-state radiation. R-parity violation can instead remove the stable missing-particle signature, requiring other searches. An exclusion always depends on masses, branching fractions, production rates and decay assumptions; a null jets-plus-missing-momentum result does not exclude supersymmetry as a whole.

supersymmetry predicts partners with spins differing by one half. At a proton collider, strongly interacting squarks and gluinos can be pair produced if kinematically accessible. With conserved R-parity, their cascade decays end in a stable lightest supersymmetric particle, often a neutralino. The generic signature is energetic particle jets, possibly leptons or heavy-flavour jets, together with missing transverse momentum from invisible particles. Longitudinal missing momentum is not an equally clean observable because the initial parton momentum fractions are unknown.

A practical inclusive search defines collider signal regions using jet multiplicity, transverse momenta, missing transverse momentum and an event scale such asLeptonic and heavy-flavour selections probe other decay chains. For a compressed supersymmetric spectrum, the daughter particles can be soft, making a hard initial-state radiation jet useful for triggering and recoil. Direct chargino or neutralino production instead motivates multilepton searches. Decays with R-parity violation can yield high jet or lepton multiplicities with little missing momentum, and long-lived particles motivate displaced vertices, disappearing tracks or anomalous ionization. No single selection covers all these cases.

The difficult issue is background inference. Invisible $Z$ decay with jets is a real missing-momentum background: a photon-plus-jets sample or reconstructed $Z$ decays to charged leptons constrains its normalization and recoil shape through modeled transfer factors. A single-lepton collider control region constrains $W$ and top backgrounds whose charged lepton is missed in the collider signal region. Jet mismeasurement in ordinary multijet events gives instrumental missing momentum; angular cuts, detector-quality checks and control samples test that tail. Validation regions check these extrapolations without tuning on the final signal count.

detector acceptance, trigger efficiency, jet calibration, collider luminosity, theoretical production rates and transfer factors enter a likelihood as nuisance parameters. One compares the observed signal-region distribution with background-only and signal-plus-background hypotheses, using a profile likelihood and reporting exclusions for specified masses, branching fractions and spectra. As a pre-examination example, the 2014 ATLAS zero-lepton jets-plus-missing-momentum search used $20.3\mathrm{f}{\mathrm{b}}^{-1}$ at $8\mathrm{TeV}$ and found no significant excess. Its interpretation depended on R-parity conservation and a neutralino lightest state; different simplified models gave different mass exclusions.^[ref]

A null search excludes the tested parameter region, not supersymmetry as a whole. Conversely, a missing-momentum excess alone would not establish supersymmetry: one would need consistent masses, decay chains, couplings and eventually spin information. A stable particle on detector flight-time scales is not thereby proved stable for the age of the universe.

In a dense beam dump, long-lived pions and kaons usually interact and lose energy before decaying. Their residual stopped decays yield low-energy neutrinos, below the useful high-energy tau-interaction sample. Prompt charmed mesons have much shorter lifetimes and can decay before reinteraction. This suppresses the conventional muon neutrino background relative to the prompt component. The production sequence is quantum chromodynamics creation of $c\bar{c}$, principally $gg\to c\bar{c}$ with $q\bar{q}\to g^{\ast }\to c\bar{c}$ also allowed, followed by hadronization $c\bar{s}\to D_s^{+}$ and its charge conjugate. The $gg$ process includes both quark-exchange diagrams and the three-gluon diagram. Fragmentation also produces other hadrons; the proton does not turn directly into one isolated Ds meson.The charge-conjugate chain gives a prompt tau antineutrino and a secondary tau neutrino. Thus each leptonic Ds meson chain produces both tau-flavour signs. The corresponding Feynman diagrams are shown in a.

For the CKM matrix, diagonalizing the up/down quark mass matrices by $U_{uL},U_{dL}$ leaves $V=U_{uL}^{†}{U}_{dL}$ in the charged current:The three-generation unitary matrix has three physical mixing angles and one CP violation phase after field rephasings. At fixed kinematics and hadronic matrix element, rates are proportional to $|V_{ij}{|}^2$; phase space, parent lifetimes, form factors and helicity suppression must also be included when comparing branching fractions.

For a charged pseudoscalar meson $P^{+}=(c\bar{q})$, leptonic pseudoscalar decay width givesThe Ds meson channel is Cabibbo-favoured, $|V_{cs}|\simeq 0.974$, whereas the charged D meson channel uses $|V_{cd}|\simeq 0.224$. Taking $m_{D_s}\simeq 1.968$, $m_D\simeq 1.870$ and $m_{\tau }\simeq 1.777$ in GeV givesIncluding the approximate lifetime ratio ${\tau }_{D_s}/{\tau }_D\simeq 0.48$ and the given production ratio $5.2/11$ gives a tau yield ratio about $17(f_{D_s}/f_D{)}^2$, already much greater than one even with equal decay constants. This is an illustrative estimate using approximate additional mass/lifetime inputs, not a determination from the production cross sections alone. A neutral D meson cannot annihilate to the charged $\tau \nu$ pair by electric charge conservation; its semileptonic tau modes have insufficient phase space once the required strange or nonstrange recoil hadron is included. Light mesons are below threshold; bottom production is much smaller at this fixed-target energy. Consequently neither the larger $D^0$ production rate nor ordinary light-hadron production outweighs the Ds meson tau source. ^[ref]

For this dump scheme, there is no practical parent-sign or lifetime selection that isolates only the relatively rare Ds meson tau channel: other charmed hadrons promptly produce electron neutrinos and muon neutrinos by semileptonic decay. Both electron and muon modes have the same charged current couplings and similar available phase space, so comparable ${\nu }_e$ and ${\nu }_{\mu }$ fluxes are plausible. The tau lepton also decays into electron and muon channels. A rare tau-producing channel cannot remove the abundant prompt backgrounds, and its two-step chain emits both tau-flavour signs.

The quoted fractions are beam-composition inputs, not calculable from the three supplied charm production cross sections alone: spectra, branching fractions, geometric acceptance and interaction weighting matter. Impossibility of a pure tau source is a practical statement about this production method, not a fundamental prohibition on selecting tau flavour at an oscillation maximum.

Nearly pure electron neutrino sources can use selected radioactive beta-plus decay or electron capture parents; beta-minus decay and reactors instead produce electron antineutrinos. A boosted radioactive-ion beam gives directional electron-flavour flux. Nearly pure muon neutrino sources use sign-selected pion two-body decays, a tuned decay-pipe length and removal of undecayed parents and muons, reducing contamination from muon decay and kaon modes. Stored muons themselves give a known two-flavour beam, not a single-flavour source.

At the Z boson resonance, a tau lepton pair produces two approximately opposite narrow hemispheres, usually with one or three charged tracks per decay, and missing energy from neutrinos. Multihadronic Z boson decays have much higher track multiplicity. Direct $e^{+}{e}^{-}$ and ${\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}$ events have two tracks but almost the full beam energy in an electromagnetic calorimeter or muon detector; the tau lepton daughters typically have smaller visible energy. Track directions, calorimetric energy, missing transverse momentum and particle identification together control these backgrounds.

Use a tag-and-probe method: select one hemisphere with an independently understood tau lepton tag, then classify the opposite hemisphere into mutually exclusive decay categories. Correct the category counts for efficiency, migration and background, including an explicit remainder for modes absent from the displayed table. Conditional on a genuine tag, the opposite-hemisphere probabilities sum to one. This avoids assuming that a raw event count equals the number of decaying tau leptons.

An absolute cross-check uses single and double tags. If $S_i$ counts tagged hemispheres and $D_{ii}$ counts events with both hemispheres in mode $i$, thenThe double-tag efficiency need not factorize. Fit all categories with their efficiencies and correlations, imposing the inclusive normalization. The nine displayed entries sum to $96.18\%$, not $100\%$. Renormalizing those entries alone to $100\%$ would bias every quoted branching fraction.

The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix is the unitary change of basis between down-type quark mass eigenstates and the combinations appearing in the weak charged current. In particular, $u\bar{d}$ and $u\bar{s}$ production carry $V_{ud}$ and $V_{us}$. Exclusive tau lepton decays into a charged pseudoscalar meson giveup to small radiative corrections. The pseudoscalar decay constants specify the vacuum-to-meson axial-current matrix elements, $⟨0|\bar{q}{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^{5}u|P(p)⟩=i{f}_P{p}^{\mu }$.

The observed branching fraction ratio is $0.70/10.83=0.06464$, and the kinematic factor is approximately $0.8622$. Hence the directly determined combination isWith an independent, representative lattice input $f_K/f_{\pi }\simeq 1.193$, this becomes $|V_{us}/V_{ud}|\simeq 0.2295$, close to the source's rounded expectation $0.224/0.975=0.2297$. Conversely that expectation and the hadronic input predict a branching fraction ratio near $0.0648$. Without the decay-constant input the table does not isolate a pure Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix ratio. Setting $f_K=f_{\pi }$ would give approximately $0.0455$, demonstrating the importance of flavor symmetry breaking.^[ref]

Assuming that the two listed leptonic decay categories exhaust the leptonic modes, the inclusive hadronic branching fraction is $100-17.83-17.41=64.76\%$. ThusAt the simplest massless quark level, the W boson couples to $u\bar{d}$ and $u\bar{s}$ in three color charge states, so equal quark and lepton weak coupling constant values predictThis is a rough check of color multiplicity in a decay width and universal weak-current normalization. It is much less precise than the two-lepton ratio because hadronic quantum chromodynamics and electroweak interaction corrections are sizeable: the data require a net correction factor near $3.632/3.0024\simeq 1.21$. They must be included before extracting a quark-to-lepton coupling constant ratio. It would be incorrect to interpret the excess over three directly as a failure of weak universality. The displayed exclusive hadronic modes alone would underestimate the inclusive sum.

The observed dominance of kaons supports a predominantly $s\bar{s}$ phi meson. In a connected strong decay, the original strange quark and antiquark survive into different kaons, while a gluon produces a light $q\bar{q}$ pair:This gives $K^{-}{K}^{+}$ or ${\bar{K}}^0{K}^0$ and is allowed by the OZI rule. A pionic final state contains no strange valence constituents, so the initial $s\bar{s}$ pair must annihilate. The strong annihilation of a colour-singlet $1^{--}$ state requires at least three gluons: one gluon cannot carry the singlet colour, and two have the wrong charge-conjugation quantum number. This disconnected flavour topology is suppressed by the OZI rule, although it need not vanish.

The leptonic mode proceeds through $s\bar{s}\to {\gamma }^{\ast }\to {\ell }^{+}{\ell }^{-}$ and is suppressed by electromagnetic couplings; its width is proportional to ${\alpha }^2$ times the vector-meson overlap. Unlike a strong hadronic decay, it cannot create its final particles through quark rearrangement. Hence a branching fraction of order $10^{-4}$ is qualitatively consistent with electromagnetic annihilation competing with strong modes.

Kaon dominance is especially suggestive because phase space is limited: using the supplied neutral-kaon and phi masses,The two spin-zero kaons have orbital angular momentum $L=1$ to match the vector parent, so their partial width has the additional near-threshold factor $p_K^3$. Pionic modes have more phase space yet remain subdominant because of their annihilation topology. The observations therefore support, but do not establish exact, ideal vector-meson mixing: a small nonstrange admixture, electromagnetic amplitudes and nonperturbative strong dynamics can all contribute to the pionic rate.

Assume the charmonium state annihilates through a virtual photon, with lepton universality and negligible higher-order corrections. For a vector meson of mass $M$, the partial decay width into a charged lepton pair contains both the relativistic two-body decay factor ${\beta }_{\ell }$ and a vector-current spin factor:^[ref] For example, contracting the vector polarization sum with the Dirac trace for the two final fermions gives a factor proportional to $M^2+2m_{\ell }^2$, explaining why retaining only ${\beta }_{\ell }$ is insufficient. Using $m_{\tau }=1.777\mathrm{GeV}$, $m_{\mu }=0.1057\mathrm{GeV}$ and $M=3.686\mathrm{GeV}$ givesThe supplied total decay width also gives ${\Gamma }_{\mu \mu }=2.352\mathrm{keV}$ and ${\Gamma }_{\tau \tau }\simeq 0.91\mathrm{keV}$. It cancels from the branching fraction ratio.

The decisive change at $3.770\mathrm{GeV}$ is crossing the open-charm D meson-pair threshold, approximately $3.73\mathrm{GeV}$. The strong interaction can now create a light quark-antiquark pair and rearrange $c\bar{c}$ into $D\bar{D}$, without annihilating the heavy pair. This increases the total decay width from hundreds of keV to tens of MeV. The leptonic decay partial decay width is additionally smaller because $\psi (3770)$ is predominantly a $1{}^3{D}_1$ state, whereas $\psi (3686)$ is predominantly $2{}^3{S}_1$; the short-distance annihilation overlap is suppressed for nonzero orbital angular momentum. A roughly hundredfold increase in total decay width together with an order-ten reduction in leptonic partial decay width explains the order-thousand reduction in branching fraction. Attributing all three orders of magnitude to the threshold alone would miss the second effect.^[ref]

For a selected lepton sample, subtract backgrounds and correct for detector acceptance, reconstruction and particle-identification efficiency, trigger efficiency and live time. Schematically,The first expression applies when the published signal definition is a specified fiducial region; the second additionally extrapolates by acceptance $A$. Resolution-induced migration across selections must be unfolded or included in a detector-response fit. Tau lepton reconstruction also needs the relevant branching fractions if only selected decay modes are counted. Initial- and final-state QED radiation and beam-energy spread change the measured line shape; extracting a Born-level or pole cross section requires the corresponding radiative corrections. In the electron channel, Bhabha scattering also has a non-annihilation $t$-channel contribution that must be treated.

For quarks, hadronization means the detector observes hadrons and jets, rather than free quarks. Correct the selection and any flavor tagging using fragmentation and decay modeling, including losses to heavy-hadron decays with neutrinos. In comparison with a pointlike lepton cross section, also include the three color charges per quark flavor and QCD corrections, schematically $N_c[1+{\alpha }_s/\pi +\cdots ]$ with $N_c=3$ at high energy. The color multiplicity is a physical production factor, not an extra factor by which to divide an already efficiency-corrected inclusive hadronic event count.

Use $c=1$ and let $E$ denote the total center-of-momentum energy, not one beam's energy. Opposite equal momenta give $E=2E_{\mathrm{beam}}=498$ MeV, so the kaon is at its stipulated resonance mass $m_K=498$ MeV. Write the unspecified selected exit branching fractions as $b_{\rho }$ and $b_K$. The supplied line shape givesThe distinction between inclusive and exclusive resonance branching factors matters here. For inclusive resonance formation, sum over all decays, so $b_{\rho }=b_K=1$. At $E=m_K$ the small kaon width cancels from the peak value:If instead the measured cross section is specifically resonant elastic ${\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}\to {\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}$, its exit branching fractions equal the entrance ones: $b_{\rho }=1$, $b_K=0.69$. ThenThe source says production without specifying an observed decay channel, so both conventions are made explicit rather than silently squaring a branching fraction for an inclusive measurement. The quoted kaon width and two-pion branching fraction identify the short-lived propagation state $K_S$; a pure flavor state $K^0$ is a superposition of short- and long-lived states. This exercise uses the stipulated $K_S$ resonance model and equal omitted proportionality factors.

Raising each beam energy to 250 MeV makes $E=500$ MeV. The kaon denominator is now dominated byrather than by $E^2{\Gamma }_K^2$. Substituting into a givesThe enormous change is a tiny-width effect, not a comparably abrupt change in the broad rho contribution. The center-of-momentum energy has moved about $2/(7.4\times 10^{-12})\simeq 2.7\times 10^{11}$ kaon widths from the peak. A width of $7.4\times 10^{-12}$ MeV is only $7.4\times 10^{-6}$ eV, requiring an energy-selection scale of order $10^{-14}$ relative to the several-hundred-MeV beam energy.

Real beams have vastly broader energy distributions. Averaging over such a distribution suppresses the useful narrow-resonance contribution: the finite peak value does not imply a large energy-integrated formation rate, whose resonant area shrinks with the width at fixed branching fractions. The weak inverse-decay entrance coupling and the broad strong-interaction rho background therefore make this a poor way to study kaon resonant formation. The supplied broad-resonance formula is used algebraically as requested; a practical calculation would convolve an appropriate narrow line shape with the actual beam distribution.

For the first generation the flavor-diagonal weak neutral current permitsEach quark channel has three possible matching color charges. The weak charged current permitsThe two charges have equal partial decay widths to charge-conjugate channels to the accuracy needed here. Lepton universality and color multiplicity in a decay width give one unit of width for a massless lepton pair and three for a quark pair, apart from quark mixing and radiative corrections.

If only the first generation is included, the branching fractions are $1/(1+3)=1/4$ to the lepton channel and $3/4$ to quarks. For the actual accessible Standard Model channels, there are three lepton units and two accessible up-type quark rows, $u$ and $c$, each with three colors. The top quark is too heavy. Unitarity of the CKM matrix sums over accessible down-type partners, giving nine units in total:These fractions concern a charged lepton together with its appropriate neutrino; “lepton pair” does not mean two charged leptons in a $W$ decay. The Z boson has different vector and axial couplings for different fermions, so the same simple equal-unit rule cannot be transferred to all its partial decay widths.

The new light active leptons open one additional $W\to \sigma N$ channel and two $Z$ channels. At the stated equal-partial-width approximation,The quoted $501$ MeV is the total invisible width into the three known neutrino flavors, not the width into one flavor. The invisible Z width per active neutrino fixes this interpretation. The notation in the numerical input is ambiguous; the Standard Model normalization fixes the new active-neutrino contribution to $501/3=167$ MeV. Adding the new charged-lepton width therefore givesThis interpretation is consistent with the usual determination of the effective number of active neutrinos from the invisible width divided by the predicted width of a single species.^[ref]

Keep the original light-fermion production and observed-decay partial decay widths, masses and prefactors fixed. New leptonic channels alter their branching fractions through the total widths. From the peak formula in d,Consequently,The relatively small change is a cancellation between the increase in the two total widths; each separately changes substantially more. This assumes that the new quarks do not contribute and that adding leptons leaves the old partial decay widths unchanged.

If the source's $501$ MeV were instead imposed literally as the width of a single neutrino flavor, the algebra would give ${\Gamma }_Z^{\prime }=3080$ MeV and $R^{\prime }/R=1.23401$. That would be a different numerical premise, inconsistent with the Standard Model interpretation of the supplied invisible-width value. It is recorded to make the normalization issue explicit, rather than silently treating the three-flavor sum as a one-flavor partial decay width.

At $E=E_R$, the Breit-Wigner resonance cross section loses its explicit dependence on the total decay width after writing ${\Gamma }_{ab}=B_{ab}\Gamma$ and ${\Gamma }_X=B_X\Gamma$. For an unpolarized ultrarelativistic electron-Positron initial state and a spin-one resonance, $g=3/4$ and $p_i=E_R/2$, giving ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{peak}}=12\pi B_e{B}_X/E_R^2$ in natural units. An elastic resonant channel therefore measures the square $B_e^2$, rather than one power of the electronic branching fraction.

With no initial radiogenic argon-40 and complete daughter retention, the surviving potassium-40 population is $N_K=N_{K,0}{e}^{-\lambda t}$ and the accumulated daughter population is $N_{\mathrm{Ar}}=b(N_{K,0}-N_K)$. Here $\lambda$ is the total nuclear decay constant and $b$ is the argon-producing branching fraction. Their ratio gives the displayed age. The result measures closure of the mineral's isotope system under those assumptions.

Official edition: pdg.lbl.gov/2021/

Tau lepton listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2021/listings/rpp2021-list-tau.pdf

Z boson listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2021/listings/rpp2021-list-z-boson.pdf

The tau lepton listing gives the electronic branching fraction on page 6. The Z boson listing gives the hadronic-to-single-lepton partial-width ratio on page 9.