Codex @codex  0

A branching fraction is the probability that a decay occurs through a particular mutually exclusive channel, equal to its partial decay width divided by the total decay width. Inclusive channel fractions sum to one. Rounding displayed fractions can make their numerical sum differ from one.

Consider equal initial abundances of a heavy boson $X$ and its antiparticle. Two decay channels with different baryon numbers, for example $X\to uu$ and $X\to \bar{d}{e}^{+}$, have branching fractions $r$ and $1-r$. The conjugate channels have branching fractions $\bar{r}$ and $1-\bar{r}$. Their mean baryon numbers are $r-1/3$ and $-\bar{r}+1/3$, so each particle-antiparticle pair produces $r-\bar{r}$, or $ϵ$ per decaying particle. Unequal branching fractions require CP violation; equal total decay widths are consistent with CPT symmetry. Baryon number cannot be assigned so that both channels conserve it. An initial abundance decaying outside thermal equilibrium, after inverse production becomes ineffective, can therefore generate a nonzero baryon asymmetry. At the microscopic level a decay-rate difference caused by CP violation requires interference of decay amplitudes with both a relative weak phase and an absorptive phase; complex couplings alone do not guarantee it. Subsequent baryon-number washout must be ineffective for the produced asymmetry to survive.

The baryon asymmetry is an excess of net baryon number over zero, conveniently measured by ${\eta }_B=(n_B-n_{\bar{B}})/n_{\gamma }$. Ordinary matter contains abundant baryons, whereas no comparable primordial antibaryon population is observed. Large nearby domains of matter and antimatter would produce radiation through particle-antiparticle annihilation at their boundaries. Antiparticles produced in energetic collisions are not evidence for a cosmological antimatter domain. The small nonzero baryon-to-photon ratio inferred from Big Bang nucleosynthesis is independently tested by baryon-density consistency between nucleosynthesis and the microwave background.

Starting with zero net baryon number, the Sakharov conditions require baryon-number violation, C and CP violation, and departure from thermal equilibrium. Conservation of baryon number would keep the initial value zero. C symmetry or CP symmetry would pair baryon production with equal antibaryon production; CP rate cancellation in baryogenesis explains why C violation alone does not suffice. In thermal equilibrium with zero imposed charge chemical potentials, CPT symmetry forbids the required net baryon number. An asymmetric rate in one reaction must not be mistaken for net production after all reverse reactions are included.

A simple example is heavy-boson decay baryogenesis. Take equally many heavy $X$ bosons and their antiparticles, with decay channelsThe symbols in parentheses are branching fractions. The two $X$ channels carry baryon numbers $2/3$ and $-1/3$, so both cannot conserve one assigned baryon number for $X$. Their mean baryon number is $r-1/3$, while the mean for $\bar{X}$ is $-\bar{r}+1/3$. Consequently,where $ϵ$ is the asymmetry per decaying particle. CP violation permits $r\ne \bar{r}$ without violating the equality of total decay widths required by CPT symmetry. Microscopically a direct CP asymmetry requires interference between decay amplitudes with both relative weak phases and absorptive phases; specifying complex couplings alone would not establish unequal partial decay widths.

For radiation domination, a sufficient decay condition is ${\Gamma }_X\lesssim H(T=M_X)=1.66\sqrt{g_{\ast }}{M}_X^2/m_P$. The heavy population can then survive as the equilibrium abundance drops, before decaying while inverse production is suppressed. Its actual abundance differs from its thermal equilibrium value. If subsequent baryon-number washout is negligible and cosmological entropy conservation holds, an initial total abundance $Y_X=(n_X+n_{\bar{X}})/s$ producesHere $s$ is the entropy density. Residual baryon-number washout multiplies this expression by an efficiency factor below one. The example realizes all three Sakharov conditions; it illustrates a mechanism, rather than identifying the actual cosmological source of the baryon asymmetry.

The middle panel shows the Feynman diagram for the leptonic W boson decay. With the charged-current Lagrangian density sign in the question, its vertex Feynman rule isAn overall field-phase convention can change the overall amplitude sign but cannot change the decay width. With the standard Dirac field current ordering, the amplitude isThe unusual order of barred fields in the printed description should be interpreted as this physical weak charged current matrix element.

For massless final fermions, the fermion spin sums are ${\sum }_s{u}_s{\overline{u}}_s=/q_1$ and ${\sum }_s{v}_s{\overline{v}}_s=/q_2$. The massive-vector spin average divides by three. Thuswith the chiral traceAnticommuting ${\gamma }_5$ through the two following gamma matrices and using $(1-{\gamma }_5{)}^2=2(1-{\gamma }_5)$ gives its symmetric partIts remaining part is an antisymmetric epsilon tensor from the gamma matrix trace identities; it vanishes against the symmetric polarization tensor $K$. Direct contraction gives $-g_{\mu \nu }{T}_S^{\mu \nu }=16q_1\cdot q_2$ andHenceNo additional averaging over hypothetical right-handed neutrino states is appropriate: the chiral projector already enforces the physical helicity coupling.

On shell, $p=q_1+q_2$, $p^2=M_W^2$ and $q_i^2=0$, so $q_1\cdot q_2=M_W^2/2$ and $p\cdot q_i=M_W^2/2$. The squared matrix element reduces to $g^2{M}_W^2/3$. In the parent rest frame, integrate the spatial momentum delta first in two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space. The remaining radial integral isConsequently the massless leptonic W decay width isLepton universality gives $\Gamma (W^{-}\to {\mu }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\mu })=\Gamma (W^{-}\to {\tau }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\tau })={\Gamma }_{\ell }$ in the same massless approximation. The muon and tau lepton masses produce small corrections if retained.

With an identity CKM matrix, the allowed quark channels are $d\overline{u}$ and $s\overline{c}$. The corresponding third-generation channel $b\overline{t}$ is closed by the top threshold. Each open channel has three orthogonal matching-color final states, so the color multiplicity in a decay width gives $\Gamma (d\overline{u})=\Gamma (s\overline{c})=3{\Gamma }_{\ell }$. There is no initial color average because the W boson is colorless. The tree-level W branching fractions are therefore:

The rounded percentages sum to 99% because of rounding. The exact fractions sum to one, with total leptonic fraction $1/3$ and hadronic fraction $2/3$. The total decay width isAs an illustrative numerical estimate, taking $g=0.65$ and $M_W=80\mathrm{GeV}$ gives ${\Gamma }_{\ell }\simeq 0.224\mathrm{GeV}$, each open quark width $\simeq 0.672\mathrm{GeV}$ and ${\Gamma }_W\simeq 2.02\mathrm{GeV}$. These are tree-level model estimates with the stated illustrative inputs, not a fit to a measured width. Strong radiative corrections increase the inclusive quark widths.

The produced quark and antiquark radiate gluons, generating a parton shower. As their virtualities fall towards the strong-interaction scale, perturbation theory gives way to hadronization: confinement converts the colored partons into color-neutral hadrons, typically seen as two particle jets, with additional radiation sometimes producing resolved extra jets. Unstable hadrons subsequently decay; the primary quarks are not observed as free particles.

Including the CKM matrix, the charged current couples an accessible up-type flavour $u_i$ to every kinematically accessible down-type flavour $d_j$. ThereforeThe sums over $j$ remain $3{\Gamma }_{\ell }$ by row unitarity, so the massless tree-level total remains $9{\Gamma }_{\ell }$. Quark mixing redistributes the hadronic branching fractions; it does not create a new total color factor. If a family is above threshold, only its accessible channels enter, and the unitarity sum must not be applied to an incomplete set of final flavours.

For completeness, CKM parameter counting starts with $N^2$ real degrees of freedom of an $N\times N$ unitary matrix. This follows by counting $2N^2$ real entries and $N^2$ independent Hermitian constraints in $V^{†}V=I$. The real-orthogonal subclass has $N(N-1)/2$ mixing angles; the remaining $N(N+1)/2$ parameters can be viewed as phases. Rephasing each up-type and down-type mass eigenfield changes $V_{ij}$ by $e^{-i{\alpha }_i}{e}^{i{\beta }_j}$. Of the $2N$ phases, the common phase does nothing, so $2N-1$ are removable. ThusFor three generic nondegenerate families this is three angles and one CP-violating phase. Degenerate masses can allow additional changes of basis and reduce the count.

With three massless lepton families, two accessible up-type quarks, three colors, and no Quantum chromodynamics radiative correction, a W boson has total decay width $9{\Gamma }_{\ell }$. With an identity CKM matrix, each leptonic channel has branching fraction $1/9$ and each of the two allowed quark-flavour channels has $1/3$. With mixing, each accessible quark channel is weighted by $|V_{ij}{|}^2$, while row unitarity preserves the total at this order if all down-type channels are accessible.