Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ib Paper 1 10E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
A function is differentiable at if there is a linear map such thatThe map , which is unique, is the derivative .
The inverse function theorem states that if is continuously differentiable near and is invertible, then restricts to a bijection between neighbourhoods of and ; its local inverse is continuously differentiable, with derivativeIn the normalized case and , continuity of gives a closed ball on whichFor small , define . The mean value inequality makes a contraction mapping with constant . If , thenso maps the ball into itself. The contraction mapping theorem gives a unique fixed point , and the fixed-point equation is precisely . Moreover,so . Thus is a continuous local inverse.
For the polynomial map in the question,The derivative is invertible, so the inverse function theorem supplies some and a continuously differentiable such thatThere can be no inverse on all of , becauseso is not injective.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 105 3 ii Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
The preceding estimate gives constants such that, whenever ,Choose so that , and then choose so that . If , the closed ball is mapped into itself.
For , factor the cubic gradient nonlinearity asThe same Sobolev embedding theorem and the Holder inequality implyThe elliptic estimate therefore yieldsShrinking further makes , so is a contraction mapping of the closed ball. This ball is complete because is a Banach space. The contraction mapping theorem gives a fixed point , and its defining equation isThus the nonlinear elliptic boundary value problem has a solution for sufficiently small .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 11G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The Banach fixed-point theorem states that a contraction from a nonempty complete metric space to itself has a unique fixed point. Indeed, for ,so the geometric-series estimate makes Cauchy. Completeness gives a limit , continuity gives , andproves uniqueness.
Every solution of lies in . The cosine maps this complete interval into itself and, by the mean value theorem, has Lipschitz constant at most there. It therefore has exactly one real fixed point.
The mean value inequality says that on a convex domain, a uniform derivative bound implies . Equip with the maximum norm and takeFor , elementary cosine bounds giveso . The maximum absolute row sum ofis at most . The mean value inequality makes a contraction on the complete set , so it has a fixed point.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 1 10G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space satisfies: for every there is such that whenever . A complete metric space is one in which every Cauchy sequence converges to a point of the space.
Now suppose is complete and is a decreasing sequence of nonempty closed sets with . Choose . Given , choose with . For , both points lie in , so . Completeness gives . For each fixed , the tail lies in the closed set , hence . Therefore
Conversely, assume the nested-set property and let be Cauchy. DefineThese sets are nonempty, closed, and decreasing. The Cauchy property implies ; taking a closure does not change the diameter. Choose . Since ,Thus every Cauchy sequence converges and is complete. This proves the Cantor intersection theorem characterization.
The contraction mapping theorem states that a contraction of a nonempty complete metric space has a unique fixed point.
For each , the map is a contraction with the common constant , so it has a unique fixed point . This defines the required unique function. Fix . The fixed-point identities and the triangle inequality giveConsequentlyThe numerator tends to zero as by the assumed continuity for the fixed point . Hence is continuous, an instance of continuous dependence of the fixed point of a uniform contraction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 105 2 e Solution 2026-09-28
There is a sign issue in the printed problem. Part (c) constructs the inverse of , whereas the second equation printed in part (e) contains . The latter operator is invertible with homogeneous Dirichlet data only when is not a Dirichlet Laplacian eigenvalue. Thus the assertion as printed needs this nonresonance hypothesis; with a minus sign it follows directly from parts (c) and (d).
Under either the intended minus sign or the stated nonresonance condition, let and be the bounded Dirichlet solution operators for the two linear equations. Choose and work with . Since is a Sobolev algebra,DefineElliptic regularity gives, on a ball of radius ,and the difference estimate has Lipschitz constant at most . Choose small and then so that . The contraction mapping theorem gives a solution for . Repeated elliptic regularity and smoothness of bootstrap the solution to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 319 1 f Solution 2026-09-28
Write the nonlinearity asIn one dimension, the Sobolev embedding theorem gives . HenceThus is locally Lipschitz.
On defineOn a ball of radius , unitarity givesChoose and then small enough that the first bound preserves the ball and . The contraction mapping theorem gives a unique fixed point. Precisely, the local mild solution is
For general energy data , this solution need not be differentiable in . If , standard semilinear evolution theory and the smoothness of give a local classical solution.
The blow-up alternative for a semilinear evolution equation says that the solution continues while its norm stays finite, but global existence does not hold for every datum. Spatially constant solutions obeyFor sufficiently large with , the solution grows until and blows up in finite time. These constant functions are periodic and belong to every Sobolev space, so they provide finite-time blow-up examples for the original equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 2 2F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The contraction mapping theorem states that a contraction of a nonempty complete metric space has a unique fixed point, and that the iterates from every starting point converge to it. To prove this, choose and put . Thenso, for ,Thus is Cauchy and converges, by completeness, to some . A contraction is continuous, soIf is another fixed point, thenforcing .
For the Newton mapone has andOn the given neighbourhood,Since , choose a closed interval centred at and contained in so small that there. Thenso and is a contraction on the complete interval . The local contraction proof for Newton iteration therefore shows that is the unique fixed point of on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 105 3 d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
By the contraction mapping theorem, the contraction has a unique fixed point . The identity says exactly that is the weak solution of the linear initial boundary value problem whose forcing is . Consequently satisfieswith the prescribed initial and homogeneous Dirichlet data. Thus a sufficiently small gives a local weak solution of the semilinear wave equation, as summarized by the local weak solution by contraction for a semilinear wave equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ib Paper 4 2G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A contraction satisfies for some . Starting from , define . The geometric bound on successive distances makes Cauchy, so completeness gives a limit . Continuity of gives . If , then , hence . This is the contraction mapping theorem.
If is a contraction, it has a unique fixed point . Since , the point is also fixed by , so uniqueness gives . Every fixed point of is fixed by , so it too must equal . Thus has exactly one fixed point.
The polynomial factors as , so is a multiple root of multiplicity two. The Newton root-finding iteration isFor , cancelling a factor givesThis expression extends continuously to . Let . On this closed interval,Thus is increasing, andBy the mean value theorem, for all . The contraction mapping theorem states that a contraction mapping from a nonempty complete metric space into itself has a unique fixed point, and every fixed-point iteration converges to it. The closed interval with ordinary Euclidean distance is complete, and , soIn fact . The Newton iteration at a multiple root here has linear convergence, since . Thus the convergence assertion is true for the simplified fixed-point iteration, and for the usual Newton root-finding iteration that stops upon reaching an exact root of a polynomial. If one insists on applying the unsimplified quotient at every step, it is undefined for the allowed starting value , since both and vanish there; that literal version of an infinite sequence requires the stated stopping convention or continuous extension.
By the mean value theorem, for all real . Thus is a contraction mapping on the complete metric space . Starting from arbitrary , define . Induction gives . For , the triangle inequality and a geometric series yieldHence is a Cauchy sequence and completeness of the real numbers supplies a limit . The Lipschitz continuity of implies . Thus the limit is a fixed point, independently of the initial value. If were another, would force . This proves the contraction mapping theorem in this setting, with error estimate
For every real , , so there is no fixed point. Direct differentiation givesWriting , the inequality showsIn particular , but as . There is no common contraction constant smaller than one. Strict pointwise bounds on the derivative therefore do not suffice for the contraction mapping theorem.
Let be continuous in its first variable and uniformly Lipschitz continuous in its second variable, with constant . Retain the finite-interval smoothness assumptions and the bound from the preceding subpart. We first establish solvability of each implicit step. For a proposed starting state , the maphas Lipschitz constant . If , the contraction mapping theorem on the complete state space gives a unique next state .
To compute a useful Lipschitz constant for the method, introduce its increment function byFor two starting states ,Rearranging gives the implicit midpoint Lipschitz estimateThus, for example, gives an increment Lipschitz constant at most , uniformly as .
For an explicit global error estimate, set . Subtract the numerical formula from the exact-value identity containing :The Lipschitz condition and the triangle inequality implyand thereforeIterating this inequality is the elementary discrete Gronwall inequality argument. For , summing the geometric series and using givesFor , . If , this provesWith the exact initial value, , the global error is and tends uniformly to zero on every such finite interval. If , the recurrence instead gives , with the same conclusion. Starting values merely converging to the exact initial value also suffice for numerical convergence; second-order accuracy requires their errors to be . The result concerns exact implicit solves and convergence on fixed finite intervals, not uniform accuracy over an unbounded time interval.
Picard iteration Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-31
Picard iteration replaces a tentative trajectory by the accumulated integral of its proposed rate. For an initial value problem , , define the Picard map and its starting function byHere is the constant starting trajectory; the same symbol without its argument denotes the initial state. A fixed point of solves this integral equation, and the fundamental theorem of calculus gives the original ordinary differential equation.
For , , successive integrals giveAt , the first five values are , while . The fourth polynomial misses by about . On , every omitted term of the exponential series is nonnegative and increasing, so the largest error occurs at . The tail tends to zero, giving uniform convergence to the exponential function on this interval.
Picard iteration builds the exponential solution by repeated integration
. The first five polynomials approach the exponential function on . Endpoint values are listed in the legend; the last error is approximately . Details.The beauty of Picard iteration is that each proposed trajectory supplies a better rate history for the next one. For this example, one integration adds exactly the next term of the exponential series. In general, the integrals may be difficult to compute, but the construction still explains local existence and uniqueness.
The short contraction mapping argument needs two independent controls. Choose a time-state cylinder on whichThe second bound is the uniform local Lipschitz condition. Set with , and . In the function space of continuous functions , use the supremum norm . On its closed ball , direct integral estimates giveThus the map preserves the closed ball and is a contraction mapping there. This closed ball is a complete metric space, so the contraction mapping theorem gives convergence to exactly one fixed point. Any other local solution of a differential equation stays in the same ball after shortening its interval, and hence agrees there.
For , take , so in the state ball and , . Choosing gives and , with the actual solution satisfying . The plotted interval is longer than this simple guarantee: the explicitly computed exponential series converges there anyway. The condition is sufficient for this one-step contraction mapping argument, rather than a necessary lifespan bound.
Picard operator on a closed ball 2026-10-31
Suppose is continuous and Lipschitz in its state variable on a closed cylinder , , with bounds and Lipschitz constant . On a smaller interval of radius , the displayed Picard operator maps continuous curves in that closed ball into itself when , and it is a contraction mapping in the supremum norm when . This function space is complete because it is a closed subset of a Banach space of continuous vector-valued functions. The contraction mapping theorem gives a unique fixed point, and the fundamental theorem of calculus makes it a solution of the ordinary differential equation. Choosing also prevents any solution with the same initial data from first exiting the cylinder during that interval.
Stage solvability of an implicit Runge-Kutta method Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
For a vector field uniformly Lipschitz continuous in the state with constant , the stage fixed-point map of an implicit Runge-Kutta method is a contraction in the maximum stage norm if . The contraction mapping theorem then gives unique stages. This is a sufficient small-step condition; a dissipative vector field may permit solvability for larger steps. An algebraic stability or B-stability estimate compares existing stage solutions and should not be mistaken for an unqualified stage-existence theorem.
