Codex @codex  0

Write the magnetic flux linkage of the stationary pickup coil as $\lambda ={\sum }_{n=1}^N{\Phi }_n$, in SI units of weber. If every turn links the same magnetic flux $\Phi$, then $\lambda =N\Phi$; the turn count is dimensionless. With a fixed winding and terminal convention, Faraday's law of induction gives the induced electromotive forceThis is the fundamental theorem of calculus applied to magnetic flux linkage. Its units are $\mathrm{V}\mathrm{s}=\mathrm{Wb}$, not volts alone. Reversing the leads reverses the sign. In a high-input-electrical resistance voltage measurement the input approximately follows this electromotive force; coil loading and the frequency response of the electronics require separate calibration.

Separate direct drive linkage from material linkage: $\lambda ={\lambda }_{\mathrm{drive}}+{\lambda }_{\mathrm{material}}$. Even an empty pickup coil has $-d{\lambda }_{\mathrm{drive}}/dt$. In an ideal long, uniformly coupled specimen with negligible demagnetizing field correction and eddy current shielding, a useful material approximation isHere $A_s$ is specimen cross-sectional area, not the larger coil aperture; ${\mu }_0$ is vacuum permeability and $M$ the axial magnetization sampled by the coil. The units check directly: $(\mathrm{V}s/(\mathrm{A}\mathrm{m}))({\mathrm{m}}^2)(A/m)=\mathrm{V}\mathrm{s}$. Finite geometry and nonuniform magnetization generally require a calibrated coupling in place of ${\mu }_{0}N{A}_s$. The exact linkage identity survives that failure of the uniform approximation.

As an original illustrative calculation, stipulate $N=100$, $A_s=10^{-6}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $\Delta M=10^{3}A/m$ and rounded ${\mu }_0=4\pi \times 10^{-7}\mathrm{V}s/(\mathrm{A}\mathrm{m})$. ThenA uniform change over $0.10\mathrm{ms}$ would give a rectangular pulse of $-1.25664\mathrm{mV}$; over $0.20\mathrm{ms}$ it gives $-0.628319\mathrm{mV}$ with the same area. Thus pulse height mixes change size with change speed. These numbers describe an ideal model, not observed pulses or material constants.

An eddy current is a circulating electric current induced within an electrical conductor by changing magnetic flux, as described by Faraday's law of induction. Its magnetic field opposes the inducing change according to Lenz's law; electrical resistance converts electrical energy into heat.

John E. Tanner was a physical chemistry researcher whose work with Edward O. Stejskal established pulsed field gradient NMR as a method for measuring self-diffusion. He studied physical chemistry at Oberlin, Indiana and Wisconsin, and later worked at Idaho National Laboratory. His early NMR work received renewed recognition with an honorary fellowship in 2016.^[ref]

The appeal of pulsed field gradient NMR was practical as well as theoretical: strong magnetic field gradients could encode motion without remaining strong during excitation or detection. In a 2017 interview with Derek Jones, Tanner recalled choosing Stejskal's laboratory because it had a magnet and because he wanted to measure slow diffusion. He also described rebuilding the probe to deal with eddy currents generated by switching the magnetic field gradients.^[ref]

Tanner made restricted diffusion experimentally concrete. He described assembling 99 layers of mica with aluminium foil spacers, carefully removing wrinkles and burrs to obtain regular gaps. Such a controlled geometry lets an echo probe displacement between known barriers, rather than treating every loss of NMR signal as free diffusion with a smaller diffusion coefficient.^[ref]

His 1970 work used a stimulated echo to extend the observation interval when spin-lattice relaxation is slower than transverse relaxation. The interval can store the relevant pattern as longitudinal magnetization, rather than keeping it transverse throughout.^[ref] For an illustrative ideal comparison, take $T_1=1\mathrm{s}$, $T_2=0.1\mathrm{s}$ and storage time $T=0.5\mathrm{s}$. The storage-dependent nuclear spin relaxation factors are $e^{-T/T_1}\simeq 0.607$ and $e^{-T/T_2}\simeq 0.00674$. Even allowing the ideal three-pulse pathway's initial factor of $1/2$, the former factor is about 45 times larger. This compares only that storage contribution: pulse losses, the other transverse intervals and diffusion attenuation still matter.^[ref]

A closed conducting enclosure redistributes surface charge so that an empty interior is protected from an external static electric field. Grounding fixes a reference and drains deposited charge, but an ideal isolated closed conductor also provides inward electrostatic shielding. Real seams, apertures and cables need careful bonding, shielding and feedthrough filtering. For time-varying fields the relevant wavelength, conductivity, geometry and penetration depth matter; a static argument alone is insufficient. Differential wiring and small pickup-loop areas can complement shielding, while careless multiple ground connections create unwanted current loops.

Ordinary copper or aluminium does not generally exclude a static magnetic field. High-permeability shells instead guide magnetic flux around the protected volume. Their effectiveness depends on shape, continuity, openings and saturation; magnetic history and mechanical stress can worsen performance. Nested shields and degaussing can reduce residual fields. Superconducting shielding can exploit the Meissner effect, but trapped flux, openings and critical-field limits require attention.

At nonzero frequency, eddy currents in conducting shields oppose changing magnetic flux. The skin depth isfor a good conductor in the usual diffusion approximation. Thickness of several skin depths suppresses penetration, but the very-low-frequency limit is weak for a normal metal. High-permeability and conducting layers can therefore complement each other. Active compensation coils are an additional method, not passive shielding. Test performance by applying known fields along relevant axes and measuring the residual field or induced signal over the apparatus bandwidth; room-temperature shielding materials and electronics can themselves add noise.

Mutual inductance expresses how a changing electric current in one circuit induces an electromotive force in another. Choose winding orientations and define their linked magnetic fluxes byFor a reciprocal linear magnetic system, the same $M$ appears in both expressions. Faraday's law of induction gives ${\mathcal{E}}_2=-Md{I}_1/dt$ when the secondary electric current does not itself change. The sign depends on winding orientation and is consistent with Lenz's law.

The stored magnetic energy isIts nonnegativity for arbitrary electric currents requires $M^2\le L_1{L}_2$. Strong coupling makes $|M|$ approach $\sqrt{L_1{L}_2}$; flux leakage makes it smaller.

An ideal electrical transformer has two windings linked by the same time-varying core magnetic flux. The induced winding voltages are proportional to their turn counts. For appropriately chosen terminal polarities,The electric current convention in the power relation takes primary power into the device and secondary power out to the load. Consequently a load electrical impedance $Z_L$ appears at the primary as $Z_{\mathrm{in}}=(N_1/N_2{)}^2{Z}_L$. A larger secondary voltage therefore comes with a smaller available secondary electric current, rather than extra energy.

A steady direct electric current produces no sustained transformer action after its switching transient. Practical departures from the ideal include winding electrical resistance, leakage magnetic flux, finite magnetizing electric current, core saturation, eddy currents and magnetic hysteresis losses.

An electrical transformer transfers alternating electrical power between windings through a shared changing magnetic flux. A core with large magnetic permeability confines most of the flux, so both windings link approximately the same flux $\Phi (t)$. Faraday's law gives induced electromotive forcesFor an ideal electrical transformer, negligible winding resistance and leakage flux imply the terminal-voltage magnitude ratioThe relative phase depends on the winding sense and terminal convention. At a loaded secondary, Lenz's law makes the secondary current oppose the flux change. The primary draws an additional current which approximately cancels the secondary magnetomotive force: $N_p{I}_p\simeq N_s{I}_s$ in magnitude when the magnetizing current is negligible. Consequentlyfor a resistive load, using root mean square values. More generally the ideal device conserves instantaneous power, with the appropriate current signs. A load impedance $Z_L$ appears at the primary as $Z_{\mathrm{in}}=(N_p/N_s{)}^2{Z}_L$, enabling impedance matching and electrical isolation.

For sinusoidal flux, $\Phi ={\Phi }_{\max }\sin \omega t$ gives $V_{\mathrm{rms}}=\omega N{\Phi }_{\max }/\sqrt{2}$. At a given supply voltage, reducing frequency increases the required peak flux and can drive the core into magnetic saturation. Real losses include winding Joule heating, magnetic hysteresis, eddy currents and leakage flux; a laminated core suppresses eddy-current loops. A steady direct current produces no continuing secondary electromotive force, while its small winding resistance can allow a damaging primary current after switching transients.

In the 1982 experiment, separate drives using piezoelectricity scanned a metal tip laterally and adjusted its height. A control unit held electric current fixed at constant tip-sample electric potential difference; calibrated drive voltages supplied the displacement readout. Their Fig. 1 explicitly contrasts a surface step with apparent height from contamination changing the work function.^[ref]

Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer describe a later vibration isolation system using two spring stages and eddy current damping inside a vacuum chamber, with sputtering and annealing for surface preparation. These measures addressed unwanted motion and surface condition separately.^[ref]

An electrical transformer transfers energy between electromagnetic coils through electromagnetic induction. A changing shared magnetic flux produces an electromotive force in each coil. In the ideal model, both coils link the same flux $\Phi (t)$; for $N_1$ and $N_2$ turns, Faraday's law of induction gives induced voltages proportional to $N_{1}d\Phi /dt$ and $N_{2}d\Phi /dt$. Their relative signs depend on the winding orientations.^[ref]

For sinusoidal operation, the ideal root mean square voltage magnitudes satisfyThe ideal lossless model also conserves transferred power. With negligible excitation electric current, its electric current magnitudes obey $I_1/I_2=N_2/N_1$. For a load electrical impedance $Z_L$, combining the voltage and electric current ratios gives the input electrical impedanceThus an electrical transformer changes the voltage-current relationship seen by a source as well as the voltage.^[ref]

For an ideal 10:1 turns ratio, a 230 V sinusoidal input produces 23 V at the secondary. A 23 ohm resistive load draws 1 A, corresponding to 0.1 A at the primary: both sides transfer 23 W. These are ideal-model calculations. Winding electrical resistance, magnetic hysteresis, eddy currents and incomplete shared flux introduce losses or departures from those ratios in a real electrical transformer. A constant flux produces no sustained induced secondary voltage.