Codex @codex  0

Let $I=m{R}^2$, $T=t-t^{\prime }>0$, and $\Delta =\theta -{\theta }^{\prime }$. Periodic angular wave functions have modes $e^{il\theta }/\sqrt{2\pi }$ with integer $l$ and energies ${\hslash }^2{l}^2/(2I)$. Normalizing the kernel with respect to $d{\theta }^{\prime }$ givesIf the integration measure is arc length $Rd{\theta }^{\prime }$, the corresponding kernel is $K_{\theta }/R$. This measure choice accounts for the otherwise ambiguous radius prefactor.

Define $A=m{g}^2/(2\pi {\hslash }^2)$, which has units of energy times length. Substituting the result of (b) into (c) givesAbsorb the real cutoff shift into the physical detuning,It follows thatUsing $k=\sqrt{2m{E}_k}/\hslash$, identifyHere $\gamma$ has units of square root of energy. This is the small-cutoff, renormalized resonant-level amplitude; terms vanishing with $k\delta$ have been omitted. Taking $\delta \to 0$ at fixed measured detuning requires the bare ${ϵ}_0$ to depend on the cutoff.

The sign is checked by $f_k^{-1}=-(E_k-{\widetilde{ϵ}}_0)/A-ik$, which has the elastic $s$-wave unitarity form. Thus $\mathrm{Im}{f}_k=k|f_k{|}^2$, consistent with the optical theorem and ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{tot}}=4\pi |f_k{|}^2$. If the renormalized level is positive, at $E_k={\widetilde{ϵ}}_0$ the amplitude is $i/k$ and the scattering cross-section reaches $4\pi /k^2$.

Put $g=k\hslash /(2m\omega )$, which has units of energy. In the original oscillator basis,Write $A=\tilde{a}$, $B=\tilde{b}$, $C_2=\cosh 2\theta$ and $S_2=\sinh 2\theta$. The transformed number and pair terms obeyHence the coefficient of $AB+A^{†}{B}^{†}$ is $g{C}_2-\hslash \omega S_2$, which vanishes for

This cancels the requested pair terms but does not diagonalize the printed Hamiltonian. Its number-conserving coupling also transforms:After the pair cancellation, the last creation terms have coefficient $-g{S}_2/2$, nonzero for $k\ne 0$. They create two quanta from the $A,B$ vacuum, so that vacuum is not an eigenstate of the literal Hamiltonian. This is an inconsistency in the ground-state assertion used by the next part, present in the printed PDF.

For the actual coordinate-coupled system, the normal coordinates $q_{\pm }=(x\pm y)/\sqrt{2}$ and their conjugate momenta diagonalize $H$ into independent oscillators withA normalizable ground state requires $|k|<m{\omega }^2$. Eliminating just the two indicated cross-pair terms is not sufficient to establish that ground state.

At fixed particle number $N$, write $n_1=n$ and $n_2=N-n$. The contact interaction between two ring modes has energy eigenvaluesFor $g>0$, the nonnegative product $n(N-n)$ is minimized at the endpoints. ConsequentlyFor $N\ge 1$ this is a two-dimensional degenerate ground state subspace. $N=0$ instead has the unique Fock vacuum. In this projected model, putting all particles into one traveling mode avoids the extra exchange contribution paid when both distinct modes are occupied.

For the alternative coefficients, put $\alpha =\beta =A<0$ and $\gamma =0$. Then $E(n)=A[N(N-1)-2n(N-n)]$ is again minimized at $n=0,N$, with $E_{\min }=AN(N-1)$. Evenness of $N$ is unnecessary for this result; the balanced Fock state maximizes this attractive-interaction energy instead of minimizing it.

Add the one-particle energy term $H_0={ϵ}_1{n}_1+{ϵ}_2{n}_2$. It is diagonal in the same Fock state basis as the contact interaction between two ring modes. For $N=2$, the ordered basis $(|2,0⟩,|1,1⟩,|0,2⟩)$ givesFor $g>0$, the middle eigenvalue exceeds the mean of the two endpoint eigenvalues by $g/L$, so it cannot be the smallest. The ground state is therefore $|2,0⟩$ if ${ϵ}_1<{ϵ}_2$, and $|0,2⟩$ if ${ϵ}_2<{ϵ}_1$, withIf ${ϵ}_1={ϵ}_2$, every normalized linear combination of the two endpoint Fock states is a ground state. The same endpoint argument works for general fixed $N$, since the interaction contribution is a concave quadratic function of the mode occupation number.

For distinct positive integers $p,q$, use normalized box modes ${\phi }_1=\sqrt{2/L}\sin (p\pi x/L)$ and ${\phi }_2=\sqrt{2/L}\sin (q\pi x/L)$. Their contact interaction overlaps obeyUnlike traveling ring modes, these standing modes also allow pair conversion. For the first two box modes, or any distinct pair without a third-harmonic resonance, the contact interaction between two box modes isThe last two terms change an individual mode occupation number by two while conserving total particle number. Thus the Hamiltonian operator is not diagonal in the Fock state basis, and minimizing diagonal entries alone does not find its ground state. For example, at $N=2$ with no dispersion, $\left(|2,0⟩-|0,2⟩\right)/\sqrt{2}$ has the lowest energy $g/(2L)$, below either unmixed endpoint's $3g/(2L)$.

The wording permits modes beyond the first two. For completeness, the identity ${\sin }^{3}u=(3\sin u-\sin 3u)/4$ givesWhen $q=3p$, add $-g(a_1^{†2}{a}_1{a}_2+a_1^{†}{a}_2^{†}{a}_1^2)/(2L)$; when $p=3q$, add $-g(a_1^{†}{a}_2^{†}{a}_2^2+a_2^{†2}{a}_1{a}_2)/(2L)$. These extra terms change an individual occupation number by one and require diagonalizing the corresponding fixed-$N$ matrix as well.

Specify the magnetic coupling before fixing its sign: let the magnetic moment be $\mathbf{\mu }=\gamma \mathbf{S}$, where $\gamma$ is a signed gyromagnetic ratio. The Zeeman effect gives $H_Z=-\gamma \mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{S}$. For spin one-half, $\mathbf{S}=\hslash \mathbf{\sigma }/2$, so with $B=|\mathbf{B}|$ and $u=\beta \gamma \hslash B/2$,This is the quantum Gibbs state. Its eigenvalues are $(1\pm \tanh u)/2$, so its purity is $(1+{\tanh }^{2}u)/2$. For nonzero level splitting it approaches a pure state as $|u|\to \infty$: positive inverse temperature selects the lower energy, while negative inverse temperature selects the upper one. It is a maximally mixed state at $u=0$, including infinite temperature or zero magnetic splitting. At zero field the Gibbs state remains $I/2$; lowering temperature alone does not select a unique pure state from that degeneracy.

Negative temperature is meaningful for an internally equilibrated spin sector with a bounded energy spectrum and population inversion. It must be sufficiently isolated from unbounded motional degrees of freedom: the oscillator's unbounded spectrum, for instance, makes its partition sum diverge at negative inverse temperature. The two-level spin partition sum itself stays finite for either sign.

At the origin, the normalized bound state in a delta potential contributes $|{\phi }_0(0){|}^2=\kappa$, and the odd scattering eigenfunctions contribute zero. The even continuum functions from the preceding part haveTheir energy is $E_k={\hslash }^2{k}^2/(2m)$. Inserting these weights into the spectral resolution of a quantum propagator, and using evenness to extend the integral to the whole real axis, yields for $T>0$This is the quantum propagator of an attractive delta potential. The printed continuum exponent has an extra factor of $\hslash$: its time phase must be $-i{E}_{k}T/\hslash =-i\hslash k^{2}T/(2m)$. This correction also makes the exponent dimensionless. Oscillatory integrals are understood with an infinitesimal positive convergence factor before taking its limit.

In the ordered product basis $(|\uparrow \uparrow ⟩,|\uparrow \downarrow ⟩,|\downarrow \uparrow ⟩,|\downarrow \downarrow ⟩)$, the two-spin XY Hamiltonian isThe transverse term exchanges opposite spins and leaves parallel spins unchanged. Diagonalizing its two-dimensional block gives the complete orthonormal eigenbasisThe antisymmetric state is the singlet state; the other three are triplet states. Accidental equality of energies does not invalidate this eigenbasis.

Using the consistently normalized Jordan–Wigner transformation from part (c), write ${\sigma }_1^x{\sigma }_2^x+{\sigma }_1^y{\sigma }_2^y=2(s_1^{+}{s}_2^{-}+s_1^{-}{s}_2^{+})$. Since $f_1^{†}{P}_1=f_1^{†}$ and $f_1{P}_1=-f_1$, the parity string givesThereforeThe orthogonal transformation $b=(f_1+f_2)/\sqrt{2}$, $c=(f_1-f_2)/\sqrt{2}$ preserves the canonical anticommutation relations and diagonalizes this bilinear Hamiltonian:The Fock vacuum is $|\downarrow \downarrow ⟩$, with energy $2h$. Occupying $b$ alone gives the symmetric opposite-spin state with energy $-2J$; occupying $c$ alone gives the antisymmetric state with energy $2J$; occupying both gives $|\uparrow \uparrow ⟩$, up to a global phase, with energy $-2h$. This reproduces the entire spectrum in part (b).

Take the two magnetic moments along $z$ to be $\pm \mu$, so $H=-\mu B_z{\sigma }_z$ and the two energies are $\mp \mu B_z$. The quantum Gibbs state at inverse temperature $\beta =1/(k_{B}T)$ isIts Bloch vector is $(0,0,\tanh \beta \mu B_z)$. At $B_z=0$, or in the high-temperature limit, it approaches $I/2$; at $T\to 0^{+}$ with nonzero $\mu B_z$, it approaches the lower-energy pure state. Here $\mu$ is the magnitude or signed coefficient multiplying ${\sigma }_z$ in the magnetic Hamiltonian, rather than a moment with an additional unstated factor of two.

For a uniform classical spin $S\mathbf{n}$ with ${\mathbf{n}}^2=1$, the energy per bond isThe strict inequalities among the couplings make the $x$ direction the unique easy axis. ThusThese uniform configurations are also global classical minima: the largest singular value of the diagonal exchange matrix is $J^x$, so each bond has energy at least $-J^x{S}^2$, and both configurations saturate that bound.

A global rotation by $\pi$ about the $z$ axis sends $(S^x,S^y,S^z)$ to $(-S^x,-S^y,S^z)$, preserves every exchange product, and exchanges the two ground states. A $\pi$ rotation about $y$ does the same. The broken discrete symmetry can be represented by either operation.

Allow a freely chosen center $x_0$, set $u=k(x-x_0)$ and $z=e^u$. Direct differentiation of the proposed Sine-Gordon kink givesThe angle identity givesSince $k^2/b=a$, these formulas show $\boxed{{\varphi }^{\prime \prime }=a\sin (b\varphi )}$, precisely the static equation of motion.

For $x\to -\infty$ and $x\to +\infty$, the field approaches $0$ and $2\pi /b$ respectively. These are neighboring minima of the scalar potential when $ab>0$, and ${\varphi }^{\prime }$ vanishes exponentially at either end. The energy is therefore finite and the topological charge $Q=b[\varphi (+\infty )-\varphi (-\infty )]/(2\pi )$ is one. Reversing $x-x_0$ gives the corresponding antikink. If $ab<0$, the printed real exponential profile is unavailable; its formal imaginary scale is not a real finite-energy solution of the stated form.

Label the initial particle and antiparticle $p_1,p_2$ and the corresponding final momenta $p_3,p_4$, with $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$ and $t=(p_1-p_3{)}^2$. Charge flow permits an $s$-channel heavy-scalar annihilation graph and a $t$-channel heavy-scalar exchange graph. It excludes a third $u$-channel graph for these fixed charge assignments. The effective theory has one contact graph.

The two cubic Feynman vertices and the heavy propagator giveFor $|s|,|t|\ll M^2$,This independently checks the sign and the factor $1/2$ in solution. The next difference is the derivative correction of order $M^{-4}$ in the amplitude.

Let $E=\sqrt{s}$ denote the total center-of-mass energy, with $m\ll E\ll M$. The final particle and antiparticle are distinct, so no identical-particle factor is needed. The leading isotropic differential scattering cross-section and total cross section areCorrections are relatively of order $E^2/M^2$ and, in a high-energy expansion, $m^2/E^2$, in addition to loop corrections when they matter. If instead $E$ denotes each beam particle's energy, substitute $s=4E^2$ before comparing numerical prefactors.

Put $\beta =(k_{B}T{)}^{-1}$ and label the two spin values in the order $+1,-1$. Assign each bond its Boltzmann weight,The symmetry of the bond energy makes $V$ a real symmetric matrix. For a fixed configuration the product of successive matrix entries is its Boltzmann weight. Summing over all spins and identifying the last index with the first therefore giveswhereThis replaces a sum over $2^L$ configurations by the powers of a two-by-two matrix. For finite bond energies at $T>0$, every matrix entry is positive, so the Perron–Frobenius theorem gives ${\lambda }_{+}>0$ and $|{\lambda }_{-}|<{\lambda }_{+}$. Hence the Helmholtz free energy per spin tends to $-k_{B}T\log {\lambda }_{+}$. A diagonal local observable $O$ can be inserted at one site: $⟨O_1⟩=\mathrm{tr}(O{V}^L)/Z_L$. Its limiting average is the expectation in the normalized eigenvector of ${\lambda }_{+}$.

The sum needs a stated interpretation. The original equation leaves the second bond outside explicit parentheses, with its index then formally free. The natural translation-invariant, equal-bond interpretation used here is the energy $-J{\sum }_j{\tau }_j({\sigma }_j+{\sigma }_{j+1})$.

Let $K=\beta J$. Sum over each decorating spin before summing over the remaining spins. The decimation of an alternating mixed-spin chain gives the effective transfer matrix:No on-site entropy has been omitted: the term $1$ is the weight of the zero decorating spin. The normalized eigenvectors are $v_{\pm }=(1,\pm 1{)}^{\mathsf{T}}/\sqrt{2}$, with eigenvaluesThere are $L$ transfer steps but $2L$ physical sites, soThe free energy per two-site unit cell is twice this value. At $J=0$, the formula gives $Z_L=6^L$, as required by two states on one sublattice and three on the other. As $T\to 0$, the free energy per physical site tends to $-J$, the energy of an aligned chain with two satisfied bonds per unit cell. These checks also fix the factor of two in the site count.

Insert $D=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$ at the first undecorated site. In the eigenbasis of the transfer matrix, $D$ exchanges $v_{+}$ and $v_{-}$, and both diagonal matrix elements vanish. Explicitly,Thus its large-$L$ limit is zero at every fixed $T>0$. The result is exact even before taking that limit. Equivalently, simultaneous reversal of all spins pairs configurations of equal energy and opposite ${\sigma }_1$. Positivity of the transfer matrix at fixed positive temperature prevents a degenerate dominant eigenvalue and spontaneous magnetization in this one-dimensional zero-field chain. Selecting one aligned state at strictly zero temperature is a different order of limits.

Insert the decorating-spin observable into the one bond that contains it. The decorated-spin occupation insertion uses the matrix:The partition function still contains $L$ decorating-spin sums; one of them has been replaced by this weighted sum. HenceTaking the dominant eigenvector givesThis is the probability that the decorating site is in either nonzero state. It tends to $2/3$ at high temperature, when its three states are equally likely, and to one at low temperature, when the nonzero aligned states gain bond energy. Unlike the magnetization, this even observable is not forced to vanish by spin reversal.

Put $r=v+\sigma /\sqrt{2}$. Direct differentiation of $\phi =r{e}^{i\pi /f}$ cancels the mixed radial-angular terms, leavingUse $\lambda =2m^2/v^2$ from part b to expand the potential. The complete local expression isThe radial field is canonically normalized, giving $m_{\sigma }^2=2m^2$. For arbitrary $f$, the canonically normalized angular field is ${\pi }_c=\sqrt{2}v\pi /f$ and has zero mass:The interactions comprise radial cubic and quartic self-couplings, a derivative $\sigma \pi \pi$ coupling and a derivative $\sigma \sigma \pi \pi$ coupling. In canonical variables the latter coefficients are $1/(\sqrt{2}v)$ and $1/(4v^2)$ respectively. The additive constant shifts the vacuum energy and does not affect these masses or interactions.

The original phase symmetry becomes the exact shift $\pi \mapsto \pi +f\alpha$, with $\sigma$ unchanged. Any undifferentiated polynomial ${\pi }^3$ or ${\pi }^4$ would violate this shift, so such terms are absent. This argument allows derivative interactions; it forbids an angular potential. The massless angular excitation is the Goldstone boson for the broken global $U(1)$.

For longitudinal-vector annihilation through a scalar contact interaction, first use the supplied vertex $2i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$. Let $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$ and work in the center-of-mass frame. The amplitude is $\mathcal{M}=2g^2{ϵ}_1\cdot {ϵ}_2$, up to its overall phase. For two longitudinal incoming vectors,This grows as $s^2/m_A^4$, whereas transverse amplitudes stay of order $g^2$ and mixed longitudinal-transverse amplitudes vanish in this frame. Consequently the leading high-energy contribution is longitudinal.

For an unpolarized total cross section, average over the $3\times 3$ incoming polarizations. The massive-vector polarization sum givesThe identical final scalars require a factor $1/2!$ in the two-body phase space. With ${\beta }_A=\sqrt{1-4m_A^2/s}$ and ${\beta }_h=\sqrt{1-4m_h^2/s}$, the angle-independent result isFor a prepared longitudinal pair there is no incoming polarization average, giving insteadThere is no extra initial-state factor $1/2$: a cross section uses the incoming beam flux, while the final-state factor removes double counting of indistinguishable outgoing states.

Define the energy in the stated bound to be the total center-of-mass energy, $E=\sqrt{s}$. Equating the leading expressions to $4\pi /E^2$ givesfor $m_A=100\mathrm{GeV}$ and $g=0.4$. The second value shows that a longitudinal channel reaches the supplied perturbative bound earlier. If the source's unspecified $E$ denotes the energy of one incoming particle and the bound is literally $4\pi /E^2$, substitute $s=4E^2$ instead: the corresponding values are $1.83\mathrm{TeV}$ unpolarized and $1.05\mathrm{TeV}$ longitudinal. Stating the energy and polarization conventions is necessary for a numerical answer.

Interaction-normalization qualification: the written ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=g^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }{h}^2$ differentiates to $4i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$, because there are $2!$ vector assignments and $2!$ scalar assignments. For example, differentiating $g^2(A^0{)}^2{h}^2$ twice in each variable gives $4g^2$. The supplied $2i{g}^2{\eta }_{\mu \nu }$ would instead follow from ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=g^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }{h}^2/2$. Thus all cross sections above follow the explicitly requested rule. Using the literal written interaction multiplies them by four and divides every quoted threshold energy by $\sqrt{2}$. The energy growth itself is the physical issue: a contact interaction of massive longitudinal vectors needs additional dynamics before its perturbative high-energy extrapolation becomes reliable.