Use , so . Up to an overall minus sign, the differential form becomes
Seeking a monomial integrating factor , equality of mixed derivatives gives
These give , so the integrating factor in the original variables is
One may verify exactness directly without relying on invertibility of the cosine substitution:
Thus the implicit first integral is
The equivalence with the differential equation holds directly where . The zero solution is included at . At a zero of , the original graph equation requires for any finite differentiable continuation, so no extra finite graph with nonzero is created by multiplying by the vanishing factor. If one allows vertical parametrized integral curves of the differential form, is also such a curve and is already contained in the level set .
Write the differential form as , with the coefficients as printed. A monomial integrating factor can be found from . The exactness condition gives
Solving yields . Thus, on ,
After multiplication, the differential form is
Hence the implicit solutions are
The branch was excluded by the integrating factor but satisfies the original equation and must be restored. On any graph branch with , differentiation of the boxed first integral recovers the original differential equation.
If the integrand has no explicit dependence, differentiate along a stationary path:
The last equality uses and the Euler-Lagrange equation. This proves the Beltrami identity, the first integral .
For variations with , integration by parts gives . The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations therefore gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
For the ramp, use conservation of energy from rest at the rim. The vertical drop is , so . The spherical surface arc length is . On a monotone segment described by , the travel time is consequently
For increasing this has the printed limits to ; for a descent, reverse the decreasing angular limits to keep time positive. The azimuth is a cyclic coordinate of this integrand. Its conserved derivative gives the first integral for the brachistochrone on a hemispherical ramp:
Solving for its square yields
For a regular stationary path with finite , this tends to zero as the rim is approached. The ratio of azimuthal to meridional displacements is , which also tends to zero. Hence the initial direction is along a meridian toward the bottom. This conclusion concerns the initial heading; the later route can turn before reaching the bottom when its rim endpoints require a nonzero azimuthal displacement.
For the displayed form take and . Substitute in the first integral:
Inverting the hyperbolic cosine gives the catenary light ray in a linear refractive index
The minimum occurs at and , so the integration constant has the specified meaning. The integral above describes the graph branch; the other sign of the square root continues it smoothly to the other side of the turning point in .
The signed-constant qualification matters: for in part (a), integration reverses horizontal direction, and the positive prefactor in the full catenary is , with minimum height . The printed expression presupposes . The separate case gives constant, a vertical ray. At the turning point diverges, so is not a single regular graph across it, although is smooth.
Here has no explicit dependence, so use the Beltrami identity. With , one has and therefore
This first integral reduces the second-order Euler-Lagrange equation to a first-order relation.
Choose the tangent angle in , so . At the maximum, the first integral has value . Hence
A nonconstant regular branch below its positive maximum has and , giving . For completeness, strictness follows from the differential equation rather than assuming it at every point: the Euler-Lagrange equation simplifies to
At the maximum, implies . If , the positive-height initial data , give the constant solution uniquely, contradicting the existence of the lower-height branch. Thus is only the degenerate horizontal solution. The first integral with also excludes on this regular branch.
Rearrange the first integral from part (iv) and use the half-angle identities:
Eliminating gives
Squaring removes the sign of the slope; the rising and falling sides of the same profile have opposite tangent angles but obey the same height relation. Heights and angles must remain on the regular branch with .
If has no explicit dependence, the chain rule gives
Consequently
on an Euler-Lagrange equation solution. Thus the Beltrami identity supplies the first integral
The opposite sign is an equally valid convention. The conserved value can be zero for particular integrands or paths; absence of explicit alone does not guarantee a nonzero numerical value. The useful statement is that this expression is constant along an extremal.
Applying the implicit midpoint rule to the simple harmonic oscillator system gives
Factor the change in the quadratic form and substitute these equations:
Thus every step preserves the first integral
For completeness, the implicit equations are solvable for every real : putting , their coefficient matrix has determinant and the update is
This is an orthogonal matrix, as follows from . It therefore preserves the Euclidean norm, explaining geometrically the exact energy conservation. This is a concrete instance of Runge-Kutta conservation of quadratic invariants. Preservation of the circle does not assert that the numerical and exact solutions have the same phase at a fixed nonzero step size.
For a regular isoperimetric constraint, introduce a constant Lagrange multiplier and set . With fixed endpoint values, the Euler-Lagrange equation is
If and have no explicit dependence, the Beltrami identity gives the first integral
The regularity assumption excludes the exceptional case in which the constraint itself has zero first variation for every admissible perturbation.
Parametrize the surface of revolution by . The magnitude of is . Integrating the resulting surface area element over , and integrating the circular cross-sectional areas for the volume, gives
Here because it is a radius. For a regular connected closed surface, take in the interior; the closing endpoints can have unbounded even when the surface itself is smooth.
After dividing by , its integrand is . The Euler-Lagrange equation and Beltrami identity become
As tends to zero at an endpoint, also tends to zero, so . On the positive interior this implies and, writing ,
The Euler-Lagrange equation also yields . Therefore
including at the maximum where . Integrating and using the first integral gives
Thus the regular extremal is a sphere. The two zeros fix its center and radius:
Equivalently, the prescribed volume fixes . If are fixed in advance, their separation and the prescribed volume must be compatible with these equations; there is no positive regular stationary profile of the stated type for an incompatible volume.
For minimality, the three-dimensional isoperimetric inequality states that every sufficiently regular closed surface enclosing volume has
with equality precisely for a sphere. Our extremal has and , so it attains equality and is a global minimum of area at the fixed volume. This also makes clear the connected-surface assumption behind uniqueness: allowing several disconnected components introduces stationary collections of spheres, rather than the single positive generating profile used here.
For , the Euler-Lagrange equation is
Since has no explicit dependence, the Beltrami identity gives
Solving this first integral, or substituting into the second-order equation, yields
The constants satisfy and . There need not be a solution for arbitrary endpoint data, and when there is one these equations can have more than one pair of constants. These are the possible stationary catenoids, so the axisymmetric second variation of a catenoid still matters when deciding whether they minimize surface area.
Take , , and the negative-norm convention for a timelike curve used by the printed metric. Writing and gives
Spatial translation is a Killing vector field. Equivalently, the geodesic Lagrangian has the cyclic coordinate , so its conserved momentum is
Therefore the correct first integral for this metric is
The first-integral assertion in the PDF is false. Its dimensionless square root requires , and even after setting it is missing the factor . For example, the nonvertical geodesics below have proportional to .
Set . Solving for the velocity, with increasing as the time orientation, gives . The complete unparametrized family of timelike geodesics of a quadratic-time conformal metric is
Each curve is restricted to a connected positive- or negative- patch; is excluded because the metric becomes degenerate. For , , and the two independent constants are and . If an explicit affine parametrization is desired,
while the vertical family has . A reversal of the time orientation reverses the parameter without changing these paths.
With , set
Then the first integral gives . On the descending and ascending halves of the physical track choose respectively and , so that . Solving for gives
The unsquared equation requires . At this says ; it is not permissible to retain other values merely because the displayed formula for has a squared denominator.
For completeness, the Euler-Lagrange equation also gives . Thus decreases through zero exactly once, so the chosen parameter runs through the whole single arch without an extra branch. Differentiating the formula for and dividing by gives, continuously also at ,
Using yields
Since , the arc length is obtained by cancelling one factor of in . The conditions and become
These determine a unique parameter pair for each . To see uniqueness, regard as the expected value of under a probability density function proportional to on . Differentiation under the integral sign gives the covariance identity
The first argument decreases with and the second increases. The strict sign follows by applying to two independent unequal values and averaging; the integrable endpoint singularity of causes no problem. As , the weight concentrates at , so . As , endpoint estimates give numerator and denominator , so . Continuity then covers every . At one recovers the cycloid and .
Smoothness qualification. Near ,
and the other endpoint has . These are smooth graphs on , not graphs on the closed interval. Indeed a finite endpoint slope would make the conserved diverge as . The travel time remains finite because
Thus the printed phrase “smooth solution” must be understood on the interior, with improper endpoint limits. The variational calculation supplies necessary stationary arches; it does not by itself prove global minimality in every larger class of tracks.
At these parameters the equation becomes , where . Multiply by and integrate:
Outer matching gives and , so . No slip gives . At that point the first integral fixes , so there are exactly two smooth initial-value solutions of the second-order equation satisfying the matching condition. Put . Translation invariance of the supplied profile gives them explicitly:
The first decreases monotonically from zero to . The second first rises to at , crosses zero again at , and then tends to . Integrating either profile from zero recovers with .
Figure 1.
Two translated similarity profiles: monotone outer-flow matching and a branch with an internal reversed-flow region
. Details.
One would not expect both branches to be equally stable. The rising branch contains flow opposite to its negative outer stream and interior inflection points, typical ingredients for shear instability. The monotone branch has at finite positive and no interior inflection point, so the classical inviscid inflection-point mechanism is absent there. This motivates expecting the reversed-flow branch to be unstable and the monotone branch to be the stable candidate. A definitive viscous temporal-stability result requires perturbing the time-dependent equations; the steady first integral alone is not a stability proof.
Write and . Until quarantine and while , division of the equations gives
Integration from the initial state yields the first integral
Let be the susceptible count at the first time . It is the root of an equation reached on the decreasing- outbreak trajectory of
For a strictly rising threshold crossing this is the larger admissible root of an equation, with ; if the threshold equals the peak, . The assumption that quarantine is reached selects the physically relevant branch and excludes a merely hypothetical declining-branch crossing after an earlier one.
Since there is no incubation period here, all removals from have already become infection cases by quarantine. No further susceptible individuals are infected after isolation. The requested number among the initially susceptible individuals is therefore
Substitute into the bacterial profile equation. This gives
which integrates once to
At the asymptotic constant states the profile derivative tends to zero. The state ahead of the travelling wave, where and , therefore gives . The state behind it, where and , gives . Since ,
This first integral expresses the matching between biomass produced and biological growth factor consumed after the chosen nondimensionalization.
The first integral and yield the linear identity . Multiply by the integrating factor and integrate from . Since the bounded limit makes there,
Positivity of makes the last integral nonnegative, and strictly positive at any finite point of a strictly positive travelling wave. Thus
with equality approached only at the far-behind boundary. This bound uses the first integral rather than an unsupported assumption that the bacterial profile is monotone.