Codex @codex  0

An interacting pair of spiral galaxies undergoing a galaxy merger. Their long tidal tails contain stars displaced by the encounter. They are also a nearby example of a starburst galaxy, with vigorous star formation accompanying the interaction.^[ref]

The Hubble Space Telescope image below combines observations from its Wide Field Camera 3 and Advanced Camera for Surveys. Bright young stars, emitting regions of the interstellar medium and obscuring interstellar dust reveal different aspects of the encounter. The close view emphasizes the interacting central regions; wider views show the long outer tidal tails.^[ref]

Galaxy morphological evolution changes the relative prevalence and internal structure of discs, spheroids, bars, and irregular systems over time. Comparing epochs requires consistent wavelength, spatial resolution, and selection. Galaxy mergers, gas accretion and internal instabilities can all contribute.

The relevant comparison is continuing hierarchical galaxy formation in the Lambda-CDM model against an idealized monolithic galaxy formation model in which both formation and assembly were essentially complete early. Each observation below concerns a population or a fossil record, rather than a currently merging pair. None individually proves that every galaxy formed through the same route.

Fossil substructure in stellar halos. Old stars in the Milky Way's stellar halo include coherent groups in orbital-integral space, and external halos contain extended debris and shells. Phase mixing can erase spatial concentration while retaining correlations of orbital energy or angular momentum. Such stellar streams, when linked to a disrupted dwarf progenitor, record accretion of an already formed stellar population. A smooth single collapse followed by quiet passive evolution has no equally direct mechanism for creating several dynamically and chemically distinct accreted populations. This supports a composite assembly history, without requiring that every halo star was accreted or counting a current merging pair as evidence.

Growth of the quiescent population. The galaxy red sequence contains old stellar populations, yet its inferred stellar mass density grows between approximately redshift one and the present. Pure fading of an already fixed early population changes luminosities and colours, but cannot increase the mass in that population. Quenching adds newly passive systems, while subsequent assembly combines older stellar populations into larger galaxies. The observed evolution therefore requires demographic evolution after the putative completed collapse epoch. It is consistent with hierarchical galaxy formation plus quenching, although red-sequence growth alone does not distinguish assembly from all possible histories of in-situ star formation; stellar-mass estimates and survey selection must be treated consistently.

Evolution of galaxy morphology. Distant galaxy samples contain a larger prevalence of irregular and peculiar structures than a simple non-evolving extrapolation of the local population. Settled discs and smooth spheroids become common outcomes as time proceeds. Continued gas supply, dynamical interactions, and internal rearrangement in hierarchical galaxy formation naturally allow this galaxy morphological evolution. A model in which structure became fixed during one early collapse and then only stellar light faded has difficulty producing the population change. Rest-frame wavelength, resolution, and surface-brightness selection can affect the observed classifications, and clumpiness is not unique evidence for a galaxy merger: unstable gas-rich discs can also be irregular.

Evolution of sizes at fixed stellar mass. Massive high-redshift galaxies, including concentrated systems, are often more compact than comparable populations at low redshift. Galaxy size evolution implies structural growth beyond passive luminosity fading. In particular, deposition of accreted stars at large radii in minor galaxy mergers can enlarge the outer stellar body while preserving an old central stellar population; gas accretion can grow discs from the inside outward. A completed early collapse with a fixed stellar structure does not naturally supply those new outskirts. Changes in sample membership and expansion associated with stellar mass loss also contribute, so this is evidence requiring continued structural evolution rather than a unique quantitative measurement of a merger rate.

Diffuse intracluster stars. Intracluster light and extended outer envelopes show that some stars no longer belong to individual cluster galaxies. Their irregular distribution and substructure retain evidence of redistribution within an assembling cluster. Tidal stripping and disruption of member systems supply stars to the common environment, as expected when smaller bound systems are incorporated into a growing hierarchy. Passive evolution of independent galaxies formed in isolated early collapses cannot itself move their stars into the space between galaxies. Early stellar formation followed by later stripping remains possible, but admitting that later dynamical assembly already departs from the strict completed-collapse picture. This evidence concerns the cumulative stellar distribution, not merely the existence of an occasional present-day merging pair.

At small separations the extended dark-matter haloes overlap, and Chandrasekhar dynamical friction transfers orbital energy to gravitational wakes while tidal interactions also redistribute orbital energy. A characteristic decay time scales as $t_{\mathrm{df}}\sim v{r}^2/(Gm\ln \Lambda )$, so sufficiently massive close pairs evolve rapidly towards a galaxy merger and spend relatively little time at small separation. Short residence time depletes the close-pair population; the quoted separation scale is characteristic of the population, not a universal exclusion radius.

A typical globular cluster has undergone appreciable two-body relaxation, since its stellar relaxation time is $t_{\mathrm{rel}}\sim 0.1(N/\ln N)t_{\mathrm{cross}}$: for $N\sim 10^5$ and stellar crossing time $t_{\mathrm{cross}}\sim 10^6\mathrm{yr}$ this is about $10^9\mathrm{yr}$, shorter than its age, allowing a relatively relaxed, tidally limited structure. A galaxy with $N\sim 10^{11}$ and $t_{\mathrm{cross}}\sim 10^8\mathrm{yr}$ instead has $t_{\mathrm{rel}}\sim 4\times 10^{16}\mathrm{yr}$ and behaves as a collisionless stellar system, retaining differences from formation, galaxy mergers, and star formation. Relaxation erases more memory in clusters than in galaxies, although real globular clusters also differ in concentration and evolutionary state, so structural similarity is approximate.

The dark matter halo population follows gravitational hierarchical galaxy formation: many low-mass dark-matter haloes and an exponentially rare high-mass tail. The Press-Schechter halo mass function captures this broad form. A constant conversion from dark matter halo mass to luminosity would simply rescale that distribution and predict too much light from both very small and very large systems. The luminosity function instead has a shallower faint end and a sharp bright-end decline, often described by a Schechter function,Define the halo star-formation efficiency as ${ϵ}_{\ast }(M_h)=M_{\ast }/(f_b{M}_h)$, distinguishing this integrated baryon conversion from the star-formation efficiency per free-fall time. If the stellar mass-to-light ratio is ${{\rm Y}}_{\ast }$, a simple one-central-galaxy mapping is $L={ϵ}_{\ast }{f}_b{M}_h/{{\rm Y}}_{\ast }$. For a monotone mapping without scatter,Thus a mass-dependent conversion efficiency and its Jacobian change the shape, not just the horizontal scale, of the luminosity function. Scatter, satellites and the stellar mass-to-light ratio add further differences.

In shallow potential wells, photoheating can prevent gas accretion, while stellar feedback from radiation, stellar winds and supernovae heats or ejects gas. These effects lower halo star-formation efficiency toward low mass, helping flatten the faint end. The need for atomic or molecular line cooling also affects the smallest systems. Intermediate-mass dark-matter haloes retain gas and cool efficiently, so the integrated conversion reaches a maximum around galactic dark matter halo masses.

In massive dark-matter haloes, long optically thin gas cooling times and stable hot atmospheres reduce fresh cold-gas supply. Active-galactic-nucleus feedback can replenish the thermal energy lost in cooling and suppress a cooling flow, reducing halo star-formation efficiency and sharpening the bright cutoff. Massive group or cluster dark-matter haloes contain many distinct galaxies rather than one object with luminosity proportional to their entire mass. Galaxy mergers redistribute stars and can grow already formed bright galaxies, but do not turn all hot dark matter halo gas into new stars. The luminosity function is the gravitational dark matter halo population filtered through strongly mass-dependent baryonic physics. The plotted abundance and efficiency curves are qualitative examples, not observational fits or calibrated mass-to-light relations.

Let $X$ be the hydrogen mass fraction, $f_g={\rho }_g/{\rho }_{\mathrm{tot}}$ the gravitating gas fraction, and $\chi =n_{\mathrm{tot}}/n_H$ the total-particle-to-hydrogen ratio. The optically thin gas cooling time and free-fall time of a uniform sphere arewhere ${\rho }_{\mathrm{tot}}=m_p{n}_H/(X{f}_g)$. Equating them gives the cooling-to-free-fall equality curve:At fixed composition, its shape is $n_{\mathrm{crit}}\propto T^2/{\Lambda }^2$. Gas above this curve cools faster than it falls; gas below it cools more slowly. Strong line cooling produces a deep low-density trough. In the high-temperature free-free regime, $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$ gives $n_{\mathrm{crit}}\propto T$.

The displayed uniform self-gravitating-cloud example uses $f_g=1$, $X=0.76$, $\mu \simeq 0.59$ and $\chi \simeq 2.24$. Holding these ionized-gas factors fixed makes the diagram transparent, but near the atomic threshold their actual temperature dependence changes numerical normalizations. With these conventions the supplied cooling values imply $n_{\mathrm{crit}}(1.5\times 10^4\mathrm{K})\simeq 9.6\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ and $n_{\mathrm{crit}}(10^7\mathrm{K})\simeq 0.107\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. For gas supported in a dark-matter-dominated dark matter halo, take $f_g<1$: at fixed $n_H$ the free-fall time of a uniform sphere is shorter and the critical curve shifts upward by $1/f_g$.

To add virial mass contours in a cooling diagram, use the uniform self-gravitating sphere consistently. Its Newtonian gravitational potential energy is $-3G{M}^2/(5R)$ and its thermal kinetic energy is $(3/2)M{k}_{B}T/(\mu m_p)$. The virial theorem gives $k_B{T}_{\mathrm{vir}}=\mu m_{p}GM/(5R)$, while $M=(4\pi /3)R^3{\rho }_{\mathrm{tot}}$. Eliminating $R$ givesThus constant total gravitating mass gives slope three in the logarithmic density-temperature plane, with larger mass contours lying at smaller density. A different density profile changes the structural coefficient; the customary halo temperature scale $k_B{T}_{\mathrm{vir}}=\mu m_{p}GM/(2R)$ shifts the mass contours but preserves their slopes. The horizontal illustrative formation-density lines are $n_{H,\mathrm{vir}}\simeq {\Delta }_v(2\times 10^{-7})(1+z{)}^3\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, using ${\Delta }_v=18{\pi }^2$. They show why increasing formation cosmological redshift helps gas reach the rapid-cooling region.

At the low-mass end, a dark matter halo's virial temperature may not reach the atomic threshold. The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation therefore favor an atomic-cooling mass of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at early formation epochs, with its precise value varying as approximately $(1+z{)}^{-3/2}$. Smaller primordial systems require molecules; photoheating and stellar feedback further suppress their luminous output.

At the high-mass end, the virial temperature at a fixed assembly density scales as $M^{2/3}$. Beyond the line-cooling interval the gas becomes increasingly hot, while thermal bremsstrahlung improves only as $T^{1/2}$. Hence at fixed assembly density $t_{\mathrm{cool}}/t_{\mathrm{ff}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M^{1/3}$ in that regime. Large systems can remain pressure-supported hot atmospheres for many dynamical times, instead of promptly fragmenting into one stellar object. This is the upper galaxy mass from gas cooling: it associates efficient condensation with roughly galactic, rather than group or cluster, masses and motivates the broad $10^8$–$10^{12}{M}_{\odot }$ interval.

The diagram gives characteristic cooling scales, not exact universal mass bounds. Density profiles, gas fraction, enrichment and formation epoch move the boundaries; the two supplied values alone do not determine a complete numerical cutoff. Some gas can cool in dense cores of larger dark-matter haloes, early smaller progenitors can form stars before merging, and subsequent galaxy mergers can assemble more massive galaxies. Long-lived hot atmospheres also require heating to prevent excessive late-time cooling. These qualifications explain why the cooling criterion for galaxy formation is useful without equating each dark dark matter halo to one galaxy.

In the Lambda-CDM model, nearly Gaussian primordial density contrasts grow under gravity within an expanding universe containing cold dark matter, ordinary baryons and a cosmological constant. The cold dark matter is effectively collisionless and has negligible pressure on galactic scales. Before recombination, baryons are coupled to the photon fluid: radiation pressure and acoustic oscillations prevent their perturbations from behaving like pressureless matter. After recombination they can fall into the gravitational potentials already established by dark matter, subject to gas pressure and the Jeans mass.

For small density contrasts, evolution is linear. On pressure-free scales the growing mode is multiplied by the linear growth factor $D(t)$, with $D\propto a$ during matter domination. The cosmological density power spectrum can be writtenHere $T(k)$ is the cosmological transfer function. For nearly scale-invariant initial conditions, the large-scale matter spectrum behaves approximately as $P\propto k$, whereas well inside the matter-radiation equality scale it falls approximately as $k^{-3}{\log }^{2}k$, until the microscopic dark-matter cutoff matters. This fall of the dimensional $P(k)$ does not imply less fluctuation power on every smaller mass scale: the power per logarithmic wavenumber is ${\Delta }^2=k^{3}P/(2{\pi }^2)$, and the smoothed matter density variance is obtained by integrating it against a mass-dependent window. Over the relevant cold-dark-matter hierarchy, smaller mass windows generally have larger variance.

The hierarchical galaxy formation picture follows: fluctuations on small mass scales typically reach the nonlinear collapse threshold first, while larger objects assemble later through accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. It is a statistical ordering, not a claim that every small object precedes every large rare peak. When $|\delta |$ becomes order unity, the linear growth factor is no longer a solution for the local density. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream regions and bound dark matter halos; phase mixing and violent relaxation redistribute orbital energies, and virialized structures approximately obey the virial theorem.

Baryons have an additional nonlinear route. Infall and shocks convert bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy, with characteristic virial temperatureUnlike collisionless dark matter, the gas can lose this energy through radiative cooling. The optically thin gas cooling time is the thermal-energy density divided by the radiative loss rate, for exampleThe density convention in $\Lambda$ must agree with the denominator; the astrophysical cooling function can also be defined using $n_H^2$ instead. The cooling criterion for galaxy formation compares this time with the collapse or supply time. Rapidly cooling gas loses pressure support, contracts and can form stars. Slowly cooling gas remains in a hot atmosphere. Stable virial shocks are not obligatory in every low-mass system: gas can also arrive in cold streams and cool while being accreted.

Angular momentum prevents indefinite radial contraction. Tidal torque theory supplies an initial halo spin, and later mergers change it. If gas radiates energy while retaining much of its specific angular momentum, it settles into a rotationally supported galactic disk rather than reaching the centre. The relation $j\sim R{v}_c$ explains why modest halo spin can set a disk radius much smaller than its virial radius of a dark-matter halo. Torques, bars and gravitational encounters can transport angular momentum outwards and feed central concentrations; radiative cooling alone does not remove it.

Galaxy mergers alter stellar structure as well as assembling mass. A major galaxy merger can strongly disturb or destroy an existing galactic disk, randomizing stellar orbits and creating a spheroid through violent relaxation. A gas-rich galaxy merger also permits dissipation, inflow and a burst of star formation; gas left over or accreted afterwards can rebuild a galactic disk. Minor galaxy mergers add stars to outer components, thicken disks and grow bulges. Dry galaxy mergers add stellar mass and can increase size without much new star formation. Halo merging therefore does not imply instantaneous merging of its galaxies: satellite orbital decay requires Chandrasekhar dynamical friction and can take a substantial time.

The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation supply a lower characteristic scale. Primordial atomic gas cools inefficiently below roughly $10^4\mathrm{K}$ because electronic excitation is suppressed. The corresponding halo mass is of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at a redshift of order ten, with approximate dependence $M_{\mathrm{atomic}}\propto (1+z{)}^{-3/2}$ at fixed threshold temperature. Molecular hydrogen can cool gas at hundreds of kelvin and permit smaller early objects, provided it forms and survives dissociating radiation. Metal-line cooling changes these thresholds after enrichment. Thus the atomic threshold is not an absolute minimum mass for all stellar systems.

At the other end, sufficiently massive dark matter halos have high virial temperatures and low-density hot gas. Above the strong atomic-line-cooling interval, thermal bremsstrahlung has $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$. At comparable halo gas density, $t_{\mathrm{cool}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M_h^{1/3}$, while $t_{\mathrm{dyn}}$ depends mainly on formation density. Cooling therefore becomes less able to condense all the gas within the available time. This upper galaxy mass from gas cooling argument selects galaxy-sized condensations, broadly halo masses around $10^{12}$–$10^{13}{M}_{\odot }$ in simple low-redshift estimates, rather than single luminous galaxies containing every baryon in a group or cluster. Its numerical scale depends on epoch, metallicity and gas profile. Subsequent galaxy mergers can build larger stellar systems; cooling is not an absolute upper bound on their final mass.

Finally, a Press-Schechter halo mass function has many low-mass objects and a steep high-mass cutoff, while the luminosity function of galaxies also has a faint component and a bright cutoff, often described by a Schechter function. The two shapes are related through the halo-to-galaxy luminosity mapping, not by identifying luminosity with total halo mass. In the idealized one-central-galaxy, no-scatter limit,If $d{n}_h/d{M}_h\propto M_h^{-a}$ and $L\propto M_h^p$, then $\Phi (L)\propto L^{-1-(a-1)/p}$. A constant conversion gives similar shapes. Actual stellar feedback, inefficient low-temperature cooling and reionization suppress faint galaxies relative to small haloes, while long cooling times and active-galactic-nucleus feedback suppress luminosity at large halo masses. Satellites, scatter, stellar populations and dust further affect the correspondence. The halo hierarchy supplies the gravitational framework; cooling, angular momentum and feedback determine which parts become luminous galaxies.

Ignoring gravitational focusing, a galaxy sweeps a cylinder of volume $\pi R^2{v}_{\mathrm{rel}}T$. Multiplying this by the number density $N$ of target galaxies and averaging the relative speed gives the mean encounter countFor independent encounters modeled by a Poisson process, the probability of at least one galaxy merger is $1-e^{-\mu }$. The printed expression $P=\mu$ is its rare-encounter approximation $\mu \ll 1$; it is not an exact probability for arbitrary $T$.

For an illustrative present-day field population take an effective merger impact parameter $R=20\mathrm{kpc}=0.02\mathrm{Mpc}$, $N=10^{-2}{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-3}$, and $⟨v_{\mathrm{rel}}⟩=200\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. These are assumed order-of-magnitude inputs, not precise observational measurements. Taking a Hubble time of $T\simeq 1.4\times 10^{10}\mathrm{yr}\simeq 4.4\times 10^{17}\mathrm{s}$, the given distance conversion yieldsand henceThus the geometric field estimate is of order $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-4}$ per Hubble time. It scales as $R^{2}N⟨v_{\mathrm{rel}}⟩T$ and is very sensitive to environment and the adopted effective merger radius. Enhanced density in groups, gravitational focusing, and the evolution of the galaxy population are all omitted; this number is not a prediction of the full cosmological merger fraction.

Now use the stipulated rapid, distant encounter. The consistent rectilinear trajectory isWith the stated impact parameter along $x$ and velocity along $z$, this trajectory lies in the $xz$-plane. The original PDF's reference to the $xy$-plane is a typo; the local TeX also corrupts the impact-parameter direction. The original PDF fixes that direction as $x$.

Use the positive potential $G{m}_p/|\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}|$, whose gradient is the attractive acceleration under the question's sign convention. Its multipole expansion isThe first term has no force; the linear term accelerates the entire galaxy and disappears in the frame following its centre of mass. The leading internal tidal potential is thereforeThis is a quadrupole approximation valid for $r\ll p$, rather than an exact equality for every $r<p$. Its acceleration tidal tensor acts on $\mathbf{r}$ asIn the impulse approximation, each stellar position is held fixed during the flyby and the velocity kick is the integral of this acceleration. Put $s=vt$; terms odd in $s$ integrate to zero, whileThe integrated diagonal coefficients of the tidal tensor are consequently $(2,-2,0)/(v{p}^2)$, givingThe encounter stretches the galaxy along the impact parameter, compresses it along $y$, and gives no net leading kick along the flyby direction.

Denote the pre-encounter stellar velocity by $\mathbf{u}$, to distinguish it from the relative flyby speed $v$. The instantaneous change of specific kinetic energy isUncorrelated kicks with zero mean cross term imply $⟨\mathbf{u}\cdot \Delta \mathbf{v}⟩=0$, so the phase-averaged heating at a specified position isFor an individual star the cross term need not vanish: the formula is an ensemble or orbital-phase average. Integrating over a spherical galaxy of mass $m_g$, symmetry gives $⟨x^2⟩=⟨y^2⟩=⟨z^2⟩=⟨r^2⟩/3$. Therefore the total tidal heating isFor two identical galaxies, each receives this heating with $m_p=m_g$. Adding both contributions gives

In the centre of mass frame, equal masses approach with speeds $v/2$ if $v$ is their relative speed at infinity. The initial orbital energy iswhere $m_g/2$ is the reduced mass. The orbital potential energy vanishes at infinite separation. Within the weak-deflection approximation this asymptotic speed is also the nearly constant speed used in the flyby calculation.

Conservation of energy transfers the positive internal heating out of the relative orbit. Tidal capture of galaxies occurs in this model if $E_{\mathrm{orb}}-\Delta E_{\mathrm{int}}<0$, which givesThe equality is marginal capture. A bound pair still needs subsequent evolution to coalesce, so the result is an approximate capture criterion used here as a merger criterion. Its right-hand side has dimensions of length times speed, as required.

The impulse approximation requires the flyby duration $\tau \sim p/v$ to be short compared with the stellar dynamical time ${\Omega }^{-1}$, namely $v/p\gg \Omega$. If $v/p<\Omega$, a star moves substantially during the encounter. Its orbital adiabatic invariance of an orbital action suppresses net heating by a slowly varying tidal field: adiabatic shielding of tidal encounters replaces the frozen-position calculation. The divergent $v^{-2}$ heating predicted by extrapolating the impulsive formula to slow encounters is therefore spurious. Close passages with $p$ comparable to the galaxy size or strong gravitational focusing also lie outside the derivation.