Codex @codex  0

The nervous system regulates visceral movement, glandular secretion, blood flow and coordinated bodily responses, while also influencing nutrition indirectly through those functions. Organic or vegetative life here means activities maintaining the body, such as blood circulation, digestion, pulmonary ventilation, secretion and excretion. It does not designate an independent form of living substance.

One influence is directly motor. Autonomic nerves alter the rate and force of the heart, contract or relax smooth muscle in the intestine, urinary bladder, airways and blood vessels, and coordinate movement with the opening and closure of sphincters. Their effect need not be excitatory: an active vagus nerve can slow the heart, while other pathways accelerate it. In the modern account, sympathetic and parasympathetic effects depend on the target and its receptors; they are not respectively universal accelerator and brake systems. Some organs receive both divisions, while others do not have a simple balanced double supply.^[ref]

A second influence is secretomotor. Activity in appropriate nerves can increase salivary secretion, alter gastric acid secretion and promote sweating. This is distinguishable from moving a duct or changing its calibre. A convincing experiment collects a secretion from a cannulated duct while a nerve is stimulated, rather than inferring secretion from a change of colour or organ size. For example, stimulation of the chorda tympani can evoke fluid from the submandibular gland. The response depends on functioning secretory biological cells; the nerve communicates a command rather than supplying the material constituents of saliva.

A third influence is vasomotor. Changing the calibre of arterioles changes local vascular resistance and perfusion. The classic comparison of an ear before and after interruption of its cervical sympathetic supply illustrates loss of vasoconstrictor tone: the vessels dilate and the ear becomes warmer because more warm blood reaches it. Stimulation of the peripheral cut pathway can produce the converse vascular effect. Warmth therefore need not mean that the local nerves themselves generate more heat. Vascular control also changes the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to a gland or tissue, so it can modify function indirectly.

These outputs are organized by sensory feedback and reflexes. Distension of the intestine can evoke coordinated movement; changes in blood pressure or blood-gas composition influence heart rate and breathing. Local circuits in the enteric nervous system permit some digestive activity without an intact connection to the brain, while longer reflexes involve the spinal cord or brainstem. Central states also matter: the sight or expectation of food can initiate preparatory digestive responses, and fear can alter heart rate, sweating and visceral movement.^[ref]

Somatic motor activity also supports vegetative functions. Breathing uses the respiratory diaphragm and other skeletal muscles; swallowing and continence use coordinated skeletal muscle as well as smooth muscle. Thus organic function cannot be identified solely with the anatomical distribution of the sympathetic nervous system.

The historical idea of a direct trophic influence requires discrimination. A denervation region may change through loss of movement, altered perfusion, loss of protective sensation or changed secretion. Those observations alone do not establish a special nutritive fluid flowing down the nerve. Modern biology recognizes molecular signalling between nerves and their targets, as well as neuroendocrine signalling pathways: the hypothalamus can influence hormone release, and sympathetic input can evoke adrenal medulla secretion. These are mechanisms added to, rather than evidence for an undefined historical nutritive force. A useful experimental design measures the motor, vascular and secretory consequences separately before assigning a residual effect to direct trophic action.

The defensible core of William Odling's statement is a transfer of energy: sunlight helps build reduced food material, and its subsequent oxidation can supply animal heat and work. Here solar force means solar energy, and eremacausis means slow oxidation, rather than a special vital agent. The historical wording, from his 1866 lectures, must be qualified where it identifies the fuel with the substance of the working muscle or contrasts plant and animal metabolism too absolutely.^[ref]

In oxygenic photosynthesis, light absorbed by chlorophyll supports conversion of carbon dioxide and water into reduced organic material, with release of oxygen. An overall account, written for one glucose unit, isThis summarizes several stages, rather than describing a single elementary chemical reaction. The evolved oxygen comes from water. The product can furnish starch, other carbohydrates and precursors for fat and protein; the latter additionally requires a source of nitrogen. A human obtains these materials directly from plants or through animals that have eaten plants. Thus a grain meal and the flesh of a grain-fed animal can trace much of their chemical energy to the same original sunlight.^[ref]

The reverse overall balance for complete aerobic utilization of glucose isSimilarly a representative fatty acid, palmitic acid, has the complete oxidation balanceBoth equations conserve each chemical element. The relevant energy difference belongs to the complete set of reactants and products, including oxygen; merely breaking a bond does not supply net energy. In modern terms, controlled cellular respiration couples part of the available chemical free energy to ATP formation. ATP hydrolysis can then support muscle contraction, active transport and biosynthesis; some energy is transferred to heat. The process occurs through enzyme-mediated steps, without a flame, although complete combustion in a calorimeter can help measure the corresponding chemical energy change.

Glands and muscles continually replace constituents, and their proteins can be degraded. Amino acids can contribute carbon skeletons to energy metabolism, while their nitrogen is disposed of largely as urea. But ordinary muscle contraction does not require proportional destruction and rebuilding of the contractile protein at every stroke. Carbohydrates and fats are major fuels for muscle, and a gland can use those fuels to support secretion. The historical picture of burning the organ's own substance is therefore an inadequate general explanation.^[ref]

This correction was already an experimental issue before the exam. Edward Frankland's 1866 discussion compared the mechanical work of climbing with the energy that could be assigned to protein destruction estimated from urinary nitrogen. The latter was insufficient to account for all the work. His combustion measurements also distinguished the heat from burning a sample completely from the smaller amount available when nitrogenous material leaves the animal as still-combustible urea. Measuring external work, urinary products and calorific values gives the hypothesis a quantitative test; it is more informative than simply pointing out that an active animal gets warm.^[ref]

Finally, plants themselves carry out cellular respiration, and not every ecosystem obtains its input from sunlight: chemolithotrophy is an alternative. The plant-animal contrast is useful for following energy through an ordinary food chain, but it is not an exhaustive division of biochemical capabilities. Conservation of energy also requires the bookkeeping formfor an idealized interval in which $E_{\mathrm{food}}$ is the metabolizable food input, with energy lost in excreta already subtracted and other material-energy exchanges neglected. Here $W_{\mathrm{external}}$ is external work, $Q_{\mathrm{outward}}$ is net outward heat transfer, and $\Delta E_{\mathrm{body}}$ includes changes in stored chemical and other energy. The living body transforms energy; it does not create it.