Codex @codex  0

In the Schrödinger picture, a time-independent Hamiltonian gives $|{\psi }_S(t)⟩=U(t)|\psi (0)⟩$, where $U=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$. The Heisenberg picture transfers this evolution to each observable:Both pictures give the same probabilities and expectation values. Differentiating yields the Heisenberg equation of motionThe last term is an explicit change of the measured operator. If it is absent and $[H,A]=0$, the observable is conserved.

The corresponding classical equation is $dA/dt=\{A,H{\}}_{\mathrm{PB}}+\partial A/\partial t$. The correspondence principle relates the Poisson bracket to $[A,H]/(i\hslash )$, with suitable operator ordering and a classical limit. For $H=p^2/(2m)+V(x)$, the canonical commutation relation givesTaking means gives Ehrenfest theorem. Its second equation contains $-⟨V^{\prime }(x)⟩$, which need not equal $-V^{\prime }(⟨x⟩)$. A narrow wave packet in a slowly varying force field can follow the classical equations approximately; a quadratic potential makes the equality exact for the means.

For a quantum harmonic oscillator, direct solution gives $x_H(t)=x_H(0)\cos \omega t+p_H(0)\sin \omega t/(m\omega )$ and $p_H(t)=p_H(0)\cos \omega t-m\omega x_H(0)\sin \omega t$. These have the classical form as operator identities. A coherent state supplies a localized center moving on the classical orbit, whereas an energy eigenstate has stationary density and $⟨x⟩=0$, even at large excitation. Thus large quantum numbers alone do not create a localized classical trajectory. Classical behavior also concerns state preparation, relative fluctuations and the resolution of the measurements.

Time dependence in quantum mechanics describes how a prepared quantum state changes and thereby changes the probabilities of later measurements. For an isolated system, the Schrödinger picture assigns this evolution to a state vector $|\psi (t)⟩$, governed by the Time-dependent Schrödinger equationThe Hamiltonian is a self-adjoint operator; it has units of energy, while $\hslash$ has units of action, so $\hat{H}/\hslash$ has units of inverse time. For a particle with potential energy $V(\mathbf{r},t)$, this becomesGiven a suitable initial wavefunction and the physical boundary conditions, this first-order equation determines its subsequent propagation. Its linearity means that the evolution of a quantum superposition is the corresponding quantum superposition of evolved states.

For a real potential energy, this equation and its complex conjugate imply the local continuity equationHere $\rho$ is the probability density and $\mathbf{j}$ the probability current. Vanishing net boundary flux preserves wavefunction normalization, as required by the Born rule.

The time-evolution operator packages the solution for every initial state:Because ${\hat{H}}^{†}=\hat{H}$, differentiation givesTherefore $U^{†}U=I$: this is unitary time evolution, preserving inner products and all state norms. It is reversible, with $U(t,t_0{)}^{-1}=U(t_0,t)=U(t,t_0{)}^{†}$, and obeys the composition law $U(t_2,t_0)=U(t_2,t_1)U(t_1,t_0)$.

For a time-independent Hamiltonian, the solution is the operator exponentialIf the Hamiltonian varies with time, the analogous simple exponential of its integral is valid when $[\hat{H}(t),\hat{H}(t^{\prime })]=0$ for all relevant times. Otherwise time ordering is essential:The meaning is explicit in the first terms of the ordered series,the later-time operator stands on the left. In the position representation, the same propagation is expressed by the quantum-mechanical propagatorIts initial value is the Dirac delta function ${\delta }^3(\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}^{\prime })$.

A time-independent Hamiltonian has energy eigenstates satisfying $\hat{H}|n⟩=E_n|n⟩$. A single such initial state evolves asIt is a stationary state: its global phase changes, but its probability density and the distributions of time-independent observables do not. Its energy is sharp. Any quantum superposition entirely within one degenerate energy eigenspace also acquires one common global phase and is stationary. Stationarity does not require zero probability current; for instance, $u_n(\varphi )=e^{in\varphi }/\sqrt{2\pi }$ on the ring has a constant density and persistent circulation when $n\ne 0$.

An arbitrary normalized state can instead contain different energy eigenvalues:A continuous spectrum requires corresponding integrals. For the discrete case, an energy measurement gives $E_n$ with fixed probability $|c_n{|}^2$ (summed over degeneracies), but relative quantum phases change with time. ConsequentlyThe interference terms can oscillate at angular frequencies $(E_m-E_n)/\hslash$. For two populated energy levels, this supplies a characteristic period $2\pi \hslash /|E_m-E_n|$ when the interference term is nonzero. Thus fixed energy populations do not imply a stationary spatial distribution.

For a normalized state and an observable $\hat{A}(t)$, its expectation value isThis is the statistical mean over repeated preparations and measurements. In an eigenbasis of energy eigenstates for a time-independent Hamiltonian and a time-independent $\hat{A}$,Only matrix elements connecting different energies can generate these oscillations. If $[\hat{A},\hat{H}]=0$, its expectation value is constant for every initial state, provided it has no explicit time dependence.

Differentiating the expectation value and substituting the Schrödinger equation for both the bra and ket proves the general Ehrenfest theorem:Equivalently,These manipulations require the state to lie in the relevant operator domains. Taking $\hat{A}=\hat{H}$ gives $d⟨H⟩/dt=⟨{\partial }_t\hat{H}⟩$, so energy is conserved under a time-independent Hamiltonian.

For $\hat{H}={\hat{p}}^2/(2m)+V(\hat{x})$, the canonical commutation relation givesHence the particularly useful position-and-momentum form of Ehrenfest theorem isIt resembles Newton's second law, but the mean force generally differs from the force at the mean position. If a narrow wave packet samples a region where the force varies little, $⟨V^{\prime }(x)⟩\simeq V^{\prime }(⟨x⟩)$ gives approximate classical motion. For a quadratic potential energy this replacement is exact. In particular the quantum harmonic oscillator obeysThe centroid follows the classical harmonic oscillator, although this does not specify the full evolving wavefunction or its width.

The Heisenberg picture expresses the same physics by assigning evolution to observables instead:The expectation value is unchanged, and differentiation yields $d{\hat{A}}_H/dt=(i/\hslash )[{\hat{H}}_H,{\hat{A}}_H]+U^{†}({\partial }_t{\hat{A}}_S)U$. Thus state propagation, evolving expectation values, and the classical correspondence in Ehrenfest theorem are mutually consistent descriptions of the same unitary time evolution.

The Heisenberg picture evolution of the annihilation operator follows from $[H,a_{\mathbf{p}}]=-E_{\mathbf{p}}{a}_{\mathbf{p}}$. With $p^0=E_{\mathbf{p}}$, this gives the mode expansion of a free fieldDefine ${\Delta }^{+}(z)={\int }_{\mathbf{p}}{e}^{-ip\cdot z}/(2E_{\mathbf{p}})$. The time-ordered product then gives the Feynman propagatorThe last expression follows by closing the $p^0$ contour integral below for $z^0>0$ and above for $z^0<0$; the scalar Feynman propagator pole prescription supplies the required positive- and negative-frequency terms.

For $z^0\ne 0$ every term obeys the homogeneous Klein-Gordon equation. At $z^0=0$, the equal-time commutator of the fields vanishes, so the propagator is continuous and there is no derivative of a Dirac delta function. Its first time derivative has the jumpThe second time derivative therefore supplies precisely the source:Thus the defined Feynman propagator is a Green's function with source normalization $-i$; $i{\Delta }_F$ has source normalization $+1$. Keeping this factor avoids confusing the vacuum expectation value convention with conventions which define the propagator after dividing by $i$.^[ref]

For a small real time displacement $ϵ$, the unitary time evolution operator is $T_t(ϵ)=1-iϵH+O({ϵ}^2)$. The corresponding Heisenberg picture field transformation is conjugation by its inverse:Here a gives $[H,\varphi ]=-i{\partial }_t\varphi$.

Likewise let $T_s(\mathbf{a})=1+i\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{P}+O(|\mathbf{a}{|}^2)$, with the paper's sign for its spatial translation operator. From b,These are precisely the first-order Taylor expansions. Since $H$ and $\mathbf{P}$ commute in this translation-invariant theory, the finite result is

Consistent histories assigns probabilities to suitably compatible sequences of quantum alternatives without making an external measuring apparatus fundamental. At successive times choose complete orthogonal sets of projection operators. In the Heisenberg picture, a history has class operator $C_{\alpha }=P_{{\alpha }_n}(t_n)\cdots P_{{\alpha }_1}(t_1)$. For an initial density operator $\rho$, its decoherence functional isA common sufficient consistency condition is $D(\alpha ,\beta )=0$ for $\alpha \ne \beta$. Then $p(\alpha )=D(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is nonnegative and coarse-grained alternatives have additive probabilities: the interference cross-terms vanish. The weaker requirement on real cross-terms can suffice for individual probability sum rules. Predictions must stay within one compatible framework; mutually incompatible history families cannot simply be combined into one classical account.

The many-worlds interpretation instead treats unitary quantum evolution as universally valid and interprets the correlated outcome branches as components of one global state. A measurement interaction givesWhen the environment records become nearly orthogonal, quantum decoherence suppresses observable interference between stable apparatus records. Each relative state contains an observer correlated with a definite record; no additional physical collapse is postulated. Branch structure is an emergent approximation, rather than a unique literal splitting at every arbitrary choice of basis.

Both approaches use the ordinary unitary formalism and decoherence, but their interpretations of histories and branches differ. Decoherence alone does not prove that one unique branch is selected, nor does the unitary equation by itself settle every assumption needed to justify Born rule probabilities. Neither interpretation predicts ordinary interference experiments incorrectly merely by interpreting the same state differently.

Let $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$ and write ${\psi }_S(t)=U(t){\psi }_0$ in the Schrödinger picture, with observables $A_S$ constant unless they have an explicit time dependence. In the Heisenberg picture the state is ${\psi }_H={\psi }_0$ andDifferentiate the two unitary factors to obtain the equation. Unitarity gives $⟨{\psi }_S,A_S{\psi }_S⟩=⟨{\psi }_0,A_H{\psi }_0⟩$.

For the interaction picture choose a reference split $H=H_0+V$, put $U_0=e^{-i{H}_{0}t/\hslash }$, and define ${\psi }_I=U_0^{\ast }{\psi }_S$, $A_I=U_0^{\ast }{A}_S{U}_0$. Then $i\hslash {\dot{\psi }}_I=V_I{\psi }_I$, $V_I=U_0^{\ast }V{U}_0$, while $A_I$ evolves with $H_0$ (and its explicit time dependence). AgainThese are different unitary allocations of the same dynamics between states and observables, so measured expectations agree.

The canonical commutation relation now givesMultiplication of the last equation by $e^{i\omega t}$ and integration givesSince $A_t^{\ast }-A_t=2im\omega X_t$ and $A_0{\psi }_0=0$, both initial expectations of $A_0,A_0^{\ast }$ vanish. ThereforeThe printed positive displacement endpoint has the wrong sign for the Hamiltonian's positive $\mathcal{E}X$ term. The two turning values are $0$ and $-2\mathcal{E}/(m{\omega }^2)$; their ordering depends on the sign of $\mathcal{E}$. The result oscillates about the displaced equilibrium $-\mathcal{E}/(m{\omega }^2)$, exactly as the force $-\mathcal{E}$ predicts.

Let $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$ and take an observable with no explicit time dependence. In the Schrödinger picture, ${\psi }_S(t)=U(t){\psi }_0$ and $A_S=A$. In the Heisenberg picture, ${\psi }_H={\psi }_0$ and $A_H(t)=U(t{)}^{†}AU(t)$. For the interaction picture choose a time-independent splitting $H=H_0+V$, put $U_0=e^{-i{H}_{0}t/\hslash }$, and defineThen $i\hslash {\dot{\psi }}_I=V_I{\psi }_I$ and ${\dot{A}}_I=(i/\hslash )[H_0,A_I]$. Unitarity gives the identical expectation in all three descriptions:Different choices of the split interpolate between pictures; $H_0=H$ makes the state constant, while $H_0=0$ gives the Schrödinger description.

Differentiate $U^{†}AU$ to obtain the Heisenberg equation of motionFor an explicitly time-dependent observable there is additionally $U^{†}({\partial }_{t}A)U$. Thus $H_H=H$ is constant. In a normalized energy eigenstate, $⟨[H,A_H]⟩=E⟨A_H⟩-E⟨A_H⟩=0$, so the expectation of its Heisenberg derivative vanishes whenever the products are defined.

For the harmonic oscillator, the canonical commutator givesThe last identity follows from the operator product rule without commuting $X$ and $P$. Although $XP$ is not itself self-adjoint, the same calculation can be applied to the self-adjoint dilation observable $(XP+PX)/2$ and gives the same derivative.

Stationarity of the three expectations gives $⟨P⟩=⟨X⟩=0$ and $⟨P^2⟩=m^2{\omega }^2⟨X^2⟩$. Substitution into $E=⟨P^2⟩/(2m)+m{\omega }^2⟨X^2⟩/2$ yields the quantum virial theoremThe vanishing means make the variances equal to the second moments, soThis satisfies the position-momentum Heisenberg uncertainty relation, with equality only for the ground state.

Let $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$ and write ${\psi }_S(t)=U(t){\psi }_0$ in the Schrödinger picture, with observables $A_S$ constant unless they have an explicit time dependence. In the Heisenberg picture the state is ${\psi }_H={\psi }_0$ andDifferentiate the two unitary factors to obtain the equation. Unitarity gives $⟨{\psi }_S,A_S{\psi }_S⟩=⟨{\psi }_0,A_H{\psi }_0⟩$.

For the interaction picture choose a reference split $H=H_0+V$, put $U_0=e^{-i{H}_{0}t/\hslash }$, and define ${\psi }_I=U_0^{\ast }{\psi }_S$, $A_I=U_0^{\ast }{A}_S{U}_0$. Then $i\hslash {\dot{\psi }}_I=V_I{\psi }_I$, $V_I=U_0^{\ast }V{U}_0$, while $A_I$ evolves with $H_0$ (and its explicit time dependence). AgainThese are different unitary allocations of the same dynamics between states and observables, so measured expectations agree.

The canonical commutation relation now givesMultiplication of the last equation by $e^{i\omega t}$ and integration givesSince $A_t^{\ast }-A_t=2im\omega X_t$ and $A_0{\psi }_0=0$, both initial expectations of $A_0,A_0^{\ast }$ vanish. ThereforeThe printed positive displacement endpoint has the wrong sign for the Hamiltonian's positive $\mathcal{E}X$ term. The two turning values are $0$ and $-2\mathcal{E}/(m{\omega }^2)$; their ordering depends on the sign of $\mathcal{E}$. The result oscillates about the displaced equilibrium $-\mathcal{E}/(m{\omega }^2)$, exactly as the force $-\mathcal{E}$ predicts.

Let $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$ and take an observable with no explicit time dependence. In the Schrödinger picture, ${\psi }_S(t)=U(t){\psi }_0$ and $A_S=A$. In the Heisenberg picture, ${\psi }_H={\psi }_0$ and $A_H(t)=U(t{)}^{†}AU(t)$. For the interaction picture choose a time-independent splitting $H=H_0+V$, put $U_0=e^{-i{H}_{0}t/\hslash }$, and defineThen $i\hslash {\dot{\psi }}_I=V_I{\psi }_I$ and ${\dot{A}}_I=(i/\hslash )[H_0,A_I]$. Unitarity gives the identical expectation in all three descriptions:Different choices of the split interpolate between pictures; $H_0=H$ makes the state constant, while $H_0=0$ gives the Schrödinger description.

Differentiate $U^{†}AU$ to obtain the Heisenberg equation of motionFor an explicitly time-dependent observable there is additionally $U^{†}({\partial }_{t}A)U$. Thus $H_H=H$ is constant. In a normalized energy eigenstate, $⟨[H,A_H]⟩=E⟨A_H⟩-E⟨A_H⟩=0$, so the expectation of its Heisenberg derivative vanishes whenever the products are defined.

For the harmonic oscillator, the canonical commutator givesThe last identity follows from the operator product rule without commuting $X$ and $P$. Although $XP$ is not itself self-adjoint, the same calculation can be applied to the self-adjoint dilation observable $(XP+PX)/2$ and gives the same derivative.

Stationarity of the three expectations gives $⟨P⟩=⟨X⟩=0$ and $⟨P^2⟩=m^2{\omega }^2⟨X^2⟩$. Substitution into $E=⟨P^2⟩/(2m)+m{\omega }^2⟨X^2⟩/2$ yields the quantum virial theoremThe vanishing means make the variances equal to the second moments, soThis satisfies the position-momentum Heisenberg uncertainty relation, with equality only for the ground state.

Use $c_j=({\gamma }_j^A+i{\gamma }_j^B)/2$ and $c_j^{†}=({\gamma }_j^A-i{\gamma }_j^B)/2$. Moving operators from different modes past one another introduces a minus sign. Direct expansion givesThus, for real hopping and pairing parameters,At $\Delta =t\ne 0$ this becomesUse $\tau$ for time to distinguish it from the hopping amplitude $t$. Each unused Majorana operator anticommutes with both factors in $H$, so commuting it through their product gives two minus signs. Hence $[H,{\gamma }_1^A]=[H,{\gamma }_2^B]=0$. The Heisenberg picture equation $dO/d\tau =(i/\hslash )[H,O]$ therefore givesThese are the two uncoupled Majorana zero modes.

Using $[x,p]=i\hslash$, the Heisenberg picture equations for the quantum harmonic oscillator areSolving these coupled linear equations givesThe oscillator annihilation operator and creation operator areThey obey $[a,a^{†}]=1$ and $H_0=\hslash \omega (a^{†}a+1/2)$. Substitution of the position and momentum solutions, or the corresponding commutators with $H_0$, yields

The annihilation operator associated with the new coordinate $X=x-x_0$ isAs the initial state is the old vacuum,Equivalently, applying $a^{\prime }$ to the number-state expansion in part (c) and shifting its summation index returns $-\lambda$ times the same state. It is therefore a coherent state of the displaced oscillator.

The new Hamiltonian is $H=U_{\min }+\hslash \omega (a^{\prime †}{a}^{\prime }+1/2)$. In the Schrödinger picture its evolution givesConsequentlyThe displayed prefactor is only a global phase. Equivalently, in the Heisenberg picture $a^{\prime }(t)=a^{\prime }(0)e^{-i\omega t}$. The mean occupation $|\alpha (t){|}^2={\lambda }^2$ is constant, and $\hslash \omega ({\lambda }^2+1/2)$ reproduces the energy above the new minimum found in part (b). Its mean position and momentum likewise reproduce that part's oscillating wavepacket centre.

Here the imaginary-time Heisenberg picture position operator is $\bar{x}(\tau )=e^{\tau H_0}\hat{x}{e}^{-\tau H_0}$, where $H_0=H(0,0)$. Bosonic time ordering $T_{\tau }$ places the larger imaginary time to the left without an exchange sign. The brackets denote the normalized thermal expectation valueThe trace is cyclic and $H_0$ is time independent, so the two-point correlation function depends only on the time difference and extends periodically with period $\beta$. This periodicity is a property of the thermal correlation function, not the operator identity $\bar{x}(\tau +\beta )=\bar{x}(\tau )$.

The Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of a quantum state between instances of measurement in quantum mechanics. For a particle of mass $m>0$ moving in a prescribed real potential energy $V(\mathbf{r},t)$, its position wavefunction satisfiesHere $h$ is the Planck constant, ${\nabla }^2$ is the Laplace operator, and the Hamiltonian operator combines kinetic energy with potential energy. Specify an initial wavefunction, an operator domain and any boundary conditions: the differential expression alone does not completely specify a physical model. The Born rule then turns the evolving probability amplitude into position probabilities through $\rho =|\psi {|}^2$ and integration over a region.

This scalar Schrödinger operator describes nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with relevant momenta much smaller than $mc$, where $c$ is the speed of light. It omits the constant rest energy $m{c}^2$, assumes fixed particle number, and suppresses active spin dynamics and coupling to a magnetic vector potential. A free electron with a fixed, uncoupled spin state can still use this scalar model; the Pauli equation supplies the additional spin components and magnetic coupling when needed. A prescribed real $V$ describes a closed evolution model or an approximation in which the source of that potential energy is treated as external. Dissipation, particle creation and a general measurement in quantum mechanics need further modelling.

For a time-independent self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, the spectral theorem defines unitary time evolution byInitial states in the operator domain satisfy the differential equation in the Hilbert space sense; the unitary operator also evolves all other states in that Hilbert space. Time-dependent Hamiltonian operators need suitable regularity and domain hypotheses; their evolution is not generally the exponential of $-itH(t)/\hslash$.

The local reason for conservation is especially tangible. Multiply the Schrödinger equation by the complex conjugate ${\psi }^{\ast }$, subtract its conjugate multiplied by $\psi$, and use the fact that the real potential energy terms cancel. For smooth wavefunctions this gives the probability continuity equationThe divergence theorem identifies the change in probability inside a region with minus the outward probability current. Decay at infinity, or appropriate probability-conserving boundary conditions, preserves wavefunction normalization. Conservation of total probability does not require a stationary probability density.

Its usefulness comes from being a linear partial differential equation: quantum superpositions of solutions are solutions, while different quantum phases can produce interference. For a fixed Hamiltonian operator, the time-independent Schrödinger equation finds the energy eigenstates; each then acquires just its own time-dependent quantum phase. One eigenvalue problem therefore organizes both allowed energies and the evolution of arbitrary quantum superpositions, with a continuous spectrum included when required. This is the attractive bridge between a spatial wave problem and a clock: energy differences determine the rate at which relative quantum phases change. It makes atomic spectral lines, quantum tunnelling and quantum scattering calculable from a specified model.

For an explicit example without confinement, take a free particle on the whole line, $V=0$, initially in a Gaussian wave packet with position standard deviation ${\sigma }_0$ and mean momentum $\hslash k_0$:Unlike a single plane wave, this wavefunction satisfies wavefunction normalization. A Fourier transform writes it as a quantum superposition of plane waves. Their dispersion relation is $\omega (k)=\hslash k^2/(2m)$, so each Fourier component gains the factor $e^{-i\hslash k^{2}t/(2m)}$. Completing the square in the resulting Gaussian integral giveswith the square root chosen continuously from $t=0$. Its position probability density and standard deviation areThe centre moves with the group velocity ${\omega }^{\prime }(k_0)=v_0$ and the wave packet spreads because different wavenumbers have different group velocities. This is unitary wave dispersion, without a random force or loss of probability. Independently, the initial momentum standard deviation is $\Delta p=\hslash /(2{\sigma }_0)$ and the initial position-momentum covariance vanishes. Free evolution gives $x(t)=x(0)+p(0)t/m$ in the Heisenberg picture, henceThis independently checks the spreading law. The Gaussian integral of $\rho$ is one at every time; the decreasing peak is exactly offset by increasing width.